|
Title: Cool, now default trust user supports scam Post by: cortexx066 on May 18, 2017, 07:21:38 PM I wasn't paid by directbet so I created scam accusation against them
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1922969.new#new they posted random fake bet IDs saying that my winning was used to cover up those bets that doesn't belongs to me and additional proof of his scam attempt is total sum of those bets doesn't match my winning amount. I asked for information and they said we did investigation and our decision is final Now a dumb guy from default trust given me negative trust while I was scammed by them and asking for more information why add such stupid guys to default trust who don't even know how to use trust.adding such users to default trust is like giving a gun to chimpanzee who don't know where to use it https://www.viralviralvideos.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/0-6463.jpg Title: Re: Cool, now default trust user supports scam Post by: yahoo62278 on May 18, 2017, 08:18:13 PM Actually this "monkey" as you say, has tagged both of you. Your activity looks scammy with the double spend accusations against you. So im awaiting directbet to show a wallet trail linked to your addresses. If they do so your tag will stay. If they cannot do so, i'll remove your tag and leave theirs.
I find it pretty stupid that anyone can create a scam accusation without any repurcussions if the accusation is wrong. You cannot just try and tarnish a reputation of a site if you're scamming yourself. If a user is doing shady activity to a site and then complaining they didn't get paid due to that scammy activity, i'm gonna neg them everytime. Title: Re: Cool, now default trust user supports scam Post by: botany on May 19, 2017, 01:22:30 AM If what Walletbet alleges is indeed true, they need to change their policies on accepting unconfirmed bets. A person could repeat the same with bitcoins from 2 different wallets and Walletbet will have no choice but to honour the winning bet.
Title: Re: Cool, now default trust user supports scam Post by: Joel_Jantsen on May 19, 2017, 04:58:38 AM Actually this "monkey" as you say, has tagged both of you. Your activity looks scammy with the double spend accusations against you. So im awaiting directbet to show a wallet trail linked to your addresses. If they do so your tag will stay. If they cannot do so, i'll remove your tag and leave theirs. Isn't it suppose to be a "common sense" the user is indeed trying to double spend ? Moreover,we're talking about the all time best rated sportsbook by the community.Don't think they would scam users for a negligible amounts when they have a history of paying much more than that to solve similar situations just so they can keep upto the expectations of the community.IMHO,giving them a negative over such insignificant amounts is a hasty decision.Having said that,I totally understand you're open to revise the feedback however,you shouldn't be wasting time doing it for the sake of trolls opening threads with irrelevant proofs.I find it pretty stupid that anyone can create a scam accusation without any repurcussions if the accusation is wrong. You cannot just try and tarnish a reputation of a site if you're scamming yourself. Exactly and that's why you could have waited until the other side of the story is exposed.Title: Re: Cool, now default trust user supports scam Post by: ImHash on May 19, 2017, 05:21:13 AM By the power of the seven monkeys I now ban Yahoo62278 and we shall walk him naked on the streets and shame him.
Who will bring a bell though? because I lost mine during the last confess session :D :D Title: Re: Cool, now default trust user supports scam Post by: cortexx066 on May 20, 2017, 05:46:08 PM Actually this "monkey" as you say, has tagged both of you. Your activity looks scammy with the double spend accusations against you. So im awaiting directbet to show a wallet trail linked to your addresses. If they do so your tag will stay. If they cannot do so, i'll remove your tag and leave theirs. Isn't it suppose to be a "common sense" the user is indeed trying to double spend ? Moreover,we're talking about the all time best rated sportsbook by the community.Don't think they would scam users for a negligible amounts when they have a history of paying much more than that to solve similar situations just so they can keep upto the expectations of the community.IMHO,giving them a negative over such insignificant amounts is a hasty decision.Having said that,I totally understand you're open to revise the feedback however,you shouldn't be wasting time doing it for the sake of trolls opening threads with irrelevant proofs.I find it pretty stupid that anyone can create a scam accusation without any repurcussions if the accusation is wrong. You cannot just try and tarnish a reputation of a site if you're scamming yourself. Exactly and that's why you could have waited until the other side of the story is exposed.Previously guys like you were talking about best rated escrow master-p who did scammed around 25btc don't be fool and watch everything closely That monkey with gun keep saying that directbet provided proof but where they are,I am also asking for proof because I know they are lying Title: Re: Cool, now default trust user supports scam Post by: cortexx066 on May 20, 2017, 05:54:03 PM Why forum add such blind and dumb users to trust list who can't see anything,there are no proofs provided by directbet
I am asking same, give me proof because I know you are lying and hired army of monkeys to support you and give negative to everyone who complaint about you. Title: Re: Cool, now default trust user supports scam Post by: cortexx066 on May 21, 2017, 05:38:07 AM Why these monkeys are silent now or they didn't got any order from their master ???
Remove this fucking negative trust and put it to real scammer who isn't providing proofs and keep ignoring my question. |
