|
Title: What's better for ICO? Post by: Serge_Quantor on November 14, 2017, 02:33:24 PM Hello everyone!
What do you think is better for ICO - to setup additional subdomain name on your existing web site like ico.quantor.co or just setup new one like Quantor.ai (or smth like that)? Title: Re: What's better for ICO? Post by: EXtremeAEX on November 14, 2017, 03:48:50 PM I'm going for the existing one, ico.quantor.co as it is simpler and easy to remember. A new domain may confuse your visitors to your current site, and it is hard to devise a catchy site name for the ICO as well.
Just took a look at your site, I would suggest adding more photos of your company and perhaps even upgrade your site to get more users, good luck for your upcoming ICO! :D Title: Re: What's better for ICO? Post by: cynical on November 14, 2017, 05:16:32 PM i would also recommend having a subdomain rather than a seperate domain.
a subdomain also highlights the main site while the ICO is being advertised which i would imagine is always good. Title: Re: What's better for ICO? Post by: efeaydin on November 14, 2017, 05:50:52 PM Hello everyone! What do you think is better for ICO - to setup additional subdomain name on your existing web site like ico.quantor.co or just setup new one like Quantor.ai (or smth like that)? The subdomain one looks better. If you have 2 domains, example.co and example.ai, we should remember which one belongs to ICO - or make one more HTTP request. ico.example.co is easy to remember. I'd prefer that. Title: Re: What's better for ICO? Post by: KingScorpio on November 14, 2017, 11:59:06 PM Hello everyone! What do you think is better for ICO - to setup additional subdomain name on your existing web site like ico.quantor.co or just setup new one like Quantor.ai (or smth like that)? People are copy and pasting so much nowadays especially those that handle cryptos. I dont think domains matter much Title: Re: What's better for ICO? Post by: Serge_Quantor on November 18, 2017, 07:58:51 PM I'm going for the existing one, ico.quantor.co as it is simpler and easy to remember. A new domain may confuse your visitors to your current site, and it is hard to devise a catchy site name for the ICO as well. Just took a look at your site, I would suggest adding more photos of your company and perhaps even upgrade your site to get more users, good luck for your upcoming ICO! :D Thanks for your opinion and kind wishes! Title: Re: What's better for ICO? Post by: Serge_Quantor on November 18, 2017, 08:27:45 PM Hello everyone! What do you think is better for ICO - to setup additional subdomain name on your existing web site like ico.quantor.co or just setup new one like Quantor.ai (or smth like that)? The subdomain one looks better. If you have 2 domains, example.co and example.ai, we should remember which one belongs to ICO - or make one more HTTP request. ico.example.co is easy to remember. I'd prefer that. Thank you! Title: Re: What's better for ICO? Post by: luke.watson on November 18, 2017, 08:36:33 PM A sub domain is going to be a lot more trust worthy IMO - plus it will save you buying another domain just to advertise an ICO! :)
Title: Re: What's better for ICO? Post by: nestegg on November 19, 2017, 12:17:51 PM Only get a domain if you can find something catchy but I would just redirect to your regular domain.
Title: Re: What's better for ICO? Post by: Serge_Quantor on November 19, 2017, 06:50:30 PM A sub domain is going to be a lot more trust worthy IMO - plus it will save you buying another domain just to advertise an ICO! :) Thank you! Title: Re: What's better for ICO? Post by: Serge_Quantor on November 19, 2017, 06:56:41 PM i would also recommend having a subdomain rather than a seperate domain. a subdomain also highlights the main site while the ICO is being advertised which i would imagine is always good. Thanks a lot! Title: Re: What's better for ICO? Post by: Iksie on November 19, 2017, 07:59:56 PM Thanks! :)
Title: Re: What's better for ICO? Post by: horal on November 19, 2017, 10:31:54 PM If the main page of your domain is already used (the site existed long before the ICO), then its better to have a subdomain. Otherwise, if you are creating a brand-new site for ICO, I would use the main domain, and subdomain for "Investor's profile" Title: Re: What's better for ICO? Post by: h55 on November 20, 2017, 01:11:45 AM 1-team
2-adviser 3-roadmap 4-project subjects 5-developers Ideas of projects and other parameters that can help to be better Title: Re: What's better for ICO? Post by: militarymonster1027 on November 20, 2017, 04:17:35 AM Its best I think to just have ICO on main website. Subdomains seem sketchy imo.
Title: Re: What's better for ICO? Post by: Serge_Quantor on November 20, 2017, 06:20:21 AM 1-team 2-adviser 3-roadmap 4-project subjects 5-developers Ideas of projects and other parameters that can help to be better Thank you! Title: Re: What's better for ICO? Post by: WorldBitICO on November 20, 2017, 12:05:28 PM Legal team/advisor is also very important.
|