Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Reputation => Topic started by: swetka on January 01, 2018, 07:10:05 AM



Title: To the attention of Mr. or Mr. Lauda. UNRESTED NEGATIVE TRUST.
Post by: swetka on January 01, 2018, 07:10:05 AM
Hello Lauda. IT IS UNACCEPTABLE!!!
I ask you to correct your mistake, which led me to a negative Trust.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=865030

 The charges are completely absent.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg24817660#msg24817660

The address of my myetherwallet has nothing to do with other addresses.

https://etherscan.io/address/0x266D4e05E1F1EC06257b0061A179307f2Cbe5c3b






Dear Moderators, I ask you to correct this mistake.


Title: Re: To the attention of Mr. or Mr. Lauda. UNRESTED NEGATIVE TRUST.
Post by: timerland on January 01, 2018, 11:25:32 AM
Hello Lauda. IT IS UNACCEPTABLE!!!
I ask you to correct your mistake, which led me to a negative Trust.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=865030

 The charges are completely absent.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg24817660#msg24817660

The address of my myetherwallet has nothing to do with other addresses.

https://etherscan.io/address/0x266D4e05E1F1EC06257b0061A179307f2Cbe5c3b






Dear Moderators, I ask you to correct this mistake.

This is what makes the forum a shit place as it is. If you got caught have multiple accounts, you got caught. Thats it.

There is no way that Lauda would remove you your negative feedback, and IMO I wouldn't too.

Dear Moderators, I ask you to correct this mistake.

The moderators will do absolutely nothing. The trust rating is entirely different to the forum rules. If Lauda feels like tagging you, he/she can and will do so.


Title: Re: To the attention of Mr. or Mr. Lauda. UNRESTED NEGATIVE TRUST.
Post by: marlboroza on January 01, 2018, 01:08:57 PM
You were caught with more than one account in the same signature campaign, which is cheating.
Link which you posted is proof that natka, taktik, ssuchy and pisston are alt accounts.
This post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg24427507#msg24427507 connects account swetka with accounts above.


Title: Re: To the attention of Mr. or Mr. Lauda. UNRESTED NEGATIVE TRUST.
Post by: swetka on January 01, 2018, 02:58:13 PM
You were caught with more than one account in the same signature campaign, which is cheating.
Link which you posted is proof that natka, taktik, ssuchy and pisston are alt accounts.
This post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg24427507#msg24427507 connects account swetka with accounts above.
You need to first check the information you refer to.
I really participated in the company bounty center: the number of the spreadsheet 25  .
my ETH address:0x266D05E1F1EC4e06257b0061A179307f2Cbe5c3b

my myetherwallet has only one transaction, the payment for the signature work of the company token CTR.

With this transaction
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x24c9c9d6564ba96f58f4d0cae2d6745390dde3835f1ab240bd683811f531aed8
my address
0x266D05E1F1EC4e06257b0061A179307f2Cbe5c3b
has nothing in common.


check before you speak.


Title: Re: To the attention of Mr. or Mr. Lauda. UNRESTED NEGATIVE TRUST.
Post by: Lauda on January 01, 2018, 04:21:45 PM
https://i.imgur.com/c72iM9G.png

Natka with address: "0xC34F3c896b6940f75d8ab8a197055180Bf412939", sends Contra token to: "0xc1522d24f6bdee02b019c5b895ba378567f5d4c6"1. That address then sends funds to swetka, i.e. to: "0xC34F3c896b6940f75d8ab8a197055180Bf412939"2.

[1] https://etherscan.io/tx/0xb4141a034c3d72256f7ceb0cfa877b1af218deccb83c4823b71fdd00b03b93ef
[2] https://etherscan.io/tx/0x24c9c9d6564ba96f58f4d0cae2d6745390dde3835f1ab240bd683811f531aed8

Let me guess, swetka is your 7th cousin once-removed? ::)


Title: Re: To the attention of Mr. or Mr. Lauda. UNRESTED NEGATIVE TRUST.
Post by: swetka on January 01, 2018, 06:12:55 PM
https://i.imgur.com/c72iM9G.png

Natka with address: "0xC34F3c896b6940f75d8ab8a197055180Bf412939", sends Contra token to: "0xc1522d24f6bdee02b019c5b895ba378567f5d4c6"1. That address then sends funds to swetka, i.e. to: "0xC34F3c896b6940f75d8ab8a197055180Bf412939"2.

[1] https://etherscan.io/tx/0xb4141a034c3d72256f7ceb0cfa877b1af218deccb83c4823b71fdd00b03b93ef
[2] https://etherscan.io/tx/0x24c9c9d6564ba96f58f4d0cae2d6745390dde3835f1ab240bd683811f531aed8

Let me guess, swetka is your 7th cousin once-removed? ::)
I understood everything. There is no point in proving something. It is already becoming a habit to observe how a person who has power is always "right". Let it be according to you, thank you for your attention and response.


Title: Re: To the attention of Mr. or Mr. Lauda. UNRESTED NEGATIVE TRUST.
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on January 01, 2018, 08:13:10 PM
Happy new year!

Because you called attention to your misdeeds, and the evidence is solid, I've added to your feedback.   I would advise others to do likewise.


Title: Re: To the attention of Mr. or Mr. Lauda. UNRESTED NEGATIVE TRUST.
Post by: TheUltraElite on January 02, 2018, 09:55:28 AM
I understood everything. There is no point in proving something. It is already becoming a habit to observe how a person who has power is always "right". Let it be according to you, thank you for your attention and response.

If you were a legitimate person with legitimate claims that Lauda was wrong then you would have provided the same and asked for a petition to recheck the proofs. Seems like you are from the same legion of shitposting third world bottomfeeders who dont care about spam in this forum and have been creating alts just to earn money get-rich-quick.

People like you deserve the negative trust from DT. Here enjoy another one from me even though my rating does not matter much. ;D


Title: Re: To the attention of Mr. or Mr. Lauda. UNRESTED NEGATIVE TRUST.
Post by: actmyname on January 02, 2018, 10:52:43 AM
Wait, hold up. I don't see any conclusive evidence on the spreadsheet pinpointing swetka to the others.

Now, I'm not sure if the spreadsheet changed or not since the Nov 11 post (as they do) but currently, there is no proof of linkage. Now, if the newbie that made the linkage had actually archived it at the time, then we would have something to work with.
The address that swetka is currently using on the spreadsheet and their profile literally has no relation to the others.


Title: Re: To the attention of Mr. or Mr. Lauda. UNRESTED NEGATIVE TRUST.
Post by: marlboroza on January 02, 2018, 04:51:05 PM
~
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x24c9c9d6564ba96f58f4d0cae2d6745390dde3835f1ab240bd683811f531aed8
my address
0x266D05E1F1EC4e06257b0061A179307f2Cbe5c3b
has nothing in common. [/b]

check before you speak.
That was wrongly posted transaction ID, this one:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa50fc9bd51d97c155f79d52a05d47410dfa3ff8f11889e5f35710c1b739de96c

Is much better.
I have already checked that, along with all other "coincidences" such as natka, sweetka taktik accounts were created within 6 minutes on june 20. 2016., all three accounts joined the same signature campaign, all three accounts posted in russian local board and all three accounts either deleted old post history or all three accounts decided to wake up after 1 year time gap somewhere between July 28. 2017 and July 31. 2017. https://prnt.sc/hv6bk8 https://prnt.sc/hv6bcx https://prnt.sc/hv6bfw

This address is interesting https://etherscan.io/address/0xc1522d24f6bdee02b019c5b895ba378567f5d4c6 but I don't have time to go trough addresses, I said somewhere that ether is confusing.


Wait, hold up. I don't see any conclusive evidence on the spreadsheet pinpointing swetka to the others.

Now, I'm not sure if the spreadsheet changed or not since the Nov 11 post (as they do) but currently, there is no proof of linkage. Now, if the newbie that made the linkage had actually archived it at the time, then we would have something to work with.
The address that swetka is currently using on the spreadsheet and their profile literally has no relation to the others.
https://i.imgur.com/LB6IojB.png
https://i.imgur.com/vQ20t4t.png

Newbie obviously posted wrong tx id.


Title: Re: To the attention of Mr. or Mr. Lauda. UNRESTED NEGATIVE TRUST.
Post by: actmyname on January 02, 2018, 04:54:45 PM
That was wrongly posted transaction ID, this one:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa50fc9bd51d97c155f79d52a05d47410dfa3ff8f11889e5f35710c1b739de96c

Is much better.
I have already checked that, along with all other "coincidences" such as natka, sweetka taktik accounts were created within 6 minutes on june 20. 2016., all three accounts joined the same signature campaign, all three accounts posted in russian local board and all three accounts either deleted old post history or all three accounts decided to wake up after 1 year time gap somewhere between July 28. 2017 and July 31. 2017.
This address is interesting https://etherscan.io/address/0xc1522d24f6bdee02b019c5b895ba378567f5d4c6 but I don't have time to go trough addresses, I said somewhere that ether is confusing.
Got it now. Yeah, Ethereum requires a couple hoops to jump through to investigate but if you're good at it, it sure is easy to clear out a whole bunch of names in bounty sheets all at once.


Title: Re: To the attention of Mr. or Mr. Lauda. UNRESTED NEGATIVE TRUST.
Post by: marlboroza on January 02, 2018, 05:27:00 PM
~
Got it now. Yeah, Ethereum requires a couple hoops to jump through to investigate but if you're good at it, it sure is easy to clear out a whole bunch of names in bounty sheets all at once.
With bitcoin is simple, walletexplorer shows all addresss from one wallet.
Ether is complicated, it shows transactions between wallet A and wallet B, honestly it is not solid proof because people do make deals and trade with each other(for example this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2644741.0 ether connection will most likely lead to jamalaezaz but these accounts are not his, he made deal with them)

Lauda did a little mistake pasting wrong txid
https://i.imgur.com/c72iM9G.png

Natka with address: "0xC34F3c896b6940f75d8ab8a197055180Bf412939", sends Contra token to: "0xc1522d24f6bdee02b019c5b895ba378567f5d4c6"1. That address then sends funds to swetka, i.e. to: "0xC34F3c896b6940f75d8ab8a197055180Bf412939"2.

[1] https://etherscan.io/tx/0xb4141a034c3d72256f7ceb0cfa877b1af218deccb83c4823b71fdd00b03b93ef
[2] https://etherscan.io/tx/0x24c9c9d6564ba96f58f4d0cae2d6745390dde3835f1ab240bd683811f531aed8

Let me guess, swetka is your 7th cousin once-removed? ::)

But I am not sure why TheUltraElite and The Pharmacist gave negative to swetka, their reference has nothing to do with swetka  :P


Title: Re: To the attention of Mr. or Mr. Lauda. UNRESTED NEGATIVE TRUST.
Post by: TheUltraElite on January 02, 2018, 07:05:05 PM

But I am not sure why TheUltraElite and The Pharmacist gave negative to swetka, their reference has nothing to do with swetka  :P

Forgive me if I am wrong (which I may be) but I will remove or modify my negative trust on swetka if needed, In case my reference is not enough proof. I have not looked into the above discussion simply because I am busy these first few weeks on the year.

I will come back to this thread later on this week if I get time or maybe sooner.

EDIT: Changed the reference to the negative feedback. Shitposters like them are not going anywhere without the red mark.


Title: Re: To the attention of Mr. or Mr. Lauda. UNRESTED NEGATIVE TRUST.
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on January 03, 2018, 03:48:15 AM
But I am not sure why TheUltraElite and The Pharmacist gave negative to swetka, their reference has nothing to do with swetka  :P
Changed reference to this thread. Lauda catching someone cheating and calling it out is enough proof for me.  If Lauda's wrong, I'll delete my feedback.  This guy is a slimy shitposter and thus my standard of proof of wrongdoing goes way down, and I have a hair trigger with the paint gun.