|
Title: THE NEW BANHAMMER MODERATOR Post by: gesyqe@amail.club on October 19, 2017, 12:26:45 PM BITCOINTALK IS BEING AN ASS RIGHT NOW... WHAT THE FUCK IS UNSUBSTANTIAL POST ? DO YOU NEED 100 WORDS EVERYTIME WE POST ? KEEP DELETING POST AND BANNING PEOPLE UNTIL YOU LOSE EVERYONE.. GOODBYE
Title: Re: THE NEW BANHAMMER MODERATOR Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on October 20, 2017, 12:24:43 AM Praise to the banhammer mod, even though I have no idea which account(s) you're talking about that got banned.
100 characters is nothing, really, plus quantity does not equal quality. Most of the users I've reported only write one line shitposts in broken English and add absolutely zero to a thread. It's obvious such assholes are just posting to rank up or meet a quota for a signature campaign. I'm damn tired of that, and you're frustrated because you're probably one of those shitposters. Too bad, so sad, bye bye. Title: Re: THE NEW BANHAMMER MODERATOR Post by: BTCMILLIONAIRE on October 20, 2017, 12:28:18 AM Praise to the banhammer mod, even though I have no idea which account(s) you're talking about that got banned. Are you implying that a quality post actually addresses the thread and doesn't simply post random shit that is vaguely relevant to the thread title? Preposterous.100 characters is nothing, really, plus quantity does not equal quality. Most of the users I've reported only write one line shitposts in broken English and add absolutely zero to a thread. It's obvious such assholes are just posting to rank up or meet a quota for a signature campaign. I'm damn tired of that, and you're frustrated because you're probably one of those shitposters. Too bad, so sad, bye bye. Title: Re: THE NEW BANHAMMER MODERATOR Post by: actmyname on October 20, 2017, 12:37:53 AM BITCOINTALK IS BEING FTFY. Title: Re: THE NEW BANHAMMER MODERATOR Post by: Erelas on October 20, 2017, 01:05:25 AM Hmm, couple of problems with this, first the OP:
- If you had more than one post deleted because of a lack of quantity of characters (regardless of content), I could agree that is unwarranted, as quantity does not indicate quality. Some of the best "one-liners" in the world are short and to the point and would be deleted under that guidance. - Was that indicated in the banning, the quantity, or some other reason? Not enough is known and that right there would have given indication of the mods intent. - When reacting to something like this, it's usually better just to be quiet, and not respond publicly in an all-caps rant type of post, that will certainly make you stick out in someones mind as potentially needing moderation in the future. Ok, on the unknown "banhammer" moderator: - If it's a new mod, you might have just gotten unlucky, and they are still finding their way, so to speak. - Internet mods tend to be a little younger, in their twenties, and a bit zealous when handed that responsibility, don't hold it too much against them, in their minds it's probably entirely logical and warranted. |