Bitcoin Forum

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=234771
Starting war against all this shady retards around placing fake negative reps.
You were warned son.
You have 24 hours to remove the negative rep, or i will spend more than 1bitcoin to ruin your account down :)
Learn how,  who and where to negative rep, especially with fake claims

You mean suchmoon? Good luck with that... Are you new here? :P

Edit - it's right here, scammer... You deserve it, IMO.  Get a new account. Don't be a Danos. Danos ruined his account (He thinks)?  ;D

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2426183.0

Im not new here, buti have the money to do all the dirty job to make this cock sucker to go buy new account :)
Edit: Danos is the scammers nightmare and Danos will continue to be the same.
Danos can play dirty, can payh for negative rep, buy legendary accounts with green rep and everything needed to put retards like this on his place.
You were warned son :) Even if its going to take me month, your trust abuse will end here believe me :)
After the 24 hours period end and you don't check ur statements and if u want to tag me, make it with proof based arguments, you will be start at reddit :)
Also i will start buying every single stolen/hacked account with green trust to make your account look beautiful from the red side :)
Don't worry, i have nearly 146btc, and im more than willing to spend few to make your virtual world red and shiny.

You're going to spend over a bitcoin just for some petty vengeance? I highly doubt it.

Blanket statements have no value. If you're serious, sign an address with over 1 BTC ;)

I can sing with address with much more than 1btc :)

Here is bounty:First one who make this clown red trust get paid 5k Ripple.

P.S: I don't care who the spamming retard is.
That's why this forum is trash, because every single retard here don't know the word "PROOF".

I don't really care about this account, i catch scammers with it.
I already have Legendary with enough green trust which none of you knows.

*sign (sorry, had to :P

Also that's pretty much purchasing trust, would highly doubt anyone condones sensible condones that


Even he is paying 1 BTC, what exactly is his plan? Begging a DT1 one to take the 1 BTC and ~ suchmoon? And that's hoping another DT1 doesn't step in to preserve the ratings suchmoon left.

Since when Begging is paying ?
Firstly im trying with the easy part some DT1 member to see this retard abuse and realize negative feedbacks should be placed proof based.
If that not work, i can pay no problem

To my knowledge most of the DT1s (atleast those among the active ones) are all early adopters who have a decent among of BTC stashed from the good old days. Doubt any of them would easily take 1 BTC and potentially sabotage their reputation (which can earn them much more in the long run)

Dude seems like you don't understand english.
I don't offer DT members cash to neg rep them, i offer them to check whats going on and take actions based on the proofs.
If they are not willing to take action, im paying everyone else to make this kid with red negative rep

So let's see that address holding more than 1BTC.   ::)

For someone who's been here longer than me, you don't seem to understand how the forum works. A non DT neg rating someone makes no difference to the trust rating shown UNLESS said user in on your trusted list. No matter how many 1000s neg rate him, he'll still show up as positive trusted unless a DT makes a move.


I wont stop you, but that's a neat way to waste money for something that will do you no benefit either

You know exactly who to contact. It's not like the person who I'm talking about is in control of multiple DT  accounts and it's also not like he received money for a promise which he never kept. So yeah.

Thank you for the warning, that's very nice of you. I have to say though that threatening to buy accounts or to buy trust is probably not the right way to go about it. But do what you gotta do. I don't need the 24 hours. Your neg rep will stay permanently, have at it.

That's just burning money. I don't see the point of buying accounts just to spam feedback. ::)

I thought that this account was worthless to you. What are you doing, spending months on some asinine fit of anger?

What an unintelligent way of wasting your money. Someone tags an account that you yourself don't care about and now you're going to spend significant chunks of time and money to attempt to ruin their account? What kind of childishness are you playing with?

I don't see a signed message yet, by the way.

Thanks for having brought this to my attention (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3095008.msg32333457#msg32333457).

Negative trust feedback from nullius to #992943 “Danos” (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=992943)

Reference: https://web.archive.org/web/20180315002952/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126248.0

You got present you little pedophile :)
Edit: It was time this account to go to the used list :)
Everyone posted here say welcome to your new spam of 200 negative feedbacks on your profile till tomorrow.
To lazy to start my bot rightnow./

Wow!! What a keyboard warrior you are!! I'm sure Nullius is crying in his pillow right now!!

You really don't get it do you, idiot? You can neg rate everyone you want here but it won't mean shit. Just like the neg that pissed you off doesn't mean shit. Now you've just buried yourself in negative trust, brain warrior. ::)

Thanks! I'm looking forward to getting a free boost to my collection of useless, retaliatory negative feedback from 15 year-olds!

---

You would think that someone with 146 BTC acting so arrogantly would at least want to prove it to induce a little bit of despair.

Or that their site would look less shitty.

Did you accidentally delete your imaginary bot like you deleted those e-mails and chat logs I asked for?

So even those supporting you but posted here will get 200 negative ratings?  ::)


Well people being rich doesn't necessarily make them more intimidating enough for people to fear speaking against them. Look at Trump for example  ;D

New snapshot of this thread:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180315013509/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126248.0

Edit:  Newer snapshot:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180315014644/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126248.0;all

---

For the record:

Negative trust feedback from #992943 “Danos” to nullius (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=976210)

Date: 2018-03-15
Risked BTC amount (alleged): 111,111.00000000
Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126248.0 (this thread)

---

Sobbing my little heart out.  Also, I am terrified.


He is also too stupid to realize that the only time administrators intervene in trust disputes is in clear-cut cases of spam.

---

I am jealous!  This scumbag called you a “sociopath and pedophile”, but he only called me a paedophile.  Where is my accusation of sociopathy?  (It’s not as if I haven’t been accused of it before (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2876160.msg30262591#msg30262591)!)  How can I be more awesome like you, actmyname?

How ironic. You were part of a group of individuals arguing that emotion is not necessary whereas I have the opposite opinion. I cannot remember the exact thread but it is funny to see this dichotomy flipped around.

---

How can I be a pedophile if I'm only 11? ::)_/s

I never spoke against emotion.  Rather, against empathy.  The discussion started after a DT (whom I otherwise respect) said he felt sad over the plea of an allegedly impoverished spammer who allegedly really, really needed to spam.  Even if the sob story be true, I have no empathy, compassion, or pity whatsoever for such a cretin.

(N.b. that if poverty were adequate cause for criminal behaviour, then I myself would have become a criminal at certain points in my life.  I did not; and I have nothing but cold contempt for those who do.)


I just set my profile birthday to my account’s creation date.  Since my account is now only 11 months old, my profile now shows my age as 0.  Beat that.

That doesn't really make very much sense considering the amount of attention he has now brought upon himself.

I'm also not quite sure why he would be going around scamming for pennies when he claims to have <$1 million in bitcoin. He is honestly probably just a troll.

Well he doesn't seem to be very smart either  ;) But for real though what's even the point of this thread, the "threats" clearly aren't working. The rating has now been seen by quite a few people and any countering of trust ratings would be pretty useless (AFAIK it would require like 3-4 negative ratings to bring suchmoon to Negative and I doubt that would happen as then given the "hype" that would create that would start petty rating wars)


From what I've read in his accusation threads he pretty much sets off on a high horse and attacks anyone criticizing him non stop till people stop. He's pretty much gaslighting people IMO

You can say that again.


And that.


Actually, no.  (This is the point of my hereby post.)

It would require negative ratings from trusted people to affect suchmoon in any way whatsoever.  Check my trust page (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=976210).  With a relatively new account and moderate anti-abuse activity, I already have 5 negatives—all retaliatory red from morons.  Do I like like I’m in the negative to you?  Now, look at suchmoon’s trust page (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=234771).  I count about seven dozen red marks.  Like mine, they show under “Untrusted feedback” unless you’re stupid enough to add people like Danos to your trust list.

Or if you really want an eye-popping sight, look at Lauda’s trust page (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=101872).  There, in addition to about a zillion untrusted red marks from whining spammers and scammers, you may see a few allegedly “trusted” negatives from OgNasty and shorena.  It is for this reason that I recommend setting exclusions (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust), such as ~OgNasty.  Or better still, dump DefaultTrust and set up your own trust list from scratch.  I currently have the following at my Depth 0, and the world of the Bitcoin Forum looks quite different to me than it will to you:


That is my “trust list quick fix (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2945878.msg30706812#msg30706812)”.  Lauda has more detailed recommendations (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2945878.msg30696383#msg30696383); but I want to develop my trust list independently, and the foregoing suffices for me for now.

There is much more to learn about the trust system.  I suggest you start with theymos’ announcement thereof (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.0), although n.b. that some things have changed in the five years since his OP in that thread.  Also, it’s ironic that the first reply was from TradeFortress (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=67058), who subsequently pulled one of the worst long-con scams in Bitcoin Forum history.  By the way (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3095008.0) (I know you replied there; though that thread may be difficult for you to understand if you don’t dig around and figure out the history of the characters involved).

---

Actually I feel like I should have clarified, I meant he would required negatives from DTs which is substantially more difficult than regular negatives and from what little I have seen there's very obvious "factions" (without delving too deep into that since I guess it's pretty who's usually supporting who) and any DT negatively rating another generally causes a crap ton of unnecessary drama and hence it's pretty unlikely any DT would act to support some inconsequential nobody.


Or you're Danos' alt  ::)


I'm currently yet to edit my trust list since I'm still figuring out who's reliable and worthy of being trusted. I particularly don't bother reading the numbers at times and feel the actual details are more relevant. Quite a few times the unstrusted feedback can prove to be useful (there's quite a few "trusted" but not DT members who leave ratings) and reading the references attached which usually gives you a clearer picture than arbitrary ratings which may or may not be accurate. Obviously I ignore all the retaliatory and downright idiotic feedback like the ones left on everyone's profile "Wants Gay child porn".

Side Note: You're trying too hard to be a troll and failing OP  :-\


I've skimmed it a couple of times but I kinda slackened and get lazy reading long articles  :P


I have kinda dug up some of the dirt that was being flung and read up a bit. I have a rough idea of what the general accusations every one is usually associated with (QS and Self Escrows/Alting, OG and his business, a bunch of people and some extortion, TF's inputs.io etc) but not the exact details so I haven't made any specific comments.

I can see why you get the bitches so wet buddy! I so want to buy you a pint!

You claim to have over 100 bitcoins.

We know you had at least 20 bitcoins you stole.

You beg for tips in your signature.   ::)

Dude why you think i have scammed pennies ? Why the fuck you even think i scammed anyone ?
Im just sick of this cancer community. I will just go ahead and use my Legendary account once again because catching scammers from this one was hard job.
People love scammers, and i will support them from now on.
P.S: My offer still stands to see this kid with red trust.

Ok


That's not how being sick of something works


hmm


hmmmmmmmmmmm

---

tl;dr contradictory statements, followed by more contradictory statements mixed with a heavy dose of irony and hypocrisy.

That would also imply that suchmoon is worried about getting negged or even kicked out of DT, which to the best of my knowledge is not the case. The OP is pissing into the wind regardless of the credibility of those threats.


I hope you haven't scammed anyone yet, not for the lack of trying though. Please use your Legendary account to tag me red or to call me an...

I prefer to use your mother for my sperm needs fag :)
Don't forget this account, it will bring you a lot of hassle.
And don't forget the world is really small.
Someday somehow if you meet me, i promise to make video for the community how you begging :)

New negative trust feedback (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=992943):

---

P.S., suchmoon, someday somehow if you meet me, you can buy me a beer.

To keep up with the spirit of this thread I will make a video of you begging for beer.

Yeah, it would be a good idea to get a ciggie and burn your sperm up. We don't want to risk the chance of having more Danos's running around now, do we? There are enough inane 15 year-olds online already.

---

EDIT: two days later, still waiting for the bot to be activated. :)

That so funny!

Dear actmyname! I need you help, and I want to talk with you!!!! On pm please!!!

Yeah, I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that following him around the forum posting off topic replies isn't going to help you get your negative trust removed.

Donos is in trouble once again. Now why am I not surprised...?  ;D

please remember who was the first one to discover and actually tag this lowlife scammer  :P

I wanna know where the 200 negatives are coming..

He probably remembered doing that would expose his entire alt ring and decided to just keep them to shitpost and scam

Or he probably had nothing and they were just empty threats. A lot of scammers feeling indignant will resort to such childish methods, which never improve their situation. If they—for once—logically thought it through, they would realize that it was pointless to even send such a threat.
Especially one that would not affect the intended parties.