Bitcoin Forum

Other => Archival => Topic started by: icopress on September 24, 2017, 11:57:51 PM



Title: [CLOSED] Parsing bbcode
Post by: icopress on September 24, 2017, 11:57:51 PM
Quote from: Abiiiii12
My BTC address 1MNsJV5q8JGCg5i8EPv1aJAuM7sZq37Pq1 (https://mempool.space/ru/address/1MNsJV5q8JGCg5i8EPv1aJAuM7sZq37Pq1)
Quote from: Brahim012
BTC address : 1GdZnYf7np7uovA9Lux21Q3ZuFnwHKR5dW (https://mempool.space/ru/address/1GdZnYf7np7uovA9Lux21Q3ZuFnwHKR5dW)

  • Both part of wallet 0000001bce (https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0000001bce8b8aa0) which looks to be some sort of custodial wallet [1] (https://www.walletexplorer.com/address/1GdZnYf7np7uovA9Lux21Q3ZuFnwHKR5dW), [2] (https://www.walletexplorer.com/address/1MNsJV5q8JGCg5i8EPv1aJAuM7sZq37Pq1)
  • The first Bitcoin transaction was made on the same day with an interval of 19 hours and 13 minutes (2023-05-23).
  • Both account reuse legacy addresses.
  • They both sent to bc1qm34lsc65zpw79lxes69zkqmk6ee3ewf0j77s3h which belongs to Binance.
  • Both addresses are links to a mixer / Both sent to this same address bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp address.
  • Both addresses are received coins from bc1qq904ynep5mvwpjxdlyecgeupg22dm8am6cfvgq
  • Both addresses were directly interacted through 1FAAphFUwM4WWJtqjJjQuHcMANqoJDdpi2


Title: Re: Development of a bounty company
Post by: TheCoinFinder on September 26, 2017, 08:05:56 AM
I think 70% of the members here seek a chance to get space in a signature or bounty campaign.
Making your bounty limited to a few participants may make most applicants feel disappointed.
It is appreciated if you can keep payments on average so that maximum number of members can join.


Title: Re: Development of a bounty company
Post by: buxlover on September 26, 2017, 11:15:48 AM
I think it's good to put the participant to limited as you said. Getting too many participation doesn't really mean that bounty is getting published in good way. There could scammers in the campaign who may not do the job seriously and end up in spam.

Limiting the participation will also save the unwanted spreading of the tokens, if too much payment is given in the form of token then it might just loose the value in later time of ICO. This is the reason why we see those ICO failing who has airdrops going on. Becuase if the tokens are given away like that almost free then this has to be paid by the company above the heads.

So keep it limited. That would be better.


Title: Re: Development of a bounty company
Post by: anggriani on September 27, 2017, 01:55:29 PM
we see and know how the current campaign situation. as a bounty hunter I strongly agree if campaign participants are made to be limited. his heavy rule it's okay, which is important we are serious in working, not the work like spammers.


Title: Re: Development of a bounty company
Post by: error08 on September 27, 2017, 02:34:36 PM
I think 70% of the members here seek a chance to get space in a signature or bounty campaign.
Making your bounty limited to a few participants may make most applicants feel disappointed.
It is appreciated if you can keep payments on average so that maximum number of members can join.

What you can advise on the basis of the fact that the company of generosity will be about $ 200,000
If the average divided by $ 100 per participant, then this is 2000 people

May I ask, what kind of company? any further detail?
It is about advertising your company? or invest in your bounty company?
I assume, you want to advertise your company. 250-500 people are enough to advertise your company for months, instead of hire 2000 people which is could lead to so much spammer everywhere. However, you can discuss it with trusted manager in this forum, to calculate it.
But, you said the requirements will be high, what are the requirements?


Title: Re: [CLOSED] Parsing bbcode
Post by: icopress on July 21, 2023, 12:04:59 PM
r