Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Development & Technical Discussion => Topic started by: jackjack on May 21, 2013, 04:53:33 PM



Title: Block 237226
Post by: jackjack on May 21, 2013, 04:53:33 PM
This block (http://blockexplorer.com/block/00000000000000db30c287eb12c87f92b79478f6d96002eed0cac9f57cf89011) came 19 minutes 28 seconds after the previous one, and the miner didn't include any transaction
Bastard  ;D


Title: Re: Block 237226
Post by: candoo on May 21, 2013, 05:15:37 PM
Sorry, my fault!


Title: Re: Block 237226
Post by: TalkingAntColony on May 21, 2013, 06:29:56 PM
Wow, the address that received the block reward is very rich...

https://blockchain.info/address/1Baf75Ferj6A7AoN565gCQj9kGWbDMHfN9


Title: Re: Block 237226
Post by: zvs on May 22, 2013, 12:16:13 PM
Sorry, my fault!

mr. t has pity


Title: Re: Block 237226
Post by: akabmikua on May 22, 2013, 04:12:55 PM
I think, that guy would have a pretty massive hashing power! But this much is next to impossible!


Title: Re: Block 237226
Post by: grue on May 22, 2013, 04:56:12 PM
Wow, the address that received the block reward is very rich...

https://blockchain.info/address/1Baf75Ferj6A7AoN565gCQj9kGWbDMHfN9
probably botnet owner


Title: Re: Block 237226
Post by: Remember remember the 5th of November on May 22, 2013, 05:06:51 PM
That address belongs to a pool/entity/something called 'Eclipse' according to a search on the forums.


Title: Re: Block 237226
Post by: scintill on May 26, 2013, 06:43:29 AM
That address belongs to a pool/entity/something called 'Eclipse' according to a search on the forums.

Yep, Eclipse Mining Consortium (https://eclipsemc.com/).


Title: Re: Block 237226
Post by: jdbtracker on May 26, 2013, 12:56:12 PM
hmmm they either made a typo or they are not sending just currency... I bet you it's porn.


Title: Re: Block 237226
Post by: Shevek on May 26, 2013, 05:28:57 PM
Why the other nodes accepted the block!? I think nodes/miners can have the power to reject such blocks that bother the whole system.

Bitcoin is about transactions. So, no transaction, no subsidy.


Title: Re: Block 237226
Post by: leijurv on May 26, 2013, 05:33:18 PM
I think nodes/miners can have the power to reject such blocks that bother the whole system.
+1


Title: Re: Block 237226
Post by: jackjack on May 26, 2013, 06:12:06 PM
Why the other nodes accepted the block!? I think nodes/miners can have the power to reject such blocks that bother the whole system.

Bitcoin is about transactions. So, no transaction, no subsidy.
Another +1
A new block with less than 50% of your transactions pool? Block rejected

Direct proof of your signature btw


Title: Re: Block 237226
Post by: Shevek on May 26, 2013, 06:36:01 PM

Direct proof of your signature btw


 ;D

Well, in fact I don't stand for specific improve. I think, miners / nodes can reject such blocks within the actual protocol rules.