|
Title: bip91, lockin by 90%. Post by: rtinedal on July 21, 2017, 11:44:44 AM Hello guys according to my research BIP 91 just locked in. Up to 90 percent of all hash power signaled support for this soft fork, which implies miners intend, in turn, to trigger Segregated Witness (SegWit) activation. By extension, this should make BIP 148 obsolete and August 1 a non-event.
Title: Re: bip91, lockin by 90%. Post by: Minecache on July 21, 2017, 11:46:21 AM Hello guys according to my research BIP 91 just locked in. Up to 90 percent of all hash power signaled support for this soft fork, which implies miners intend, in turn, to trigger Segregated Witness (SegWit) activation. By extension, this should make BIP 148 obsolete and August 1 a non-event. There's an official thread discussing all this already.Title: Re: bip91, lockin by 90%. Post by: savon2k on July 21, 2017, 11:47:48 AM But is Segweet already activated on $BTC ?
Title: Re: bip91, lockin by 90%. Post by: TryNinja on July 21, 2017, 11:53:46 AM But is Segweet already activated on $BTC ? No. For now that's just BIP91 getting locked in."BIP 91 activation is scheduled to take place in: 271 Blocks" (at the time I'm making this post) https://coin.dance/blocks Title: Re: bip91, lockin by 90%. Post by: savon2k on July 21, 2017, 12:51:53 PM But is Segweet already activated on $BTC ? No. For now that's just BIP91 getting locked in."BIP 91 activation is scheduled to take place in: 271 Blocks" (at the time I'm making this post) https://coin.dance/blocks Oh what a time :) I heard that Antpool and other 2x supporters started signaling support for segwit today..what the hell is going on lol Title: Re: bip91, lockin by 90%. Post by: Kprawn on July 21, 2017, 01:17:16 PM I think this explains it very well, https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6oksam/bip91_lockin_does_not_guarantee_segwit_will_be/
If I can quote a little bit of it, " Soft-forks are ultimately enforced by users, not miners, and right now practically no users are running BIP-91 enforcing nodes like segsignal. " - Peter Todd Title: Re: bip91, lockin by 90%. Post by: xbiv2 on July 21, 2017, 01:20:49 PM 1. "SOFT FORK" imposible.
2. Exchangers Position: https://poloniex.com/press-releases/2017.03.17-Hard-Fork/ https://www.okcoin.com/t-423.html Title: Re: bip91, lockin by 90%. Post by: RoommateAgreement on July 21, 2017, 01:36:31 PM 1. "SOFT FORK" imposible. 2. Exchangers Position: https://poloniex.com/press-releases/2017.03.17-Hard-Fork/ https://www.okcoin.com/t-423.html LOL, do you even know what a "SOFT FORK" means. i seriously doubt that. at least put some efford and do a little research and learn what the words you are using really mean. and while you are at it search for the previous forks that bitcoin had to feel even more stupid for saying what you have been repeating all these days :D and the links you are posting are about a very different and irrelevant thing. Title: Re: bip91, lockin by 90%. Post by: Segwit on July 21, 2017, 02:50:30 PM Eureka!! Segwit era started.
Title: Re: bip91, lockin by 90%. Post by: savon2k on July 21, 2017, 08:17:22 PM I think this explains it very well, https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6oksam/bip91_lockin_does_not_guarantee_segwit_will_be/ If I can quote a little bit of it, " Soft-forks are ultimately enforced by users, not miners, and right now practically no users are running BIP-91 enforcing nodes like segsignal. " - Peter Todd It's funny how Peter Todd seems so anti crypto currency and stuff ,but still he follows crypto world and just post about how $btc about to drop all the time 😂😂 |