Bitcoin Forum

From the analytical point of view, all the chances and burden now are clearly to the choosing (hope without significant splits) of the

SW2x

solution, incoming these historical days.


The chances of it most of us have been sold to in many attempts and expectation generating postings.

It looks we are close to implement it and with this a huge burden comes in to fullfill all the expectations.

I hope that we all are aware of this burden and use this to unify, otherwhise I feel strong it could break all apart and bitcoins reputation might be gone for long time. Other alts are close by and might take over EVEN if they have less scarcity, user base,.... the cryptoworld future is complex.

Feel free to comment on that but I hope we all stay tuned for bitcoin's sake, rather not for individual's.

The burden is now Bitcoin Cash.

The chance is to use the BCH money to push old Bitcoin.

Another chance is to make BCH osolete sticking to NYA.

But the burden might be old core.

the "burden" of SW2x is not about network capacity.
the "burden" of SW2x is not about hard drive capacity.
the "burden" of SW2x is not about node capability.

the "burden" of sw2x is if core take their thumb out their behind and code an implementation that will allow it. so that their devoted sheep have an implementation brand they can trust.

all technical issues have been debunked. now its just a "i only trust core" bottom of the barrel last excuse that some are fighting to not implement it

as long as core release a version that allows 2mb baseblock, there will be no controversy.

preventing scaling purely based on devotion and trust, is the opposite of bitcoins ethos of trustless technology. but because some only trust core, its time core actually do something their loyal sheep can run. because there is no technical reason not to.. only a brand reason