|
Title: Pushpoold vs custom? Post by: vector76 on July 14, 2011, 11:02:24 AM Maybe a dumb question but which of pools are using pushpoold and which are using custom rolled software? Does anyone know?
Title: Re: Pushpoold vs custom? Post by: DrHaribo on July 14, 2011, 11:40:17 AM I built my own pool backend as well as miner and web application.
Title: Re: Pushpoold vs custom? Post by: zoro on July 14, 2011, 03:51:50 PM https://pool.bitp.it
uses custom software ;) Title: Re: Pushpoold vs custom? Post by: phorensic on July 15, 2011, 07:27:50 AM Our pool uses pushpoold with a custom script for Long Polling which works better than blkmond. I'm not sure what information you are trying to gather, but pushpoold is no longer the problem as I first suspected. JoelKatz has patched the heck out of bitcoind for pool operators to bring the bottleneck from ~300GH/s to ~1000GH/s and other improvements.
Title: Re: Pushpoold vs custom? Post by: simplecoin on July 15, 2011, 08:43:50 PM Our pool uses pushpoold with a custom script for Long Polling which works better than blkmond. I'm not sure what information you are trying to gather, but pushpoold is no longer the problem as I first suspected. JoelKatz has patched the heck out of bitcoind for pool operators to bring the bottleneck from ~300GH/s to ~1000GH/s and other improvements. Yes, the new patched bitcoin client is fantastic. I've had 0 downtime after switching. There is no more need for blkmond either, which is one less dependency. My cronjobs seem to have a bigger impact than pushpool now, which is fantastic. Title: Re: Pushpoold vs custom? Post by: 1bitc0inplz on July 15, 2011, 11:03:09 PM indeed, pushpool just doesn't cut it.
Come join us if you prefer a pool that doesn't use pushpool. ;) |