|
Title: Garzik's new replay protection proposal not protect exchanges from replay attack Post by: chek2fire on October 04, 2017, 05:22:31 PM Garzik's new replay protection proposal not protect at all exchanges or better users to drain exchanges from legacy coins after hard fork. And the next question is why anyone to use this proposal and not just split his coins so it can protect them from replay?
Exchanges and payment providers as we see and to the etc-eth case will have the most problem and they will need days to split their coins if they want to protect them from replay. For that reason is almost certain that exchanges will stop bitcoin trading for days after this fork. I like to hear and your thought about this matter. The poor "replay protection" that propose Garzik is an btc address that is not valid to segwit2x chain https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/745jlm/segwit2x_merges_in_optin_transaction_replay/dnvqi6b/ lol is this guy a developer? And how this joker be around bitcoin so many years and no one notice what clown he is? Title: Re: Garzik's new replay protection proposal not protect exchanges from replay attack Post by: Andre_Goldman on October 04, 2017, 05:29:14 PM Garzik's new replay protection proposal not protect at all exchanges or better users to drain exchanges from legacy coins after hard fork. And the next question is why anyone to use this proposal and not just split his coins so it can protect them from replay? Exchanges and payment providers as we see and to the etc-eth case will have the most problem and they will need days to split their coins if they want to protect them from replay. For that reason is almost certain that exchanges will stop bitcoin trading for days after this fork. I like to hear and your thought about this matter. The poor "replay protection" that propose Garzik is an btc address that is not valid to segwit2x chain https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/745jlm/segwit2x_merges_in_optin_transaction_replay/dnvqi6b/ lol is this guy a developer? And how this joker be around bitcoin so many years and no one notice what clown he is? last time I heard about him he was talking something about "C" language ... Title: Re: Garzik's new replay protection proposal not protect exchanges from replay attack Post by: chek2fire on October 04, 2017, 05:32:13 PM Garzik's new replay protection proposal not protect at all exchanges or better users to drain exchanges from legacy coins after hard fork. And the next question is why anyone to use this proposal and not just split his coins so it can protect them from replay? Exchanges and payment providers as we see and to the etc-eth case will have the most problem and they will need days to split their coins if they want to protect them from replay. For that reason is almost certain that exchanges will stop bitcoin trading for days after this fork. I like to hear and your thought about this matter. The poor "replay protection" that propose Garzik is an btc address that is not valid to segwit2x chain https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/745jlm/segwit2x_merges_in_optin_transaction_replay/dnvqi6b/ lol is this guy a developer? And how this joker be around bitcoin so many years and no one notice what clown he is? last time I heard about him he was talking something about "C" language ... he was talking about c language but dev means to be a mechanic and to give tech solution. How you see this proposal for the replay protection. In your terms this is a smart solution? Exchanges will still need to stop trading for days after the hf to protect their assets. And why exchanges not to just split their coins? Why they have to add such a poor tech solution to every transactions and add one more fee to their fees? Is ridiculous. What he talk about C? Do you remember? :P |