|
Title: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: krnlx on August 07, 2017, 10:26:15 AM https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx
Absolutely free - no fee's, no viruses, etc. Based on Alexis Provos code. :) :) :) tested on linux, no win version now -( But You can compile! 1080Ti: Code: [2017-08-10 09:40:13] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 52.54 MH/s Feel free to donate SIGT BLq8t6NQrfRC8kFyrvZ5YMGY33SVCQBeT4 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: hanskan on August 07, 2017, 10:29:40 AM https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx Absolutely free - no fee's, no viruses, etc. Based on Alexis Provos code. :) :) :) tested on linux, no win version now -( But You can compile! 1080Ti: Code: [2017-08-07 13:22:41] accepted: 58/59 (diff 1.720), 99.51 MH/s yes! Feel free to donate BLq8t6NQrfRC8kFyrvZ5YMGY33SVCQBeT4 TDP / clocks on these rates ? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: krnlx on August 07, 2017, 10:36:15 AM stock palit SJS 1080ti, no tweaking. Clocks from nvidia-smi
Code: Clocks Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 07, 2017, 11:04:50 AM Hum i do :
./autogen.sh ./configure When i do "make" or "make -j 4" i get this error :( http://imgur.com/a/uZKLG Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: santan on August 07, 2017, 11:07:51 AM Can someone post the Windows Binary......... for everyone... Please
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: KL0nLutiy on August 07, 2017, 11:08:45 AM Can someone post the Windows Binary......... for everyone... Please +1 wait for windows binaryTitle: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: krnlx on August 07, 2017, 11:25:22 AM Hum i do : ./autogen.sh ./configure When i do "make" or "make -j 4" i get this error :( http://imgur.com/a/uZKLG Can you show full error log ? It seems, that it is openssl-related issue, do you have openssl-dev installed ? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Epsylon3 on August 07, 2017, 11:34:26 AM use ./build.sh (tested ok)
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: halker2010 on August 07, 2017, 11:43:45 AM any good guide for compiling things like this ? for windows ? very noob sorry
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: NameTaken on August 07, 2017, 12:13:56 PM Can confirm my 1080Ti went from 46.5 to 50.3.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Epsylon3 on August 07, 2017, 12:18:32 PM doesnt run on windows from my first tests (cuda 9)
edit: it works with cuda 8 same on linux, ok with cuda 7.5 and 8, not 9 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Decker on August 07, 2017, 12:21:35 PM Was compiled and tested on one GeForce GTX 1060 3GB (stock, without overclocking). Hashrate compared with other miners:
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 07, 2017, 12:27:17 PM Hum i do : ./autogen.sh ./configure When i do "make" or "make -j 4" i get this error :( http://imgur.com/a/uZKLG Can you show full error log ? It seems, that it is openssl-related issue, do you have openssl-dev installed ? make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx' Making all in compat make[2]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[3]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all-am'. make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[2]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -fopenmp -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/cuda/include -DUSE_WRAPNVML -O3 -march=native -D_REENTRANT -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16 -MT ccminer-bignum.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/ccminer-bignum.Tpo -c -o ccminer-bignum.o `test -f 'bignum.cpp' || echo './'`bignum.cpp In file included from bignum.cpp:8:0: bignum.hpp:63:24: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}’ class CBigNum : public BIGNUM ^ In file included from /usr/local/include/openssl/bn.h:32:0, from bignum.hpp:20, from bignum.cpp:8: /usr/local/include/openssl/ossl_typ.h:80:16: note: forward declaration of ‘BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}’ I just do apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev, dont remove the error. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: krnlx on August 07, 2017, 12:32:54 PM Hum i do : ./autogen.sh ./configure When i do "make" or "make -j 4" i get this error :( http://imgur.com/a/uZKLG Can you show full error log ? It seems, that it is openssl-related issue, do you have openssl-dev installed ? make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx' Making all in compat make[2]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[3]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all-am'. make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[2]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -fopenmp -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/cuda/include -DUSE_WRAPNVML -O3 -march=native -D_REENTRANT -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16 -MT ccminer-bignum.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/ccminer-bignum.Tpo -c -o ccminer-bignum.o `test -f 'bignum.cpp' || echo './'`bignum.cpp In file included from bignum.cpp:8:0: bignum.hpp:63:24: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}’ class CBigNum : public BIGNUM ^ In file included from /usr/local/include/openssl/bn.h:32:0, from bignum.hpp:20, from bignum.cpp:8: /usr/local/include/openssl/ossl_typ.h:80:16: note: forward declaration of ‘BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}’ I just do apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev, dont remove the error. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=770064.msg20355655#msg20355655 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: konqueror on August 07, 2017, 12:57:49 PM GPU #1: Graphics Device, 50.50 MH/s
With Palgin's was ~46 MH/s. Good work! :) Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: zhulick on August 07, 2017, 01:08:47 PM damn you...
now i'm gonna have to learn how to compile :) Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: yunihuni on August 07, 2017, 01:21:36 PM Can someone post the Windows Binary......... for everyone... Please +1 and whats hashrate on 1080? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: morcus on August 07, 2017, 01:49:47 PM I built the project from source on windows but I got allocation errors.
The compiled binary is here : sendspace <DOT> com/file/yxp59j It is preferable to build it yourself to avoid any embedded viruses... EDIT : Error message https://i.imgur.com/3yPWY0m.png Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: philipma1957 on August 07, 2017, 01:52:53 PM Can confirm my 1080Ti went from 46.5 to 50.3. what tdp 80%? could you test with a 50% tdp? I can do 38 with 50% tdp using a 1080ti Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 07, 2017, 01:55:26 PM I built the project from source on windows but I got allocation errors. The compiled binary is here : sendspace <DOT> com/file/yxp59j It is preferable to build it yourself to avoid any embedded viruses... How to build. Please give a step by step guide. thanks Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: morcus on August 07, 2017, 02:04:00 PM I built the project from source on windows but I got allocation errors. The compiled binary is here : sendspace <DOT> com/file/yxp59j It is preferable to build it yourself to avoid any embedded viruses... How to build. Please give a step by step guide. thanks You need: - Visual Studio 2013 (Free edition) - CUDA ToolKit 8 - GIT And do the following : git clone https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx git clone https://github.com/peters/curl-for-windows.git compat/curl-for-windows Copy the second project inside the first project (you will see a folder called "compat") Then open the ccminer.sln project using Visual Studio, and then BUILD / Batch Build ... , and tick the build button next to "Release|win32". And then click the build button on the top right corner. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Xeonus on August 07, 2017, 02:07:08 PM Meanwhile, if you use Ubuntu, use this guide for easy compiling: http://thecryptoworld.org/comment-compiler-ccminer-sur-ubuntu
I get 2MH/s more in total compared to palgin's mod on my rig with 980 Ti and 970 ^^ Thanks for the mod! Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Ayers on August 07, 2017, 02:09:53 PM is this faster than sp mod 5? i see with sp mod you get 30.5, here how much exactly? you said 30+, so i guess the same as sp mod or not? so i don't need to pay for it thanks
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: NameTaken on August 07, 2017, 02:24:56 PM Can confirm my 1080Ti went from 46.5 to 50.3. what tdp 80%? could you test with a 50% tdp? I can do 38 with 50% tdp using a 1080ti Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: seasonw on August 07, 2017, 02:26:44 PM Thanks for sharing. My 1080ti with palginmod = 44mh/s at stock clock, although not much improve but it is now 46mh/s at stock clock, still a good mod.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: deepWebRun on August 07, 2017, 02:47:11 PM Really wish author made a windows release version, the one provided in previous posts didn't want to start...
Thanks anyway, will just have to wait.... Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 07, 2017, 02:47:20 PM I built the project from source on windows but I got allocation errors. The compiled binary is here : sendspace <DOT> com/file/yxp59j It is preferable to build it yourself to avoid any embedded viruses... How to build. Please give a step by step guide. thanks You need: - Visual Studio 2013 (Free edition) - CUDA ToolKit 8 - GIT And do the following : git clone https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx git clone https://github.com/peters/curl-for-windows.git compat/curl-for-windows Copy the second project inside the first project (you will see a folder called "compat") Then open the ccminer.sln project using Visual Studio, and then BUILD/Compile Thanks! Which visual studio should i use for this. VS community 2017? Edit: nvm. I just the list. Will try and get back to you. Thanks again. Much appreciated. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: philipma1957 on August 07, 2017, 02:51:53 PM Can confirm my 1080Ti went from 46.5 to 50.3. what tdp 80%? could you test with a 50% tdp? I can do 38 with 50% tdp using a 1080ti Okay 220/280 is close to 80% And depending on your 1080ti 140 could be 50 to 56 % My 1080ti drops to 125 as it is a tdp of 250 not 280. This build in Linux looks like it is good. I wonder if full zero could put it his nv0018 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: notsure85 on August 07, 2017, 02:54:33 PM I build the file, fine so far.
After installing CUDA 8 I cant modify power limit on cards anymore. Guess I´ll have to reinstall drivers because something got overwritten? During cuda 8 installation is deselected all driver components though. edit: spoke too soon. Getting errors trying to compile in vs studio 2017 community. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: lyolyalya on August 07, 2017, 03:24:28 PM can't build with win10+cuda8+vs2015.what's wrong?
Code: Cepьeзнocть Кoд Oпиcaниe Пpoeкт Фaйл Cтpoкa Cocтoяниe пoдaвлeния Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 07, 2017, 03:57:39 PM Hum i get between 211-213 mh/s with 8x 1070 with palginmod
With yours i am between 191-193 mh/s ... palginmod run stable at OC clock : 130 MEM clock : -2000 PowerLimit : 150 TempLimit : 70c This one keep crashing ... Any advice ? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 07, 2017, 04:09:39 PM Hum i get between 211-213 mh/s with 8x 1070 with palginmod With yours i am between 191-193 mh/s ... palginmod run stable at OC clock : 130 MEM clock : -2000 PowerLimit : 150 TempLimit : 70c This one keep crashing ... Any advice ? Can you link to the palgin mod so I can try. Im trying to compile the krnlx mod in VS 2015 and get this error: "Unable to read the project file "ccminer.vcxproj". Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: BitPorium on August 07, 2017, 04:27:35 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16.
Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: morcus on August 07, 2017, 04:37:40 PM Hum i get between 211-213 mh/s with 8x 1070 with palginmod With yours i am between 191-193 mh/s ... palginmod run stable at OC clock : 130 MEM clock : -2000 PowerLimit : 150 TempLimit : 70c This one keep crashing ... Any advice ? Can you link to the palgin mod so I can try. Im trying to compile the krnlx mod in VS 2015 and get this error: "Unable to read the project file "ccminer.vcxproj". CUDA Toolkit 8 is missing Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 07, 2017, 04:41:55 PM Hum i get between 211-213 mh/s with 8x 1070 with palginmod With yours i am between 191-193 mh/s ... palginmod run stable at OC clock : 130 MEM clock : -2000 PowerLimit : 150 TempLimit : 70c This one keep crashing ... Any advice ? Can you link to the palgin mod so I can try. Im trying to compile the krnlx mod in VS 2015 and get this error: "Unable to read the project file "ccminer.vcxproj". https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer After a restart it seems better, but i only get ~27.5mh/s far away from 30.5mh/s, wath i miss ? The GPU dont seems to work at 100% weird ... http://imgur.com/a/kEves Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: morcus on August 07, 2017, 04:51:09 PM I managed to build the project under windows with success.
I have approximately the same perf than SP3 on a 1070. Here is the updated "how to" to build it: You need: - Visual Studio 2013 (Free edition) - CUDA ToolKit 8 - GIT And do the following : git clone https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx git clone https://github.com/peters/curl-for-windows.git compat/curl-for-windows Copy the second project inside the first project (you will see a folder called "compat") Then open the ccminer.sln project using Visual Studio, and then BUILD / Batch Build ... , and tick the build button next to "Release|win32". And then click the build button on the top right corner. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: BitPorium on August 07, 2017, 05:02:03 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: thesmokingman on August 07, 2017, 05:18:12 PM FYI
This miner has been added to pimpOS ( https://getpimp.org/shop/pimp/ (https://getpimp.org/shop/pimp/) ) with excellent results. I was able to hit 48MHs on 1070s before it crashed via OCs lol....I was able to achieve 27-28MH/s using no OCs. https://miner.farm/farmer/554/farmstatus?node=315 If you're running pimpOS, just run the "pimpup" command and selection <option 2> and the OS will build the miner for you. Just edit the config file and start the miner! I'm available here or via IRC/Discord chat if anyone needs any help getting this miner setup via pimpOS.... Happy Mining! https://image.prntscr.com/image/lKNxSAlsR9egfuaFsdQeYg.png Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 07, 2017, 05:18:23 PM I managed to build the project under windows with success. I have approximately the same perf than SP3 on a 1070. Here is the updated "how to" to build it: You need: - Visual Studio 2013 (Free edition) - CUDA ToolKit 8 - GIT And do the following : git clone https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx git clone https://github.com/peters/curl-for-windows.git compat/curl-for-windows Copy the second project inside the first project (you will see a folder called "compat") Then open the ccminer.sln project using Visual Studio, and then BUILD / Batch Build ... , and tick the build button next to "Release|win32". And then click the build button on the top right corner. Thank you Im getting this error now: <VCMessage Code="MSB8020" Type="Error" Arguments="$(PlatformToolset);$(PlatformToolset)" Condition="'$(DesignTimeBuild)'!='true' and '$(_ToolsetFound)' != 'true' and '$(PlatformToolset)' != 'v90' and '$(PlatformToolset)' != 'v100' and '$(PlatformToolset)' != 'v110'" /> Severity Code Description Project File Line Suppression State Error MSB8020 The build tools for v120 (Platform Toolset = 'v120') cannot be found. To build using the v120 build tools, please install v120 build tools. Alternatively, you may upgrade to the current Visual Studio tools by selecting the Project menu or right-click the solution, and then selecting "Retarget solution". ccminer C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft.Cpp\v4.0\V140\Microsoft.Cpp.Platform.targets 57 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: newmz on August 07, 2017, 05:51:03 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe Thank you so much. In Windows 8.1 going from the original miner (linked from the signatum site) to this one I went from around 78mh/s to 110mh/s. 2 x 1070s & 3 x 1060s, all core +100 mem -500 in afterburner. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 07, 2017, 06:06:18 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe I tried this binary and it is 2-3 MHs slower than sp3 mod. Intensity 18 Can someone please post a binary that gives 30+ Mh/s as is the title of this thread please. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: soothaa on August 07, 2017, 06:10:14 PM Thank you so much for this! My 1080tis are currently pushing 53-54 MHs and are running great! Hopefully SIGT stays stable enough for now for us all to continue mining it. Does anyone know when the next Block Reward reduction is? It is still currently 2500 I believe so the upcoming reduction will probably increase the price due to speculation, don't you think? Again, thank you dev for you great work - it is much appreciated and very good!
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: thebigjdoe on August 07, 2017, 06:28:20 PM I'm trying to compile... Do we need visual studio 13? or does community 2017 work also? Thanks!
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 07, 2017, 06:30:19 PM I'm trying to compile... Do we need visual studio 13? or does community 2017 work also? Thanks! I tried it with 2015. But getting errors. Takes a long time to download the updates with 2015. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: thebigjdoe on August 07, 2017, 06:35:58 PM Used the link to the 64 bit windows binary and getting ~25MH/s per 1070 in a 6 card rig
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: BitPorium on August 07, 2017, 06:41:16 PM I'm trying to compile... Do we need visual studio 13? or does community 2017 work also? Thanks! I used 2013 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: chrysophylax on August 07, 2017, 07:07:04 PM nice work ...
#crysx Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: notsure85 on August 07, 2017, 07:09:07 PM so ive successfully compiled the code with vs2013.
when starting the miner i get an error "ptxas fatal : memory allocation failed". All other ccminer flavors run flawlessly. win7,x64,2x1080ti edit: rebuild release/win32 version ~50mh on 1080ti 80% +190 core -502 mem Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: MnngSprvsr on August 07, 2017, 07:35:32 PM can someone please share a build linux binary :-)
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 07, 2017, 07:46:09 PM Anyone get 30mh/s on 1070 GTX ?
Can u share your setting please ? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: LackyHash on August 07, 2017, 08:16:25 PM thank krnlx - get 30.5 mh 1070 with 1900-2000 cclock and i 23
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: apphero on August 07, 2017, 09:08:42 PM Great Work !!!
[2017-08-08 04:07:52] GPU #4: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 50.84 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:07:53] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 51.90 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:07:53] GPU #2: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 51.96 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:07:53] GPU #6: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 51.37 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:07:53] GPU #5: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 51.30 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:07:53] GPU #7: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 49.10 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:07:53] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 51.84 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:02] GPU #3: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 54.06 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:02] accepted: 99/100 (diff 1.306), 411.27 MH/s yes! [2017-08-08 04:08:03] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 51.87 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:03] GPU #2: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 51.75 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:03] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 52.12 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:03] GPU #5: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 51.36 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:03] GPU #6: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 51.32 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:04] GPU #4: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 50.66 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:04] GPU #4: 1912 MHz 211.79 kH/W 239W 66C FAN 96% [2017-08-08 04:08:04] GPU #7: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 48.91 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:05] accepted: 100/101 (diff 1.424), 412.50 MH/s yes! [2017-08-08 04:08:12] GPU #3: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 53.89 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:14] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 51.96 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:14] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 52.28 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:14] GPU #2: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 51.93 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:14] GPU #6: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 51.32 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:14] GPU #5: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 51.16 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:15] GPU #7: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 49.10 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:15] accepted: 101/102 (diff 4.639), 412.48 MH/s yes! [2017-08-08 04:08:16] GPU #4: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 50.67 MH/s [2017-08-08 04:08:17] accepted: 102/103 (diff 1.442), 412.46 MH/s yes! Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Vetal_inside on August 07, 2017, 10:17:07 PM Wow man, nice!
At the moment - there is fastest skunk free/paid miner, that available to people. add: used binary from here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20692081#msg20692081): 5x1070 palit gamerock, +100-150 core, -500 mem, 100% tdp, intensity=22,25,25,25,25, Win8.1x64, 384.94 drivers got ~146.12 mh With spmod5 I had ~144.5md Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: car1999 on August 07, 2017, 10:19:08 PM I'm building it, do we need to add nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_61,code=\"sm_61,compute_61\" to Makefile.am?
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: dbc23 on August 07, 2017, 10:32:22 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG Thank you kind sir, for saving me compile time I shall give you a tip ;) Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: car1999 on August 07, 2017, 10:54:25 PM ubuntu 16.04 x64, cuda 8.0, build success, but run error:
Code: *** ccminer skunk-krnlx for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***^M Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Brucelats on August 07, 2017, 11:10:10 PM I used binary posted here, both of them 32 and 64 bit one. They both run, i see command promt blink and it closes - CMD opens fast and closes fast.
I use win 10. Anyone got it working on win 10? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: car1999 on August 07, 2017, 11:14:00 PM I used binary posted here, both of them 32 and 64 bit one. They both run, i see command promt blink and it closes - CMD opens fast and closes fast. I use win 10. Anyone got it working on win 10? add PAUSE to the bottom of your bat file and see what's the error. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Brucelats on August 07, 2017, 11:24:33 PM I think i am doing something wrong. Never used CC miner. Do i need to download normal CC miner and then paste this modded exe file?
I tried use CC miner with only this 1 binary file posted here. 1 icon. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Susch on August 07, 2017, 11:29:26 PM Code: :loop You must use a bat , just start ccminer.exe doesnt work. No GUI. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Brucelats on August 07, 2017, 11:54:10 PM Code: :loop You must use a bat , just start ccminer.exe doesnt work. No GUI. Ohh, thanks! Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Brucelats on August 08, 2017, 12:22:58 AM Ok got it working.
I use Zotac AMP Extreme - GTX 1070 8GB. What should i put for Clocks for this algorithm? I can get max around 27 with 64bit binary. How u guys got 30-31MH/s per card? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Vetal_inside on August 08, 2017, 12:29:10 AM Ok got it working. I use Zotac AMP Extreme - GTX 1070 8GB. What should i put for Clocks for this algorithm? I can get max around 27 with 64bit binary. How u guys got 30-31MH/s per card? used binary from here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20692081#msg20692081): upd: Up to 147.5mh. And yet - x32 binary seems more profitability.5x1070 palit gamerock, +100-150 core, -500 mem, 100% tdp, intensity=22,25,25,25,25, Win8.1x64, 384.94 drivers got ~146.12 mh With spmod5 I had ~144.5md To krnlx - maybe you have eth address for donations too? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: candyiman on August 08, 2017, 12:40:10 AM Hashes on 1060 3gb? and Settings anyone?
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: continuousminer on August 08, 2017, 01:08:49 AM Great Job! On this I am able to hit just about 30 sometimes 30 on my GTX 1070's at 100% power dialing it back to 65% power has a small effect on hashrate but a huge effect on power. I have 8 X Zotac 1070 Mini
Also I have 8 x Asus GTX 1060 6GB with an average Hash of 18 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: candyiman on August 08, 2017, 01:29:51 AM Great Job! On this I am able to hit just about 30 sometimes 30 on my GTX 1070's at 100% power dialing it back to 65% power has a small effect on hashrate but a huge effect on power. I have 8 X Zotac 1070 Mini Also I have 8 x Asus GTX 1060 6GB with an average Hash of 18 Settings on 1060? I'm Running Palgin mod and im getting 17,2-17,4 Settings 112pl 150 Core clock Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: PolarFiasco on August 08, 2017, 02:13:04 AM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe Windows Defender detecting trojan in 64bit version. I did not bother with the others after that... Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Yerbabie on August 08, 2017, 02:13:17 AM The files upload have trojans according to windows defender, it does not like them, and deletes them.
Trojan:Win32/Spursint.F!cl (Severe). Can someone link to a clean file.... The file linked in is 3 times the size of the original ccminer... seriously. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Vetal_inside on August 08, 2017, 02:39:06 AM The files upload have trojans according to windows defender, it does not like them, and deletes them. VirusTotal results (https://www.virustotal.com/ru/file/86c4d7ff5e077532c8ebf100880fa1b8fa6bbe3092861b0e84966ee7bc8050ce/analysis/). Seems nothing dangerous. Of course, if you not trust - you can always build miner from sources: that's why open source are great :)Trojan:Win32/Spursint.F!cl (Severe). Can someone link to a clean file.... The file linked in is 3 times the size of the original ccminer... seriously. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 08, 2017, 03:00:44 AM The files upload have trojans according to windows defender, it does not like them, and deletes them. VirusTotal results (https://www.virustotal.com/ru/file/86c4d7ff5e077532c8ebf100880fa1b8fa6bbe3092861b0e84966ee7bc8050ce/analysis/). Seems nothing dangerous. Of course, if you not trust - you can always build miner from sources: that's why open source are great :)Trojan:Win32/Spursint.F!cl (Severe). Can someone link to a clean file.... The file linked in is 3 times the size of the original ccminer... seriously. You can always share the binary also if so inclined so others dont have to build miner. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: ConAim on August 08, 2017, 03:14:18 AM Wow, good stuff..
I was able to compiled it using Visual Studio 2013 (must be 2013 and not 2015 nor 2017). Surprising, the hashrate can stay above 29+ at 60 TDP on each 1070 cards. This is much better than any other ccminer that I known off... :o Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: kidio on August 08, 2017, 03:15:07 AM I compiled the code on ubuntu 14.04 and cuda 8.0. Everything is going fine but when I run the miner , I got this error:
Code: [2017-08-08 03:11:50] Starting on stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106 Does anyone have this problem before ? Thanks !!! Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 08, 2017, 03:37:23 AM Wow, good stuff.. I was able to compiled it using Visual Studio 2013 (must be 2013 and not 2015 nor 2017). Surprising, the hashrate can stay above 29+ at 60 TDP on each 1070 cards. This is much better than any other ccminer that I known off... :o Do you mind sharing your .exe please Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: puwaha on August 08, 2017, 03:57:09 AM Hmmm... I got the exact same hashrate on my 1070s, and 1080tis with both this one and Palginmod. And actually my original ccminer is just slightly faster.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Epsylon3 on August 08, 2017, 03:57:24 AM ccminer.org/preview/ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80.7z
and curl is on the git, no need to rebuild that except if you want to use VS2015 (VS2017 requires cuda 9, but this kernel is not compatible) Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Vladeg on August 08, 2017, 04:14:54 AM ccminer.org/preview/ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80.7z and curl is on the git, no need to rebuild that except if you want to use VS2015 (VS2017 requires cuda 9, but this kernel is not compatible) Working well on Win 10 x64. Thanks! Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: thebigjdoe on August 08, 2017, 04:18:58 AM ccminer.org/preview/ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80.7z and curl is on the git, no need to rebuild that except if you want to use VS2015 (VS2017 requires cuda 9, but this kernel is not compatible) is this different than what was posted on page 2 ? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Epsylon3 on August 08, 2017, 04:21:01 AM git clone https://github.com/peters/curl-for-windows.git compat/curl-for-windows is not required, the prebuilt lib and include files are in the source
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: cashen on August 08, 2017, 04:25:18 AM ccminer.org/preview/ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80.7z and curl is on the git, no need to rebuild that except if you want to use VS2015 (VS2017 requires cuda 9, but this kernel is not compatible) is this different than what was posted on page 2 ? I tried this with results less than that of SP#4 for 1080s and 1080 TIs Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: PolarFiasco on August 08, 2017, 04:25:57 AM ccminer.org/preview/ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80.7z and curl is on the git, no need to rebuild that except if you want to use VS2015 (VS2017 requires cuda 9, but this kernel is not compatible) is this different than what was posted on page 2 ? Yes, very different. It is a build posted by a very trusted member of the community...so no malware like the other ones. However, I got a lower hash rate ~35 MH/s @ 75% TDP on 1080TI. My 32-bit build was at 50 MH/s. I am getting build errors on my 64bit build. :( Trying again after a clean. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: du44 on August 08, 2017, 04:29:32 AM Epsylon, why you using CUDA 8.0? 7.5 some faster
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Epsylon3 on August 08, 2017, 04:31:23 AM so build it.. and try ;) ive other things to do
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: thebigjdoe on August 08, 2017, 04:33:42 AM ccminer.org/preview/ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80.7z and curl is on the git, no need to rebuild that except if you want to use VS2015 (VS2017 requires cuda 9, but this kernel is not compatible) is this different than what was posted on page 2 ? Yes, very different. It is a build posted by a very trusted member of the community...so no malware like the other ones. However, I got a lower hash rate ~35 MH/s @ 75% TDP on 1080TI. My 32-bit build was at 50 MH/s. I am getting build errors on my 64bit build. :( Trying again after a clean. I'm getting 51MH/s at -400 ram and +160core 1080ti with epsylon build Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: car1999 on August 08, 2017, 04:37:09 AM ubuntu 16.04 x64, cuda 8.0, build success, but run error: Code: *** ccminer skunk-krnlx for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***^M I found that the miner doesn't support more than 8 cards, if i use -d 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7 it works well, but i have 9 cards, please help, i think it isn't hard to fix this issue, great appreciate. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: PolarFiasco on August 08, 2017, 04:39:16 AM 64-bit build still failing for me. I am not sure why one of the errors is caused by a .pdb file since it is a release build.
Code: Error 7 error C1033: cannot open program database 'c:\dev\ccminer - krnlx\ccminer\vc120.pdb' C:\Dev\ccminer - krnlx\ccminer\x64\Release\cuda_bmw.cu.cpp.ii 1 1 ccminer Code: Error 8 error MSB3721: The command ""C:\Program Files\NVIDIA GPU Computing Toolkit\CUDA\v8.0\bin\nvcc.exe" -gencode=arch=compute_52,code=\"sm_52,compute_52\" -gencode=arch=compute_50,code=\"sm_50,compute_50\" -gencode=arch=compute_35,code=\"sm_35,compute_35\" -gencode=arch=compute_30,code=\"sm_30,compute_30\" -gencode=arch=compute_20,code=\"sm_21,compute_20\" --use-local-env --cl-version 2013 -ccbin "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 12.0\VC\bin\x86_amd64" -I"C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NvToolsExt\\include" -I. -Icompat -I"compat\curl-for-windows\curl\include" -Icompat\jansson -Icompat\getopt -Icompat\pthreads -I"compat\curl-for-windows\openssl\openssl\include" -I"compat\curl-for-windows\zlib" -I"C:\Program Files\NVIDIA GPU Computing Toolkit\CUDA\v8.0\include" -I"C:\Program Files\NVIDIA GPU Computing Toolkit\CUDA\v8.0\include" -I"C:\Program Files\NVIDIA GPU Computing Toolkit\CUDA\v8.0\include" --keep --keep-dir x64\Release -maxrregcount=76 --ptxas-options=-v --machine 64 --compile -cudart static --Wno-deprecated-gpu-targets -DWIN32 -DNDEBUG -D_CONSOLE -D_CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS -DCURL_STATICLIB -DUSE_WRAPNVML -DSCRYPT_KECCAK512 -DSCRYPT_CHACHA -DSCRYPT_CHOOSE_COMPILETIME -D_MBCS -Xcompiler "/EHsc /W3 /nologo /Ox /FS /Zi /MT " -o x64\Release\cuda_bmw.cu.obj "C:\Dev\ccminer - krnlx\ccminer\Algo256\cuda_bmw.cu"" exited with code 2. C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft.Cpp\v4.0\V120\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 8.0.targets 689 9 ccminer Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: kemo6600 on August 08, 2017, 04:45:17 AM Can confirm my 1080Ti went from 46.5 to 50.3. what tdp 80%? could you test with a 50% tdp? I can do 38 with 50% tdp using a 1080ti Okay 220/280 is close to 80% And depending on your 1080ti 140 could be 50 to 56 % My 1080ti drops to 125 as it is a tdp of 250 not 280. This build in Linux looks like it is good. I wonder if full zero could put it his nv0018 50% TPD on my EVGA SC is also doing 42 60% TPD = 45.6 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: xnoom on August 08, 2017, 05:40:16 AM Just build with CUDA 7.5 32bits.
https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/download/cuda7.5-32bits/ccminer-skunk.7z Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: thebigjdoe on August 08, 2017, 05:56:06 AM is there any tutorial on how to compile this (guessing like compiling any ccminer?). I keep getting an error
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: happytorn on August 08, 2017, 07:39:37 AM Core clock +100
Memory clock -500 Code:
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: newapp on August 08, 2017, 08:15:58 AM Where i can get windows miner please?
I would appreciate help, thank you!! Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: NoOneLt on August 08, 2017, 08:24:07 AM Hi guys, and first of all thanks dev for the work!!! Seeing great numbers :) I believe non x64 could be a bit faster, i use prebuild ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80 right now, why - below:
I wanted to ask about building, a bit new into this, but will to learn. A have cloned https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx i am in $ cd ccminer-skunk-krnlx in git But i do not know what is next step? I can not find any local files to compile in Project 2013? Where are they stored locally? Maybe someone can guide me a bit? Thanks in advance, and thank you @Epsylon3! Can you PM me your ETC/ETH/SIA? as i will not have SIGT for some time. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: BitPorium on August 08, 2017, 08:45:23 AM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe Windows Defender detecting trojan in 64bit version. I did not bother with the others after that... But as always. It's good to check files. And if there is any risk at all I suggest you don't use the links I posted. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Eyedol-X on August 08, 2017, 08:57:40 AM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe A curiosity question -- why are these files 45mb and 55mb in size? Others that compiled your own binaries, were they this large as well? Obviously VT detects this binaries as PUA and Bitcoinminer etc... I don't see anything that screams there is something wrong with these files so I want to be clear that I'm not implying anything with my question; I'm just curious what makes them so large. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: damNmad on August 08, 2017, 09:03:55 AM Hum i do : ./autogen.sh ./configure When i do "make" or "make -j 4" i get this error :( http://imgur.com/a/uZKLG Can you show full error log ? It seems, that it is openssl-related issue, do you have openssl-dev installed ? make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx' Making all in compat make[2]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[3]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all-am'. make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[2]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -fopenmp -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/cuda/include -DUSE_WRAPNVML -O3 -march=native -D_REENTRANT -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16 -MT ccminer-bignum.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/ccminer-bignum.Tpo -c -o ccminer-bignum.o `test -f 'bignum.cpp' || echo './'`bignum.cpp In file included from bignum.cpp:8:0: bignum.hpp:63:24: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}’ class CBigNum : public BIGNUM ^ In file included from /usr/local/include/openssl/bn.h:32:0, from bignum.hpp:20, from bignum.cpp:8: /usr/local/include/openssl/ossl_typ.h:80:16: note: forward declaration of ‘BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}’ I just do apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev, dont remove the error. Have you managed to fix the issue, if so, do you mind sharing please? Thanks. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 08, 2017, 09:27:30 AM Hum i do : ./autogen.sh ./configure When i do "make" or "make -j 4" i get this error :( http://imgur.com/a/uZKLG Can you show full error log ? It seems, that it is openssl-related issue, do you have openssl-dev installed ? make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx' Making all in compat make[2]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[3]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all-am'. make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[2]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -fopenmp -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/cuda/include -DUSE_WRAPNVML -O3 -march=native -D_REENTRANT -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16 -MT ccminer-bignum.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/ccminer-bignum.Tpo -c -o ccminer-bignum.o `test -f 'bignum.cpp' || echo './'`bignum.cpp In file included from bignum.cpp:8:0: bignum.hpp:63:24: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}’ class CBigNum : public BIGNUM ^ In file included from /usr/local/include/openssl/bn.h:32:0, from bignum.hpp:20, from bignum.cpp:8: /usr/local/include/openssl/ossl_typ.h:80:16: note: forward declaration of ‘BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}’ I just do apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev, dont remove the error. Have you managed to fix the issue, if so, do you mind sharing please? Thanks. apt-get remove openssl libssl updatedb apt-get install openssl libssl updatedp Try to ./build.sh again Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: jeblond on August 08, 2017, 09:55:50 AM can someone share an compiled version for ubuntu ?
I get the BIGNUM errors ... Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: damNmad on August 08, 2017, 10:00:21 AM Hum i do : ./autogen.sh ./configure When i do "make" or "make -j 4" i get this error :( http://imgur.com/a/uZKLG Can you show full error log ? It seems, that it is openssl-related issue, do you have openssl-dev installed ? make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx' Making all in compat make[2]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[3]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all-am'. make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[2]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -fopenmp -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/cuda/include -DUSE_WRAPNVML -O3 -march=native -D_REENTRANT -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16 -MT ccminer-bignum.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/ccminer-bignum.Tpo -c -o ccminer-bignum.o `test -f 'bignum.cpp' || echo './'`bignum.cpp In file included from bignum.cpp:8:0: bignum.hpp:63:24: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}’ class CBigNum : public BIGNUM ^ In file included from /usr/local/include/openssl/bn.h:32:0, from bignum.hpp:20, from bignum.cpp:8: /usr/local/include/openssl/ossl_typ.h:80:16: note: forward declaration of ‘BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}’ I just do apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev, dont remove the error. Have you managed to fix the issue, if so, do you mind sharing please? Thanks. apt-get remove openssl libssl updatedb apt-get install openssl libssl updatedp Try to ./build.sh again Thanks for the reply. I tried the above command as is 'apt-get remove openssl libssl' it failed to find the package so I have tried to remove 'apt-get remove openssl', managed to remove and install it again. When i tried to build, still failed with same error you've got in the first place. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: damNmad on August 08, 2017, 10:02:16 AM can someone share an compiled version for ubuntu ? I get the BIGNUM errors ... Yes please... Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: rednoW on August 08, 2017, 10:18:01 AM Just build with CUDA 7.5 32bits. well, you compiled without compute_50 support ))https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/download/cuda7.5-32bits/ccminer-skunk.7z Can you do cuda7.5 x64 build with both maxwell and pascal support? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: car1999 on August 08, 2017, 10:58:33 AM can someone share an compiled version for ubuntu ? you need an old version of openssl, maybe 1.0.2I get the BIGNUM errors ... Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 08, 2017, 11:26:57 AM Hum i do : ./autogen.sh ./configure When i do "make" or "make -j 4" i get this error :( http://imgur.com/a/uZKLG Can you show full error log ? It seems, that it is openssl-related issue, do you have openssl-dev installed ? make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx' Making all in compat make[2]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[3]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all-am'. make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[2]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -fopenmp -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/cuda/include -DUSE_WRAPNVML -O3 -march=native -D_REENTRANT -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16 -MT ccminer-bignum.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/ccminer-bignum.Tpo -c -o ccminer-bignum.o `test -f 'bignum.cpp' || echo './'`bignum.cpp In file included from bignum.cpp:8:0: bignum.hpp:63:24: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}’ class CBigNum : public BIGNUM ^ In file included from /usr/local/include/openssl/bn.h:32:0, from bignum.hpp:20, from bignum.cpp:8: /usr/local/include/openssl/ossl_typ.h:80:16: note: forward declaration of ‘BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}’ I just do apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev, dont remove the error. Have you managed to fix the issue, if so, do you mind sharing please? Thanks. apt-get remove openssl libssl updatedb apt-get install openssl libssl updatedp Try to ./build.sh again Thanks for the reply. I tried the above command as is 'apt-get remove openssl libssl' it failed to find the package so I have tried to remove 'apt-get remove openssl', managed to remove and install it again. When i tried to build, still failed with same error you've got in the first place. apt-get install libssl Will do the work ;) Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: PolarFiasco on August 08, 2017, 11:29:25 AM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe Windows Defender detecting trojan in 64bit version. I did not bother with the others after that... But as always. It's good to check files. And if there is any risk at all I suggest you don't use the links I posted. I don't know what to tell you. Windows Defender seemed to find a legit threat. I built 32 and 64 myself and they did not have any issues with AV. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: BitPorium on August 08, 2017, 11:51:32 AM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG Windows Defender detecting trojan in 64bit version. I did not bother with the others after that... But as always. It's good to check files. And if there is any risk at all I suggest you don't use the links I posted. I don't know what to tell you. Windows Defender seemed to find a legit threat. I built 32 and 64 myself and they did not have any issues with AV. ok. I have been doing a test on my end. I find this very interesting I went and ran a scan on the original compiled files. The 32 bit version had no threats detected by windows defender. the 64 bit version on the other hand did. I should have tested before but usually windows had a popup telling me there is/was a threat and it did not pop up. I had to manually scan them. Also, i used a hashing app to hash the files. I could not has the 64 bit version because it would detect said trojan. So i appologies for posting the 64 bit build. The 64 bit build seems to be infected. Now i am not sure if its real or a false positive but it does seem to come up as dirty. I don't know why but that is what was built in vs2013 when i select 64 bit. I am currently rebuilding the source and will report back when done. I still am not sure what exactly happened or if its even a real hit. But fo rthe time being the 64bit build should be avoided. Also here are the hashes for the 32 bit build which scans clean on windows defender md5 795B7F9693A98FF568E1AE0EBC5D9C7F Sha-1 2084EE0EA845F64B5001F1F3ED26B67BC69ED0D8 Sha256 30ABBDC0DF8538E417534A5A49E24975D2F00DC9BFDCD0A8B8142AE1A7D1A5B1 Sha512 7D9B99CDF7DC3987038FA0D66969186BABA82757864B9F637954BA5716B03ABF87B9D3AA2FAEF16 744594EFDAF1FC3F21D01132F3B52ACD179D5E58B9D2F955E Used quickhash Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: damNmad on August 08, 2017, 12:11:20 PM Hum i do : ./autogen.sh ./configure When i do "make" or "make -j 4" i get this error :( http://imgur.com/a/uZKLG Can you show full error log ? It seems, that it is openssl-related issue, do you have openssl-dev installed ? make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx' Making all in compat make[2]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[3]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all-am'. make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/compat' make[2]: Entering directory '/home/m1/ccminer-skunk-krnlx' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -fopenmp -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/cuda/include -DUSE_WRAPNVML -O3 -march=native -D_REENTRANT -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16 -MT ccminer-bignum.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/ccminer-bignum.Tpo -c -o ccminer-bignum.o `test -f 'bignum.cpp' || echo './'`bignum.cpp In file included from bignum.cpp:8:0: bignum.hpp:63:24: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}’ class CBigNum : public BIGNUM ^ In file included from /usr/local/include/openssl/bn.h:32:0, from bignum.hpp:20, from bignum.cpp:8: /usr/local/include/openssl/ossl_typ.h:80:16: note: forward declaration of ‘BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}’ I just do apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev, dont remove the error. Have you managed to fix the issue, if so, do you mind sharing please? Thanks. apt-get remove openssl libssl updatedb apt-get install openssl libssl updatedp Try to ./build.sh again Thanks for the reply. I tried the above command as is 'apt-get remove openssl libssl' it failed to find the package so I have tried to remove 'apt-get remove openssl', managed to remove and install it again. When i tried to build, still failed with same error you've got in the first place. apt-get install libssl Will do the work ;) Tried that too, but ends with Code: E: Unable to locate package libssl so I've tried 'libssl-dev' Code: apt-get remove openssl libssl-dev but Code: ./build.sh still giving me BIGNUM error!! Have I missed something?? Thanks Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: PolarFiasco on August 08, 2017, 12:11:36 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG Windows Defender detecting trojan in 64bit version. I did not bother with the others after that... But as always. It's good to check files. And if there is any risk at all I suggest you don't use the links I posted. I don't know what to tell you. Windows Defender seemed to find a legit threat. I built 32 and 64 myself and they did not have any issues with AV. ok. I have been doing a test on my end. I find this very interesting I went and ran a scan on the original compiled files. The 32 bit version had no threats detected by windows defender. the 64 bit version on the other hand did. I should have tested before but usually windows had a popup telling me there is/was a threat and it did not pop up. I had to manually scan them. Also, i used a hashing app to hash the files. I could not has the 64 bit version because it would detect said trojan. So i appologies for posting the 64 bit build. The 64 bit build seems to be infected. Now i am not sure if its real or a false positive but it does seem to come up as dirty. I don't know why but that is what was built in vs2013 when i select 64 bit. I am currently rebuilding the source and will report back when done. I still am not sure what exactly happened or if its even a real hit. But fo rthe time being the 64bit build should be avoided. Also here are the hashes for the 32 bit build which scans clean on windows defender md5 795B7F9693A98FF568E1AE0EBC5D9C7F Sha-1 2084EE0EA845F64B5001F1F3ED26B67BC69ED0D8 Sha256 30ABBDC0DF8538E417534A5A49E24975D2F00DC9BFDCD0A8B8142AE1A7D1A5B1 Sha512 7D9B99CDF7DC3987038FA0D66969186BABA82757864B9F637954BA5716B03ABF87B9D3AA2FAEF16 744594EFDAF1FC3F21D01132F3B52ACD179D5E58B9D2F955E Used quickhash I think it is a real hit because it was a specific trojan not the usual warning that it is "risky software" because it is associated with mining. With the SIGT hype/greed and the malware infected versions of sp mods going around it is probably best for everyone to build themselves. Unless the trojan is in the source itself, which could be easy to hide since lots of people are not familiar with the code. I did a quick look and did not see anything, but that isn't saying much to vouch for the safety. Epsylon3 provided a build, I would think he would catch anything in the source though. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: gregfromo on August 08, 2017, 12:25:56 PM Many thanks to all who contributed.
I managed to build the cuda 8.0 windows version x86/x64. For test I installed also the cuda 7.5 sdk, but I'm in no way have a clue beside pushing buttons and changing switches, so what need's to be changed to compile against the 7.5 SDK? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: jeblond on August 08, 2017, 01:02:42 PM So i finnaly managed to compile this miner for linux ( i use nvOC for mining )
For all those who cant get this compiled, here is my compiled version: https://ufile.io/kxlay https://www.file-upload.com/6m9ekmvm6qrz Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: car1999 on August 08, 2017, 01:14:59 PM So i finnaly managed to compile this miner for linux ( i use nvOC for mining ) do you have a rig with more than 8cards?does it work?For all those who cant get this compiled, here is my compiled version: https://ufile.io/kxlay https://www.file-upload.com/6m9ekmvm6qrz Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Eyedol-X on August 08, 2017, 01:20:26 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe A curiosity question -- why are these files 45mb and 55mb in size? Others that compiled your own binaries, were they this large as well? Obviously VT detects this binaries as PUA and Bitcoinminer etc... I don't see anything that screams there is something wrong with these files so I want to be clear that I'm not implying anything with my question; I'm just curious what makes them so large. So I posted the above earlier, two previous binaries that were shared were 45 and 55mb by a Hero Member here Now this one below is 30mb from a noob account? So i finnaly managed to compile this miner for linux ( i use nvOC for mining ) For all those who cant get this compiled, here is my compiled version: https://ufile.io/kxlay https://www.file-upload.com/6m9ekmvm6qrz Anyone out there care to explain the difference? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: PolarFiasco on August 08, 2017, 01:31:12 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe A curiosity question -- why are these files 45mb and 55mb in size? Others that compiled your own binaries, were they this large as well? Obviously VT detects this binaries as PUA and Bitcoinminer etc... I don't see anything that screams there is something wrong with these files so I want to be clear that I'm not implying anything with my question; I'm just curious what makes them so large. So I posted the above earlier, two previous binaries that were shared were 45 and 55mb by a Hero Member here Now this one below is 30mb from a noob account? So i finnaly managed to compile this miner for linux ( i use nvOC for mining ) For all those who cant get this compiled, here is my compiled version: https://ufile.io/kxlay https://www.file-upload.com/6m9ekmvm6qrz Anyone out there care to explain the difference? My windows builds are 45 and 55 MB too. Epsylon3's 64bit build is only 14 MB...but he knows what he is doing. This one is Linux? I really don't know but the first Window 64bit build posted here was removed by Windows Defender for me. My own build came back clean on the AV so hoping the source is clean. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: xnoom on August 08, 2017, 01:33:53 PM Just build with CUDA 7.5 32bits. well, you compiled without compute_50 support ))https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/download/cuda7.5-32bits/ccminer-skunk.7z Can you do cuda7.5 x64 build with both maxwell and pascal support? compiled with compute_50 and 52 https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: jeblond on August 08, 2017, 01:38:47 PM My 10 card rig works ok, 13 card rig crashes.
My build is for linux, so it's normal to have a different size. I get +5 mh for each card (1080ti), too bad that it doesnt work on the 13 cards rig Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: nizzuu on August 08, 2017, 01:40:41 PM Hi guys, can you provide your results with this miner for 1080ti? My setup: 1999MHz core, 5005 mem, 100% tdp.
I'm getting 51.5...51.75 Mh/s (Win10, Pentium G4600 CPU) with these settings using palgin's mod v 1.1, so I'm just wondering if there're any improvements here. Thanks. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Eyedol-X on August 08, 2017, 01:45:32 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe A curiosity question -- why are these files 45mb and 55mb in size? Others that compiled your own binaries, were they this large as well? Obviously VT detects this binaries as PUA and Bitcoinminer etc... I don't see anything that screams there is something wrong with these files so I want to be clear that I'm not implying anything with my question; I'm just curious what makes them so large. So I posted the above earlier, two previous binaries that were shared were 45 and 55mb by a Hero Member here Now this one below is 30mb from a noob account? So i finnaly managed to compile this miner for linux ( i use nvOC for mining ) For all those who cant get this compiled, here is my compiled version: https://ufile.io/kxlay https://www.file-upload.com/6m9ekmvm6qrz Anyone out there care to explain the difference? My windows builds are 45 and 55 MB too. Epsylon3's 64bit build is only 14 MB...but he knows what he is doing. This one is Linux? I really don't know but the first Window 64bit build posted here was removed by Windows Defender for me. My own build came back clean on the AV so hoping the source is clean. Out of curiosity, can you upload your version to VT to see what flags it throws? It should get detected as PUA or Bitcoin mining software by some of the AV's at the minimum. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Brucelats on August 08, 2017, 01:52:51 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe Fu*k, I seen ppl reporting this one having a Trojan and i downloaded and tried this version on 3 of my rigs. Any idea how to clean my pc properly now in case it was infected? :/ Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: crypticj on August 08, 2017, 01:56:30 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe Fu*k, I seen ppl reporting this one having a Trojan and i downloaded and tried this version on 3 of my rigs. Any idea how to clean my pc properly now in case it was infected? :/ Dynamite it !! Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Brucelats on August 08, 2017, 02:00:28 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe Fu*k, I seen ppl reporting this one having a Trojan and i downloaded and tried this version on 3 of my rigs. Any idea how to clean my pc properly now in case it was infected? :/ Dynamite it !! Nahh im srs. I mean, ok, i deleted the files, but what if trojan horse got somewhere after i ran the app? Should avira be enough? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: zhulick on August 08, 2017, 02:04:44 PM Just build with CUDA 7.5 32bits. well, you compiled without compute_50 support ))https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/download/cuda7.5-32bits/ccminer-skunk.7z Can you do cuda7.5 x64 build with both maxwell and pascal support? compiled with compute_50 and 52 https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52 just tried this. win 10 didn't throw up any flags, so i guess it's clean. i get the same speed as spmod on my 1070s at 60%tdp (my sweet spot setting for these cards) - 28. not sure if it's this compile or the coin's network that's being hammered, or the miner overall, but it was very slow to start submitting shares. took well over a minute on yimp before i saw a white line, and almost two on nova. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: BitPorium on August 08, 2017, 02:07:13 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe Fu*k, I seen ppl reporting this one having a Trojan and i downloaded and tried this version on 3 of my rigs. Any idea how to clean my pc properly now in case it was infected? :/ Dynamite it !! Nahh im srs. I mean, ok, i deleted the files, but what if trojan horse got somewhere after i ran the app? Should avira be enough? Just run whatever AV software you have. If windows defender picks it up then probably everything else will aswell. If you had wallets on those systems I suggest you transfer coins to another address with a wallet generated on a known clean system. And keep an eye out on your email and such for suspicious activity. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: car1999 on August 08, 2017, 02:13:39 PM My 10 card rig works ok, 13 card rig crashes. what's your gcc and CUDA version? Did you add nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_61,code=\"sm_61,compute_61\" to Makefile.am?My build is for linux, so it's normal to have a different size. I get +5 mh for each card (1080ti), too bad that it doesnt work on the 13 cards rig Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: PolarFiasco on August 08, 2017, 02:17:33 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe A curiosity question -- why are these files 45mb and 55mb in size? Others that compiled your own binaries, were they this large as well? Obviously VT detects this binaries as PUA and Bitcoinminer etc... I don't see anything that screams there is something wrong with these files so I want to be clear that I'm not implying anything with my question; I'm just curious what makes them so large. So I posted the above earlier, two previous binaries that were shared were 45 and 55mb by a Hero Member here Now this one below is 30mb from a noob account? So i finnaly managed to compile this miner for linux ( i use nvOC for mining ) For all those who cant get this compiled, here is my compiled version: https://ufile.io/kxlay https://www.file-upload.com/6m9ekmvm6qrz Anyone out there care to explain the difference? My windows builds are 45 and 55 MB too. Epsylon3's 64bit build is only 14 MB...but he knows what he is doing. This one is Linux? I really don't know but the first Window 64bit build posted here was removed by Windows Defender for me. My own build came back clean on the AV so hoping the source is clean. Out of curiosity, can you upload your version to VT to see what flags it throws? It should get detected as PUA or Bitcoin mining software by some of the AV's at the minimum. Hmm..not sure what to make of this... 32bit: bf3afb527ef9fcc198545e21401346d1bbb4140b8cb6e84b6b488046cb13fae4 64bit: d95fd19dd9acf42459287d1e9c4aaf728e4c2a584a905fa269dfb23f4384d388 The 64bit 55MB file looks clean, but the 32bit is coming back with Malware.Heuristic!ET#98% (rdm+) which is odd. Going to run a full scan with another AV to see if anything comes back. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: mysimply on August 08, 2017, 02:19:06 PM Hi,
I've some question about "Intensity" option that I not set in bash script. It's automatic set to 19 as following below log: [2017-08-08 10:59:04] Starting on stratum+tcp://sigt.pool.mn:8732 [2017-08-08 10:59:04] 6 miner threads started, using 'skunk' algorithm. [2017-08-08 10:59:07] Stratum difficulty set to 0.00390625 [2017-08-08 10:59:07] skunk block 28955, diff 32703.377 [2017-08-08 10:59:07] GPU #1: Intensity set to 19, 524288 cuda threads!!!! [2017-08-08 10:59:07] GPU #1: Intensity set to 19, 524288 cuda threads [2017-08-08 10:59:07] GPU #0: Intensity set to 19, 524288 cuda threads!!!! [2017-08-08 10:59:07] GPU #0: Intensity set to 19, 524288 cuda threads[2017-08-08 10:59:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 285.22 kH/s [2017-08-08 10:59:11] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 284.48 kH/s [2017-08-08 10:59:11] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 281.38 kH/s [2017-08-08 10:59:11] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 279.85 kH/s [2017-08-08 10:59:11] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 276.46 kH/s [2017-08-08 10:59:11] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 275.47 kH/s [2017-08-08 10:59:07] GPU #4: Intensity set to 19, 524288 cuda threads!!!! [2017-08-08 10:59:07] GPU #4: Intensity set to 19, 524288 cuda threads [2017-08-08 10:59:07] GPU #2: Intensity set to 19, 524288 cuda threads!!!! [2017-08-08 10:59:07] GPU #2: Intensity set to 19, 524288 cuda threads [2017-08-08 10:59:07] GPU #3: Intensity set to 19, 524288 cuda threads!!!! [2017-08-08 10:59:07] GPU #3: Intensity set to 19, 524288 cuda threads [2017-08-08 10:59:07] GPU #5: Intensity set to 19, 524288 cuda threads!!!! [2017-08-08 10:59:07] GPU #5: Intensity set to 19, 524288 cuda threads I've try to set 20 or 25. System crash and reboot. Please suggest me how to tune it? My hash rate only 40-45 per card. My system use Ubuntu 14.04, Cuda 8 and Nvidia Driver 381.22 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: damNmad on August 08, 2017, 02:31:04 PM So i finnaly managed to compile this miner for linux ( i use nvOC for mining ) For all those who cant get this compiled, here is my compiled version: https://ufile.io/kxlay https://www.file-upload.com/6m9ekmvm6qrz Doesn't seem to work for me!! I've created a separate folder in Home on my nvOC setup, copied the ccminer to that folder and tried to run!! miner not being getting detected, so i tried to run it using ./ccminer command, seems its expecting CUDA 7.5 or something!! Anybody tested this?? please help Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: jeblond on August 08, 2017, 02:54:58 PM on nvoc v018 has to work. i use nvoc on all my rigs...
but you need to install libcudart7.5 i think sudo apt-get install libcudart7.5 sudo chmod 777 ccminer ./ccminer try this. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: uhro on August 08, 2017, 03:27:15 PM I managed to build the project under windows with success. I have approximately the same perf than SP3 on a 1070. Here is the updated "how to" to build it: You need: - Visual Studio 2013 (Free edition) - CUDA ToolKit 8 - GIT And do the following : git clone https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx git clone https://github.com/peters/curl-for-windows.git compat/curl-for-windows Copy the second project inside the first project (you will see a folder called "compat") Then open the ccminer.sln project using Visual Studio, and then BUILD / Batch Build ... , and tick the build button next to "Release|win32". And then click the build button on the top right corner. This worked just as listed for me, jumped my hash rates almost 40% over ccminer2.2 skunk On a side note, the .exe was around 45 meg, took a while to compile but I have a bunch of other stuff going on this machine. Great work krnlx!!! Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: damNmad on August 08, 2017, 03:40:07 PM on nvoc v018 has to work. i use nvoc on all my rigs... but you need to install libcudart7.5 i think sudo apt-get install libcudart7.5 sudo chmod 777 ccminer ./ccminer try this. Thanks mate, it worked now, but I still have an issue with it!! Previous ccminer was running straightaway on intensity 21, but this one only runs on 19 even i add -i 21!! Any idea?? EDIT: My bad, sorry, I've figured out. Thanks a lot for your help :) Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: jeblond on August 08, 2017, 04:01:25 PM on nvoc v018 has to work. i use nvoc on all my rigs... but you need to install libcudart7.5 i think sudo apt-get install libcudart7.5 sudo chmod 777 ccminer ./ccminer try this. Thanks mate, it worked now, but I still have an issue with it!! Previous ccminer was running straightaway on intensity 21, but this one only runs on 19 even i add -i 21!! Any idea?? EDIT: My bad, sorry, I've figured out. Thanks a lot for your help :) Glad i could help :) Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: santan on August 08, 2017, 04:35:06 PM It must be false positive by AV... I don't think someone will pollute the source in front of all experts here...
The community is so helpful .. Thanks for the uplift on this miner... and the build process.... I made 200 coins in 2 hour using just 2 Cards on the day of coin launch... but never expected it will become so popular.... should have continued.. :( Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: NoOneLt on August 08, 2017, 04:37:31 PM Guys what SIG pool you use, i am on suprnova but see at best 150 out of miner reported 190 MH... not happy at all.
Making about 10 SGT per hour at most. Donating 1% to the pool. Suprnova dont' give a lot of stats unfortunately :( Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: MnngSprvsr on August 08, 2017, 04:59:54 PM [2017-08-08 12:56:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.82 MH/s
[2017-08-08 12:56:15] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.98 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:16] GPU #6: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.57 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:17] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.37 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:17] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.19 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:17] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.18 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:17] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 16.89 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:25] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 16.90 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:25] accepted: 2/2 (diff 2.193), 121.88 MH/s yes! can please someone confirm that this is normal hashrate für 1060 Cards? I think it is to low Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: mysimply on August 08, 2017, 05:07:01 PM Guys what SIG pool you use, i am on suprnova but see at best 150 out of miner reported 190 MH... not happy at all. Making about 10 SGT per hour at most. Donating 1% to the pool. Suprnova dont' give a lot of stats unfortunately :( Pool list that I know: http://www.zpool.ca/ http://yiimp.ccminer.org/ https://sigt.suprnova.cc/ https://pool.mn/sigt https://mining-enthusiasts.net/ I use pool.mn Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: rdluffy on August 08, 2017, 05:18:25 PM [2017-08-08 12:56:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.82 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:15] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.98 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:16] GPU #6: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.57 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:17] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.37 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:17] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.19 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:17] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.18 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:17] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 16.89 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:25] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 16.90 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:25] accepted: 2/2 (diff 2.193), 121.88 MH/s yes! can please someone confirm that this is normal hashrate für 1060 Cards? I think it is to low Yes, it's normal You can downclock memory to -400, core + 170~190, PL 70% and set intensity to 25 to obtain better results Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: santan on August 08, 2017, 05:40:07 PM Someone still trying to compile...... can try to change this line in ..... ccminer.cpp
From this Code: Sprintf (suppl, "diff% .3f", sharediff); Code: Sprintf (suppl, "diff% .3f, best% .3f", sharediff, p-> best_share); It would be cool to have this version of ccminer.... @Epsylon Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Za1n on August 08, 2017, 06:59:20 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe Fu*k, I seen ppl reporting this one having a Trojan and i downloaded and tried this version on 3 of my rigs. Any idea how to clean my pc properly now in case it was infected? :/ Dynamite it !! Nahh im srs. I mean, ok, i deleted the files, but what if trojan horse got somewhere after i ran the app? Should avira be enough? Only surefire way is to wipe the machine completely and reinstall everything from the OS on up. Be sure to do a full reformat of the SDD/HDD as well before reinstalling. The file may also have contained a worm that spread to other systems on your network, so you may want to check any other computers you may own over thoroughly as well. As was suggested earlier, if you have wallets on any of those systems you may want to consider transferring the balances to a secure wallet first and just hope the Trojan is not lying in wait for you to unlock your wallet before front running you. Wipe those systems as well afterwards and reinstall everything fresh. Are these steps a lot of work? Yes, but what do you expect when you download a .exe from some random guy on the Internet and then run it? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: cryptouse on August 08, 2017, 07:28:53 PM is there already compiled version for windows ?
regards Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: damNmad on August 08, 2017, 07:34:54 PM [2017-08-08 12:56:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.82 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:15] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.98 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:16] GPU #6: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.57 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:17] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.37 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:17] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.19 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:17] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 17.18 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:17] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 16.89 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:25] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 16.90 MH/s [2017-08-08 12:56:25] accepted: 2/2 (diff 2.193), 121.88 MH/s yes! can please someone confirm that this is normal hashrate für 1060 Cards? I think it is to low Yes, it's normal You can downclock memory to -400, core + 170~190, PL 70% and set intensity to 25 to obtain better results Everything else seems ok, but intensity doesn't seem to work!! Though I set it as '-i 25' its still taking it as 21! Any work around for this?? Thanks for sharing your OC settings/suggestions. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: astronyu on August 08, 2017, 07:54:02 PM I built the project from source on windows but I got allocation errors. The compiled binary is here : sendspace <DOT> com/file/yxp59j It is preferable to build it yourself to avoid any embedded viruses... How to build. Please give a step by step guide. thanks You need: - Visual Studio 2013 (Free edition) - CUDA ToolKit 8 - GIT And do the following : git clone https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx git clone https://github.com/peters/curl-for-windows.git compat/curl-for-windows Copy the second project inside the first project (you will see a folder called "compat") Then open the ccminer.sln project using Visual Studio, and then BUILD/Compile Where did you download VS2013 from? I tried but download was not available on Microsoft. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: morcus on August 08, 2017, 08:33:32 PM I built the project from source on windows but I got allocation errors. The compiled binary is here : sendspace <DOT> com/file/yxp59j It is preferable to build it yourself to avoid any embedded viruses... How to build. Please give a step by step guide. thanks You need: - Visual Studio 2013 (Free edition) - CUDA ToolKit 8 - GIT And do the following : git clone https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx git clone https://github.com/peters/curl-for-windows.git compat/curl-for-windows Copy the second project inside the first project (you will see a folder called "compat") Then open the ccminer.sln project using Visual Studio, and then BUILD/Compile Where did you download VS2013 from? I tried but download was not available on Microsoft. I took it a long time ago on the microsoft website. It seems to be available on this link but you need to create an account : https://www.visualstudio.com/vs/older-downloads/ Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: EvilMonkey on August 08, 2017, 08:40:48 PM https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx Absolutely free - no fee's, no viruses, etc. Based on Alexis Provos code. :) :) :) tested on linux, no win version now -( But You can compile! 1080Ti: Code: [2017-08-07 13:22:41] accepted: 58/59 (diff 1.720), 99.51 MH/s yes! Feel free to donate SIGT BLq8t6NQrfRC8kFyrvZ5YMGY33SVCQBeT4 I don't trust people posting here. I had all sorts of errors trying to compile. If you added already compiled versions to your Git I am sure people would do alot more donating. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: dexxa05 on August 08, 2017, 08:41:37 PM Hi Guys,
How much did you get with normal 1080s not the TI ?! Thx in advance Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: brosub2942 on August 08, 2017, 08:51:32 PM Any available version for windows 10?
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: MnngSprvsr on August 08, 2017, 09:00:53 PM https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx Absolutely free - no fee's, no viruses, etc. Based on Alexis Provos code. :) :) :) tested on linux, no win version now -( But You can compile! 1080Ti: Code: [2017-08-07 13:22:41] accepted: 58/59 (diff 1.720), 99.51 MH/s yes! Feel free to donate SIGT BLq8t6NQrfRC8kFyrvZ5YMGY33SVCQBeT4 I don't trust people posting here. I had all sorts of errors trying to compile. If you added already compiled versions to your Git I am sure people would do alot more donating. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: ConAim on August 08, 2017, 09:19:51 PM Any available version for windows 10? Get if from xnoom's GitHub. I belived it was forked from krnlx with x64 compile fixed. I tested it... https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: konqueror on August 08, 2017, 09:24:29 PM Any available version for windows 10? Get if from xnoom's GitHub. I belived it was forked from krnlx with x64 compile fixed. I tested it... https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52 I don't believe there is such a stupid person in this forum, who will download miner shared by a newbie. But who knows... ??? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: continuousminer on August 08, 2017, 09:28:12 PM C:\Users\user\Downloads\PortableGit\ccminer-skunk-krnlx\ccminer.vcxproj : error : Unable to read the project file "ccminer.vcxproj".
C:\Users\user\Downloads\PortableGit\ccminer-skunk-krnlx\ccminer.vcxproj(42,5): The imported project "C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft.Cpp\v4.0\V120\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 8.0.props" was not found. Confirm that the path in the <Import> declaration is correct, and that the file exists on disk. Is the above error I get. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: ConAim on August 08, 2017, 09:30:11 PM C:\Users\user\Downloads\PortableGit\ccminer-skunk-krnlx\ccminer.vcxproj : error : Unable to read the project file "ccminer.vcxproj". C:\Users\user\Downloads\PortableGit\ccminer-skunk-krnlx\ccminer.vcxproj(42,5): The imported project "C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft.Cpp\v4.0\V120\BuildCustomizations\CUDA 8.0.props" was not found. Confirm that the path in the <Import> declaration is correct, and that the file exists on disk. Is the above error I get. Download and install CUDA 8.0 Toolkit Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: PolarFiasco on August 08, 2017, 10:00:34 PM Any available version for windows 10? Get if from xnoom's GitHub. I belived it was forked from krnlx with x64 compile fixed. I tested it... https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52 I don't believe there is such a stupid person in this forum, who will download miner shared by a newbie. But who knows... ??? VirusTotal scan: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/cc44706a0bb0a9d38f680697287e3c13fa2b3ac52deb42fc3bb71c607cdf06ed/analysis/1502229385/ Looks like you might be on to something about the noobs... Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Brucelats on August 08, 2017, 10:18:08 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe Fu*k, I seen ppl reporting this one having a Trojan and i downloaded and tried this version on 3 of my rigs. Any idea how to clean my pc properly now in case it was infected? :/ Dynamite it !! Nahh im srs. I mean, ok, i deleted the files, but what if trojan horse got somewhere after i ran the app? Should avira be enough? Only surefire way is to wipe the machine completely and reinstall everything from the OS on up. Be sure to do a full reformat of the SDD/HDD as well before reinstalling. The file may also have contained a worm that spread to other systems on your network, so you may want to check any other computers you may own over thoroughly as well. As was suggested earlier, if you have wallets on any of those systems you may want to consider transferring the balances to a secure wallet first and just hope the Trojan is not lying in wait for you to unlock your wallet before front running you. Wipe those systems as well afterwards and reinstall everything fresh. Are these steps a lot of work? Yes, but what do you expect when you download a .exe from some random guy on the Internet and then run it? True, altough BitPorium is a Hero Member and seemed legit after short investigation. If he just compiled, dunno how trojan/virus appeared? I'll do that. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: ConAim on August 08, 2017, 10:34:58 PM Any available version for windows 10? Get if from xnoom's GitHub. I belived it was forked from krnlx with x64 compile fixed. I tested it... https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52 I don't believe there is such a stupid person in this forum, who will download miner shared by a newbie. But who knows... ??? I use my best practice to test stuffs... - Download source code from GitHub, investigate any suspected codes or protocols or DLL access,.... - Compile exe from source code. - Dup a windows clean images with everything pre-setup on a USB/SSD (use a duplicator). - Test. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: xcougarx on August 08, 2017, 10:53:09 PM I compiled my own.
VS 2017 community does not work. VS 2013 community works. I reinstalled cuda 8.0 after vs2013, it would not work if cuda is installed before, in my case after vs2017. It looks for whitelisted VS versions. Debug build was default and broken for me (was too old compute model wise I believe given it kept running out of memory), choosing "release" "win32" from main window's drop down worked. I get very close numbers , ~0.5% more than palgin with 1080 tis the way I run them. For me it was not worth the effort for the minor result improvement, I do prefer to use a binary I know is clean. Can cuda 7.5 coexist with 8.0 installation? I can attempt that also. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: xnoom on August 08, 2017, 11:38:24 PM Any available version for windows 10? Get if from xnoom's GitHub. I belived it was forked from krnlx with x64 compile fixed. I tested it... https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52 I don't believe there is such a stupid person in this forum, who will download miner shared by a newbie. But who knows... ??? VirusTotal scan: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/cc44706a0bb0a9d38f680697287e3c13fa2b3ac52deb42fc3bb71c607cdf06ed/analysis/1502229385/ Looks like you might be on to something about the noobs... I never put any virus into it, just check after ziped when unzip I got the virus warning and remove my file. My computer got virus don't know where came from, I will remove all file and re-install windows. Dot'n have time to clean another 2 rigs, just keep running. :'( Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: maxmad_x on August 08, 2017, 11:57:23 PM Any available version for windows 10? Get if from xnoom's GitHub. I belived it was forked from krnlx with x64 compile fixed. I tested it... https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52 I don't believe there is such a stupid person in this forum, who will download miner shared by a newbie. But who knows... ??? VirusTotal scan: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/cc44706a0bb0a9d38f680697287e3c13fa2b3ac52deb42fc3bb71c607cdf06ed/analysis/1502229385/ Looks like you might be on to something about the noobs... I never put any virus into it, just check after ziped when unzip I got the virus warning and remove my file. My computer got virus don't know where came from, I will remove all file and re-install windows. Dot'n have time to clean another 2 rigs, just keep running. :'( I am pretty certain that these are all regular CCminer related positive results. I am almost sure that this one is clean Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Brucelats on August 09, 2017, 12:03:30 AM Any available version for windows 10? Get if from xnoom's GitHub. I belived it was forked from krnlx with x64 compile fixed. I tested it... https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52 I don't believe there is such a stupid person in this forum, who will download miner shared by a newbie. But who knows... ??? VirusTotal scan: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/cc44706a0bb0a9d38f680697287e3c13fa2b3ac52deb42fc3bb71c607cdf06ed/analysis/1502229385/ Looks like you might be on to something about the noobs... I never put any virus into it, just check after ziped when unzip I got the virus warning and remove my file. My computer got virus don't know where came from, I will remove all file and re-install windows. Dot'n have time to clean another 2 rigs, just keep running. :'( I am pretty certain that these are all regular CCminer related positive results. I am almost sure that this one is clean What about other CC miner binaries for win x64 and x32, posted from hero member on second page? Does anyone have safe binary for x32? i dont have VS studio. x32 hashes better then x64 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: PolarFiasco on August 09, 2017, 12:07:37 AM Any available version for windows 10? Get if from xnoom's GitHub. I belived it was forked from krnlx with x64 compile fixed. I tested it... https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52 I don't believe there is such a stupid person in this forum, who will download miner shared by a newbie. But who knows... ??? VirusTotal scan: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/cc44706a0bb0a9d38f680697287e3c13fa2b3ac52deb42fc3bb71c607cdf06ed/analysis/1502229385/ Looks like you might be on to something about the noobs... I never put any virus into it, just check after ziped when unzip I got the virus warning and remove my file. My computer got virus don't know where came from, I will remove all file and re-install windows. Dot'n have time to clean another 2 rigs, just keep running. :'( I am pretty certain that these are all regular CCminer related positive results. I am almost sure that this one is clean This one is completely bogus. The source is just krlnx source with no modifications. It is CUDA 8 not CUDA 7.5 as claimed. The VT scan is not typical results of ccminer. Download a version from links from ccminer.org and scan one of those on VT and see the difference. Those don't have win32.malware-gen or Trojan.gen2 results. But hey, use it if you want. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: thebigjdoe on August 09, 2017, 12:12:34 AM Do people actually store wallets on their mining machines?
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: PolarFiasco on August 09, 2017, 12:16:17 AM Any available version for windows 10? Get if from xnoom's GitHub. I belived it was forked from krnlx with x64 compile fixed. I tested it... https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52 I don't believe there is such a stupid person in this forum, who will download miner shared by a newbie. But who knows... ??? VirusTotal scan: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/cc44706a0bb0a9d38f680697287e3c13fa2b3ac52deb42fc3bb71c607cdf06ed/analysis/1502229385/ Looks like you might be on to something about the noobs... I never put any virus into it, just check after ziped when unzip I got the virus warning and remove my file. My computer got virus don't know where came from, I will remove all file and re-install windows. Dot'n have time to clean another 2 rigs, just keep running. :'( I am pretty certain that these are all regular CCminer related positive results. I am almost sure that this one is clean What about other CC miner binaries for win x64 and x32, posted from hero member on second page? Does anyone have safe binary for x32? i dont have VS studio. x32 hashes better then x64 This is the only member I would trust on this thread (and no offense to anyone...well maybe some this kind of stuff is bad for crypto) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20703817#msg20703817 It is 64bit but runs as good as the 32bit build I did for myself. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: maxmad_x on August 09, 2017, 12:17:24 AM actually I tried it for some time. Kept log of every entry of connecting to internet and it did not connect to any other server and any other port than what I assigned. But I can be very well wrong and might be at risk of virus. So I will still purge my system. Just to be safe
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: ConAim on August 09, 2017, 12:28:07 AM Any available version for windows 10? Get if from xnoom's GitHub. I belived it was forked from krnlx with x64 compile fixed. I tested it... https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52 I don't believe there is such a stupid person in this forum, who will download miner shared by a newbie. But who knows... ??? VirusTotal scan: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/cc44706a0bb0a9d38f680697287e3c13fa2b3ac52deb42fc3bb71c607cdf06ed/analysis/1502229385/ Looks like you might be on to something about the noobs... I never put any virus into it, just check after ziped when unzip I got the virus warning and remove my file. My computer got virus don't know where came from, I will remove all file and re-install windows. Dot'n have time to clean another 2 rigs, just keep running. :'( I am pretty certain that these are all regular CCminer related positive results. I am almost sure that this one is clean This one is completely bogus. The source is just krlnx source with no modifications. It is CUDA 8 not CUDA 7.5 as claimed. The VT scan is not typical results of ccminer. Download a version from links from ccminer.org and scan one of those on VT and see the difference. Those don't have win32.malware-gen or Trojan.gen2 results. But hey, use it if you want. Great ideas, here is the result from tprusvot latest version of ccminer.exe: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/36350644cdfa78b4d43cf164339e88277a7a3447c2bec602fd3f1916bb08036f/analysis/ I wondered if tprusvot planted the virus-gus all these times... ROFL Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: PolarFiasco on August 09, 2017, 12:41:00 AM Any available version for windows 10? Get if from xnoom's GitHub. I belived it was forked from krnlx with x64 compile fixed. I tested it... https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52 I don't believe there is such a stupid person in this forum, who will download miner shared by a newbie. But who knows... ??? VirusTotal scan: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/cc44706a0bb0a9d38f680697287e3c13fa2b3ac52deb42fc3bb71c607cdf06ed/analysis/1502229385/ Looks like you might be on to something about the noobs... I never put any virus into it, just check after ziped when unzip I got the virus warning and remove my file. My computer got virus don't know where came from, I will remove all file and re-install windows. Dot'n have time to clean another 2 rigs, just keep running. :'( I am pretty certain that these are all regular CCminer related positive results. I am almost sure that this one is clean This one is completely bogus. The source is just krlnx source with no modifications. It is CUDA 8 not CUDA 7.5 as claimed. The VT scan is not typical results of ccminer. Download a version from links from ccminer.org and scan one of those on VT and see the difference. Those don't have win32.malware-gen or Trojan.gen2 results. But hey, use it if you want. Great ideas, here is the result from tprusvot latest version of ccminer.exe: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/36350644cdfa78b4d43cf164339e88277a7a3447c2bec602fd3f1916bb08036f/analysis/ I wondered if tprusvot planted the virus-gus all these times... ROFL Wow...I did not believe you so I just scanned 2.1 myself and yes...it matches so good point and I guess fuck me. I have scanned previous versions and did not see results like this, just the bitcoin miner flags. Weird that my local build of this source does not look that way: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/bf3afb527ef9fcc198545e21401346d1bbb4140b8cb6e84b6b488046cb13fae4/analysis/ Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Epsylon3 on August 09, 2017, 03:59:56 AM Antivirus doesnt like UPX (which compress the binary from 50MB to 15MB) and me i dont like 50MB binaries
As antiviruses also dont like normal binaries freshly compiled, i dont care anymore Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: astronyu on August 09, 2017, 04:32:38 AM I built the project from source on windows but I got allocation errors. The compiled binary is here : sendspace <DOT> com/file/yxp59j It is preferable to build it yourself to avoid any embedded viruses... How to build. Please give a step by step guide. thanks You need: - Visual Studio 2013 (Free edition) - CUDA ToolKit 8 - GIT And do the following : git clone https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx git clone https://github.com/peters/curl-for-windows.git compat/curl-for-windows Copy the second project inside the first project (you will see a folder called "compat") Then open the ccminer.sln project using Visual Studio, and then BUILD/Compile Where did you download VS2013 from? I tried but download was not available on Microsoft. I took it a long time ago on the microsoft website. It seems to be available on this link but you need to create an account : https://www.visualstudio.com/vs/older-downloads/ Nope, its gone from that site. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: gregfromo on August 09, 2017, 05:11:06 AM here is the link where i got vs2013 from
https://www.computerbase.de/downloads/systemtools/entwicklung/visual-studio-2013/ p.s. what needs to be changed to compile agaist cuda 7.5 sdk (already installed)? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Amph on August 09, 2017, 10:50:47 AM what setting for the 30Mh +? with this version i'm getting less than the sp mod5 what is the intensity here to set, 25?
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: huyhoang on August 09, 2017, 10:59:08 AM Anyone try out with 1060 yet? is this good, and how is the hashrate?
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: ConAim on August 09, 2017, 12:53:59 PM I built the project from source on windows but I got allocation errors. The compiled binary is here : sendspace <DOT> com/file/yxp59j It is preferable to build it yourself to avoid any embedded viruses... How to build. Please give a step by step guide. thanks You need: - Visual Studio 2013 (Free edition) - CUDA ToolKit 8 - GIT And do the following : git clone https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx git clone https://github.com/peters/curl-for-windows.git compat/curl-for-windows Copy the second project inside the first project (you will see a folder called "compat") Then open the ccminer.sln project using Visual Studio, and then BUILD/Compile Where did you download VS2013 from? I tried but download was not available on Microsoft. I took it a long time ago on the microsoft website. It seems to be available on this link but you need to create an account : https://www.visualstudio.com/vs/older-downloads/ Nope, its gone from that site. https://www.visualstudio.com/dev-essentials/ Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: astronyu on August 09, 2017, 02:32:48 PM I built the project from source on windows but I got allocation errors. The compiled binary is here : sendspace <DOT> com/file/yxp59j It is preferable to build it yourself to avoid any embedded viruses... How to build. Please give a step by step guide. thanks You need: - Visual Studio 2013 (Free edition) - CUDA ToolKit 8 - GIT And do the following : git clone https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx git clone https://github.com/peters/curl-for-windows.git compat/curl-for-windows Copy the second project inside the first project (you will see a folder called "compat") Then open the ccminer.sln project using Visual Studio, and then BUILD/Compile Where did you download VS2013 from? I tried but download was not available on Microsoft. I took it a long time ago on the microsoft website. It seems to be available on this link but you need to create an account : https://www.visualstudio.com/vs/older-downloads/ Nope, its gone from that site. https://www.visualstudio.com/dev-essentials/ Thanks, downloading now. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: mirny on August 09, 2017, 03:37:28 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe Fu*k, I seen ppl reporting this one having a Trojan and i downloaded and tried this version on 3 of my rigs. Any idea how to clean my pc properly now in case it was infected? :/ Dynamite it !! Nahh im srs. I mean, ok, i deleted the files, but what if trojan horse got somewhere after i ran the app? Should avira be enough? The best thing you can do is, format whole drive, and install fresh copy of your os. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Za1n on August 09, 2017, 05:36:21 PM Here is a windows binary built from the source. No mods made. Just a build. Can confirm it works on my gtx 970 nothing else. As for hashrate it seemed a little lower than spmod3 but I was at i 16. And here is the 64 bit release.Here you go. I uploaded to a few places ufile<dot>io/haxxr nofile<dot>io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe cheers Maybe? a tip? But not needed or necesary! Tip the dev better. B8zNWAJiQ5AEVdLZJDZfiQ2WDxYy72w1RG nofile<dot>io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe Fu*k, I seen ppl reporting this one having a Trojan and i downloaded and tried this version on 3 of my rigs. Any idea how to clean my pc properly now in case it was infected? :/ Dynamite it !! Nahh im srs. I mean, ok, i deleted the files, but what if trojan horse got somewhere after i ran the app? Should avira be enough? Only surefire way is to wipe the machine completely and reinstall everything from the OS on up. Be sure to do a full reformat of the SDD/HDD as well before reinstalling. The file may also have contained a worm that spread to other systems on your network, so you may want to check any other computers you may own over thoroughly as well. As was suggested earlier, if you have wallets on any of those systems you may want to consider transferring the balances to a secure wallet first and just hope the Trojan is not lying in wait for you to unlock your wallet before front running you. Wipe those systems as well afterwards and reinstall everything fresh. Are these steps a lot of work? Yes, but what do you expect when you download a .exe from some random guy on the Internet and then run it? True, altough BitPorium is a Hero Member and seemed legit after short investigation. If he just compiled, dunno how trojan/virus appeared? I'll do that. Yeah, I did not necessarily mean to disparage BitPorium in my post, but the point is we are all essentially strangers to one another. Even going by rank or trust is still trusting an unknown person as accounts can be sold so you cannot even know for certain if the person is the same one who started the account. Also, if you read through the later comments, even BitPorium himself was uncertain and recommended to not use that version any longer. Myself, I think it may have indeed been a false positive as many antivirus vendors adopt a better safe than sorry attitude when it comes to mining software and will aggressively flag any miner as probably 95%+ of their customers do not run miners. But anyway, the poster I was replying to indicated he was fearful of a Trojan and asked how he could be sure he completely removed it. My response was to address that concern specifically and the only way to be sure is to do a complete wipe and reinstall from known clean source material. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Yerbabie on August 10, 2017, 12:19:14 AM SO... is there a new clean version of the file anywhere for windows, 32bit / 7.5 Cuda, as this seems to work the best? surely there must be someone in here who can provide a clean file with some decent ethics.
Cheers, Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: nullifies on August 10, 2017, 12:55:52 AM I'm getting 25 Mh now instead of 18 w/ a 980Ti. Thanks!
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Erotic Toothpaste on August 10, 2017, 01:15:47 AM I got a decent bump from about 93 MH/s to about 99-100 MH/s when I first started using this. Now it's back down to 91-93. Any idea why it would drop? I haven't changed my settings and my gpu's aren't throttling. I'm confused.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: santan on August 10, 2017, 05:54:07 AM Even if we don't know personally...... still i am 100% sure that file provided by Epsilon is CLEAN, and we can use blindly.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Haldon on August 10, 2017, 06:08:28 AM Don't waste your time mining signatum, it's done.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: krnlx on August 10, 2017, 06:46:56 AM Code updated. Up to 52.5 mh on stock 1080ti
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: krnlx on August 10, 2017, 06:54:57 AM 1070 cards got speedup to.
I am getting best results with -i 26 on ti and -i 25 on 1070 with last updates, stock cards. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: gilbertloong on August 10, 2017, 08:02:12 AM is there version for windows?
not sure how it works. tried few way, it seem unable to launch it. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: coinzoid on August 10, 2017, 08:43:10 AM If Windows version is still not available I can ask my team of developers to compile one. However, they will require some donations. If anyone with large gpus interested in, feel free to pm me.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: gregfromo on August 10, 2017, 09:18:07 AM who want to download, compiled from the latest git:
ccminer_krnlx170810.7z (http://www48.zippyshare.com/v/flkMq9uF/file.html) 3 exe x86 cuda 8.0 & 7.5 x64 cuda 8.0 x64 cuda 7.5 doesn't compile, errors all are upx --lzma compressed thanks to all developers making this available. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bignevola on August 10, 2017, 09:49:56 AM who want to download, compiled from the latest git: ccminer_krnlx170810.7z (http://www48.zippyshare.com/v/flkMq9uF/file.html) 3 exe x86 cuda 8.0 & 7.5 x64 cuda 8.0 x64 cuda 7.5 doesn't compile, errors all are upx --lzma compressed thanks to all developers making this available. Thanx for compiled version. Could you help me how can setup this to my pool? Where/how can I put my .bat file? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Michael20 on August 10, 2017, 10:17:45 AM Possibly in nicehash? How?
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Juniormkl on August 10, 2017, 10:30:28 AM who want to download, compiled from the latest git: ccminer_krnlx170810.7z (http://www48.zippyshare.com/v/flkMq9uF/file.html) 3 exe x86 cuda 8.0 & 7.5 x64 cuda 8.0 x64 cuda 7.5 doesn't compile, errors all are upx --lzma compressed thanks to all developers making this available. Thanks dude, this version is pretty good, around 55Mh/s on gtx 1080Ti +135 on core Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: rednoW on August 10, 2017, 10:52:52 AM cuda 7.5 x64 compile from krnlx github
equihash excluded as it caused build errors I like x64 builds - they have temp monitoring both maxwell and pascal work https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4flkNGCHIGFbnF5TktUTEtsRW8 52mhs 1080ti @80%tdp Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bignevola on August 10, 2017, 11:07:24 AM Works great ;)
44mhs @ 1080 ti Afterburner settings: - Core Voltage: 0 - Power Limit: 75% - Temp. Limit: 75 c - Core clock: +100MHz - Memory Clock: +600MHz. Any suggestions to get even better result? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: gregfromo on August 10, 2017, 11:10:04 AM cuda 7.5 x64 compile from krnlx github equihash excluded as it caused build errors I like x64 builds - they have temp monitoring both maxwell and pascal work https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4flkNGCHIGFbnF5TktUTEtsRW8 52mhs 1080ti @80%tdp @rednoW would you mind to explain how to exclude the part that is causing the errors from the build process, I'd like to test it myself? I just doing this for 2 days and could need some assistance. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: rednoW on August 10, 2017, 11:20:44 AM cuda 7.5 x64 compile from krnlx github equihash excluded as it caused build errors I like x64 builds - they have temp monitoring both maxwell and pascal work https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4flkNGCHIGFbnF5TktUTEtsRW8 52mhs 1080ti @80%tdp @rednoW would you mind to explain how to exclude the part that is causing the errors from the build process, I'd like to test it myself? I just doing this for 2 days and could need some assistance. Well, I'm not sure I make it in an easiest way )) I deleted equihash branch from project tree and commented out all equihash function calls in ccminer.cpp and util.cpp. Guess that it was not necessary, try to remove compute_62 from nvidia compiler options, it seems to hardcoded for equihash and not supported by cuda 7.5 compiler)) Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: rednoW on August 10, 2017, 11:22:08 AM Works great ;) 44mhs @ 1080 ti Afterburner settings: - Core Voltage: 0 - Power Limit: 75% - Temp. Limit: 75 c - Core clock: +100MHz - Memory Clock: +600MHz. Any suggestions to get even better result? no need to mem overclock, try to reduce mem clock as much as possible Use -i 26 for 1080ti Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: deepWebRun on August 10, 2017, 12:31:24 PM Compiled ccminer-skunk_krnlx-rednoW-build is marginally faster than SP-mod #3 and #5. Great job, thank you!
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: serg_25 on August 10, 2017, 12:33:05 PM no need to mem overclock, try to reduce mem clock as much as possible Use -i 26 for 1080ti You right, no need to overclock mem. Was checking with\without overclock. Result is same. Code: [2017-08-10 14:49:08] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 53.18 MH/s Btw this is -i 25. 26 for me is toooo luggy. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: falconrus on August 10, 2017, 12:39:28 PM Hello !
I m trying change stratum difficulty d=0.1 at suprnova but it dosnt work. ccminer: unsupported non-option argument 'd=0.1' Is it possible to change starting difficulty? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: notsure85 on August 10, 2017, 01:08:38 PM Code updated. Up to 52.5 mh on stock 1080ti you are awesome sir ! Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Brucelats on August 10, 2017, 02:03:07 PM Guys, can anyone please post best version of this krnlx miner? Compiled version.
I heard there are differencies between x64 and x32 and that x32 is faster? can someone reliable and trusted post x32? PLEASE !! This version posted on this page, is that trusted? :/ I am having troubles with compiling myself Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: gregfromo on August 10, 2017, 02:06:38 PM cuda 7.5 x64 compile from krnlx github equihash excluded as it caused build errors I like x64 builds - they have temp monitoring both maxwell and pascal work https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4flkNGCHIGFbnF5TktUTEtsRW8 52mhs 1080ti @80%tdp @rednoW would you mind to explain how to exclude the part that is causing the errors from the build process, I'd like to test it myself? I just doing this for 2 days and could need some assistance. Well, I'm not sure I make it in an easiest way )) I deleted equihash branch from project tree and commented out all equihash function calls in ccminer.cpp and util.cpp. Guess that it was not necessary, try to remove compute_62 from nvidia compiler options, it seems to hardcoded for equihash and not supported by cuda 7.5 compiler)) @rednoW thanks mate, you were right, removing the unsupported arch from the cuda build options for equihash did the trick. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: morcus on August 10, 2017, 03:08:02 PM Do you notice an improved performance using CUDA 7.5 over of 8?
I got +1MH using the last version of the code from the GIT + CUDA 8. x86 and x64 seems to be the same performance wise. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: gregfromo on August 10, 2017, 03:28:06 PM Do you notice an improved performance using CUDA 7.5 over of 8? I got +1MH using the last version of the code from the GIT + CUDA 8. x86 and x64 seems to be the same performance wise. x86 reboots my 1080/Ti rig (but all x86 caused reboot yet), the 1070 rig runs fine and +1MH faster x86 vs x64 x64 cuda 8.0 "faster" then 7.5 on 1080/Ti I'm talking about +1MH, same what you noticed YMMV Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: morcus on August 10, 2017, 04:05:13 PM Using the last build (x86) I have +1MH on my Gigabyte 1070 cards.
However, using the same build I have -1MH on my MSI 1070 Gaming X cards. Still using old build for the gaming X cards. Thank you for this miner software ;) Anybody here is using CWI to make the comparison? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Real_Unhooked on August 10, 2017, 04:07:40 PM who want to download, compiled from the latest git: ccminer_krnlx170810.7z (http://www48.zippyshare.com/v/flkMq9uF/file.html) 3 exe x86 cuda 8.0 & 7.5 x64 cuda 8.0 x64 cuda 7.5 doesn't compile, errors all are upx --lzma compressed thanks to all developers making this available. Wow! I received 5~6 MH/s increase when compared to ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80. \o https://i.imgur.com/G8vZfXz.png Thank you very much! Which of the 3 files did you use and what gpu? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Amph on August 10, 2017, 04:13:08 PM what setting for the 30Mh +? with this version i'm getting less than the sp mod5 what is the intensity here to set, 25? Set intensity to 25. ;) 68~69 MH/s now. https://i.imgur.com/YOnWqkE.png yeah but i get 27.7 MH versus 28.5 on sp mod 5 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Doncarlos74 on August 10, 2017, 04:37:12 PM Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Juniormkl on August 10, 2017, 04:41:19 PM Just tried the ccminerx64_170810_CUDA8.0, but always reboot my 1080Ti rigs, i tried 1 rig with spmod3 and 2 with this miner and both of ccminerx64_170810_CUDA8.0 reboot after 3 hours approximately, and the one with spmod3 still working fine, then i just swapped the miners on the rigs and the one with ccminerx64_170810_CUDA8.0 just reboot again, and the ones with spmod3 worked fine, any suggestions?
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: MarcusDe on August 10, 2017, 05:10:07 PM I just compiled on Windows, latest version
40MH on 1080 on stock settings. Good job mate! Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: gregfromo on August 10, 2017, 05:18:32 PM @krnlx
thank you for sharing with us. is there a chance to reduce CPU load for ccminer, like CWI claims do have done? I can't confirm if it's true, as I don't have ther binary to test. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: cashen on August 10, 2017, 05:23:37 PM My miner is showing great results but the pool side hash rate dropped.
gonna let it run a little bit. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Real_Unhooked on August 10, 2017, 05:43:12 PM I get best results with 32Bit and 7.5Cuda for my 1070s
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: chrysophylax on August 10, 2017, 05:45:10 PM what setting for the 30Mh +? with this version i'm getting less than the sp mod5 what is the intensity here to set, 25? Set intensity to 25. ;) 68~69 MH/s now. https://i.imgur.com/YOnWqkE.png yeah but i get 27.7 MH versus 28.5 on sp mod 5 tried our miner amph? ... #crysx Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: preda on August 10, 2017, 05:47:03 PM It's still profitable? Even after 30.000 block? Or all is changed?
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: ManuBBXX on August 10, 2017, 06:15:33 PM Best skunk miner EVER !
Even compairing with Sp mod #5 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: botmanside on August 10, 2017, 06:28:02 PM It's still profitable? Even after 30.000 block? Or all is changed? not sure of retarded, or just cant do the basic math though..... Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: preda on August 10, 2017, 06:33:27 PM It's still profitable? Even after 30.000 block? Or all is changed? not sure of retarded, or just cant do the basic math though..... Retarded to me??? Lmao you talk without use the brain really... I always help ppl without offending Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: ManuBBXX on August 10, 2017, 06:51:10 PM I just compiled on Windows, latest version 40MH on 1080 on stock settings. Good job mate! Man, you're the KING ! Would love to test it on my win10 install :) EDIT : What's the best mining pool between suprnova, sigt.POOL.MN, and yiimp sigt ? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Brucelats on August 10, 2017, 09:18:39 PM I just compiled on Windows, latest version 40MH on 1080 on stock settings. Good job mate! Man, you're the KING ! Would love to test it on my win10 install :) EDIT : What's the best mining pool between suprnova, sigt.POOL.MN, and yiimp sigt ? I wonder that also. All pools are really bad, that i am aware of. Calculations sux, no monitoring, no estimated earning and such. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: relayd on August 10, 2017, 10:47:39 PM I get near identical 17MH/s with -i 18 on a GTX 1060 6GB with this when compared to spmod5, however check your power usage this miner is very erratic (it goes up and down quite a bit) while spmod is stable. Anyone else noticed anything like this?
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: calculatorduck on August 10, 2017, 11:11:43 PM I get near identical 17MH/s with -i 18 on a GTX 1060 6GB with this when compared to spmod5, however check your power usage this miner is very erratic (it goes up and down quite a bit) while spmod is stable. Anyone else noticed anything like this? Ya my power usage is all over the place. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: relayd on August 10, 2017, 11:35:40 PM I'm trying the latest palginmod 1.1.1 just now it appears to be a little bit faster than spmod5 or this one for me (like 0.2-0.3 MH/s extra), power seems to be stable as well. You might need to update to latest Nvidia drivers if it complains about cuda cores not found. What's also interesting is that my temperatures are down as well.
https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/ EDIT: Actually nevermind, the hash stabilizes to near identical across all miners for me which is around 17.11 to 17.33 MH/s, but the temperature difference appears to be real down to 68C versus 70-72C on others, ambient is a stable 25C don't think that's a factor. A bit odd that at same settings I get different temps on different miners. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: preda on August 10, 2017, 11:47:08 PM I'm trying the latest palginmod 1.1.1 just now it appears to be a little bit faster than spmod5 or this one for me (like 0.2-0.3 MH/s extra), power seems to be stable as well. You might need to update to latest Nvidia drivers if it complains about cuda cores not found. What's also interesting is that my temperatures are down as well. https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/ The best performance i am getting with the New ccminer skunk-krnlx Fork With Faster SkunkHash Performance is giving me with gtx 1060 +140 core +0 memory +100% tdp 19mh each The proof https://s28.postimg.org/75i3lobul/20170811_014941.png (https://postimg.org/image/hfkikx1q1/) Just the problem is mining at 95mh whattomine say i should get 4.70 hour instead i get 3.8 coin hour Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: ManuBBXX on August 10, 2017, 11:59:44 PM With skunk-krnlx, I have 20.3 mhs on my 1060 6gb at 75% power limit, +137 core - 400mem :)
best result ever for me 32 mhs on my 1070 at 75% power limit too MarcuDe spoke about a version of the miner wich is 40mhs on 1080.. That's insane hashrate ! Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: philux on August 11, 2017, 12:02:01 AM Performance with Asus gtx 1070 +180 core -500 memory +85% tdp i 25 = 29.51mh
I am far away of the 35mh ...but the guy who said he had 35mh did not published his settings... Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: relayd on August 11, 2017, 12:54:19 AM What do u get without any changes to clocks and intensity set to -i 18?
I can reach to 20 MH/s but computer is not responsive at 24/25. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Artama on August 11, 2017, 01:25:33 AM hi. i am very new with NVDIA. can someone pls help me with this algo? i cant make it work with my gtx 1080 ti. Thank you
https://image.prntscr.com/image/5GnfGlYqQICDpmnIz1mEVA.jpg Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: sundownz on August 11, 2017, 02:28:14 AM ccminer.org/preview/ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80.7z and curl is on the git, no need to rebuild that except if you want to use VS2015 (VS2017 requires cuda 9, but this kernel is not compatible) I just say: i love you! :D 24 MH/s for 33 MH/s in my 1080. 65~66 MH/s in total (2x 1080). ;D The link shared by Epsylon is working for me under Windows 10 as well & is faster than the other ccminer. Went from 36 to 48 so far on my 1080 Ti in my home office PC. ** Update : Increased TDP on the card and up to 51 now. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: relayd on August 11, 2017, 02:45:34 AM More objective testing, GTX 1060 6GB, intensity set to 18, all defaults except fan speed set to 67% & Memory Clock -202.
I noticed card gets a higher default clock sometimes and has power drops under krnlx. https://i.imgur.com/Wq2WlaZ.jpg Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: tamdc on August 11, 2017, 03:29:02 AM I'm trying the latest palginmod 1.1.1 just now it appears to be a little bit faster than spmod5 or this one for me (like 0.2-0.3 MH/s extra), power seems to be stable as well. You might need to update to latest Nvidia drivers if it complains about cuda cores not found. What's also interesting is that my temperatures are down as well. https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/ The best performance i am getting with the New ccminer skunk-krnlx Fork With Faster SkunkHash Performance is giving me with gtx 1060 +140 core +0 memory +100% tdp 19mh each The proof https://s28.postimg.org/75i3lobul/20170811_014941.png (https://postimg.org/image/hfkikx1q1/) Just the problem is mining at 95mh whattomine say i should get 4.70 hour instead i get 3.8 coin hour Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: 12edz on August 11, 2017, 04:09:41 AM More objective testing, GTX 1060 6GB, intensity set to 18, all defaults except fan speed set to 67% & Memory Clock -202. I noticed card gets a higher default clock sometimes and has power drops under krnlx. https://i.imgur.com/Wq2WlaZ.jpg From a screenshot winner still on SP5, right? Can you compare with SP3? Thanks Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: MnngSprvsr on August 11, 2017, 04:57:33 AM it that normal (see sreenshot)?
Hashrate goes permanantly up an down? If the Miner runs for eth the hashrate constant https://pasteboard.co/GF6EPoG.png Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: KaydenC on August 11, 2017, 05:42:54 AM Tried all the miners available. I don't see much improvement over palgin's original mod hence I'm staying with that for now.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Amph on August 11, 2017, 05:49:16 AM what setting for the 30Mh +? with this version i'm getting less than the sp mod5 what is the intensity here to set, 25? Set intensity to 25. ;) 68~69 MH/s now. https://i.imgur.com/YOnWqkE.png yeah but i get 27.7 MH versus 28.5 on sp mod 5 tried our miner amph? ... #crysx no i need to send you a pm right? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: preda on August 11, 2017, 07:53:41 AM I just compiled on Windows, latest version 40MH on 1080 on stock settings. Good job mate! Share, please? ;D ccminer -a skunk -o stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106 -u x.x -p x d=0.1 -i 24 pause Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: MATHReX on August 11, 2017, 08:42:50 AM Well, tbh this miner does improve overall hashrate in comparison with other miners for skunkhash. 7x GTX 1060 and doing 118 MH/s while on other miners they were doing 112 MH/s with identical settings on Win 10. Good work, but yes power fluctuation is all over the place.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: stefanosm on August 11, 2017, 09:00:34 AM Hi all,
My results with: ccminerx64_170810_CUDA8.0.exe 1x Asus GTX 1080 TI STRIX: ~50.2 MH/s (GPU Clock +140, Mem Clock -500, Power Target 80%) 4x Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB: ~16.3 MH/s (GPU Clock +137, Mem Clock -400, Power Target 50%) Power at the wall: 480W I've achieved 55+MH with the 1080ti and nearly 20Mh with the 1060 ones, but I must stay below 500W total usage http://imgur.com/a/3W4ez Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: HeroKung on August 11, 2017, 09:17:38 AM https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx Absolutely free - no fee's, no viruses, etc. Based on Alexis Provos code. :) :) :) tested on linux, no win version now -( But You can compile! 1080Ti: Code: [2017-08-10 09:40:13] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 52.54 MH/s Feel free to donate SIGT BLq8t6NQrfRC8kFyrvZ5YMGY33SVCQBeT4 thank you for your good work ^^" Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: calculatorduck on August 11, 2017, 09:58:18 AM Any reason the power fluctuates so much? Is it the algo or the miner?
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: gregfromo on August 11, 2017, 10:15:26 AM I'm trying the latest palginmod 1.1.1 just now it appears to be a little bit faster than spmod5 or this one for me (like 0.2-0.3 MH/s extra), power seems to be stable as well. You might need to update to latest Nvidia drivers if it complains about cuda cores not found. What's also interesting is that my temperatures are down as well. https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/ EDIT: Actually nevermind, the hash stabilizes to near identical across all miners for me which is around 17.11 to 17.33 MH/s, but the temperature difference appears to be real down to 68C versus 70-72C on others, ambient is a stable 25C don't think that's a factor. A bit odd that at same settings I get different temps on different miners. just tried to build it from source.zip, but no skunk in the download :( Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: shubaduba on August 11, 2017, 10:32:51 AM I've got 57.5 MH/s on 1080ti (AORUS enthusiast model) @95% TDP +70 core -1000 memclock
And 32.5MH/s on 1070 @95% TDP +70 core -500 memclock https://i.imgur.com/L40hDK0.png Update: on my second rig Zotac 1080ti Extreme doing up to 60 MH/s at 95% TDP Thank you for doing great job! You are awesome! Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: stefanosm on August 11, 2017, 10:39:13 AM I've got 57.5 MH/s on 1080ti (AORUS enthusiast model) @95% TDP +70 core -1000 memclock And 32.5MH/s on 1070 @95% TDP +70 core -500 memclock https://i.imgur.com/L40hDK0.png Update: on my second rig Zotac 1080ti Extreme doing up to 60 MH/s at 95% TDP Thank you for doing great job! You are awesome! Really nice! Sorry for my newbie question, but what is the name of the gpu monitoring software? It looks really cool! Thanks! Steve Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Nokia555 on August 11, 2017, 10:45:29 AM krlnx monitoring is supported by www.ethmonitoring.com (http://www.ethmonitoring.com)
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: shubaduba on August 11, 2017, 10:53:59 AM Really nice! This is nvidia inspector.Sorry for my newbie question, but what is the name of the gpu monitoring software? It looks really cool! Thanks! Steve With this utility you can adjust memclock to -1000. Also, you can make different presets to change settings in 1 click. Command strings from my .bat file, for example: nvidiaInspector.exe -setBaseClockOffset:0,0,65 -setMemoryClockOffset:0,0,-1000 -setPowerTarget:0,97 -setTempTarget:0,0,71 -setFanSpeed:0,60 nvidiaInspector.exe -setBaseClockOffset:1,0,80 -setMemoryClockOffset:1,0,-1000 -setPowerTarget:1,90 -setTempTarget:1,0,71 -setFanSpeed:1,62 Could you please check the hashrate on the pool and the number of SIGT in a hour? It's known that the rate on software is 25-30% higher than the real rate on the pool. Yeah, I know that.Right now numbers at pool side are a bit lesser. About 5% less. Will check it later. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: MATHReX on August 11, 2017, 10:57:54 AM Well, I'll try to refine this thread by listing all the available compiled miners for windows and linux distros by community members to save people from all the searching:
I. An original open source non-compiled miner from krnlx (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=890540): Link: https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx (https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20683583#msg20683583 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20683583#msg20683583) II. Complied miner with krnlx code as base for Windows: 1) Compiled miner by BitPorium (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=10725): Link1 (32-bit): ufile.io/haxxr (http://ufile.io/haxxr) Link2 (32-bit): nofile.io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe (http://nofile.io/f/yLsTJy3dL9a/ccminer.exe) Link3 (64-bit): nofile.io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe (http://nofile.io/f/s49HoBZTqW0/ccminer.exe) Post (32-bit): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20692081#msg20692081 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20692081#msg20692081) Post (64-bit): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20692820#msg20692820 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20692820#msg20692820) 2) Compiled miner by Epsylon3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=374353): Link: ccminer.org/preview/ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80.7z (http://ccminer.org/preview/ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80.7z) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20703817#msg20703817 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20703817#msg20703817) 3) Compiled miner by xnoom (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1090830): Link(32-bit): https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/download/cuda7.5-32bits/ccminer-skunk.7z (https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/download/cuda7.5-32bits/ccminer-skunk.7z) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20705341#msg20705341 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20705341#msg20705341) Link(compute50/cuda7.5 x64): https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52 (https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20714666#msg20714666 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20714666#msg20714666) 4) Compiled miner by gregfromo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1049354): Link: http://www48.zippyshare.com/v/flkMq9uF/file.html (http://www48.zippyshare.com/v/flkMq9uF/file.html) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20761798#msg20761798 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20761798#msg20761798) 5) Compiled miner by rednoW (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=416241): Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4flkNGCHIGFbnF5TktUTEtsRW8/view?usp=drive_web (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4flkNGCHIGFbnF5TktUTEtsRW8/view?usp=drive_web) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20763943#msg20763943 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20763943#msg20763943) III. Compiled miner with krnlx code as base for linux distros: 1) Added to pimpOS by thesmokingman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=541760): Link: https://getpimp.org/shop/pimp/ (https://getpimp.org/shop/pimp/) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20693191#msg20693191 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20693191#msg20693191) 2) Compiled miner by jeblond (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1083261): Link1: https://ufile.io/kxlay (https://ufile.io/kxlay) Link2: https://www.file-upload.com/6m9ekmvm6qrz (https://www.file-upload.com/6m9ekmvm6qrz) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20713903#msg20713903 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20713903#msg20713903) SIGT Donations appreciated: Code: BBuHZWFNVEM6SP9DWRJ3owPAaCE4cqhAAf Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: NameTaken on August 11, 2017, 11:05:17 AM Nvidia provide convenient Docker build environment containers for compiling: https://hub.docker.com/r/nvidia/cuda/
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: car1999 on August 11, 2017, 11:40:50 AM this is the fastest skunk miner I've ever seen, but it is unstable, I always run into errors and crashes on ubuntu16.04, built with cuda7.5.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Amph on August 11, 2017, 12:17:32 PM what do you guys get on lower tdp such as 70%? it seems that this miner is only good on higher tdp, it lose speed if you reduce to much the power output
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 11, 2017, 12:36:35 PM WARNING: Do not let the reported hashrate in this miner fool you.
Track the SIGT generated over a few hours to determine if it actually yields more coins. For me this krnlx mod is very deceiving and gives less coins. Please stop posting your miners hashrate showing 30+ on 1070, 50+ on 1080 Ti. Its all garbage. Ive tracked the numbers over 6 hours of use and compared to it other mods such as sp3. So just a headsup PS: the power usage spikes along with gpu usage drops are very common every 2-3 min on each card. Just wanted everyone here to know the truth. Maybe an update to this is in order. That being said dont let the high hashrates fool you. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: NameTaken on August 11, 2017, 12:57:48 PM WARNING: Do not let the reported hashrate in this miner fool you. This is open source so you can fork the repo and submit any appropriate pull requests.Track the SIGT generated over a few hours to determine if it actually yeilds more coins. For me this krnlx mod is very deceiving and gives less coins. Please stop posting your miners hashrate showing 30+ on 1070, 50+ on 1080 Ti. Its all garbage. Ive tracked the numbers over 6 hours of use and compared to it other mods such as sp3. So just a headsup PS: the power usage spikes along with gpu usage drops are very common every 2-3 min on each card. Just wanted everyone here to know the truth. Maybe an update to this is in order. That being said dont let the high hashrates fool you. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 11, 2017, 01:07:03 PM WARNING: Do not let the reported hashrate in this miner fool you. This is open source so you can fork the repo and submit any appropriate pull requests.Track the SIGT generated over a few hours to determine if it actually yeilds more coins. For me this krnlx mod is very deceiving and gives less coins. Please stop posting your miners hashrate showing 30+ on 1070, 50+ on 1080 Ti. Its all garbage. Ive tracked the numbers over 6 hours of use and compared to it other mods such as sp3. So just a headsup PS: the power usage spikes along with gpu usage drops are very common every 2-3 min on each card. Just wanted everyone here to know the truth. Maybe an update to this is in order. That being said dont let the high hashrates fool you. Sorry im not sure what that means. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: rayday11 on August 11, 2017, 01:13:14 PM WARNING: Do not let the reported hashrate in this miner fool you. This is open source so you can fork the repo and submit any appropriate pull requests.Track the SIGT generated over a few hours to determine if it actually yeilds more coins. For me this krnlx mod is very deceiving and gives less coins. Please stop posting your miners hashrate showing 30+ on 1070, 50+ on 1080 Ti. Its all garbage. Ive tracked the numbers over 6 hours of use and compared to it other mods such as sp3. So just a headsup PS: the power usage spikes along with gpu usage drops are very common every 2-3 min on each card. Just wanted everyone here to know the truth. Maybe an update to this is in order. That being said dont let the high hashrates fool you. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: NameTaken on August 11, 2017, 01:17:06 PM WARNING: Do not let the reported hashrate in this miner fool you. This is open source so you can fork the repo and submit any appropriate pull requests.Track the SIGT generated over a few hours to determine if it actually yeilds more coins. For me this krnlx mod is very deceiving and gives less coins. Please stop posting your miners hashrate showing 30+ on 1070, 50+ on 1080 Ti. Its all garbage. Ive tracked the numbers over 6 hours of use and compared to it other mods such as sp3. So just a headsup PS: the power usage spikes along with gpu usage drops are very common every 2-3 min on each card. Just wanted everyone here to know the truth. Maybe an update to this is in order. That being said dont let the high hashrates fool you. Sorry im not sure what that means. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 11, 2017, 01:22:21 PM WARNING: Do not let the reported hashrate in this miner fool you. This is open source so you can fork the repo and submit any appropriate pull requests.Track the SIGT generated over a few hours to determine if it actually yeilds more coins. For me this krnlx mod is very deceiving and gives less coins. Please stop posting your miners hashrate showing 30+ on 1070, 50+ on 1080 Ti. Its all garbage. Ive tracked the numbers over 6 hours of use and compared to it other mods such as sp3. So just a headsup PS: the power usage spikes along with gpu usage drops are very common every 2-3 min on each card. Just wanted everyone here to know the truth. Maybe an update to this is in order. That being said dont let the high hashrates fool you. Sp mod 3 has worked much better than this as per trending. I cant speak to it being most stable but is better than krnlx (yields are consisitently higher but reported hashrate is lower. I get better yields by using a lower intensity on the sp3 mod also) . Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: alel on August 11, 2017, 01:32:34 PM WARNING: Do not let the reported hashrate in this miner fool you. This is open source so you can fork the repo and submit any appropriate pull requests.Track the SIGT generated over a few hours to determine if it actually yeilds more coins. For me this krnlx mod is very deceiving and gives less coins. Please stop posting your miners hashrate showing 30+ on 1070, 50+ on 1080 Ti. Its all garbage. Ive tracked the numbers over 6 hours of use and compared to it other mods such as sp3. So just a headsup PS: the power usage spikes along with gpu usage drops are very common every 2-3 min on each card. Just wanted everyone here to know the truth. Maybe an update to this is in order. That being said dont let the high hashrates fool you. Sp mod 3 has worked much better than this as per trending. I cant speak to it being most stable but is better than krnlx (yields are consisitently higher but reported hashrate is lower. I get better yields by using a lower intensity on the sp3 mod also) . How much % is the difference between sp3 and krnlx regarding coins earned? Did you consider pool luck and difficulty? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: ConAim on August 11, 2017, 01:52:57 PM WARNING: Do not let the reported hashrate in this miner fool you. This is open source so you can fork the repo and submit any appropriate pull requests.Track the SIGT generated over a few hours to determine if it actually yeilds more coins. For me this krnlx mod is very deceiving and gives less coins. Please stop posting your miners hashrate showing 30+ on 1070, 50+ on 1080 Ti. Its all garbage. Ive tracked the numbers over 6 hours of use and compared to it other mods such as sp3. So just a headsup PS: the power usage spikes along with gpu usage drops are very common every 2-3 min on each card. Just wanted everyone here to know the truth. Maybe an update to this is in order. That being said dont let the high hashrates fool you. Sp mod 3 has worked much better than this as per trending. I cant speak to it being most stable but is better than krnlx (yields are consisitently higher but reported hashrate is lower. I get better yields by using a lower intensity on the sp3 mod also) . It's funny that I see the other way around, krnlx's is much more stable and yields. I had reviewed the codes, they are clean (as if you was trying to accusing of cheating hash rate). And if you want to learn, I can teach you how to do that.. You can also learn to use YiiMP site to narrow down which version is better. Also, there are no point of "lower intensity" for sniff pick.. dial down the TDP if you want to lower your power usage.. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 11, 2017, 02:35:59 PM With skunk-krnlx, I have 20.3 mhs on my 1060 6gb at 75% power limit, +137 core - 400mem :) best result ever for me 32 mhs on my 1070 at 75% power limit too MarcuDe spoke about a version of the miner wich is 40mhs on 1080.. That's insane hashrate ! 32mh/s on 1070 ? 75% power limit ? Wath setting do u use ? Core / Mem / -i ? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: sundownz on August 11, 2017, 02:44:52 PM ccminer.org/preview/ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80.7z and curl is on the git, no need to rebuild that except if you want to use VS2015 (VS2017 requires cuda 9, but this kernel is not compatible) I just say: i love you! :D 24 MH/s for 33 MH/s in my 1080. 65~66 MH/s in total (2x 1080). ;D The link shared by Epsylon is working for me under Windows 10 as well & is faster than the other ccminer. Went from 36 to 48 so far on my 1080 Ti in my home office PC. ** Update : Increased TDP on the card and up to 51 now. I've got the Epsylon file running on 23 of my machines now (almost all of my NVidia machines) -- about 2 GH total on the pool stats page. Working quite well. Now let's see if Signatum Coin does well for us =) Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: a6998537 on August 11, 2017, 05:13:20 PM I want to know what miner rx480 uses How much is the force?
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: HeroKung on August 11, 2017, 05:34:04 PM Well, I'll try to refine this thread by listing all the available compiled miners for windows and linux distros by community members to save people from all the searching: I. An original open source non-compiled miner from krnlx (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=890540): Link: https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx (https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20683583#msg20683583 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20683583#msg20683583) II. Complied miner with krnlx code as base for Windows: 1) Compiled miner by BitPorium (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=10725): Link1 (32-bit): ufile.io/haxxr (http://ufile.io/haxxr) Link2 (32-bit): (http://http[Suspicious link removed) Link3 (64-bit): (http://http[Suspicious link removed) Post (32-bit): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20692081#msg20692081 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20692081#msg20692081) Post (64-bit): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20692820#msg20692820 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20692820#msg20692820) 2) Compiled miner by Epsylon3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=374353): Link: ccminer.org/preview/ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80.7z (http://ccminer.org/preview/ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80.7z) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20703817#msg20703817 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20703817#msg20703817) 3) Compiled miner by xnoom (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1090830): Link(32-bit): https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/download/cuda7.5-32bits/ccminer-skunk.7z (https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/download/cuda7.5-32bits/ccminer-skunk.7z) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20705341#msg20705341 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20705341#msg20705341) Link(compute50/cuda7.5 x64): https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52 (https://github.com/xnoom/ccminer-skunk/releases/tag/cuda7.5-compute_50_52) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20714666#msg20714666 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20714666#msg20714666) 4) Compiled miner by gregfromo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1049354): Link: http://www48.zippyshare.com/v/flkMq9uF/file.html (http://www48.zippyshare.com/v/flkMq9uF/file.html) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20761798#msg20761798 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20761798#msg20761798) 5) Compiled miner by rednoW (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=416241): Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4flkNGCHIGFbnF5TktUTEtsRW8/view?usp=drive_web (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4flkNGCHIGFbnF5TktUTEtsRW8/view?usp=drive_web) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20763943#msg20763943 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20763943#msg20763943) III. Compiled miner with krnlx code as base for linux distros: 1) Added to pimpOS by thesmokingman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=541760): Link: https://getpimp.org/shop/pimp/ (https://getpimp.org/shop/pimp/) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20693191#msg20693191 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20693191#msg20693191) 2) Compiled miner by jeblond (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1083261): Link1: https://ufile.io/kxlay (https://ufile.io/kxlay) Link2: https://www.file-upload.com/6m9ekmvm6qrz (https://www.file-upload.com/6m9ekmvm6qrz) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20713903#msg20713903 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070862.msg20713903#msg20713903) SIGT Donations appreciated: Code: BBuHZWFNVEM6SP9DWRJ3owPAaCE4cqhAAf thanks ^^ Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: lentyna on August 11, 2017, 07:54:53 PM I want to know what miner rx480 uses How much is the force? I use this one for my RX580s 8GB: https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases Getting 17 Mh/s per card. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Erotic Toothpaste on August 11, 2017, 08:06:08 PM Appears to be a good boost in speed but power useage is all over the board for me. Watching it drop as low as 20% up to 110%.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: igotek on August 11, 2017, 08:09:06 PM Can someone post the Windows Binary......... for everyone... Please +1 request Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: lentyna on August 11, 2017, 08:20:46 PM Can someone post the Windows Binary......... for everyone... Please +1 request Just compiled: ccminer.exe: https://mega.nz/#!G90UjCLB!xfuVyT5HnPSGJS_y1jVxjhRGpKXID5455i9Fo8ZVEWg (https://mega.nz/#!G90UjCLB!xfuVyT5HnPSGJS_y1jVxjhRGpKXID5455i9Fo8ZVEWg) ccminer_x64.exe: https://mega.nz/#!To8zjaSC!Qg8tXZLRDvaL4jw7Rp7_xl9NCDHcVGaMHh3QIzCfxQY (https://mega.nz/#!To8zjaSC!Qg8tXZLRDvaL4jw7Rp7_xl9NCDHcVGaMHh3QIzCfxQY) Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: lentyna on August 11, 2017, 08:23:44 PM So big difference between 32 and 64 bit versions.
Running 32bit version I'm getting 44 Mh/s while 64bit - 51-52 Mh/s on my stock GTX 1080 ti 11GB. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: ioglnx on August 11, 2017, 08:42:40 PM Could push it even to 60MH per 1080Ti with some slight modifications.
Still funny that the 32bit compiled version is around 10% faster for me than the 64bit one..still try to figure out and debug. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: igotek on August 11, 2017, 09:19:02 PM krlnx monitoring is supported by www.ethmonitoring.com (http://www.ethmonitoring.com) I have just registered for my 4 rigs. Mining SIGT. I have set up the monitoring software on the rigs. I have install the application from the app store. I have selected Signatum coin. Everything is good. After trial period, i think i will buy it. is it possible to see daily profit from the pool ? I put the api and i see my newly SIGT on the monitoring software. but is it for 24 hours or from the begining ? I see 16-17 Mh/s on GTX1060 I see 25-26 Mh/s on GTX1070 is there any way to get higher values ? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Brucelats on August 11, 2017, 09:34:48 PM krlnx monitoring is supported by www.ethmonitoring.com (http://www.ethmonitoring.com) I have just registered for my 4 rigs. Mining SIGT. I have set up the monitoring software on the rigs. I have install the application from the app store. I have selected Signatum coin. Everything is good. After trial period, i think i will buy it. is it possible to see daily profit from the pool ? I put the api and i see my newly SIGT on the monitoring software. but is it for 24 hours or from the begining ? I see 16-17 Mh/s on GTX1060 I see 25-26 Mh/s on GTX1070 is there any way to get higher values ? On which pool do you mine? I use KRNLX 32x bit version, i have +95 core clock and -500 memory clock and i get 26-30 Mh/s, depending on the card. ASus dual X OC 8gb is shitiest card that give around 26-27mh/s. Msi, Zotac and Gigabyte are 28-30. So far is very stable that way. My Power limits are 60-70%, on weaker cards is more %. Miner is running for around 30 hours now, no problems. And power is jumping a little bit but not much. Averages on 50-60%. Sometime jumpes to 40 and sometimes to 70-80 but not often. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: igotek on August 11, 2017, 09:50:16 PM My 1070s are ASUS :(
My 1060s are ZOTAC and MSI Gaming X Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: igotek on August 11, 2017, 10:00:14 PM So big difference between 32 and 64 bit versions. Running 32bit version I'm getting 44 Mh/s while 64bit - 51-52 Mh/s on my stock GTX 1080 ti 11GB. Thanks I m running 32 bit version now on Windows x64 Getting 28.4 Mh/s on Asus GTX1070 Getting 19.3 Mh/s on Zotac Amp Edition GTX1060 3GB Getting 19.3 Mh/s on MSI Gaming X GTX1060 3GB Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: stzcze on August 11, 2017, 10:41:10 PM krlnx monitoring is supported by www.ethmonitoring.com (http://www.ethmonitoring.com) I have just registered for my 4 rigs. Mining SIGT. I have set up the monitoring software on the rigs. I have install the application from the app store. I have selected Signatum coin. Everything is good. After trial period, i think i will buy it. is it possible to see daily profit from the pool ? I put the api and i see my newly SIGT on the monitoring software. but is it for 24 hours or from the begining ? I see 16-17 Mh/s on GTX1060 I see 25-26 Mh/s on GTX1070 is there any way to get higher values ? 6x gtx 1060 6GB 20+ Mh/s tdp 70 core +150 mem -500 - i 24 123 Mh/s skunk algo 32 bit 116.3 Mh/s 64bit win10 x64 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Brucelats on August 11, 2017, 10:48:59 PM So big difference between 32 and 64 bit versions. Running 32bit version I'm getting 44 Mh/s while 64bit - 51-52 Mh/s on my stock GTX 1080 ti 11GB. Thanks I m running 32 bit version now on Windows x64 Getting 28.4 Mh/s on Asus GTX1070 Getting 19.3 Mh/s on Zotac Amp Edition GTX1060 3GB Getting 19.3 Mh/s on MSI Gaming X GTX1060 3GB Which ASus model u have? Dual OC or Strix? What are your settings?, also have u tried x32 and x64? Which one hashes better for u? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: igotek on August 11, 2017, 10:58:09 PM Asus Dual OC +500 memory +150 core
I only tested the 32 bit version on Win x64 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 11, 2017, 11:16:02 PM Asus Dual OC +500 memory +150 core I only tested the 32 bit version on Win x64 I use linux but u can get the same a i think, i use 8 X ASUS 8OG -i 25 CoreClock : 130-140 depend on the card MemClock : -2000 ( if u use window -1000 ) PowerLimit : 150W ( 100% on windows ) TempLimit : 70° ( Set ur fan at 75% on window ) u grab 30.3/30.8 mh/s Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: SCSI2 on August 11, 2017, 11:31:52 PM 32-bit binaries always a little faster because memory pointers are shorter. Many other reasons exist, but as long as you don't need 4GB+ memory for your application, there is no point in building 64-bit monsters.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 11, 2017, 11:41:53 PM WARNING: Do not let the reported hashrate in this miner fool you. This is open source so you can fork the repo and submit any appropriate pull requests.Track the SIGT generated over a few hours to determine if it actually yeilds more coins. For me this krnlx mod is very deceiving and gives less coins. Please stop posting your miners hashrate showing 30+ on 1070, 50+ on 1080 Ti. Its all garbage. Ive tracked the numbers over 6 hours of use and compared to it other mods such as sp3. So just a headsup PS: the power usage spikes along with gpu usage drops are very common every 2-3 min on each card. Just wanted everyone here to know the truth. Maybe an update to this is in order. That being said dont let the high hashrates fool you. Sp mod 3 has worked much better than this as per trending. I cant speak to it being most stable but is better than krnlx (yields are consisitently higher but reported hashrate is lower. I get better yields by using a lower intensity on the sp3 mod also) . It's funny that I see the other way around, krnlx's is much more stable and yields. I had reviewed the codes, they are clean (as if you was trying to accusing of cheating hash rate). And if you want to learn, I can teach you how to do that.. You can also learn to use YiiMP site to narrow down which version is better. Also, there are no point of "lower intensity" for sniff pick.. dial down the TDP if you want to lower your power usage.. im only dialing down the intensity because the computer gets laggy. Electricity is free for me so I dont mind the power usage. I looked at yimp specifically the different miners used on that pool. Can see sp mods have higher hashrate than krnlx in most cases. Shows while most ppl are using krnlx its not as promising as ppl think it is. mod 3 is still higher hashrate. Link http://yiimp.ccminer.org/site/miners Also yiimp has 2% pool fee versus 1% on suprnva. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: toomeke on August 11, 2017, 11:56:38 PM Can someone post the Windows Binary......... for everyone... Please +1 request Just compiled: ccminer.exe: https://mega.nz/#!G90UjCLB!xfuVyT5HnPSGJS_y1jVxjhRGpKXID5455i9Fo8ZVEWg (https://mega.nz/#!G90UjCLB!xfuVyT5HnPSGJS_y1jVxjhRGpKXID5455i9Fo8ZVEWg) ccminer_x64.exe: https://mega.nz/#!To8zjaSC!Qg8tXZLRDvaL4jw7Rp7_xl9NCDHcVGaMHh3QIzCfxQY (https://mega.nz/#!To8zjaSC!Qg8tXZLRDvaL4jw7Rp7_xl9NCDHcVGaMHh3QIzCfxQY) Thankyou, no virus :), faster for me on my Asus/Gigabytes 1060 6gb 19.5mh vs 18.5(SP3 or 5) @ 70 pl, +150c, -500m 248kh/w Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Brucelats on August 12, 2017, 12:42:10 AM WARNING: Do not let the reported hashrate in this miner fool you. This is open source so you can fork the repo and submit any appropriate pull requests.Track the SIGT generated over a few hours to determine if it actually yeilds more coins. For me this krnlx mod is very deceiving and gives less coins. Please stop posting your miners hashrate showing 30+ on 1070, 50+ on 1080 Ti. Its all garbage. Ive tracked the numbers over 6 hours of use and compared to it other mods such as sp3. So just a headsup PS: the power usage spikes along with gpu usage drops are very common every 2-3 min on each card. Just wanted everyone here to know the truth. Maybe an update to this is in order. That being said dont let the high hashrates fool you. Sp mod 3 has worked much better than this as per trending. I cant speak to it being most stable but is better than krnlx (yields are consisitently higher but reported hashrate is lower. I get better yields by using a lower intensity on the sp3 mod also) . It's funny that I see the other way around, krnlx's is much more stable and yields. I had reviewed the codes, they are clean (as if you was trying to accusing of cheating hash rate). And if you want to learn, I can teach you how to do that.. You can also learn to use YiiMP site to narrow down which version is better. Also, there are no point of "lower intensity" for sniff pick.. dial down the TDP if you want to lower your power usage.. im only dialing down the intensity because the computer gets laggy. Electricity is free for me so I dont mind the power usage. I looked at yimp specifically the different miners used on that pool. Can see sp mods have higher hashrate than krnlx in most cases. Shows while most ppl are using krnlx its not as promising as ppl think it is. mod 3 is still higher hashrate. Link http://yiimp.ccminer.org/site/miners Also yiimp has 2% pool fee versus 1% on suprnva. How you made conclusion SP mod 3 is faster then KRNLX? I am curious. I will switch to SP 3 then, but it's hard to find difference, KRNLX always show better numbers. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 12, 2017, 01:09:32 AM Simple calculation:
1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT. 2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined. 3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner. 4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner. Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4) Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes.... Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: seasonw on August 12, 2017, 01:15:53 AM 32-bit binaries always a little faster because memory pointers are shorter. Many other reasons exist, but as long as you don't need 4GB+ memory for your application, there is no point in building 64-bit monsters. I was surprise to know about 32bit is faster. I always thought 64bit is faster than 32bit. Thanks for update. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Skol600ml on August 12, 2017, 01:36:38 AM Simple calculation: 1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT. 2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined. 3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner. 4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner. Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4) Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes.... Simple? There is the difficult that changes every block, there is the luck in prop, pplns pools. Traking for days means nothing. Sigt was a totally diferent thing 2 days ago. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: SCSI2 on August 12, 2017, 03:11:50 AM 32-bit binaries always a little faster because memory pointers are shorter. Many other reasons exist, but as long as you don't need 4GB+ memory for your application, there is no point in building 64-bit monsters. I was surprise to know about 32bit is faster. I always thought 64bit is faster than 32bit. Thanks for update. Generally it is faster to deal with smaller memory structures, smaller pointers etc. More of it will fit into L0/1/2/3 cache and CPU will be happier. There are cases when you need to do a ton of 64-bit math and leverage 64-bit CPU registers, or if your dataset does not fit into 4G address space like with large databases or Excel spreadsheets. There is a reason Visual Studio 2017 is still a 32-bit application... Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 12, 2017, 03:57:04 AM Simple calculation: 1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT. 2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined. 3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner. 4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner. Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4) Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes.... Simple? There is the difficult that changes every block, there is the luck in prop, pplns pools. Traking for days means nothing. Sigt was a totally diferent thing 2 days ago. First off Suprnova is pplns and not prop. Luck means nothing over extended period of time. The number of shares has a bigger impact. While each block varies usually from 10-350 seconds; if you track for 6 hours that 63 blocks min (pretty accurate for an average yield). Every person knows the block reward halved after phase 1; but how many remember the yield before and after it? Just because reward halved doesnt mean you make 50% less. Sigt was totally different 12-24 hours after it launched and is less so after phase 1. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: nsummy on August 12, 2017, 05:39:55 AM Simple calculation: 1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT. 2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined. 3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner. 4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner. Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4) Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes.... Agreed. I have been using spmod for the past few days. I switched to krnlx overnight because the reported hashrate was a little higher. Imagine my surprise when I got up in the morning and saw that suprnova reported my hashrate at about 30% of what the miner showed. The earned coins also reflected this. Switched back to spmod which fixed everything. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: maxmad_x on August 12, 2017, 08:32:30 AM Simple calculation: 1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT. 2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined. 3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner. 4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner. Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4) Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes.... Agreed. I have been using spmod for the past few days. I switched to krnlx overnight because the reported hashrate was a little higher. Imagine my surprise when I got up in the morning and saw that suprnova reported my hashrate at about 30% of what the miner showed. The earned coins also reflected this. Switched back to spmod which fixed everything. a lot of newbee accounts praising SPmod like they know everything.. hmm... What to make of it. Unless you test both miners on the same pool for at least a day simultaneously there is no way to compare results Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: igotek on August 12, 2017, 08:37:55 AM Asus Dual OC +500 memory +150 core I only tested the 32 bit version on Win x64 I use linux but u can get the same a i think, i use 8 X ASUS 8OG -i 25 CoreClock : 130-140 depend on the card MemClock : -2000 ( if u use window -1000 ) PowerLimit : 150W ( 100% on windows ) TempLimit : 70° ( Set ur fan at 75% on window ) u grab 30.3/30.8 mh/s Woov I m getting 30+ Mh/s with +140 core -1000 memory on windows x64 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: stellan0r on August 12, 2017, 10:43:34 AM Can someone post the Windows Binary......... for everyone... Please +1 request Just compiled: ccminer.exe: https://mega.nz/#!G90UjCLB!xfuVyT5HnPSGJS_y1jVxjhRGpKXID5455i9Fo8ZVEWg (https://mega.nz/#!G90UjCLB!xfuVyT5HnPSGJS_y1jVxjhRGpKXID5455i9Fo8ZVEWg) ccminer_x64.exe: https://mega.nz/#!To8zjaSC!Qg8tXZLRDvaL4jw7Rp7_xl9NCDHcVGaMHh3QIzCfxQY (https://mega.nz/#!To8zjaSC!Qg8tXZLRDvaL4jw7Rp7_xl9NCDHcVGaMHh3QIzCfxQY) Thankyou, no virus :), faster for me on my Asus/Gigabytes 1060 6gb 19.5mh vs 18.5(SP3 or 5) @ 70 pl, +150c, -500m 248kh/w same for me with the rednoW version Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: ryuvs on August 12, 2017, 10:51:38 AM But is there any future for this coin, it would definitly be geat to have some more coins to mine, new algo so what? what do you guys think..? wort hodling?
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: blissz on August 12, 2017, 11:09:06 AM spmod 6 is faster now?
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: alel on August 12, 2017, 11:33:37 AM Simple calculation: 1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT. 2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined. 3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner. 4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner. Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4) Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes.... Eh, mining 6 hours with 140% pool luck and mining another 6 hours with 100% luck can really make a difference. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: nsummy on August 12, 2017, 07:41:20 PM Simple calculation: 1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT. 2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined. 3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner. 4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner. Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4) Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes.... Agreed. I have been using spmod for the past few days. I switched to krnlx overnight because the reported hashrate was a little higher. Imagine my surprise when I got up in the morning and saw that suprnova reported my hashrate at about 30% of what the miner showed. The earned coins also reflected this. Switched back to spmod which fixed everything. a lot of newbee accounts praising SPmod like they know everything.. hmm... What to make of it. Unless you test both miners on the same pool for at least a day simultaneously there is no way to compare results I'm not praising SPmod, I'm just stating the facts. I've mined a lot of different algos with a lot of different miners through Suprnova. My reported hashrate and what suprnova reports are always within 20% of each other. In this case krnlx reports I'm getting 116 mh/s. Suprnova reports 33. That's quite a large difference. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: chrysophylax on August 12, 2017, 08:11:21 PM Simple calculation: 1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT. 2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined. 3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner. 4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner. Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4) Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes.... Simple? There is the difficult that changes every block, there is the luck in prop, pplns pools. Traking for days means nothing. Sigt was a totally diferent thing 2 days ago. First off Suprnova is pplns and not prop. Luck means nothing over extended period of time. The number of shares has a bigger impact. While each block varies usually from 10-350 seconds; if you track for 6 hours that 63 blocks min (pretty accurate for an average yield). Every person knows the block reward halved after phase 1; but how many remember the yield before and after it? Just because reward halved doesnt mean you make 50% less. Sigt was totally different 12-24 hours after it launched and is less so after phase 1. completely wrong bigjee ... local hash - pool hash - and especially nethash play a massive part in all your so called calculations ... this is why your logic is completely skewed an inaccurate ... you would be absolutely correct IF your local hashrate AND the pool hash AND the nethash did not change at all ... it does - every 30seconds ... at times - the nethash fluctuates from 1terahash to 3.7terahash and back in a matter of hours ... this is a heavy displacement in diff and a massive difference in mining ... your 6hour transient time frame means nothing in such circumstances - and these circumstances are a highly regular occurrence in signatum ... in fact almost all coins ... if you want a better way to get more accurate figures - then you need to get out of the time frame mentality - and actually get into the mathematics of the code ... not by some arbitrary way of guessing the figures ... the moment i post this from when i started - the diff and hashrate all changed dramatically again ... from 1.4th to 1.6th ... #crysx Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: blissz on August 12, 2017, 08:33:30 PM Simple calculation: 1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT. 2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined. 3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner. 4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner. Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4) Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes.... Agreed. I have been using spmod for the past few days. I switched to krnlx overnight because the reported hashrate was a little higher. Imagine my surprise when I got up in the morning and saw that suprnova reported my hashrate at about 30% of what the miner showed. The earned coins also reflected this. Switched back to spmod which fixed everything. a lot of newbee accounts praising SPmod like they know everything.. hmm... What to make of it. Unless you test both miners on the same pool for at least a day simultaneously there is no way to compare results I'm not praising SPmod, I'm just stating the facts. I've mined a lot of different algos with a lot of different miners through Suprnova. My reported hashrate and what suprnova reports are always within 20% of each other. In this case krnlx reports I'm getting 116 mh/s. Suprnova reports 33. That's quite a large difference. I do have the tools and two exact the same mining rigs (both 6x1070) to do a comparison between skunk and the spmod miner. What I will do:
I can do this with the leaked spmod 5 , since I don't have spmod 6. If one wants me to do the comparison with spmod 6, please PM me a link. edit: as we speak I run this comparison with spmod 5 now vs the last compiled skunk miner edit 2: way to early to draw conclusions as it's only running for half an hour, but this is the result so far https://s17.postimg.org/6h5jarnun/skunk-vs_spmod5.png ooh before asking why my hashrate is so low: my cards run heavily undervolted / volt modded. They draw only 75 watt each from the wall at these hashrates. This keeps my room a bit cool and saves me some power costs. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 12, 2017, 09:25:24 PM Simple calculation: 1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT. 2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined. 3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner. 4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner. Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4) Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes.... Agreed. I have been using spmod for the past few days. I switched to krnlx overnight because the reported hashrate was a little higher. Imagine my surprise when I got up in the morning and saw that suprnova reported my hashrate at about 30% of what the miner showed. The earned coins also reflected this. Switched back to spmod which fixed everything. a lot of newbee accounts praising SPmod like they know everything.. hmm... What to make of it. Unless you test both miners on the same pool for at least a day simultaneously there is no way to compare results I'm not praising SPmod, I'm just stating the facts. I've mined a lot of different algos with a lot of different miners through Suprnova. My reported hashrate and what suprnova reports are always within 20% of each other. In this case krnlx reports I'm getting 116 mh/s. Suprnova reports 33. That's quite a large difference. I do have the tools and two exact the same mining rigs (both 6x1070) to do a comparison between skunk and the spmod miner. What I will do:
I can do this with the leaked spmod 5 , since I don't have spmod 6. If one wants me to do the comparison with spmod 6, please PM me a link. edit: as we speak I run this comparison with spmod 5 now vs the last compiled skunk miner edit 2: way to early to draw conclusions as it's only running for half an hour, but this is the result so far https://s17.postimg.org/6h5jarnun/skunk-vs_spmod5.png Sound good to do this ... i feel like krnlx fake mh/s ... but i am maybe wrong I actually dont have SP mod (i am not a donor) but if i need i go back to palgin mod ... No sense to get 20 more mh/s on paper to get less ... Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 12, 2017, 09:31:04 PM Simple calculation: 1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT. 2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined. 3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner. 4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner. Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4) Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes.... Agreed. I have been using spmod for the past few days. I switched to krnlx overnight because the reported hashrate was a little higher. Imagine my surprise when I got up in the morning and saw that suprnova reported my hashrate at about 30% of what the miner showed. The earned coins also reflected this. Switched back to spmod which fixed everything. a lot of newbee accounts praising SPmod like they know everything.. hmm... What to make of it. Unless you test both miners on the same pool for at least a day simultaneously there is no way to compare results Dont take my word for it; try it out yourself. i just posted so ppl can learn themselves rather than be sheep. So sick of this newbie account banter btw. I guess all senior members post gospel 24/7 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 12, 2017, 09:40:55 PM Simple calculation: 1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT. 2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined. 3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner. 4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner. Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4) Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes.... Simple? There is the difficult that changes every block, there is the luck in prop, pplns pools. Traking for days means nothing. Sigt was a totally diferent thing 2 days ago. First off Suprnova is pplns and not prop. Luck means nothing over extended period of time. The number of shares has a bigger impact. While each block varies usually from 10-350 seconds; if you track for 6 hours that 63 blocks min (pretty accurate for an average yield). Every person knows the block reward halved after phase 1; but how many remember the yield before and after it? Just because reward halved doesnt mean you make 50% less. Sigt was totally different 12-24 hours after it launched and is less so after phase 1. completely wrong bigjee ... local hash - pool hash - and especially nethash play a massive part in all your so called calculations ... this is why your logic is completely skewed an inaccurate ... you would be absolutely correct IF your local hashrate AND the pool hash AND the nethash did not change at all ... it does - every 30seconds ... at times - the nethash fluctuates from 1terahash to 3.7terahash and back in a matter of hours ... this is a heavy displacement in diff and a massive difference in mining ... your 6hour transient time frame means nothing in such circumstances - and these circumstances are a highly regular occurrence in signatum ... in fact almost all coins ... if you want a better way to get more accurate figures - then you need to get out of the time frame mentality - and actually get into the mathematics of the code ... not by some arbitrary way of guessing the figures ... the moment i post this from when i started - the diff and hashrate all changed dramatically again ... from 1.4th to 1.6th ... #crysx While I agree my method of calculation isnt fool proof you have to understand that the average miner wont be able to read code (I certianly dont). I definitely understand that the hashrate varies but im looking for a lay mans point of view for calculating yield. Keep in mind im not looking for exact figure but an estimate. You mention variable aspects of the pool and whiel true it hasnt fluctuated as much in the past 24 hours (for suprnova). Again Im looking for rough estimate. Im not supporting developers or taking sides; just pointing out that the hashrate reported by the krnlx isnt exactly what it is. My 6 hour interval was just an example and i mentioned the longer the better.... FYI I am using your miner also (I use time frame) as a measure of profitability. If so have some material I can read Im all ears or eyes so to speak. But again others are free to check for themselves. I only know what is consistent for my rig and setup. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 12, 2017, 09:49:24 PM Simple calculation: 1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT. 2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined. 3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner. 4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner. Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4) Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes.... Agreed. I have been using spmod for the past few days. I switched to krnlx overnight because the reported hashrate was a little higher. Imagine my surprise when I got up in the morning and saw that suprnova reported my hashrate at about 30% of what the miner showed. The earned coins also reflected this. Switched back to spmod which fixed everything. a lot of newbee accounts praising SPmod like they know everything.. hmm... What to make of it. Unless you test both miners on the same pool for at least a day simultaneously there is no way to compare results I'm not praising SPmod, I'm just stating the facts. I've mined a lot of different algos with a lot of different miners through Suprnova. My reported hashrate and what suprnova reports are always within 20% of each other. In this case krnlx reports I'm getting 116 mh/s. Suprnova reports 33. That's quite a large difference. I do have the tools and two exact the same mining rigs (both 6x1070) to do a comparison between skunk and the spmod miner. What I will do:
I can do this with the leaked spmod 5 , since I don't have spmod 6. If one wants me to do the comparison with spmod 6, please PM me a link. edit: as we speak I run this comparison with spmod 5 now vs the last compiled skunk miner edit 2: way to early to draw conclusions as it's only running for half an hour, but this is the result so far https://s17.postimg.org/6h5jarnun/skunk-vs_spmod5.png ooh before asking why my hashrate is so low: my cards run heavily undervolted / volt modded. They draw only 75 watt each from the wall at these hashrates. This keeps my room a bit cool and saves me some power costs. THANK YOU!! Your experiment will help us out immensely. I await the results for 24 hours. Perhaps 48 hours for repeatability sake so it settles the doubt once and for all. Again thanks for setting this up! Edit: By skunk miner which mod do you mean. Is it the krnlx? Just wanted to confirm. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: blissz on August 12, 2017, 09:56:23 PM so what I did:
apparently the skunk miner seems to work a bit better on my rig, but this comparison is more for checking the reported hashrate vs accepted shares. Since people feel the reported hashrate is not fair on the skunk miner. Actually this test is running for a too short time to draw conclusions, but it gives an idea already. Next update will be after 12 hours of mining I will do more testing. I will test some more miners on request. Please PM me when you want me to test a private miner (ie. spmod 6 or something else) or give me a link to a public miner if you want it to be tested. https://s29.postimg.org/70ehhc5g7/skunk-vs_spmod5.png my mistake: skunk = krnlx miner :) I will update the graphics on the next update Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: blissz on August 12, 2017, 10:02:21 PM yes it's krnlx, my mistake...
Let's see the results after 12 hours 8) Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: firesec on August 12, 2017, 10:37:32 PM 6xgtx 1070 130 MH/s ? this doesn't look good
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: blissz on August 12, 2017, 10:46:38 PM 6xgtx 1070 130 MH/s ? this doesn't look good heavily undervolted / hardmod voltage. Each card runs at ~70 watt each from the wall to save power / heat and increase the lifetime of the cards. You can run a gtx 1070 upto 30 Mh/s per card, but then they draw about 175 watt per card. I prefer to run them a bit cooler / less hot. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 13, 2017, 12:04:44 AM yes it's krnlx, my mistake... Let's see the results after 12 hours 8) Perfect! :D Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: seasonw on August 13, 2017, 01:15:33 AM so what I did:
apparently the skunk miner seems to work a bit better on my rig, but this comparison is more for checking the reported hashrate vs accepted shares. Since people feel the reported hashrate is not fair on the skunk miner. Actually this test is running for a too short time to draw conclusions, but it gives an idea already. Next update will be after 12 hours of mining I will do more testing. I will test some more miners on request. Please PM me when you want me to test a private miner (ie. spmod 6 or something else) or give me a link to a public miner if you want it to be tested. https://s29.postimg.org/70ehhc5g7/skunk-vs_spmod5.png my mistake: skunk = krnlx miner :) I will update the graphics on the next update Well, nice detailed info sharing. Seems like skunk miner is way much ahead of spmod5. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: altfinance on August 13, 2017, 02:55:31 AM If you have two identical rigs, a simple way could be to create two accounts in suprnova, then run palgin on one rig and krnlx on the other. (Or krnlx and spmod3, whatever you prefer) Same settings for each of the miners. Run both at the same time and after several hours, compare the coins mined.
As soon as I read about krnlx, I installed it because it gave me more hash rate as compared to spmod3. But the coins I mined per day fell with krnlx. I thought it was due to the higher difficulty and number of miners. But when I switched back to spmod3, it seems I'm mining more coins with the latter. I have the same experience with the other two posters who mentioned this. However, I would still like to confirm my unscientific observation with more tests. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: seasonw on August 13, 2017, 05:24:38 AM If you have two identical rigs, a simple way could be to create two accounts in suprnova, then run palgin on one rig and krnlx on the other. (Or krnlx and spmod3, whatever you prefer) Same settings for each of the miners. Run both at the same time and after several hours, compare the coins mined. As soon as I read about krnlx, I installed it because it gave me more hash rate as compared to spmod3. But the coins I mined per day fell with krnlx. I thought it was due to the higher difficulty and number of miners. But when I switched back to spmod3, it seems I'm mining more coins with the latter. I have the same experience with the other two posters who mentioned this. However, I would still like to confirm my unscientific observation with more tests. I think this is what Blissz did now. 2 mining rig with same configuration on same pool. Comparing krnlx and spmod5. And the second chart is the shares comparison. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: alel on August 13, 2017, 12:28:04 PM Which one of the compiled binaries are you using for the test? x32 or x64 and which cuda version
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 13, 2017, 12:32:08 PM Hi guys, i have a newbie question. How can u grab the detailled number of share u get ?
I dont find this details stats on pool page ... Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: igotek on August 13, 2017, 12:36:39 PM After 24 hours:
Calculated profit: $47.78 Signatum suprnova.cc (SIGT): 600.84 SIGT ($39.75) Total pool profit: $39.75 Total hashrates: CCMiner: 571.7 Mh/s Hot market: SIGT-BTC (Cryptopia) I would have around 720 coin. But huh ? only 600 coin. I think this ccminer report the hashrate wrong. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 13, 2017, 12:44:57 PM After 24 hours: Calculated profit: $47.78 Signatum suprnova.cc (SIGT): 600.84 SIGT ($39.75) Total pool profit: $39.75 Total hashrates: CCMiner: 571.7 Mh/s Hot market: SIGT-BTC (Cryptopia) I would have around 720 coin. But huh ? only 600 coin. I think this ccminer report the hashrate wrong. Hum u miss a solid 20% ... that the way i feel, i gona wait the result from blissz, but i gona back to palginmod ... He have release a new version by the way, but only window :( https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: blissz on August 13, 2017, 01:03:45 PM And here is the update after 14 hours of mining.
https://s23.postimg.org/rpynguw17/skunk-vs_spmod5.png What does this tell us? Krnlx has a bit more accepted shares compared to spmod5, but it looks like the reported hashrate is a little bit off looking at the shares, krnlx is 1,5% faster compared to spmod 5 looking at the reported hashrate, krnlx is about 5% faster compared to spmod. It still can be because of the luck, factor, but it can also be that the krnlx hashrate is a few percent to optimistic compared to spmod. Still looking for testing spmod6 and CWI. Anyone can help me with that?)But will give the other suggested miners a try now. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: yunihuni on August 13, 2017, 02:03:25 PM I share my hashrate test result.
6x1080 Spmod5 230Mhash Krnlx 242Mhash. That's really good different. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 13, 2017, 02:09:16 PM And here is the update after 14 hours of mining. https://s23.postimg.org/rpynguw17/skunk-vs_spmod5.png What does this tell us? Krnlx has a bit more accepted shares compared to spmod5, but it looks like the reported hashrate is a little bit off looking at the shares, krnlx is 1,5% faster compared to spmod 5 looking at the reported hashrate, krnlx is about 5% faster compared to spmod. It still can be because of the luck, factor, but it can also be that the krnlx hashrate is a few percent to optimistic compared to spmod. Still looking for testing spmod6 and CWI. Anyone can help me with that?)But will give the other suggested miners a try now. Do u use the spmod5 fix ? If i remeber right, this first release of spmod5 get a low share report, if u have this one. This test is non sense :( Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 13, 2017, 03:05:06 PM And here is the update after 14 hours of mining. https://s23.postimg.org/rpynguw17/skunk-vs_spmod5.png What does this tell us? Krnlx has a bit more accepted shares compared to spmod5, but it looks like the reported hashrate is a little bit off looking at the shares, krnlx is 1,5% faster compared to spmod 5 looking at the reported hashrate, krnlx is about 5% faster compared to spmod. It still can be because of the luck, factor, but it can also be that the krnlx hashrate is a few percent to optimistic compared to spmod. Still looking for testing spmod6 and CWI. Anyone can help me with that?)But will give the other suggested miners a try now. Thank you blissz. Could you please run test till 24 hours so we have valid results. Unfortunately I dont have access to sp mod 5 (the one I had reported lower hashrate compared to mod 3 so I didnt use it) I would like the following combos tested if possible: a) sp mod 3 vs. cwi 0.9.8 ( have this file and can forward to you) b) sp mod 3 vs. krnlx (CUDA 7.5, X86) c) cwi 0.9.8 vs. krnlx (CUDA 7.5, X86) Also any way you could track coins generated instead of share rate please, with data labels so we can calculate % difference b/w miners. Might need to edit the test length for the cwi miner since miner pool and diff can vary. But ultimately need to find out which one generates more coin. Thanks again for posting the results. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: chrysophylax on August 13, 2017, 03:58:01 PM Simple calculation: 1. Start mining with krnlx or sp mod and note the time and number of SIGT. 2. After 6 hours (the longer the better) come back and see how many SIGT have been mined. 3. Repeat 1 and 2 with other miner. 4. Compare # of Sigt mined; the higher # is the better miner. Ive been tracking mine for days now. Im pretty confident krnlx with suprnova sucks balls. At least for my setup. (Win 7 64 bit, 1060x3, 1070 x4) Just because it shines doesnt mean its gold as the saying goes.... Agreed. I have been using spmod for the past few days. I switched to krnlx overnight because the reported hashrate was a little higher. Imagine my surprise when I got up in the morning and saw that suprnova reported my hashrate at about 30% of what the miner showed. The earned coins also reflected this. Switched back to spmod which fixed everything. a lot of newbee accounts praising SPmod like they know everything.. hmm... What to make of it. Unless you test both miners on the same pool for at least a day simultaneously there is no way to compare results Dont take my word for it; try it out yourself. i just posted so ppl can learn themselves rather than be sheep. So sick of this newbie account banter btw. I guess all senior members post gospel 24/7 no mate ... not gospel ... but we have been around for years - and have delved into the nether regions of code and core ... so we 'sorta' know what we are talking about ... as for a newbie account - i am in total agreement ... the newbie level is so restrictive that you cant do much - or post much - or be much on here ... just keep at posting and doing what you do - it will gain momentum - dont worry ... before you know it - the account is a junior memebr - and even tho thats restrictive - its nothing like the newbie level ... anyway - need to get back to work ... got another holy book to write ;) ... #crysx Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: chrysophylax on August 13, 2017, 04:07:55 PM And here is the update after 14 hours of mining. https://s23.postimg.org/rpynguw17/skunk-vs_spmod5.png What does this tell us? Krnlx has a bit more accepted shares compared to spmod5, but it looks like the reported hashrate is a little bit off looking at the shares, krnlx is 1,5% faster compared to spmod 5 looking at the reported hashrate, krnlx is about 5% faster compared to spmod. It still can be because of the luck, factor, but it can also be that the krnlx hashrate is a few percent to optimistic compared to spmod. Still looking for testing spmod6 and CWI. Anyone can help me with that?)But will give the other suggested miners a try now. Thank you blissz. Could you please run test till 24 hours so we have valid results. Unfortunately I dont have access to sp mod 5 (the one I had reported lower hashrate compared to mod 3 so I didnt use it) I would like the following combos tested if possible: a) sp mod 3 vs. cwi 0.9.8 ( have this file and can forward to you) b) sp mod 3 vs. krnlx (CUDA 7.5, X86) c) cwi 0.9.8 vs. krnlx (CUDA 7.5, X86) Also any way you could track coins generated instead of share rate please, with data labels so we can calculate % difference b/w miners. Might need to edit the test length for the cwi miner since miner pool and diff can vary. But ultimately need to find out which one generates more coin. Thanks again for posting the results. btw mate ... we will be putting of CWIgm-0.9.9 some time the end of the week or early next week by the looks of it ... IF we can get a number of issues fixed in the miner ... CWIgm-0.9.9 will not only have skunkhash and tribus in it ( like CWIgm-0.9.8 does ) - but we will also be adding timetravel10 to it ( bitcore - btx ) ... i know that a little off topic regarding other coins - but stability and hashrate will be a better in the next version ... either way - we would be interested in these results also ... #crysx Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: sp_ on August 13, 2017, 04:21:45 PM Sp-mod #6 is 9% faster than sp-mod #3 on the gtx 1070 if you use the latest driver. (384.94) and 100% tdp. (Donate 0.05B BTC to subscribe to my private miner)
The krnlx kernel is broken if you mine on high difficulty (vardiff). Try supernova with highend cards rigs. You only get payed for 80% of the hash showed in the miner. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: dragonmike on August 13, 2017, 04:39:20 PM The krnlx kernel is broken if you mine on high difficulty (vardiff). Try supernova with highend cards rigs. This seems to be correct, from my experience.You only get payed for 80% of the hash showed in the miner. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: blissz on August 13, 2017, 04:40:44 PM Sp-mod #6 is 9% faster than sp-mod #3 on the gtx 1070 if you use the latest driver. (384.94) and 100% tdp. (Donate 0.05B BTC to subscribe to my private miner) The krnlx kernel is broken if you mine on high difficulty (vardiff). Try supernova with highend cards rigs. You only get payed for 80% of the hash showed in the miner. send me spmod 6 and I will run the test again. It can be that there is an issue on variable diff. I didn't test that yet as I set it to static 1.0 diff. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: thesmokingman on August 13, 2017, 05:17:52 PM Sp-mod #6 is 9% faster than sp-mod #3 on the gtx 1070 if you use the latest driver. (384.94) and 100% tdp. (Donate 0.05B BTC to subscribe to my private miner) The krnlx kernel is broken if you mine on high difficulty (vardiff). Try supernova with highend cards rigs. You only get payed for 80% of the hash showed in the miner. so you're saying to fix this mine at a lower difficulty? got it.... Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: sp_ on August 13, 2017, 05:36:13 PM Mining on lower diff increase the hashrate on the pool, but the miner is still broken.
Some solutions are skipped, so you loose a few percent. And suprnova and many other pools doesn't support static diff, because static diff can be abused and used to steal from the other miners.. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 13, 2017, 05:52:27 PM Sp-mod #6 is 9% faster than sp-mod #3 on the gtx 1070 if you use the latest driver. (384.94) and 100% tdp. (Donate 0.05B BTC to subscribe to my private miner) The krnlx kernel is broken if you mine on high difficulty (vardiff). Try supernova with highend cards rigs. You only get payed for 80% of the hash showed in the miner. send me spmod 6 and I will run the test again. It can be that there is an issue on variable diff. I didn't test that yet as I set it to static 1.0 diff. Wath pool do u use for static diff ? Can u explain where u grab the number of share u validate ? I dont found it on suprnova / pool.mn Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: yunihuni on August 13, 2017, 06:22:08 PM Sp-mod #6 is 9% faster than sp-mod #3 on the gtx 1070 if you use the latest driver. (384.94) and 100% tdp. (Donate 0.05B BTC to subscribe to my private miner) The krnlx kernel is broken if you mine on high difficulty (vardiff). Try supernova with highend cards rigs. You only get payed for 80% of the hash showed in the miner. Stop talking shit. You are forcing people to buy your miner with worsening other miners. You greedy son of a bitch. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: sp_ on August 13, 2017, 07:23:54 PM I spend my free time to test this miner, and finds out the claimed speed in the miner window is not showing on the pool. This has been confirmed by many users on this thread already. The only way to fix this is to fix the code.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Epsylon3 on August 13, 2017, 11:53:04 PM super parasite >:( supernova high diff jumps is not new and is not a miner issue...
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on August 14, 2017, 12:53:08 AM super parasite >:( supernova high diff jumps is not new and is not a miner issue... Which pool would you recommend for low diff Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: ryanlitwiller on August 14, 2017, 01:00:25 AM I spend my free time to test this miner, and finds out the claimed speed in the miner window is not showing on the pool. This has been confirmed by many users on this thread already. The only way to fix this is to fix the code. I did see a considerable jump in my reported hashrate with this miner but my average hashrate at the pool dropped 20% Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: damniatx on August 14, 2017, 01:02:17 AM I spend my free time to test this miner, and finds out the claimed speed in the miner window is not showing on the pool. This has been confirmed by many users on this thread already. The only way to fix this is to fix the code. I did see a considerable jump in my reported hashrate with this miner but my average hashrate at the pool dropped 20% weird though. the latest ccminer from tpruvot also use this code. giving the same performance. :( https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases (https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases) Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: altfinance on August 14, 2017, 02:37:17 AM You can all try it for yourselves. Test with palgin and krnlx and spmod3/5 miners. I tested these with suprnova. Since the hash rate in the dashboard being shown by suprnova is continuously changing, I decided to test the miners with the SIGT coins I'm mining.
Yes, it was not a scientific test, I just wanted to have a rough estimate because I noticed the coins I'm mining suddenly dropped when I used krnlx. I wasn't sure at first if it was because of the difficulty in SIGT and the many miners in suprnova or it was due to krnlx. So I created 2 accounts in suprnova. I have 2 almost identical rigs, 6 x GTX1060 on rig1 and 5 x GTX 1060 on rig2. The first test was running spmod3 on rig2 and krnlx on rig1. I didn't configure the rigs to be of the exact number of gpus because I will lose mining time for a couple of hours if disable one gpu. After more than an hour, I had almost the same number of coins mined. It meant krnlx was mining slower than spmod3 because it was using 6 gpus. The next test was running palginmod on rig 1 and spmod3 on rig2. This time, palginmod mined more coins, which should be the case since it is running on 6 gpus. If I divide the number of coins per gpu, the average coin per gpu was the same for palginmod and spmod3, which meant in my crude test that both miners seem to be performing equally. There seems to be a problem with krnlx even it is showing more hash rate per second. Those of you who have a lot more resources and time can test krnlx more extensively. For now, I'm going back to palginmod or spmod. Check also a test run by jimboscott here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2030529.4700 He has the same observations. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: TobiasVR on August 14, 2017, 02:49:05 AM now it is not profit, I use 6 pieces 470 rx series vga
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: WarrenP on August 14, 2017, 08:10:51 AM You can all try it for yourselves. Test with palgin and krnlx and spmod3/5 miners. I tested these with suprnova. Since the hash rate in the dashboard being shown by suprnova is continuously changing, I decided to test the miners with the SIGT coins I'm mining. Yes, it was not a scientific test, I just wanted to have a rough estimate because I noticed the coins I'm mining suddenly dropped when I used krnlx. I wasn't sure at first if it was because of the difficulty in SIGT and the many miners in suprnova or it was due to krnlx. So I created 2 accounts in suprnova. I have 2 almost identical rigs, 6 x GTX1060 on rig1 and 5 x GTX 1060 on rig2. The first test was running spmod3 on rig2 and krnlx on rig1. I didn't configure the rigs to be of the exact number of gpus because I will lose mining time for a couple of hours if disable one gpu. After more than an hour, I had almost the same number of coins mined. It meant krnlx was mining slower than spmod3 because it was using 6 gpus. The next test was running palginmod on rig 1 and spmod3 on rig2. This time, palginmod mined more coins, which should be the case since it is running on 6 gpus. If I divide the number of coins per gpu, the average coin per gpu was the same for palginmod and spmod3, which meant in my crude test that both miners seem to be performing equally. There seems to be a problem with krnlx even it is showing more hash rate per second. Those of you who have a lot more resources and time can test krnlx more extensively. For now, I'm going back to palginmod or spmod. Check also a test run by jimboscott here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2030529.4700 He has the same observations. Interesting observation. Thank you for the information. I am going to do some investigation myself. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: FFI2013 on August 14, 2017, 10:53:27 AM wow I just bought some 1070s to replace my r9 cards there killing me on power compared to my rx cards but wanted to mine signatum now I read the miner issues what miner is recommend I never owned a nivida card in my life so the help is appreciated thanks
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 14, 2017, 12:12:43 PM wow I just bought some 1070s to replace my r9 cards there killing me on power compared to my rx cards but wanted to mine signatum now I read the miner issues what miner is recommend I never owned a nivida card in my life so the help is appreciated thanks I actually use krnlx, but i think u gone swap to epsylon ccminer build. He got improvement on 13 august on skunk, based on krnlx withtout the share problem ;) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=770064.0 Link to source code : https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer But u maybe want to go to another crypto actually, sigt is less rentable actually, lot of people sell it. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: kinzey on August 14, 2017, 01:42:30 PM thank you for the info guys... ;) ;) ;)
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: sundownz on August 14, 2017, 10:00:47 PM Decided to update all 24 of my machines doing SIGT to the new CC miner 2.2 today. Results below so far.
https://ibb.co/kqkXjv ** Image Link Seems to achieve the ~5% gain I noted on individual machines once it settles (the other machines averages 5% vs the 10% on the 1080 Ti I did this morning). Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: sundownz on August 14, 2017, 10:24:21 PM Decided to update all 24 of my machines doing SIGT to the new CC miner 2.2 today. Results below so far. https://ibb.co/kqkXjv ** Image Link Seems to achieve the ~5% gain I noted on individual machines once it settles (the other machines averages 5% vs the 10% on the 1080 Ti I did this morning). It seems to still be climbing on the pool side -- I will update again later this evening with another graph to see if it maintains the full gain. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: sundownz on August 14, 2017, 11:53:36 PM https://ibb.co/iZpH1a
** Image Link I am seeing very solid holding at 2 GH (peaking at 2.2-2.3 GH) now vs seeing it peak at 2 GH and average 1.8-1.9 GH prior. So I will say I am very satisfied with CC Miner 2.2 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: castillojim on August 15, 2017, 02:07:15 AM Somebody if possible can put the link to compiled ccminer 2 August 13 with cuda 8 for Linux, i can´t do it.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: faxxer on August 15, 2017, 04:21:57 AM What best rate u can achieve with 1060? I got around 40card to mine this coin.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: antiycda on August 15, 2017, 06:35:50 AM What best rate u can achieve with 1060? I got around 40card to mine this coin. 17m per card Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: umine on August 15, 2017, 06:50:45 AM Really great miner. Get about 29.5-30.0 Mh/s from single GTX1070 Palit SJS, downvolted to 950 mV. Rig with 6xGTX1070 is stable for some days and gets about 175-180 Mh/s:
https://i.imgur.com/OMKOCGy.jpg https://i.imgur.com/v3g2TCg.jpg Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: mrkhajit on August 15, 2017, 08:30:25 PM I'm love this version. Thank you for sharing.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 15, 2017, 11:57:42 PM Just done use krnlx version, high hashrate, low shares ...
Go on the new ccminer 2.2 tpruvot 13 august release, same hashrate, more shares. Sad for us krnlx release never get fix ... Dev a prolly something to do more urgent ... U can get SP_mod to ( u have to pay to expensive for little miner ) Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 50+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: mirny on August 16, 2017, 01:06:10 PM Finally I was able to compile some binaries on windows.
But can you tell me how to compile ccminer with cuda 7.5? I used your tutorial, but instead of Cuda8, I installed Cuda7.5, but then I get an error in visual studio, that it cant find cuda, do you know how to solve this? cheers Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Epsylon3 on August 16, 2017, 02:19:49 PM check the cuda-9 commit, its the same (in vcxproj)
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: sunnydmd on August 17, 2017, 02:10:50 AM Can someone share Windows compiled for me? I don't know how to compile :(
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: manhcuong87 on August 18, 2017, 02:00:40 AM There was spmod8. Can you share it?
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: hous26 on August 18, 2017, 02:38:08 AM Is this one that you have to unpack? I prefer the miners i can just copy my bat file into. :P
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Real_Unhooked on August 18, 2017, 06:03:22 PM So looks like Truv latest version is the best
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 18, 2017, 07:10:51 PM So looks like Truv latest version is the best Totally right, krnlx fuckup your share rate ... u gona get more from Palgin and tpru, i dont test the new palgin cause only windows version. Tpru is best free miner actually, krnlx just kill a week of mining for me ... First and last time i get a miner from him. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Real_Unhooked on August 18, 2017, 07:25:30 PM So looks like Truv latest version is the best Totally right, krnlx fuckup your share rate ... u gona get more from Palgin and tpru, i dont test the new palgin cause only windows version. Tpru is best free miner actually, krnlx just kill a week of mining for me ... First and last time i get a miner from him. You have the link for Palgin's miner? Did you compare Palgin and Tpruv? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 18, 2017, 07:33:47 PM So looks like Truv latest version is the best Totally right, krnlx fuckup your share rate ... u gona get more from Palgin and tpru, i dont test the new palgin cause only windows version. Tpru is best free miner actually, krnlx just kill a week of mining for me ... First and last time i get a miner from him. You have the link for Palgin's miner? Did you compare Palgin and Tpruv? I would like but i cant ... last palginmod window version only, the previous one have less performance versus tpru version. So i actully use tpru version. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Real_Unhooked on August 22, 2017, 02:32:51 PM I think it's safe to say Tpru's version is the best free miner out there. I am sure SP_ is probably a tad bit faster but not enough to ROI on the 0.05BTC investment anytime soon.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: helpme85 on August 26, 2017, 11:53:49 PM https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx Please share linux version. Thanks you.Absolutely free - no fee's, no viruses, etc. Based on Alexis Provos code. :) :) :) tested on linux, no win version now -( But You can compile! 1080Ti: Code: [2017-08-10 09:40:13] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 52.54 MH/s Feel free to donate SIGT BLq8t6NQrfRC8kFyrvZ5YMGY33SVCQBeT4 Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: trader59 on August 27, 2017, 04:14:00 AM Just done use krnlx version, high hashrate, low shares ... Go on the new ccminer 2.2 tpruvot 13 august release, same hashrate, more shares. Sad for us krnlx release never get fix ... Dev a prolly something to do more urgent ... U can get SP_mod to ( u have to pay to expensive for little miner ) What sort of hashrates are you getting using CCminer 2.2? I'm getting like 24-27 MH for a GTX1070 but it varies pretty greatly. Undervolted power 90%/core +125/memory -500. I think it might be a memory underclock issue. I know most people say it doesn't affect the hashrate on skunk but when I up it back to normal my hashrates jump a bit higher. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 27, 2017, 07:08:17 AM Just done use krnlx version, high hashrate, low shares ... Go on the new ccminer 2.2 tpruvot 13 august release, same hashrate, more shares. Sad for us krnlx release never get fix ... Dev a prolly something to do more urgent ... U can get SP_mod to ( u have to pay to expensive for little miner ) What sort of hashrates are you getting using CCminer 2.2? I'm getting like 24-27 MH for a GTX1070 but it varies pretty greatly. Undervolted power 90%/core +125/memory -500. I think it might be a memory underclock issue. I know most people say it doesn't affect the hashrate on skunk but when I up it back to normal my hashrates jump a bit higher. Hi u miss something for sure ... u have to grab 30+ with 1070 on this setting ? You use linux or windows ? On your bat / conf file, put -i 25 default intensity use wrong value for 1070 and you will grab 30mh/s +. Adding more MemClock give nothing, lower it can reduce temp / watt needed from Mem but u gonna loose some stability on your CoreClock. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: P00P135 on August 27, 2017, 09:40:45 AM Just done use krnlx version, high hashrate, low shares ... Go on the new ccminer 2.2 tpruvot 13 august release, same hashrate, more shares. Sad for us krnlx release never get fix ... Dev a prolly something to do more urgent ... U can get SP_mod to ( u have to pay to expensive for little miner ) What sort of hashrates are you getting using CCminer 2.2? I'm getting like 24-27 MH for a GTX1070 but it varies pretty greatly. Undervolted power 90%/core +125/memory -500. I think it might be a memory underclock issue. I know most people say it doesn't affect the hashrate on skunk but when I up it back to normal my hashrates jump a bit higher. What did you set intensity at? Should be able to get 35MH/s with a 1070. I haven't tried underclocking the RAM. I just leave it at default and set core 1900-2000 with 80% Power. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on August 27, 2017, 10:04:14 AM Just done use krnlx version, high hashrate, low shares ... Go on the new ccminer 2.2 tpruvot 13 august release, same hashrate, more shares. Sad for us krnlx release never get fix ... Dev a prolly something to do more urgent ... U can get SP_mod to ( u have to pay to expensive for little miner ) What sort of hashrates are you getting using CCminer 2.2? I'm getting like 24-27 MH for a GTX1070 but it varies pretty greatly. Undervolted power 90%/core +125/memory -500. I think it might be a memory underclock issue. I know most people say it doesn't affect the hashrate on skunk but when I up it back to normal my hashrates jump a bit higher. What did you set intensity at? Should be able to get 35MH/s with a 1070. I haven't tried underclocking the RAM. I just leave it at default and set core 1900-2000 with 80% Power. 35mh/s on 1070 ? Nice legend ;) u set your intensity on bat / conf file, as i say put "-i 25" Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: badream on September 11, 2017, 11:51:27 AM alexis78 ccminer is not working anymore with skunk algo...
can you suggest a good ccminer for sigt for a 1080ti? (i got 51mh/s with alexis mod) now i'm getting 43 with standard ccminer Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on September 11, 2017, 03:22:13 PM alexis78 ccminer is not working anymore with skunk algo... can you suggest a good ccminer for sigt for a 1080ti? (i got 51mh/s with alexis mod) now i'm getting 43 with standard ccminer ccminer from tpruvot working good for skunk algo ;) https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer Hurry only ~20k block left before no more mining! Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: bigjee on September 11, 2017, 05:11:12 PM What best rate u can achieve with 1060? I got around 40card to mine this coin. 17m per card Wrong. You can get ~20 with a 1060. Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: badream on September 11, 2017, 05:54:36 PM alexis78 ccminer is not working anymore with skunk algo... can you suggest a good ccminer for sigt for a 1080ti? (i got 51mh/s with alexis mod) now i'm getting 43 with standard ccminer ccminer from tpruvot working good for skunk algo ;) https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer Hurry only ~20k block left before no more mining! Thank you, but i'd need a compiled version :( Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Bibi187 on September 11, 2017, 09:16:04 PM alexis78 ccminer is not working anymore with skunk algo... can you suggest a good ccminer for sigt for a 1080ti? (i got 51mh/s with alexis mod) now i'm getting 43 with standard ccminer ccminer from tpruvot working good for skunk algo ;) https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer Hurry only ~20k block left before no more mining! Thank you, but i'd need a compiled version :( U can build it is easy. git clone https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer.git cd ccminer ./configure ./make sudo ./makeinstall Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Epsylon3 on September 14, 2017, 12:19:50 AM its ./build.sh on linux
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: joaocha on September 20, 2017, 03:50:47 AM Im getting
[2017-09-20 05:33:06] Starting on stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106 [2017-09-20 05:33:06] NVML GPU monitoring enabled. [2017-09-20 05:33:06] 5 miner threads started, using 'skunk' algorithm. Illegal instruction On Linux, someone can help? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: dieselfrank on September 21, 2017, 08:17:45 AM alexis78 ccminer is not working anymore with skunk algo... can you suggest a good ccminer for sigt for a 1080ti? (i got 51mh/s with alexis mod) now i'm getting 43 with standard ccminer ccminer from tpruvot working good for skunk algo ;) https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer Hurry only ~20k block left before no more mining! Thank you, but i'd need a compiled version :( U can build it is easy. git clone https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer.git cd ccminer ./configure ./make sudo ./makeinstall Perhaps easy for you. Not so easy for some like myself who know next to nothing about compiling. Hell I'm not even sure what compiling is other than it sounds like your just putting everything in a single file.....Just assume we are not capable. Do like Walmart and give us a "Take N Bake" version..... Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Decker on September 24, 2017, 01:28:08 AM Perhaps easy for you. Not so easy for some like myself who know next to nothing about compiling. Hell I'm not even sure what compiling is other than it sounds like your just putting everything in a single file.....Just assume we are not capable. Do like Walmart and give us a "Take N Bake" version..... For which OS you need to compile ccminer? For Linux - use the guide above, it's really simple. For Windows based OS - here is a small guilde "How to compile ccminer from sources for Windows? (https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/595cc89057906af2f24e2c97/rukovodstvo-kak-sobrat-ccminer-iz-ishodnikov-pod-windows-595cc92c4ffd13b1f40e2393)". It's in russian, but feel free to use Google Translate (https://translate.google.com/). Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: UnknownX on September 24, 2017, 07:09:22 PM alexis78 ccminer is not working anymore with skunk algo... ccminer 2.2. or 2.2.1 from tpruvot is definitely the best one. I don't know will you receive the same hash on Linux, but I'm getting 57mh/s with my 1080ti on Win7x64.can you suggest a good ccminer for sigt for a 1080ti? (i got 51mh/s with alexis mod) now i'm getting 43 with standard ccminer Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: dartec on November 06, 2017, 08:11:35 PM Im getting [2017-09-20 05:33:06] Starting on stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106 [2017-09-20 05:33:06] NVML GPU monitoring enabled. [2017-09-20 05:33:06] 5 miner threads started, using 'skunk' algorithm. Illegal instruction On Linux, someone can help? I am getting the same error. Can you someone please help? :) Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: stzcze on November 06, 2017, 08:54:16 PM Sigt is POS... he can not be mine.
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: car1999 on January 06, 2018, 06:09:03 AM skunk is profitable on nicehash now, who is buying this dead shit algo hashrate?
Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: Branko on January 14, 2018, 08:55:16 PM skunk is profitable on nicehash now, who is buying this dead shit algo hashrate? people mining ALTCOM? Title: Re: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE] Post by: hekiheki on February 10, 2018, 06:49:50 AM alexis78 ccminer is not working anymore with skunk algo... can you suggest a good ccminer for sigt for a 1080ti? (i got 51mh/s with alexis mod) now i'm getting 43 with standard ccminer ccminer from tpruvot working good for skunk algo ;) https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer Hurry only ~20k block left before no more mining! Thank you, but i'd need a compiled version :( U can build it is easy. git clone https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer.git cd ccminer ./configure ./make sudo ./makeinstall ./configure no such file or directory |
