Bitcoin Forum

Other => Politics & Society => Topic started by: ijphlrnxewho on July 23, 2013, 07:31:53 PM



Title: 30 million girls face genital mutilation worldwide.
Post by: ijphlrnxewho on July 23, 2013, 07:31:53 PM
The devil worshipers cult illuminati (Bilderberg Group) wants to mutilate about 30 million girls' genitals worldwide...
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/23/world/female-genital-mutilation-report/index.html


Title: Re: 30 million girls face genital mutilation worldwide.
Post by: Vandroiy on July 24, 2013, 10:01:11 PM
30M, hm, expected mutilations within a decade roughly equal to 1% of females alive now. Now this might sound harsh, but I thought it was worse. At some point mankind's madness becomes... something expected, I guess.

Why are you writing "Devil worshiper cult Illuminati" in front of everything? The article doesn't even contain the word. Interestingly, one could prepend "mad Christian God worshipers" to random articles and be correct quite often.


Title: Re: 30 million girls face genital mutilation worldwide.
Post by: 4mherewego on July 25, 2013, 07:59:03 AM
And how many boys? Got to be more than 30M boys in the US alone?


Title: Re: 30 million girls face genital mutilation worldwide.
Post by: TheGovernedSelf on July 25, 2013, 10:36:10 AM
And how many boys? Got to be more than 30M boys in the US alone?

Men don't have emotions, and thus do not deserve rights or pity.






/s


Title: Re: 30 million girls face genital mutilation worldwide.
Post by: J603 on July 25, 2013, 03:52:15 PM
And how many boys? Got to be more than 30M boys in the US alone?

Men don't have emotions, and thus do not deserve rights or pity.






/s

Circumsizing males ≠ circumsizing females.


Title: Re: 30 million girls face genital mutilation worldwide.
Post by: clearcrystal on July 26, 2013, 09:20:37 AM
What the hell?!


Title: Re: 30 million girls face genital mutilation worldwide.
Post by: 4mherewego on July 28, 2013, 04:29:32 PM
And how many boys? Got to be more than 30M boys in the US alone?

Men don't have emotions, and thus do not deserve rights or pity.






/s

Circumsizing males ≠ circumsizing females.

Yeah, one of the is tolerated in parts of the western world, the other one isn't. But it is still genital mutilation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Male_circumcision_to_prevent_masturbation
Quote
Non-religious circumcision in English-speaking countries arose in a climate of negative attitudes towards sex, especially concerning masturbation. In her 1978 article The Ritual of Circumcision,[42] Karen Erickson Paige writes: "In the United States, the current medical rationale for circumcision developed after the operation was in wide practice. The original reason for the surgical removal of the foreskin, or prepuce, was to control 'masturbatory insanity' – the range of mental disorders that people believed were caused by the 'polluting' practice of 'self-abuse.'"

"Self-abuse" was a term commonly used to describe masturbation in the 19th century. According to Paige, "treatments ranged from diet, moral exhortations, hydrotherapy, and marriage, to such drastic measures as surgery, physical restraints, frights, and punishment. Some doctors recommended covering the penis with plaster of Paris, leather, or rubber; cauterization; making boys wear chastity belts or spiked rings; and in extreme cases, castration." Paige details how circumcision became popular as a masturbation remedy:

"In the 1890s, it became a popular technique to prevent, or cure, masturbatory insanity. In 1891 the president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England published On Circumcision as Preventive of Masturbation, and two years later another British doctor wrote Circumcision: Its Advantages and How to Perform It, which listed the reasons for removing the 'vestigial' prepuce. Evidently the foreskin could cause 'nocturnal incontinence,' hysteria, epilepsy, and irritation that might 'give rise to erotic stimulation and, consequently, masturbation.' Another physician, P.C. Remondino, added that 'circumcision is like a substantial and well-secured life annuity...it insures better health, greater capacity for labor, longer life, less nervousness, sickness, loss of time, and less doctor bills.' No wonder it became a popular remedy."[42]
At the same time circumcisions were advocated on men, clitoridectomies (removal of the clitoris) were also performed for the same reason (to treat female masturbators). The US "Orificial Surgery Society" for female "circumcision" operated until 1925, and clitoridectomies and infibulations would continue to be advocated by some through the 1930s. As late as 1936, L. E. Holt, an author of pediatric textbooks, advocated male and female circumcision as a treatment for masturbation.[42]