Bitcoin Forum

hi i am trying to find out what will be fee the signature camping manager take for managing the camping for specific time .

Do they take monthly fee or weekly and how much they take for each camping ..

Go you have any idea on this

Managing campaign work needs sufficient time to review eligible posts and there is no fixed amount of payment to do this.
The fee for campaign manager gets changed periodically as per the market rate.
I have seen most campaign managers asking 0.05 bitcoin weekly as their fee, estimated in USD $250.

I think they are getting a certain percentage as a fee for every signature campaign they accepted. Maybe around 10% of the the total package will be the fee. But I'm seeing around .035-.050BTC for a trusted campaign manager and perhaps around .020-.035BTC for the mid level manager. But we all know that sometimes they are handling 2-5 simultaneous campaigns so its no easy task as well. For bitcoin campaign manager, usually they are paid weekly together with the participants, but I'm not sure how altcoin bounties works, because we all know that it takes 6-8 weeks before bounties is completed.

so on average  from BTC.02 to BTC.05 will be cost for managing the camping . but is it work because some camping like have 100 participants and the manager has to check every account for any spamming and other thing and even if he is managing more then 2-3 then more then 200+ account need to manage per week so it will be tough to find out who is doing spam until final round for counting start ..so managing more then 1-2 will decrease the camping effectiveness i thing ..

I think signature managers are paid depending on the size of the campaign and the difficulty on how it will be managed. I'm super curious though how it is. I wish someone like Yahoo would reply here and further enlighten us. Although, I highly doubt Yahoo would discuss any of this here as this is really his business we're talking about. All we can do is speculate for now until someone does explain.

Only 2 reasons why you want to know about that.
Yes, it will be different for experienced and trusted one compare to new manager.
But basically, manager paid based on their work, do it right, properly and conscientiously, then all will be fine.
A manager could set minimum amount like 0.03-0.05 for small-mid size campaigns, and 10%-15% for large campaigns.

First: you've been using the word "camping" for as long as I can remember. A camping is where people go to with their tent, for vacation. You're looking for the word campaign.

The answer to your question depends on many factors. Ultimately, any price both parties can agree upon will do. In general it's also safe to assume that you get what you pay for, and the minimum rate can depend on where someone lives (someone in Switserland has higher cost of living than someone in Poland). And it will largely depend on how much time the campaign manager is willing to spend on it. A better campaign manager reduces spam.

I'd like to manage a campaign (signature or something else) in the near future :)

Bring your management costs down for free https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2207187.0

That's why being a campaign manager is a tough job, having more than 100 participants is a pain in the ass. 0.03-0.05 BTC per week isn't enough for participants around 100-150 sometimes I saw that number on alt bounty campaigns, but if you will just handle a campaign that pays BTC then I guess it's okay, just check your participants thoroughly so you will not face more trouble when checking before the payment period.


That's what I noticed also. lol


IIRC you managed some campaigns already? or not yet. lol But will look through your future campaigns :)

Once you succeed you will also add the fees to manage the campaign. However, bot will take the members by checking adding the UID by doing first in first serve get place right.
Recently Atriz I think, he selects the members who does not have quality of many participants in his all the campaigns but 80% seems same section buster and one liners.

I hope Yahoo, Edwarded, Lutpin and Lauda will take the more campaigns to manage from these kind newbie managers in upcoming campaigns.

Correct. I've been running Rollin giveaway campaigns for more than a year, and gave away more than $5000 for the contests. Check Hero Campaign Manager LoyceV looking for new campaign to manage - Portfolio (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1777744.0) for a complete overview.
But Rollin closed earlier this month, so I have time available to run another campaign.

Ah, I thought its guitarplinker who managed that campaign but I guess I just bit confused lol.

This will happen soon, of course, if and only if the bots will continuously work without any bugs encountered, like what usually bots that were made for the forum's campaign.


What you mean is Yahoo, Edwarded, Lutpin and Lauda should try the bot made of this newbie account.

I guess they should try if how the bot looks and how it can help them, but if it gives them a hard time, then they should continue what they started with manually checking the campaigns they managed.

Actually, i don't have any idea but there are those people in the service forum offering their services as signature campaign manager.  That way, you can have idea how much these guys are earning with their duration.  Me too, i am so interested to manage one.. but i still have to really have a good knowledge how things goes around in here... So for  now, i needed to learn a lot from fellow member of this forum.   

They have all their different prices so the better you are, the higher the payments. Some are paid more when they are paid in altcoins  because it's value could increase more if the ICO is a very interesting project.

Where did I speak that trusted campaign managers to use the bot. You simply didn't read my post.
I spoke about atriz since his rank is high. He is not worth to manage the campaign. Recently most of the campaign owner to deals to him alone. I hope that is because he may deal with less fee.
I have checked all his current running campaign participants most are seems like alts. If you doubt means check the members. I don't how you be in his campaign. It's simply shit management from him.

Dude this was made last September though but what is that signature camping you've been talking about? I didn't knew that people can camp with signature's. It's signature campaign just to correct you with that and I can't really understand what you are implying to say. You should start changing that term as we've noticed you're the same calling it that way with bapparabi.

Totally depends on the campaign manager and the campaign they're planning to manage.
This differs campaign wise obviously as not all the campaigns have the same budget.Also the rule of thumb : You get what you pay for.So if a campaign is hiring a cheap shit manager,they probably can't afford a better one.

It depends on manager-to-manager basis, their terms and their way of working.
Many would do it for you at a rate of ~0.08 - 0.1 a month, while others won't compromise because they have a reputation here and they ask their worth for it.


Once again, it depends on what terms do the company decide with the manager, but most managers take it as an advance (not the fee but first week's payment) as escrow funds to ensure that both the manager and the participants are not going to get scammed for their work.

---

Depends on the company to decide whom to hire as it's not necessary that all the campaign managers remain busy all the time. But many have the ability (talent) to manage more than one campaign altogether like Yahoo, Lauda, Lutpin but affording them is not everyone's cup of tea.

It is hard to know what they are getting because almost every campaign manager cracks deal with the company privately but I have seen few campaign manager sending some bitcoin on each payment batch to their personal bitcoin address too. It seems like they are taking amount based on total amount they are paying out in total every week to other participants. And I think this is best approach as if you have to handle more members you have to spend many hours in counting every post they will make during whole period and also you have to make sure they will not remove signature in between.

I can't guess exact amount but they are taking percentage anything between 5-10%.

They get the payment from the signature campaign weekly, all sum by the number of participants and their ranks which their showed in the application, plus managers fee. And I suppose the manager is taking all those money that those persons who made less comments than it was necessary to make and money from all those users who were banned during the campaign. I am ready to bet those managers make really good money here.

It depends on the budget of the campaign and the amount of participants. It will also depend on whether it's a weekly or a monthly campaign as it's easier to count posts once a month. Some people have said that they're earning 0.05 a week. You can't expect anyone to pay this much if the campaign has 20 participants and pays 0.01 BTC to each.
A fair rate for a manager IMO is double the rate of a top ranked participant.