|
Title: [2017-10-27] Kansas Ethics Panel: Bitcoin Campaign Contributions Too Risky Post by: Chase on October 28, 2017, 09:18:18 PM Kansas Ethics Panel: Bitcoin Campaign Contributions Too Risky https://dcebrief.com/kansas-ethics-panel-bitcoin-campaign-contributions-too-risky/ Title: Re: [2017-10-27] Kansas Ethics Panel: Bitcoin Campaign Contributions Too Risky Post by: Slow death on October 28, 2017, 11:28:34 PM these politicians are very manipulative, if they use bitcoin to fund a campaign is too risky, but when they are elected they do dirty business, they are corrupt and they instigate wars in other countries, It will even be bitcoin is that it offers some risk or the candidates is that they must be responsible for their actions?
"Bitcoin is a digital currency. There is no physical manifestation of this currency in any way. It’s just alphanumeric characters that exist only online. It is not backed by any government. The value is subjective and highly volatile. However, there are millions of people who utilize bitcoin." "The greatest problem would be the strong probability of the influencing of local elections by totally unidentifiable lobbyists trying to come in. If you think the Russians affected the presidential elections, just wait. This is what’s going to happen." "It’s totally contrary to the transparency we’re asking for our political system to provide to the public." Title: Re: [2017-10-27] Kansas Ethics Panel: Bitcoin Campaign Contributions Too Risky Post by: The_Dark_Knight on October 29, 2017, 02:54:08 AM these politicians are very manipulative, if they use bitcoin to fund a campaign is too risky, but when they are elected they do dirty business, they are corrupt and they instigate wars in other countries, It will even be bitcoin is that it offers some risk or the candidates is that they must be responsible for their actions? It is a complete joke that politicians ask transparency when they are some of the most corrupted individuals in the entire world, besides unlike banks transferences, we are going to be able to see everything happening on the blockchain so in theory it could be very easy to track every single transaction, they will only need to make public their bitcoin address and everyone will be able to see the amount of money they got and where it came from, something that cannot be done with bank accounts."Bitcoin is a digital currency. There is no physical manifestation of this currency in any way. It’s just alphanumeric characters that exist only online. It is not backed by any government. The value is subjective and highly volatile. However, there are millions of people who utilize bitcoin." "The greatest problem would be the strong probability of the influencing of local elections by totally unidentifiable lobbyists trying to come in. If you think the Russians affected the presidential elections, just wait. This is what’s going to happen." "It’s totally contrary to the transparency we’re asking for our political system to provide to the public." |