|
Title: Would You Rather Have... Post by: johnniewalker on May 29, 2013, 02:22:01 AM 1 ounce of Gold or 62 Ounces of Silver? Because based on today's spot prices, thats the breakdown. I'd pick silver all day.
Title: Re: Would You Rather Have... Post by: kodo on May 29, 2013, 04:04:03 AM Silver for sure. Silver has more value intrensically
Title: Re: Would You Rather Have... Post by: r3wt on May 29, 2013, 04:04:52 AM Silver for sure. Silver has more value intrensically dafuq u talkin bout nikka? Title: Re: Would You Rather Have... Post by: TheButterZone on May 29, 2013, 06:14:18 AM Silver, has more room to rise than gold has to fall?
Title: Re: Would You Rather Have... Post by: John (John K.) on May 29, 2013, 06:23:14 AM Gold, less storage space and less heft to lug them around...
Title: Re: Would You Rather Have... Post by: johnniewalker on May 30, 2013, 02:05:57 AM Silver for sure. Silver has more value intrensically dafuq u talkin bout nikka? And, for so long, silver was not necessarily considered a "precious metal"-it was used in industry and considered expendable. As time goes on, technology will only require more silver, as no metal/alloy can imitate its features. You guys should watch Chris Duane's early (forget the scam aspect if you know what I'm talking about) videos on youtube. His channel is "thegreatesttruthnevertold". Title: Re: Would You Rather Have... Post by: pekv2 on May 30, 2013, 01:48:41 PM Gold, less storage space and less heft to lug them around... ^^ Title: Re: Would You Rather Have... Post by: webosftw on May 31, 2013, 06:49:44 AM Silver because there is more of it visually
Title: Re: Would You Rather Have... Post by: mprep on May 31, 2013, 09:34:25 AM Silver, as it may rise in price, higher than gold already is. Maybe...
|