|
Title: CDCM versus DAC which is potentially more efficient ? Discussion, Education. Post by: digitalindustry on November 05, 2013, 02:49:07 PM Terms:
http://letstalkbitcoin.com/dac-revisited/#.UnkDHn3ZXMI DAC Stands for D)ecentralized A)utonomous C)orporation coined by bytemaster, I believe. Then CDCM Is just the term im using for the traditional: C)entralized D)irect C)orporate M)onopoly I will add to this as to why this is an important discussion. Title: Re: CDCM versus DAC which is potentially more efficient ? Discussion, Education. Post by: Nutterboy on May 01, 2014, 02:32:31 PM I like DAC's because they can be moved from place to place without being prone to being forced to adhere to rules and regulations necessarily. Esspecially with things like bitcoin as the currency, while its not totally anonymous things like mixers and new wallets like darkwallet will allow for addresses a business uses to be 'secret' or more anonymous and so regulation cannot be imposed on the company. And I really like that aspect. I'll post more tomorrow if the discussion is a bit bigger :)
Title: Re: CDCM versus DAC which is potentially more efficient ? Discussion, Education. Post by: tvv on May 02, 2014, 02:30:25 AM DAC - is Digital-to-Analog Converter. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital-to-analog_converter He иcпoльзyйтe oбщeпpинятыe aббpeвиaтypы вo избeжaниe пyтaнницы! Title: Re: CDCM versus DAC which is potentially more efficient ? Discussion, Education. Post by: sockpuppet_5 on May 02, 2014, 02:42:22 AM Can you explain more about CDCM? I've heard a lot recently about DAC's but nothing about CDCM. My first impression would be DAC is better because it is decentralised, so harder to take down.
|