|
Title: [NMC] Namecoin - Satoshi and Others Discuss BitDNS Post by: snailbrain on July 04, 2013, 01:27:09 PM Interesting read (old timers will have already read)
Satoshi Quote I think it would be possible for BitDNS to be a completely separate network and separate block chain, yet share CPU power with Bitcoin. The only overlap is to make it so miners can search for proof-of-work for both networks simultaneously. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.222 Title: Re: Satoshi and Others Discuss - Namecoin Post by: Wolf Rainer on July 04, 2013, 01:59:32 PM Reserved.
Title: Re: [NMC] Namecoin - Satoshi and Others Discuss BitDNS Post by: PerfectAgent on July 04, 2013, 03:07:26 PM Wait, so this is the very early concept of Namecoin?
Title: Re: [NMC] Namecoin - Satoshi and Others Discuss BitDNS Post by: coinerd on July 04, 2013, 04:13:21 PM Wait, so this is the very early concept of Namecoin? and merge mining. Title: Re: [NMC] Namecoin - Satoshi and Others Discuss BitDNS Post by: snailbrain on July 04, 2013, 10:29:44 PM looks like it
Title: Re: [NMC] Namecoin - Satoshi and Others Discuss BitDNS Post by: AndyRossy on July 04, 2013, 11:03:17 PM wouldnt it be possible to have a dnsserver for hidden tor services, given them more "natrual" names?
Title: Re: [NMC] Namecoin - Satoshi and Others Discuss BitDNS Post by: DannyM on July 04, 2013, 11:31:48 PM wouldnt it be possible to have a dnsserver for hidden tor services, given them more "natrual" names? Yes that is one of the uses of namecoin. While there is a proposal for a separate "tor/" namespace, https://dot-bit.org/Namespace:Tor (https://dot-bit.org/Namespace:Tor) .onion addresses can also be specified as a "tor" value field in the regular d/ namespace as shown here: https://dot-bit.org/Namespace:Domain_names_v2.0 (https://dot-bit.org/Namespace:Domain_names_v2.0) |