Bitcoin Forum

I got negative feedback from Lauda without breaking any rules. This is just wrong as I helped many people here since 2011 and knew about Bitcoin before even she did. Who does she think she is to act like she can ban old members like me just for updating security info?

She claimed my account is "likely hacked" because I updated my email and password recently. Where is the scam accusation if this is not my account?

Edit: Lauda only joined this forum in 2013. I have been here since 2011 and helping people with mining. When a mod reads my post tell her she needs to delete this fake negative trust.

this should be on reputation board (maybe).

Because a lot hacked account always change email and password. I think you can contact lauda and give proof if you still own your account. Ex: sign message from your old address.

Throwing tamper tantrums is not going to help you gain any credibility.

The date you signed up is irrelevant really, so don't try to use that as some kind of points scoring. There have been dozens of hacked accounts recently, most of them are from early accounts where the real owners have long forgotten about them. Lots of accounts have also been sold with the rise in bitcoin price. All that being said, while it is suspicious to change the email and password at the same time, I'm not sure people should be penalized for it without extra proof.

I Think what Lauda is doing is putting a pre cautionary feedback on your account. on the feedback that he gave reasons where clearly stated and I believe it is disputable you just need to prove that his assumption is not true.

What he is doing kinda help to avoid scamming in the forum.

Pre cautionary feedback is neutral, not negative. If you want to put neutral I could understand, but negative when I didn't scam is just plain wrong.

Edit: Well I got no address anyway,  looks my account is forever lost. :(

If you have been here since 2011,it does come as a surprise that you haven't staked a single address yet.Why ? If asked any given day to prove an account belongs to you,how would you do it ? Sorry but if I was Lauda,I'd still think the same way.You can always come up with an address posted back in the day that you can sign a message from and sort it out with them.

Almost no one looks at Neutrals nor will the user likely respond to accusations. If you had been here as long as you say, you should know that. Lauda did the right thing here.
Find an addy and sign a message and the Negative will be removed.

Sign a message with:

12wDRLTdLcjxWRBm4pXT1G3sXb5aoqfaVa,cripperz,https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=30185

Where is this address located? Sorry, too lazy to look for it :-\

---

@cripperz, look at the situation this way:

You have been here since 2011, yet you don't know very well how the forum operates.
Anyway, lets leave that aside.

Lets say that you are who you say you are, and that the account is yours. Also lets assume that you have been away for 6 years on other business, for your case.
Then now, when you come back after 6 years you want to use your account. What do you do?

1. Change password. [Seems fair, you might have forgotten and for this you need email access]
2. Change email. [ok, lets also add this. However, to have the ability to change email you need to know your password and log in to your account]

Why change email and password at the same time? If you have had access to your account or your email guaranteed (If you say the account is really yours)

---

Also, no-one ever said you changed your password, only email. You are just confirming what Lauda has tagged your account for. The more you say, the more suspicious it gets  ::)

It is what it is, and if you don't mess up and scam, Lauda might be prevailed upon
to change his/her rating in the future.  But that's up to Lauda.

What's the importance to you anyway?  You obviously haven't been active in years,
so it's not like you need the positive trust to do deals.  Getting into a sig campaign
is going to be a challenge if that's your aim, but right now there's nothing you can
do about it. 

Too many hackers & bought accounts on bitcointalk.  That's the reason for the quick
red by DT members.

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:hvkiLefKHxcJ:https://github.com/dirtyfilthy/bitten/blob/master/utils/addresses.txt+&cd=10&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

This address is from 2011 . If you got one from 2016 maybe I will still have it. I do not keep them that long.


Of course , I update my password of every account after 6 months. facebook, twitter ,reddit stackexchange, etc. Why should I keep my email from 2011 that I do not use ?
I do not need signature campaigns , thanks to how i bought a few bitcoins a long time ago. but i would like to join to get extra income and now thanks to lauda who gives fake trust i could not.
You only joined in 2017, you know nothing. we did not even have signature campaigns before and before i could upload my avatar . scammer for updating my email, is that a joke ? :) Lauda should prove something or change to neutral warning if you really thought my account was hacked . Lauda only joined in 2013 i probably known about bitcoin for longer. :)

How come? Do you change wallets all the time?


Irrelevant. We all have to start somewhere and just because I didn't buy an account to cheat doesn't mean I'm dumb.... Ive been looking at this forum from time to time since 2015 however I have never really had the time till now to dedicate to posting and being a proper 'community member' as one might say.

---

No-one called you a scammer, Lauda just labelled your account as a potential bought account. Unless you can prove to him/her that that is not the case, No-one can help you.

LaudaM continues to give negative feedback despite having been caught in an illegal extortion crime.

To nail it, Lauda is a known criminal hypocritically tagging other users he dislikes.

Furthermore Lauda fails to defend himself, blatantly ignoring the question whether extortionists/criminals are hurting the forum or not. Keeping criminals included in Bitcointalk's Default Trust is extremely damaging to the community indeed.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2244644.msg22898077#msg22898077

I cannot comment on the above, but to confirm my account is not hacked and i got no explanation about which forum rule i broke by lauda . is it against the rules to change email address? if not, red trust must be deleted

Totally nothing to do with forum rules at all. Trust is given out at the discretion of the person who sends it. Unless you are able to convince Lauda that you are the true owner of the account cripperz with concrete evidence, I believe that is unlikely that the red trust will be removed any time soon (if ever).

Don't be sad, now that you can't join signature campaigns anymore. Since you had such a good time without them in 2011, what's the difference now?

Can you please confirm it?

Sign a message using the old address.

read below . that one is from a long time ago. i only used this account in 2011, 2016 and now. if you could find one from 2016 i may be able to sign , but my old addresses from 2011 are destroyed

Lol have you seen your posts? It's quite obvious this was a bought account and you started spamming to increase your rank. Provide a signed message or your point is moot.

Op talking shit about being back from 2011 but probably doesn't know shit about bitcoin with his brainless one liners.

HAHAHAHA! This guy is a joke  ;D ;D

The address he 'doesnt have access to' because it is destroyed has 1.4 BTC attached to it. https://blockchain.info/address/12wDRLTdLcjxWRBm4pXT1G3sXb5aoqfaVa (https://blockchain.info/address/12wDRLTdLcjxWRBm4pXT1G3sXb5aoqfaVa)

Don't tell me that you just don't have access anymore to 7,700 USD worth of funds? If so, I envy you for being that rich that you can just loose that much money without caring about it.

Unless......

you never heard of cold storage ?

Cold storage = destroyed ???

::)

you obviously have some thing to lean about keeping btc

i will not waste my time to explain, ask an other old member

Edit: i would explain only if you neutral the trust

It seems that the feedback is very much warranted, and unless supplied with a signed message other DT members should follow.

Not everything is always as it seems...

The words of a defeated man.

I doubt it. I've seen a lot of hacked, purchased accounts promoting that ICO anyways.

What the fuck are you doing? You're not even trying at all with your shitposts. This is incomprehensible garbage that has nothing to do with anything.

---

Are you so excited to hop into a signature campaign that you'll just crappily increase your activity? Clearly, you have some knowledge of the forum as you immediately hop into the Reputation threads; given the English skills, I'd assume that your main/old account had been banned and now you're trying to work your way back up. Badly.

If I had a bitcoin for every time you posted something incoherent, I'd have 15 bitcoins.