|
Title: "A topic you are watching has been removed by (anonymous)." ?? Post by: Anomaly8 on December 23, 2017, 10:57:34 PM i just got this message in my email... "A topic you are watching has been removed by (anonymous)." the post i made that was deleted was by all means a proper and concise post placed in the proper sub forum. what kind of issues might cause this? are moderators termed "anonymous " regarding this? thanks Title: Re: "A topic you are watching has been removed by (anonymous)." ?? Post by: hilariousetc on December 23, 2017, 11:36:52 PM What was the thread or post that was removed? Mod actions are anonymous to the public to stop staff from being hassled or abused for every decision they make, but the info is available to admins. Posts are usually only removed for breaking the rules though which you can find stickied in Meta, but without the content of the post/thread in question nobody can help you further.
Title: Re: "A topic you are watching has been removed by (anonymous)." ?? Post by: Anomaly8 on December 24, 2017, 01:33:59 AM What was the thread or post that was removed? Mod actions are anonymous to the public to stop staff from being hassled or abused for every decision they make, but the info is available to admins. Posts are usually only removed for breaking the rules though which you can find stickied in Meta, but without the content of the post/thread in question nobody can help you further. it was about how to retrieve tiny amounts of coins you mine in pools but the payout is way way too much of a time investment so your few bucks are stuck. Title: Re: "A topic you are watching has been removed by (anonymous)." ?? Post by: hilariousetc on December 24, 2017, 02:53:38 AM This one or something else?
If you use Binance or other exchanges, you know what I mean when you make micro trades and are left with a remaining balance that the exchange won't let you use because of minimum buy limits based on a certain decimal place of your purchasing coin... Iie: BTC / ETH etc.. Does anyone know of which exchange has the lowest decimal range that I could move these tiny amounts to, and then sell them into a bigger coin? If not, would something like ShapeShifter (a coin conversion service that wallets like JAXX use) be with it, including fees? I know big investors could care less of their "dust / fractions" ... But for a beginner trader / miner like myself, every point counts, because relative to my total, fees can add up big time. The only alternative I see is waiting years / decades until those tiny amounts are (good fortune willing) grown into tangible amounts through value increase. Any methods you've used for this would greatly appreciated! Your thoughts? Thanks! If not, can you post the deleted message here? Was it a thread you created or a post inside somebody else's? Title: Re: "A topic you are watching has been removed by (anonymous)." ?? Post by: Anomaly8 on December 25, 2017, 08:39:12 AM No.
It was a similar thread I started. It was a bit different. Yet similar. Maybe a mod thought it was a duplicate because they were so similar But I want the discussion for each of them to be separate because they're actually separate things with different distinct techniques that works be discussed... My original text for the one that was just deleted was this.... TITLE: Retrieving Mined Orphaned Coins Consider TINY mining efforts one may have done, where their balance was too small to be payed out in a reasonable time frame... Example: I mined Monero on Nanopool for two days and earned $3.00 but the minimum payout on that was projected to be over a year later...😕 So THAT'S not coming to me.. Anyone know of methods to retrieve those Toby amounts that you MINED (not from trades)... That are STUCK at the POOL.... (Not the exchange, mods) Maybe a lucrative business in a sort of opposite style that debt collection agencies buy unresolved debt from creditors to pursue... Might be companies that buy mass amounts of orphaned mining efforts at a % discounted to them that works for the consumer? Does that maybe even exist now? ...otherwise the pools just absorb all those millions of $'s worth of orphaned coins and fractions of coins into themselves after a time? I wonder how that works... Advice? Thanks END POST I really want to talk about these things. That's why I signed up here. Mods, if you could fix this thanks Sorry bout any typos. In tired. Title: Re: "A topic you are watching has been removed by (anonymous)." ?? Post by: cryptoman2.0 on March 09, 2018, 10:23:41 PM Bitcoin Forum <noreply@bitcointalk.org>
9:51 PM (15 minutes ago) to me A topic you are watching has been removed by (anonymous). Regards, The Bitcoin Forum Team. It was a thread attempting to bring devs, members, and crypto currency providers together to bring crypto to Venezuela on a mass scale,for the citizans to use instead of the local currancy as there suffing hyper inflation. its backed by leading crypto providers,dash,nano electroneum bitcoincash there was no money, no donations , just a outline of the project, and a link to videos about the project and the discord group. now the thread got removed, and i cant re-post any threads, Title: Re: "A topic you are watching has been removed by (anonymous)." ?? Post by: Thirdspace on March 09, 2018, 11:56:14 PM "A topic you are watching has been removed by (anonymous)." yes "anonymous" refers to forum moderator or staff who has the right to mod that specific sub forumthe post i made that was deleted was by all means a proper and concise post placed in the proper sub forum. what kind of issues might cause this? are moderators termed "anonymous " regarding this? for sure the mods deleted your post/thread for violating forum rules It was a similar thread I started. it is possible.It was a bit different. Yet similar. Maybe a mod thought it was a duplicate because they were so similar But I want the discussion for each of them to be separate because they're actually separate things with different distinct techniques that works be discussed... someone might have reported your post as spam because the duplicate contents not completely the same but treated as non-constructive post |