Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Bitcoin Discussion => Topic started by: FatherMcGruder on February 10, 2011, 03:33:45 PM



Title: Anonymous
Post by: FatherMcGruder on February 10, 2011, 03:33:45 PM
I was really impressed with the job Anonymous did on HBGary Federal. Could they help to propagate Bitcoin? Could Anonymous find Bitcoin useful? Stupid question? We could always move the thread to off-topic and just talk about Anonymous.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: fabianhjr on February 10, 2011, 03:51:29 PM
Anonymous is headless, feel free to grab the flag and use it for your own means. Anonymous is just ideas and ideas are bulletproof. ;)

We are anonymous
We are legion
We do not forgive
We do not forget
Expect Us


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: Anonymous on February 10, 2011, 04:06:39 PM
not your personal army   :P


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: Anonymous on February 10, 2011, 04:07:33 PM
Just start making posts about Bitcoin on 4chan.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: fabianhjr on February 10, 2011, 04:55:06 PM
And get Skiddies and puberts here? No way! D:< We talked about it on IRC over a month ago about going to SKiddie(Aka "hacking") communities to promote this and decided it wasn't worth it. Skiddies can be easily convinced with "free money". Just get a bunch of Bitcoins buy bots(Known to them as "slaves" and give them cheaply for BTC.(Cheaper than what you bought them at counting on the historic high of Bitcoins)
At the same time do contests and give Bitcoins away. In no time they will be all over Bitcoin! This is flawless, though, with a need of a deep(100-1000) USD you are willing to basically give away to SKiddies. Also, not sure if buying bots constitutes an offense by itself. xD

not your personal army   :P
^ Listen to that man. He is anonymous too! ^


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: davout on February 10, 2011, 05:27:43 PM
And get Skiddies and puberts here?
They usually have good graphic cards, and it's all that matters.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: fabianhjr on February 10, 2011, 11:57:54 PM
Not really if any body(large organization or popular individual) attempts to attack Bitcoin it would bring tons of more GPU power to defend it since it would arrive at major news sources! If we surround ourselfs with this individuals that help might now come. I prefer to have a quality user rather than a road raging one. Better places to look would be Security Experts, FOSS and Libertarians/Anarchists, etc always keeping in mind quality. :)


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: FatherMcGruder on February 11, 2011, 06:11:04 PM
What about challenging Anonymous to break Bitcoin. Such an effort could help developers find vulnerabilities and make Bitcoin stronger in the long run.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: Nefario on February 11, 2011, 06:18:44 PM
What about challenging Anonymous to break Bitcoin. Such an effort could help developers find vulnerabilities and make Bitcoin stronger in the long run.

or lose all our coins  :-[


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: davout on February 11, 2011, 06:23:26 PM
What about challenging Anonymous to break Bitcoin. Such an effort could help developers find vulnerabilities and make Bitcoin stronger in the long run.

or lose all our coins  :-[
If there is a vulnerability it won't disappear just by hiding it under the carpet....


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: FatherMcGruder on February 11, 2011, 06:25:19 PM
What might attract Anonymous to such a challenge? Perhaps a blurb on the ED article stating that not even Anonymous can break Bitcoin.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: davout on February 11, 2011, 06:46:28 PM
Why would they even care?


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: JohnDoe on February 11, 2011, 06:51:04 PM
Unless there's lulz to be had, your challenge will be an utter failure.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: Mike Hearn on February 11, 2011, 06:51:56 PM
We already know that a motivated attacker has several ways to screw with BitCoin. Asking people to break the production network isn't going to achieve anything other than hurting BitCoin, which we don't want, right?



Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: FatherMcGruder on February 11, 2011, 07:05:31 PM
Why would they even care?
Unless there's lulz to be had, your challenge will be an utter failure.
True.

We already know that a motivated attacker has several ways to screw with BitCoin. Asking people to break the production network isn't going to achieve anything other than hurting BitCoin, which we don't want, right?
But we don't want a vulnerable currency either, right?


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: Nefario on February 11, 2011, 07:07:23 PM
I had better spend all my btc before anony comes.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: davout on February 11, 2011, 07:10:48 PM
I had better spend all my btc before anony comes.
Otherwise what ?
Omg, they're gonna generate so much we're going to get so screwed.

Sometimes I don't understand how people can find so many reasons to be scared...

If someone fucks bitcoin up then good, means it wasn't strong after all.
If someone tries and fails then good ! Means it's strong.

Both outcomes are profit.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: Nefario on February 11, 2011, 07:19:20 PM
I had better spend all my btc before anony comes.
Otherwise what ?
Omg, they're gonna generate so much we're going to get so screwed.

Sometimes I don't understand how people can find so many reasons to be scared...

If someone fucks bitcoin up then good, means it wasn't strong after all.
If someone tries and fails then good ! Means it's strong.

Both outcomes are profit.

First, relax Dont take me so serious, the worst that could happen I think is we get more scammers.
Second, fuck you thats why! ( again joking)


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: davout on February 11, 2011, 07:27:24 PM
First, relax Dont take me so serious, the worst that could happen I think is we get more scammers.

No worries, some people have that tone AND are serious

Second, fuck you thats why! ( again joking)
You don't need to explain that, your resistance only makes me harder.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: FatherMcGruder on February 11, 2011, 07:34:56 PM
You don't need to explain that, your resistance only makes me harder.
I get a boner every time I log on.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: marcus_of_augustus on February 11, 2011, 08:20:38 PM

What doesn't kill it will make it stronger ... if word on the street was that Anonymous, NSA, Chinee Govt. attacked bitcoin and it didn't blink I think the value would appreciate after that.

As the man said if it fails it wasn't meant to be but we would know what not to do for the next one ... Evolution is bitch like that, only the strongest survive but also means cryptocoins are unstoppable since if not this time, then the next or the one after or the one after ... eventually a P2P cryptocoin will succeed, probably many of different flavours.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: ribuck on February 11, 2011, 10:45:44 PM
At this point it would be more prudent to encourage individual white hat hackers to try to break it privately. I would contribute coin to that.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: davout on February 11, 2011, 11:03:01 PM
At this point it would be more prudent to encourage individual white hat hackers to try to break it privately. I would contribute coin to that.
I'm not a big fan of the try-to-break-it-but-be-gentle kind of approach.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: ribuck on February 11, 2011, 11:13:09 PM
I'm not a big fan of the try-to-break-it-but-be-gentle kind of approach.
Anonymous might be very rough.

But OK David, if you or anyone else exposes a problem that could cause coin loss between now and the end of February, I'll pay a hundred bitcoins.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: marcus_of_augustus on February 11, 2011, 11:18:34 PM
Quote
if you or anyone else exposes a problem that could cause coin loss between now and the end of February, I'll pay a hundred bitcoins.

... at which point the bitcoins will be worth less because of the exposed security breach, kind of no-skin-in-the-game bet?  ???

Put the prize up in a currency outside the system, like gold grams, and you'll have a bonafide incentive.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: ribuck on February 11, 2011, 11:21:45 PM
kind of no-skin-in-the-game bet?  ???
An exploit was previously exposed in Bitcoin. The exploit was fixed, then the network selected and propagated the branch of the block chain that didn't suffer from the exploit. The value of bitcoins didn't appear to change as a result.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: Mike Hearn on February 12, 2011, 10:45:08 AM
There are several people on this forum who could break the prodnet tomorrow by flooding it with hundreds of small transactions that use up the networks CPU capacity and make it take forever to download the chain (so that many users just give up waiting).

There's no point in asking people to attack BitCoin at this point unless you restrict it to a very well defined set of rules. We want guys like Ross Anderson looking at BitCoin not some random "hacktivists".


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: caveden on February 12, 2011, 05:53:44 PM
There are several people on this forum who could break the prodnet tomorrow by flooding it with hundreds of small transactions that use up the networks CPU capacity and make it take forever to download the chain (so that many users just give up waiting).

Not true. There are fees for tiny amounts transactions and there is a maximum size limit for blocks.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: Mahkul on February 12, 2011, 06:01:07 PM
There are several people on this forum who could break the prodnet tomorrow by flooding it with hundreds of small transactions that use up the networks CPU capacity and make it take forever to download the chain (so that many users just give up waiting).

Not true. There are fees for tiny amounts transactions and there is a maximum size limit for blocks.

Yes, but after exceeding the "free of charge" size of the blockchain wouldn't all transactions (also the genuine ones) have to pay the transaction fee? Such an attack could affect everyone resulting in only the attacker's transactions being included into the current block. Correct me if I am wrong.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: marcus_of_augustus on February 12, 2011, 06:47:21 PM
Quote
There's no point in asking people to attack BitCoin at this point unless you restrict it to a very well defined set of rules.

What stage is it at exactly?

When it comes to protecting  people's private money in a wider marketplace there will be no rules period. Let alone a "well-defined set" of them.

Attack it and see if it should really be worthy of trading at parity with the fed. res funny money ... else it also is just funny money.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: davout on February 12, 2011, 08:48:02 PM
I'm not a big fan of the try-to-break-it-but-be-gentle kind of approach.
Anonymous might be very rough.
Anonymous is mostly people who don't know about IT and won't give a damn if they can't point their LOIC piece of shit at bitcoin :)

There are several people on this forum who could break the prodnet tomorrow by flooding it with hundreds of small transactions that use up the networks CPU capacity and make it take forever to download the chain (so that many users just give up waiting).

Not true. There are fees for tiny amounts transactions and there is a maximum size limit for blocks.

Yes, but after exceeding the "free of charge" size of the blockchain wouldn't all transactions (also the genuine ones) have to pay the transaction fee? Such an attack could affect everyone resulting in only the attacker's transactions being included into the current block. Correct me if I am wrong.
Each node mines for a different set of transactions, depending on the topology of the network.

There are several people on this forum who could break the prodnet tomorrow by flooding it with hundreds of small transactions that use up the networks CPU capacity and make it take forever to download the chain (so that many users just give up waiting).

There's no point in asking people to attack BitCoin at this point unless you restrict it to a very well defined set of rules. We want guys like Ross Anderson looking at BitCoin not some random "hacktivists".
I definitely disagree strongly with this point of view. I don't trust government run "stress tests" :)
What's the point of going up to hackers and be like : "ok guys, go for it, attack us, but please think inside the little box we defined for you"


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: caveden on February 12, 2011, 10:04:05 PM
Yes, but after exceeding the "free of charge" size of the blockchain wouldn't all transactions (also the genuine ones) have to pay the transaction fee? Such an attack could affect everyone resulting in only the attacker's transactions being included into the current block. Correct me if I am wrong.

Anyone could force everyone to pay transaction fees, that's true.
That wouldn't make only the attackers transaction get included, though. Those paying more fees would be included first.

What I wonder is if miners implement intelligent ways of discarding transactions if their transaction pools gets too big...


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: davout on February 12, 2011, 11:25:04 PM
What I wonder is if miners implement intelligent ways of discarding transactions if their transaction pools gets too big...
Probably not until tx fees become the main generation incentive.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: Mike Hearn on February 14, 2011, 12:58:07 PM
The DoS risk is not merely about space in the block. There are several resources that can be exhausted, for instance you could consume all the networks CPU time more easily than filling up the blocks with garbage.

I might write up a wiki page or a longer post on this. The DoS problem is one that needs a lot more work.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: fabianhjr on February 14, 2011, 01:59:12 PM
I say go for it! Don't go after the SKiddies though, go for quality personas at HTS, SecurityFocus, and other Security specialist communities. 4Chan and SKiddie Forums can join later by indirect means. ;)


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: Dobry Den on March 02, 2011, 06:15:51 AM
I actually found out about Bitcoin yesterday because Anonymous' website where they publish press releases had a "We accept Bitcoin donations" link.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: barbarousrelic on March 02, 2011, 01:06:48 PM
I have my doubts as to Anonymous's productive capacity. Their capacity for comedic revenge is well proven.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: AmpEater on March 02, 2011, 04:56:32 PM
I have my doubts as to Anonymous's productive capacity. Their capacity for comedic revenge is well proven.

I too have doubts that a collection of countless proactive and self motivated individuals with a history of action, acting within a loose set of rules whereas anyone may contribute as little or as much as one wishes at any time in any way towards any cause one finds worthy will achieve any productive capacity

Lulz

I actually found out about Bitcoin yesterday because Anonymous' website where they publish press releases had a "We accept Bitcoin donations" link.

Awesome! Welcome. Bitcoin is right up your alley.  Be sure to hit anon news with some bitcoin love when you have some to share


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: MacRohard on March 02, 2011, 05:14:19 PM
I was really impressed with the job Anonymous did on HBGary Federal. Could they help to propagate Bitcoin? Could Anonymous find Bitcoin useful? Stupid question? We could always move the thread to off-topic and just talk about Anonymous.

I noticed that http://www.anonnews.org/ is accepting bitcoin donations.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: dirtyfilthy on March 02, 2011, 07:55:21 PM
anonnews accepts bitcoin donations http://www.anonnews.org/bitcoin.html


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: da2ce7 on March 04, 2011, 10:47:03 AM
Get adding to: http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Bitcoin (http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Bitcoin) !!!


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: edric on March 06, 2011, 10:23:32 AM
Get adding to: http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Bitcoin (http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Bitcoin) !!!

Oh lord, I read that. So much mad in one article. And also...

>implying anonymous can actually break anything besides their anime pillow beat off toys

sorry

Actually, the fact is that I came across a thread on /g/ about Bitcoin and it raised my interest. I'd just gotten finished revamping some of my other systems as well as my main rig so I thought I'd give it a try.

I'm pretty much certain the influx of new people in the last couple of weeks has been due to anon.  I notice nobody's posting about it anymore on there though, likely trying to keep it on sort of the down-low? dunno.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: marcus_of_augustus on March 06, 2011, 10:49:14 AM
I think this is encouraging, a bona fide bitcoin ridicule piece ... progress.

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win ... we are moving towards the second phase .... no?



Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: no to the gold cult on March 06, 2011, 12:50:24 PM
Get adding to: http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Bitcoin (http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Bitcoin) !!!

Oh lord, I read that. So much mad in one article. And also...

>implying anonymous can actually break anything besides their anime pillow beat off toys

sorry

Actually, the fact is that I came across a thread on /g/ about Bitcoin and it raised my interest. I'd just gotten finished revamping some of my other systems as well as my main rig so I thought I'd give it a try.

I'm pretty much certain the influx of new people in the last couple of weeks has been due to anon.  I notice nobody's posting about it anymore on there though, likely trying to keep it on sort of the down-low? dunno.

You have a link? The thread on /g/ was mentioned in an update post but just led to a 4chan not found page.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: mizerydearia on March 08, 2011, 07:07:04 AM
I propose that a particular day each year is established in which currently existing Bitcoin community and enthusiasts collectively promote bitcoin throughout various locations (maybe both online and offline) and help to spread awareness through such efforts.  Any ideas for a particular date that seems worthy to establish for such efforts?


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: AmpEater on March 08, 2011, 01:42:17 PM
I propose that a particular day each year is established in which currently existing Bitcoin community and enthusiasts collectively promote bitcoin throughout various locations (maybe both online and offline) and help to spread awareness through such efforts.  Any ideas for a particular date that seems worthy to establish for such efforts?

April 20th


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: barbarousrelic on March 08, 2011, 02:48:22 PM
I propose that a particular day each year is established in which currently existing Bitcoin community and enthusiasts collectively promote bitcoin throughout various locations (maybe both online and offline) and help to spread awareness through such efforts.  Any ideas for a particular date that seems worthy to establish for such efforts?

April 20th
Let's not pick Hitler's birthday.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: FatherMcGruder on March 08, 2011, 02:49:21 PM
Let's not pick Hitler's birthday.
Are you kidding me? Hitler would have loved Bitcoin!


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: mizerydearia on May 08, 2011, 05:21:34 PM
Now http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/Bitcoin


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: AtlasONo on May 08, 2011, 10:58:18 PM
Anonymous/4chan/the youtube culture is mind numbingly retarded.

Worn out  memes and internet cliques do not a currency make. They just make you look bad by association.

*holds up spork* rofl xd


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: Anonymous on May 08, 2011, 11:18:20 PM
Let's not pick Hitler's birthday.
Are you kidding me? Hitler would have loved Bitcoin!


http://media.witcoin.com/p/1309/Hitler-Finds-Out-About-Bitcoin (http://media.witcoin.com/p/1309/Hitler-Finds-Out-About-Bitcoin)


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: BitterTea on May 08, 2011, 11:35:23 PM
Worn out  memes

Actually, the sad/amazing thing is that most memes originate from 4chan. The entire internet dances to their mind virus jig.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: luv2drnkbr on May 09, 2011, 02:58:33 AM
Wow a thread about Anonymous without CP... I'm happily surprised.


Title: Re: Anonymous
Post by: gigabytecoin on May 09, 2011, 04:34:01 AM
I was really impressed with the job Anonymous did on HBGary Federal. Could they help to propagate Bitcoin? Could Anonymous find Bitcoin useful? Stupid question? We could always move the thread to off-topic and just talk about Anonymous.

"Anonymous" is actually how I found out about bitcoin.

I am a hardcore redditor, and there was something about the hbgary hacking voted up to the top of reddit I believe...

In the top right corner of that page was a bitcoin donations button. I clicked it, and never looked back...