|
Title: btc sent with low fee stuck for a week Post by: ralphwaldoemerson on January 09, 2018, 09:25:01 AM Sent some btc on 1/3/18 from blockchain.info using their "lowest recommended" fee, 116-137 sat/b, varied on each transaction.
Still 0 confirmations on each. Will it get sent back or go thru eventually? I intentionally did the low fees because it's not a time sensitive send. Title: Re: btc sent with low fee stuck for a week Post by: KopikoBrown on January 09, 2018, 09:57:25 AM What is your transaction id?
Title: Re: btc sent with low fee stuck for a week Post by: xIIImaL on January 09, 2018, 10:16:09 AM Sent some btc on 1/3/18 from blockchain.info using their "lowest recommended" fee, 116-137 sat/b, varied on each transaction. Still 0 confirmations on each. Will it get sent back or go thru eventually? I intentionally did the low fees because it's not a time sensitive send. I do not think it is been accelerated buddy. In blockchain wallet by default there is mid range fees in that so all the time if you goes to reduced fees everyone will be faced the issue as same like you. Please share your tx id. We will try to accelerate with the viabtc or any acceleration tool. If you want to accelerate your transaction by your own. Please use the below link to done that. https://pushtx.btc.com http://confirmtx.com http://www.instantbtc.net Title: Re: btc sent with low fee stuck for a week Post by: ralphwaldoemerson on January 10, 2018, 10:02:06 PM Thanks for the links, I tried confirmtx.com about 24 hours ago, haven't seen any progress yet.
I'm a little bit wary about posting my TX ids atm bc last time I posted info about a transaction I saw an attempted login to my wallet that I definitely didn't attempt. I guess I'll wait another couple days. Title: Re: btc sent with low fee stuck for a week Post by: ralphwaldoemerson on January 11, 2018, 10:33:41 PM 2/4 of the transactions went through today, I assume 'cause of bumping them at instantbtc.net.
Now I'm having this problem with Bittrex discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2644729.new#new :'( Thanks for the help though. |