|
Title: Hi guys and KNC miner users in particular Post by: FractionalReserve on October 11, 2013, 01:51:35 PM Hello, havenīt had time to go thru the Newbie process before but as it just has changed I thought I might do some good here.
We are running a large amount of KNC Jupiter Miners and has resolved most problems during these first weeks and we have a large understanding for why issues are present on some miners. Lets see once this newbi status is gone I will post some in the KNCMiner thread that might help some people out (or at least give them some clues whats going on). Cheers Title: Re: Hi guys and KNC miner users in particular Post by: easynote on October 11, 2013, 02:04:41 PM Welcome :)
I dont have a KNC but someone can talk with you :) Title: Re: Hi guys and KNC miner users in particular Post by: chandrakant on October 11, 2013, 02:42:58 PM Welcome to the forum FractionalReserve ;D
Title: Re: Hi guys and KNC miner users in particular Post by: coinminers on October 25, 2013, 09:28:14 AM Hello, havenīt had time to go thru the Newbie process before but as it just has changed I thought I might do some good here. We are running a large amount of KNC Jupiter Miners and has resolved most problems during these first weeks and we have a large understanding for why issues are present on some miners. Lets see once this newbi status is gone I will post some in the KNCMiner thread that might help some people out (or at least give them some clues whats going on). Cheers Thanks for offering the help, I really appreciate it! I have a Mercury that's doing good, hashing at ~145 GH/s, but my Jupiter is a complete disaster: I received my Jupiter today. I tried all firmwares, always with enablecores and the only one that seemed to be hashing at some (relatively low) rate was .95 .96-.97 were a complete disaster with the miner regularly starting high at around 150 GH and then going down to zero, always accompanied with errors like [2000-01-01 00:34:22] KnC: accepted by FPGA 14 works, but only 0 submitted flooding in en masse when running "screen -dr" on the ssh console. On .95 I'm hashing somewhere around 300-350. I'm still seeing the error message above on a repetitive basis, but not as much as on the other firmware versions. I'm also seeing this error from time to time: [2000-01-01 00:03:38] KnC: core 2-76 was disabled due to 10 HW errors in a row I'm seeing via bertmod.bin that all but 3 cores are off, but I'm also seeing that one of them is a bit cooler than the other three (see screenshots). My question to KNC: What do I need to do to get it up to the advertised 550 GH/s level? Here's a snapshot of the screen -dr output: cgminer version 3.4.0 - Started: [2000-01-01 00:30:46] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (5s):339.5G (avg):338.3Gh/s | A:43010 R:1056 HW:13755 WU:5109.2/m ST: 2 SS: 0 NB: 1 LW: 81029 GF: 0 RF: 1 Connected to stratum-lb-ddos.btcguild.com diff 512 with stratum as user xxxxxx Block: 000d047a814b3ed9... Diff:268M Started: [00:30:46] Best share: 129K -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pool management Settings Display options Quit KnC 0: | 326.0G/338.5Gh/s | A:43010 R:1056 HW:13777 WU:5114.8/m -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [2000-01-01 00:40:43] KnC: accepted by FPGA 8 works, but only 2 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:43] KnC: accepted by FPGA 21 works, but only 16 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:43] KnC: accepted by FPGA 21 works, but only 14 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:44] KnC: accepted by FPGA 21 works, but only 17 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:44] KnC: accepted by FPGA 21 works, but only 13 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:44] KnC: accepted by FPGA 21 works, but only 9 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:44] KnC: accepted by FPGA 10 works, but only 8 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:44] KnC: accepted by FPGA 12 works, but only 5 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:44] KnC: accepted by FPGA 18 works, but only 12 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:44] KnC: accepted by FPGA 17 works, but only 4 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:45] KnC: accepted by FPGA 21 works, but only 1 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:45] KnC: accepted by FPGA 10 works, but only 1 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:45] KnC: accepted by FPGA 4 works, but only 1 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:45] KnC: accepted by FPGA 6 works, but only 1 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:45] KnC: accepted by FPGA 7 works, but only 2 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:45] KnC: accepted by FPGA 7 works, but only 2 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:45] KnC: accepted by FPGA 7 works, but only 1 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:45] KnC: accepted by FPGA 6 works, but only 2 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:45] KnC: accepted by FPGA 5 works, but only 0 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:45] KnC: accepted by FPGA 7 works, but only 2 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:45] KnC: accepted by FPGA 4 works, but only 1 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:45] KnC: accepted by FPGA 5 works, but only 0 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:45] KnC: accepted by FPGA 8 works, but only 5 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:45] KnC: accepted by FPGA 4 works, but only 1 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:45] KnC: accepted by FPGA 18 works, but only 12 submitted [2000-01-01 00:40:45] KnC: accepted by FPGA 10 works, but only 1 submitted And here comes the worst part, my stats as reported on btcguild for the jupiter indicate: Est. Speed: 251.22 GH/s Accepted shares: 622592 (25.25%) 25% accepted shares? Does that mean I'm basically hashing at 60 GH/s's worth of hashing power? I also posted some screenshots of bertmod here: http://forum.kncminer.com/forum/main-category/hardware/10711-jupiter-only-hashing-at-300-350?p=10712#post10712 |