Bitcoin Forum

i.e. he has nothing to offer in this thread except a number to make him self sound important that's ... pointless.
... and redirects to something where he out right lied just to get himself into the discussion.
That whole post of his he has linked to is a baseless lie which in easily provable with hind sight.

I wonder, did ASICMiner bid for your shill services after Avalon snubbed your demand for a free unit?
Or was BFL your only offer of free mining equipment? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=142083.0)
I am sure your rabid support of BFL on these forums is purely coincidence of course.  ;)

As I have already stated before, but I guess that's too much to think that you read anything since you just make up fantasies ...

It's simple, the devices and chips are the best currently available.
Show me something else available that has the same hash rate per chip or even the same power level per MH/s ... that is being delivered?
I've had one since April (a Jalapeno) and I now have a Single
The single has ~the same performance per chip (~4GH/s) as my Jalapeno I updated and uses ~265W at the wall for 62GH/s
So ... ~4GH/s a chip and ... ~4.3W per GH/s

As I also said, when that changes, then that will no longer be the case, though that may be a little beyond your understanding also.
For now, however, it simply proves the meaninglessness of this metric.

Read your link - the answer to the link question is simple and obvious - the first point - the lack of source code - as has been adequately explained in that thread for all but the delusional.
Doesn't matter what you dream about me and make up about me.

Time to delete remove some more posts from Kano again.