Bitcoin Forum

The Bounty Campaign is so hot and great . We can earn a big profit with Bounty Campaigns .
Sometimes , you see some Bounties which have less participants or more participants ? Have you already think about which one do you prefer ?


Less participants / More participants in Bounty - Which one do you prefer ?

For me I prefer less but enough participants especially when all the members, developer and the campaign manager are active in the bounty campaign and seriously do the job for the successful of the ICO..

Honestly, I don't really care much about the number of participants involved since I focus more on other aspects like developer interactions with community members through telegram, twitter etc, clear and concise whitepaper etc. I heard people say time and again that less participants leads to bigger profits which is true sometimes, but not always. If the project reveals itself as a scam, you stand to gain nothing from the bounty. I advise focusing more on the whitepaper, development team etc in this case.

Not even matter on how many participants joined the campaign, it is all about the good market result on the campaign, on how the token being introduce on the market with high market value, so that all workers enjoy their efforts and time.

I prefer projects where there are restrictions on participants as you can expect to get more tokens, but such projects are very difficult to find

I think that everything depends on the project and its goals but not on bounty participants count. I prefer to choose good projects and I don't mind about the number of bounty campaign participants.

IT all depends on the project
If it’s a project where certain amount of tokens are designed for bounties
Then less or more participants is ok cos you just need more stakes to earn more

If it’s 2% of ico sales For bounty
Then less participants please

You are right it depends on what project you are or it is zero visibility on a scam revealed project, more participants in signature maybe can help to promote project because mostly here in a forum are probably investors and another aspect are social media participants, more participants the more project well known especially those really investors.
I guess the number of participants will really help to promote the project, so therefore I must prefer on more participants more investors.

Less participants is better because it means that the partition for the allocated tokens for the bounty will be less. But this will make sense only if the bounty you joined has already reached their target cap, better if the hard cap.

More is better for the bounty.
If the bounty get less participant.
It is possible to scam and drop.
But when is more and more i think it will be come success.
That is.

I prefer for less participants of the bounties. The more you get stakes if the participants of the bounties are not many. The budget for the bounties should be distribute to all participants in every bounties. The lesser participants much better.

for a investor point of view I dont want those with airdrop and bounty.. but for a bounty hunter it should be less participant but good project right?

D115

Mostly i rather prefer  to those who less participants in bounty and legit campaign,because in time that we recieve our tokens of participation only few will be given in a huge amount of token reward thats put into our  wallet,but in some instances there is also doubt in our mind that why only less participants of that campaign joined,thats why there's going inside our mind that bounty campaign is scam or hoax,so in order to get out that hesitation we must review properly the white paper of the project  before we join,to escape and prevent those  scam bounty campaign project.

Of course, I would like fewer participants, because you will get more stakes means more coins. But unfortunately these days, there are way too many bounty hunters, the rewards we get is not worth it most of the times. I hope company increases their shares to rewards bounty hunters more.

I am more inclined to those bounty threads that rarely participate.
Because fewer people participate, it means that you can get more tokens.

Of course, few people take part in the bounty. Because fewer participants, the share will increase. and each will receive more token. but this is risky. Because bounty does not attract participants. That means that the bounty is not good or the project is nothing special. worthless

many participants or a less participants bounty.
For me no problem, what matters is the payment of bounty accordingly and on time.
The team and its developers are also active in project.
But at the moment it is very difficult to find a less project participants, with the right payment.

Of course I prefer less participants when the payment is by stakes, because in this case I will get more tokens than being among huge number of bounty participants. But not all bounty campaigns nowadays use the stakes formula to divide the tokens, some bounties give a fixed amount of tokens for each campaign participant doing his right job.

It is better to join in less participants than joining in more participants, more participants the reward that you will get is lower than the usual besides there is a lot of bounty hunters now it is better to choose a bounty that has less participants but it has a big potential so that you will gain more profit on it just search on it and you will see the big income that you will have.

I prefer the bounty with few or limited participants. By calculating the number of fewer participants will certainly get more generated in the token count. But in the end it all depends on the market.

If you participate on a signature campaign, you need find out how many members in that campaign, for me a acceptable number is below 100. It mean i want a moderate participants. If the project successful, you'll make a great profit. But you know, an attractive campaign always have many participants.

I would choose Less participant.  the reasons  cause i might get bigger portion of the cake and its worthed to work on bounty that are limiting the number of the participants. 

I always like if the  bounty a few participant or fixed amount of participant than many because we all know more participants the less the amount of token that we will have. So it's better to join a few participant bounty to get more tokens

Many people engage in bounty. That bounty will be good and will definitely be paid. But the money for each person is not much. I need certainty in my work. So I would choose the bounty to be many participants

If there was an average amount I would go for that one. One with a small amount of people doesn't show a ton of interest although the project could be good. One with loads of people is likely to get the raise but then you are getting a small piece of the pie. The best of both worlds for me is in between that amount, which gets the raise yet the people are small enough you also get a good piece.

Less Participants - You can earn a higher percentage of the bounty pool meaning more coins

More Participants - More hype and awareness for the project created

Less Participants - Not much community support with a high chance bounty rewards or rules will change.

More Participants - Vastly decreased rewards

So there are good and bad points for each really.
Personally, I haven't seen the amount of participants affect the overall value of my rewards that much.
What affects the value more is how reliable and trustworthy the ico and bounty campaign manager is.
There needs to be a dedicated bounty manager who openly communicates with the community.

Another big factor is the success of the company itself.
I never sell my bounties for a quick profit; instead, I hold on to them for potential huge gains in the future.
It's a lot different from putting in your own money.
I didn't spend a cent (although I put in time) so I don't feel any real pressure to sell at a certain profit margin.

On a side note, I suggest looking for bounties for icos that have a very low circulating token supply.
It can bring a higher proportional value to your work.

I don't look at the bounties participant when i choose to join the bounties.
But i looked up into their projects, teams, and their roadmaps.
because it's wasting if their promising us big rewards of their token but in the market, their token is priceless

both have pros and cons.

More participant may result to more crowdfund and such

Usually i select based on BM and project itself. The others I do not care that much

Most important is we are paid after bounty ends for the efforts

The number of participants is one of many reasons affecting the size of generosity, but not the main one. First of all, I'm interested in the project itself, its importance and usefulness. After all, if the ICO project is unsuccessful or simply fraudulent, it will not matter how many participants in the campaign of generosity were in it. However, among other things, I draw attention to the number of such participants, and to their ranks. If there are a lot of high-ranked participants in the generosity campaign, this means that it is more likely that the ICO project will be successful, with such ranks for any generosity campaigns not subscribed.

Obviously i will prefer campaigns with less participants and big percentage but such campaigns are very rare these days, all the good campaigns have thousands of participants from the start.

i prefer less participants in a bounty, because you can earn higher than those who have many participants. but you need to get in first. with bounties gain more participants everyday its hard to join bounties that have caps. if you find one and got in consider yourself lucky. But there's nothing wrong in bounties with many participants too because they are community friendly and can help many people who seeks bounties

Of couse i prefer less participant because i can get more rewards the less the participant is but the project want a lot of participants to promote their project so it's normal to see a high number of participants. The ideal situation is when the participants are not too much and the project earn a lot of money from the ico, because that shows that the bounty is effective to spread the words about the project.

I prefer less participants because you can't earn profit if bounty campaign have a lot of participants, but I mean less with enough participants, most important things is double verified and research before joined

it depends. since most of the bounty campaigns with more members or participants is almost 100% sure that their bounty will become success since there are a lot of advertisements are being spread which is better since it is a success but it is also a low profit since the job pay for us could get lower due to the big number of participants which is the drawback of it. in less participants or member of a bounty campaign, you could get a big value of their token/ alternate crypto currencies which means a big profit for you but that said most of the time those bounties are 50-50 i guess since it is most likely to get scammed or stop their project.

For me its neither, because I focus more on the target market of tge ICO and its potential for growth within that market segment, its like more on quality of the ICO then the quantity of the participants.  Like if there would be a crypto platform for music if their is one, and I check if the team behind it if they are communicating the the community. That is one of the reasons I have chosen photochain as my first bounty because I see a great potential from this project

First it depend on payment method. I mean Bounty manager could gives you stakes or tokens. So you should choose which one will reward you its own tokens (not stakes) like my signature campaign.

I try to choose companies with fewer participants or a limit on quantity.But  I also join companies run by a good manager, he has a lot of people in the company.

Less or more participants is okay to me. Both has advantage and disadvantage, more bounty participants = more advertising and can pick more investors. less bounty = higher bounty pay (if rewards is it form of stakes).

For me less participants which do I prefer because as you said for less members of a bounty campaign the more yoe earn profits. But havimg mode participants is a campaign are considering a big bounty campaign which is the more they need participants the highest bounty pool they also offer buy it necessarily. But sometimes we saw less members needed in a bounty campaign but there was a highest ICo. So is it not truly base on what numbers of participants a bounty campaigns are they have as long as we do our obligation to participate in some bounty campaign.

I prefer bounties where are many participants, because than its means thats project is popular and will get more volume in exchnage

It's hard to find a good bounty with few participants: many people are now doing bounty full time and they leave small rooms for the others

I think the success of one project are not lies on the number of bounty participants, yes, it was good to have many participant for the speed of spreading the news about the project, however, the true success will come from the best team, developer, marketing and adviser, of course the road map should have a clear path.

You are right. It's risky when project has only a few participants. We can think - wow...  this is a Klondaik :)  But in fact this project might be  less interesting for investors

Yes, indeed, the number of participants in many Bounties is very different. as for me, I usually prefer those projects where there are fewer participants - it seems that the project is new and therefore not many people know about it yet. and accordingly it seems that there will be large payments. but at the same time, companies with more participants seem to be more stable, which is why many prefer them.

I have no special preferences on this issue, but when there are not enough participants in the campaign, this raises suspicions. It is obviously painful to participate in a campaign where there are too many participants.

Of course I prefer when there are less partecipants but you have to be careful, usually only a few partecipants means that that ICO isn't very attractive for investors and you end up losing your time

      It does not matter if there are few or many participants. It really matters, to a certain extent. What is important is the project you are taking part in, your goals and potential. But, however, a smaller number of people enrolled in a bounty project can make you a better profit.

I like a project with real strength and limited bounty participants.Close the Bounty registration channel within two weeks of the end or beginning of the ICO. or limit the number of participants. Some activities are really too many.

I prefer less or limited number of participants to be able to get a bigger share of the bounty pool. Because if a certain bounty has many participants then number of tokens per participants is quite small.

Well, definately i must preferrable to less participants in bounty campaign because it has a big token dividen to be distributed to the successful bounties participants in the end this is because of a few memeber being work and remain during the campaign period.

If i have a concern to the succes of project it is better to hire more participants so that promotion will be easier and a good way of marketing strategy.
that's the real purpose of of bounty campaign, The Less participant you have in a bounty the lesser fame, attraction and interest you will gain to your project, but if A bounty campaign is sure win win project then there's no need to hire more participants because the project itself will attract whale investors.

Main idea is participate on solid project. Then less participants. But I wouldn't pass one solid project just because of more participants.

I don't pay much attention to the participants in a bounty. I focus on the quality of the project. A good project is likely to attract more participants.

Ammount of participants are not the most important thing in Bounty. Of course, smaller ammount = bigger profit but not always.

More important thins is development team, community etc, because if we do not focus on the most important, we will be able to lose everything when the campaign turns out to be a scam

i don't mind about less of participants or more participants while enrolling bounties programs because in my opinion the number of participants will not guarantee the particular project will sucessfully or not and as long as the project will sucessfully and the price are decent when listed to the exchange it does not matter for me

I prefer golden middle! As a lot of participants, means you are rewarded less among all of participants, but you can see that the project has high interest from the community! Less participants means more rewards, but you might end up with nothing, as the project will turn out scam or the coin will not get any value, after the ICO finishes! So there is advantages and disadvantages of both more/less participants.

I think we should keep the balance. Very often, companies have a small number of participants, because they are not sufficiently covered, which negatively affects the attraction of investments. At the same time, campaigns with a large number of participants often pay very little. Therefore, the most attractive look of bounty, where the payment is fixed for each participant and must be paid in tokens.

if in my opinion more participants are better because who get the best gift of him the best .. and with many participants we can learn a lot more. if the little participant is less comfortable in my opinion

I like bounties that are popular because that probably means that they have a good project to offer and subsequently their coin will have a bigger value in the future.

Yes the amount of the participants is not the most important thing but the project and its development team is very important on which the project can encourage investors to invest and make it successful and the participants of the bounty spread it to the investors to make it popular and support it.

I really don't care about the number of participants, because rewards in those bounty campaigns split for each participants works. The more you work, the more you earn and the main points to get good rewards is quanlity of works. Do everthing follow the rules than you will get good rewards.

less participants would be good to bounty hunters but it can be a bad side to the ICOs. less participants less exposure of the project but with many participating the more exposure of the project will get. many will get interest and possibly invest to it.

I agree that it depends primarily on the idea of the project and the team. But of course better there, where there will be fewer participants. Since there you will get more coins. Also, you can choose projects that set a pool as % of collected funds.

I prefer to see the concepts and the allocation of the bounty in advance of judging on the number of participants. Maybe it's just a bonus because of course if the fewer participants then the results obtained will be great. but not entirely be a reference ICO will succeed.

A small number of participants often means that the project is of no interest to anyone. Therefore the result of your work can be very cheap or not worth anything. Choosing a bounty by the number of participants is wrong. It is necessary to look at the question from all sides

I usually take on projects that are already running and have already reached the minimum funding limit. I think it's safer. If there are fewer participants it is better, but I also consider the size of the project value.

I prefer fewer participants. I think the rewards will be bigger. In addition we never know what surprises are in it.

Of course, I would have to choose those ICO's that has a fewer participants since the reward would surely be bigger than those who have plenty of participants. Some Ico does not limit the numbere. participants.

If we say that the ICO is successful no matter how many the participants are, then I would really prefer less participants. Its obvious, less participants means you get more share payments coins than when there are more participants.

Very often, the number of participants, especially in social companies, can bring good success to the project. But when the number of participants is limited - it's good for the participants themselves

Less participants could give you a lot of profits,because the bounty allocation will be split into few participants,the less people in the campaign the bigger the rewards that is why sometimes we should choose the low profile campaigns,which most of the people doesnt want to participate so that we can have a good bounties compre to those campaigns which has a lot of participants.

Less participants will be great because the reward must be good. More tokens more chance to get good profit.

Maybe at least 200 participants every bounties. The more participants, the lesser the rewards are be. Also it was better if someone is in signature, he cant participate to other bounty. If you are in fb participants, you cant join in twitter and signature. To all have chance.

I definitely prefer less participant than more participant in a bounty campaign. More participant means that you are going to share with more stakes, and that you;ll get less payments. Most of the campaigns with less participant, assuming they are successful, got huge bounty payments.

It doesn't matter less or more participants it's all about the good, success project and good market sale.

Honestly speaking,  I prefer less participants in a bounty. The lesser the better,  it is because the numbers of participants in a bounty affects the amount that will be given to each people who participated  in it. The allocated amount would be divided, the lesser the participants the bigger you get. But the ranking of participants are giving some considerations also,  like the higher your rank is the bigger money you have.

As a bounty hunter i am prefer projects with more participants because if a project with many participants, has a big chance that the bounty campaign will succeed because many hunters trusted it.

I think it depends on payment mode if the campaign allocate stakes then less participants is profitable for us, but some campaigns will pay tokens and someone will pay both tokens and BTC or ETH this kind of campaign it will not affect to our payments because they will fix one amount for each rank.

depending on the bounty campaign itself. usually if a good campaign would be a lot of devotees. there are many members here have learned a lot to find a good bounty ico project.
the reward problem I guess is almost nothing much different.

Sometimes it's better in less participants to gain more altcoin but if you think about it, it's better have more participants for the good of the campaign.

Well i prefer less participants than more participants because the more bounty participants the less effective the advertising because some participants are lazy and also it will be more problem for bounty manager to check the participants work if they done it properly and it takes more time if there are more participants in that campaign i knew the struggle of being bounty manager like yahoo.

To me . I always choose the bounties which have less participants , especially is signature campaign . Because , less participants will be more profit

Yes Bounty Campaigns are really hot and giving us great opportunity to earn some big rewards and I think that the number of participants doesn't matter a lot whether the participants are less or more it all depends on the value of the Bounty projects and how long the bounty and the projects are expected to run and how much are they going to pay you during the project. I would love to join those bounty programs which are having a high value with a high amount of payment on the weekly or monthly basis.

My current method isn't about the number of participants only :
I check campaigns whose ico sell percentage is high enough to ensure that ICO won't fail. And then I divide the reward into the number of participants before to decide if it's worth gettin in.

Signature campaigns here offer fixed weekly amount to members and I do not think that it is affected by the total number of members participating.

For instance, for members the pay is like $20 for making 25 meaningful posts in a week. And this pay remains the same whether there are 20 participants in the campaign or the 50. One of the better ways to judge potential profit is based on the length of the campaign. There are some signature campaigns which are running here for years and it makes sense to apply for those.

if my position as an investor or token buyer during ICO, I prefer projects that have less participants and small bounty allocations. because the risk of token price dump will decrease when the tokens listed to the market. but if my position as a bounty hunter I prefer a project that has many participants,  it's means the project is interesting and good because everyone wants to join

First, it depends on the project. Some bounties may have very strict rules and the majority of people are lazy, so I would choose to participate in bounties with strict rules and less people though it requires more time.

First I prefer to study the project and the team in details and only then watch the number of the bounty campaign participants. If the project does not deserve attention, then no matter how many participants there are.

the large number of participants in a bounty campaign, does not specify that the project is good, but the more numerous holders of the altcoin project, may determine that the price will continue to rise. my advice, stay cautious in choosing a bounty campaign, because some bounty campaigns sometimes do not pay for their participant

Less participants means more rules, but also a bigger slice of the final reward, I like to balance between the two kinds of bounties according to my free time, which I gladly invest in those activities

In my own experience,less participants will give the hunters more rewards which is why it is better to have a campaigns which has few participants compare to joining bunch of campaigns which has thousands of participants like what the campaigns of needmoney which is why i am avoid those campaigns because you will only get pennies your efforts should be paid very well because the hunters are risking time and effort here.

I would prefer less participants. But the main thing is deeply analyze of the project. Sometimes big quantity of the participants can tell that project is not a scum, but reward will be divided between all of them. Also there cases when a huge community support a project but in the end is scum.

I prefer joining bounties with less participants because you wont get big rewars from the campaign which has thousands of participants, i dont want to be involved into something that wont pay my efforts very well as you can see hunters are nowadays arent receiving that they have worked for which is why the hunters should maximize their efforts.

Both sides will give positive effects for every bounty campaign. More participants could help the campaign gain more followers and investors for it to succeed in the ico stage. Less participants could give bounty hunters more rewards at the end of the campaign. But I would probably choose the ones with many participants but with fixed number of particpants.

Sometimes it is much better to join those campaigns which has less participants but has good vision on it,because the rewards would be much higher than joining campaign which has thousands of partipants,doesnt make sense why would you choose to a lower rewards compare to what you can get to those low profile campaigns which might give you thousands of dollars instantly.

I prefer joining participants ,because the less people who joined a successful campaign the more rewards that you can get,which is why i do prefer joining campaigns which had reached softcap but less people who have joined,because surely those participants are going to get more coins than those people who joined campaigns which has thousands of participants.

I do prefer a campaign which has solid vision with less participants compare to those campaigns which ha a lot of participants like what needmoney's campaigns are,thousands of partipcants means more competitors,more division from the bounty stakes will give you less amount of rewards that is why i do stick with the campaign which has less participants.

i think its depends on project, if project is popular than there will be more participants, i prefer participate in popular so there will much more users

Bounty allocations are dividided equally to participants based on their stakes everyweek,which is why participating to campaigns which has few peole who joined will be much profitable than a campaign which has thousands of participants because the more people who joined in the more division with the total bounty stakes of a specific campaign.

Less participant I prefer it since lesser participants means more awards, but that impossible for my current manager since he's good as advice from my friends, campaign under his name has many participant.

But more important you need to check the spreadsheet, as for example if you want to join Twitter avoid joining campaign that has 2000 participants because award is now little, but if you join in the first week then it's good.

Bounty allocations is like pizza,the more people who will eat the less bite that they can get,which is why i prefer the campaigns which has less participants but with a good vision so that if the campaign has reached atleast softcap you will get plenty of rewards,do not want to join campaigns which has thousands of participants because most of them are bots.

Of course,the less participants who joined the campaign the bigger the rewards,bounty allocations are being divided that depends on your stakes ,which is why the less people who will be divided to,the more rewards that you can get that is why i do prefer the campaigns which has good project and less participants because it will find its way to be successful.

I do not think that this applies to signature campaigns. Signature campaigns that pay in bitcoins have somewhat fixed pay for all ranks. This pay is same for all campaigns irrespective of the number of participants. I have not participated in other bounties and thus cannot tell about them

It`s obviously, first check if it`s a scam,and then join only if it has a small amount of participants.
Just look at Bountyhive platform,each project has a lot of people,and payments are around 6-15$,not like in summer yeah?)

Of course we do prefer to have big rewards,which is why we should be joining campaigns which has less people who are participating so that we can maximize the rewards that we can get,you are going to have plenty of bounties after the ICO has successfully ended,because theres less people who will be divided the bounties to.

I prefer less participantes because the more people who joined the campaign the more people will be divided the bounty allocations to,thats why i am sticking with the campaigns which has potential or good vision with less participants because the rewards will be higher than those campaigns which has thousands of participants.

Less participating hunters the better because there will be more rewards to those hunters,stakes are just like slices of stakes,fewer people means more care for everyone,that is why i am focused with the campaigns which has less participants because i can earn more with these campaigns than participating campaign which has thousands of participants.

Of course the fewer people who will participate the bigger the rewards that you can get,which is why the most profitable campaigns are those campaigns which has less participants.You shouldnt be joining campaigns which has thousands of participants if you dont want to have pennies for your time and efforts in exchange.

It is better to have less participants because you will get more rewards,you should be avoiding those campaigns which has thousands of participants because you will only get pennies after the ICO has ended,and only those higher ranks would be benefit to most of these campaigns becausae the longer the bounties the smaller the rewards for the lower ranks if we are talking about the signature campaigns.

You would want to participate to the campaigns which has less participants because the fewer people whom will be divided the tokens to the bigger the rewards are,that is why we should be looking for those quality projects which has good potential to grow with less bounty participants because these campaigns are most profitable compare to those campaigns which has thousands of participants.

Of course I love less participants, because the among of earnings one will get will be more. Than that of higher participants. And it's all depends on the amount of participants they requested in the campaign also.

Hello! It depends on some things, as budget of tokens prepared for bounty, trustworthy bounty manager, As (Hotachy) I would join her company without any doubt, and yes, where less people = more profit.

I choose less participants because after the campaign surely you will make more rewards but you must choose the right ICO in order you to success. And one thing if you check your name in spreadsheet you can easily find it  ;D.

Yes it is more profitable when the campaign has less participants,which is why i am doing bounties which has potentials with fewer participants because the more participants the campaign has the smaller the rewards that the hunters will get,which is common nowadays as there are many people joining bounty campaigns.

If bounty campaign has high value tokens then everybody like less participants where if bounty campaign has decent value tokens then it doesn't care how much participant it have! It's totally simple for all, but for me it doesn't. Actually, I don't car about participants, i want to join only those bounty which has perfect goal for future to help others.

Either way can be effective in advertising, depends on the participants.
But I prefer LESS. If you have less participants, participants can easily be monitored their effectivity individualy it will eliiminate the possible entry of a shit posters, plus a higher shares of stakes.

I prefer campaigns with less participants, but they very rarely reach the hard cap. The big campaigns are more likely to raise more money.

Bounty Participation depends upon a lot many factors.

More participants usually display more excitement in crowd about the projects, also it could be possible of big bounty pool allocation. On the contrary less participants gives a hint that not many people are interested in the project, which at times also turns opposite as less participants could also be because of high qualification requirements.

I personally prefer bounties having low pool allocation, but strong project, even though you get lesser coins but over a longer period, those less coins are worth much more then the high pool bounties.

Not to be greedy but i would prefer on having less participants but somehow we can expect the outcome yet only a few will able to wear or market the project which will possible result into failure but not always thecase because if the project do have potential even how small the participant,it can able to stand out among the rest thats why its still worth a shot to join on. The good thing on having lots of participants which can really give high exposure which will able to get out potential investors that will contribute into such success.

I prefer less participants because the less people who will be given the bounties the bigger the rewards that those people will get,thousands participants are less profitable compare to the bounty campaign which has only hundreds of participants,which is why i am more focused to those bounties which has fewer people who are joining because it can give us big profits.

But we will not lose the question or doubt that just a few or many of the bounties that are going to work today are in line with the question of whether we can pay that bounty? To me i would rather have that much to share that bounty is important as we hold the assurance that we will be paid for our work.

I prefer the less participants, because it get to earn even more tokn
but it also depends on the conditions attached to such bounties, which can be rare absurd or good.
but nonethesless, bounties are worth the stress, both
Less participants / More participants in Bounty

i prefer both

I prefer to participate in bounty companies that I'm sure of. I do not care about the number of participants, besides, if this is a good project, it is usually allocated a lot of money for the bounty company, which means that enough for all participants.

Less participants will be much profitable because bounty allocations will be divided to only few people,and the more participants that we have the less profitable it will be,though campaigns which has less participants will have less chance of getting success it is indeed more profitable when it reached successful ICOs.

Exactly,  I agree to this. Though,  I have not participated in bounties, but I feel that what any bounty hunter should be interested in is the project not the high number or less number of the participants. If the project is really a good one and extremely worth it, then they should be good. Because,  what sense does it makes if one earn more tokens from a bounty and at the end of the day, it turns out that the ICO project was a pure scam!

I prefe joining less participants bounty campaigns as it can give me a lot of profits,compare to joining to these campaigns which has thousand of participants because ti do believed these stakes are pizza slices and the less people who participated the bounty the bigger slices in the pizza that they can eat that is the simplest explanation.

I do prefer bounties with less particiapants,because the less people who joined the less people who will be given stakes,and the few people who got stakes ,the bigger the division of the allocations will be.That is why campaigns which has less participants are better than campaigns which has thousands of participants that is why i aint joining any tokensuite campaign.

The lesser the bounty participant, the higher the payouts. But let's not forget that payouts solely depends on how much was raised during the tokensale. If the project was unable to reach its hard cap, payouts gets affected too. But of it achieves it's cap, and bounties hunters are few, payouts are more but the higher the bounty hunters, the lesser the payouts.

I prefer not to participate in projects where too few people. After all, the team can decide not to hold a bounty for two or three people and you can remain without payments.

I prefer also less participants, cause it's not about how many are you in but it's about how campaign manager and participants do their best for the success of an ICO project.

I dont think thousands of participants are profitable,less people who joined the bounty will be much better because the bounty allocation will be split into few people which means bigger rewards waitinf for those people as the project achieved success surely these coins are going to grow bigger which makes it more profitable.

When choosing an ICO campaign to participate in the signature campaign, I first of all assess the prospects and need for the project itself in terms of its usefulness for people, what convenience and improvement of our life will be achieved by the implementation of this project and in this regard - how much will be released in the course of it tokens. I also pay attention to the number of participants in the signature campaign. On the one hand, a large number of people who joined this project indicate that many have already assessed this project as promising, especially if the signatures were joined in large part by high ranks. However, on the other hand, a smaller number of participants suggests a larger amount of generosity. However, not always. Recently, in the context of joining the signature campaign in the general provisions, it is stated that the ICO project team has the right to change the amount of payments if the joined participants prove to be too small. I have already seen similar cases. Therefore, as a result, the number of participants in the generosity campaign does not significantly affect the amount of payments.

Of course the less people who joined the fewer divisions that will be on the total bounty pool which is why the fewer participants the bigger the rewards that will be,you should know how to stakes are calculated so that you will know how the things works in bounties! i do prefer joining low profile campaigns from the reputable managers instead of joining thousand of participants which wont pay you any!

I prefer less participants,because the rewards would be much bigger compare to those campaigns which has thousands of people joining.The rewards are being distributed to most of the people,the bigger the denominator of the fraction the less profitable the rewards will because there will be less dividends.

It will be less profitable for the hunters if there are thousands of hunters joining a certain campaign,because the more people the more denominator to tha total bounty token will be,its a simple math you should know ! the less divisor will the bigger the divisions of stakes to the hunters will be that is simply as that,you should know this before joining any campaigns.

More participants less stakes that you can have,which is why i prefer less participants bounty campaigns because it might give you thousands of dollars in an instant,which is great because only people believed in the project! you should know how the stakes are calculated so you will have a good idea on how much you can have with your campaigns.

true, if the bounty project has good value and they ICO succeed I guess many participants are not a problem because the coins will still have a good price in the end

For me it is better it the participants is not that much, because the more participants the less stakes. but if that will will maybe the team of a bounty will lessen the allocated bounty budget. but in the point of view of the team beehind the project the more participants the project will be spread in a mass way.

Less participants = bigger stakes ,thus the bigger stakes that you will have that is why smaller the number of hunters the more profitable the project will be,because i have been participating a lot of companies and most of the bigger stakes came from the projects which has less participants which is why i am focused in less low profile bounties.

The less people participating bounty campaigns the more the stakes will be given. So I do prefer less participants but lately there has been a big rise of bounty hubters joining bounty campaigns and there is nothing we can do about it. On the other hand the more the participants the more successful the project will be.

Prefer joining bounties which has less participants but it is one in a blue moon because theres a lot of people that are joining bounties today,which is why the campaigns are getting more less profitable compare to he good old times from previous years which less people are joining bounties,that is why those people are lucky enough to get those big bounties.

in following Bounty of course I will choose with participants who are not many, because in every Bounty with a many number of participants then the allocation of prize distribution will be a little, and vice versa. the most important is Bounty that I follow must be successful and no Scam

For me, the number of participants in a bounty campaign is  not the  basis to determined if it is legit. Other people said that it is better to join in a bounty campaign that has less participants because it has high payment. However, there's other people said that it is better to join in a bounty campaign that has great participants because it shows that this campaign is legit. If I were to choose , I prefer to join in a small participants but it defends on the admin if they are responsible for the payment distribution or active in their participants.

It is indeed profitable joinin campaigns which has less participants because there will be less people to get stakes,which makes each stakes bigger,the allocation is computed thru stakes which makes bigger stakes the less profitable it will for the bounty hunters who worked hard to promote the project,which is why i am focused in joining low profile campaigns!

I'm looking at the ratio of the pool and the number of participants, the timing of implementation. I make a brief analysis of the information and make a decision)

I do not matter also in how many participants who participate in the campaign, what i matter is that campaign do really exist, it is legit not a scam! so i join in their telegrams as needed for my additional informations.

Of course,its like pizza! less people more slices of stakes! which is why i do love to join small time campaigns which most of the people doesnt want to join because these campaigns are the most profitable if the ICO wont turn into scam because if you did your research im sure you wont be joining scam projects,or atleast potential scams.

I prefer less participants because it would be much profitable to the hunters as the stakes will be much bigger for each people,the more people who join the campaign the smaller the stakes will be ,that is why we should be more focus to those projects because these are the most profitable campaigns in the community,joining thousand participants will only give you pennies at the end of the campaign.

I'm fine with a lot of participants, if it's a good project with big allocation value, I think we'll still get good results even though the participants are very much

I terms of high chance of big profit so we wish a less participant to the bounty we joined. Remember that less participant is result to more token per 1 stake. But it is good also in a campiagn with a high participant but has a hard restrictunes in rules causing more participant but less stake

Projects that have been successful when private or pre-sale and have a small number of bounty campaign participants.

If this is a really a great project then we have less participants and i will join that campaign. Bounty stakes are big and getting more attention to all participants. If the coin is sold out i think they will add some bonus.

I don't have a preference, I read bounties announcements and if I like the project I join that, regardless its participants

In my opinion both of them are perfect thing because it all depends from the point view of the users .
But I saw from the high profile projects that they are allowing small numbers of participants and paying high because a better participants can give better impact over the mind of the vistiters ( customer ) .
But sometimes few campaign owners think in Thier own ways that they want just a big crowd to show Thier platforms and better service only at least once , so they use large numbers of users for and small amount for the participants .
So it depends upon the services that what they want from the visitors in actual .

This is not the most important indicator. Usually I have it somewhere in the end by priority. But I would prefer to participate where more people. This adds a bold + project that it will be successful.

I'm a fan of "invite-only" exclusive bounty programs.  This exclusivity helps control the group and messaging, and makes less users get more rewards.

The best criteria for choosing bounty is the amount of bounty will be paid and the chance that ico can reach hardcap because the amount they stated is the best scenario where they collect hard cap amount.

if im going to set my self as a campaign manager, i prefer to have a more participants, if you notice most of the bounty campaign hire around 500+ member cause it is more effective to have a lot of participant to have a good publicity in the market, cause the more user to advertise their campaign it would easy for them to enter in different exchanger. so i think more participant is better than less participant. :)

I prefer small bounties with a limited number of participants. The chance of a large payout can be higher and everything is calculated faster. It is more convenient for a manager to campaign for fewer participants. I wanted to ask a question. I know that there are black lists for unscrupulous bounty members, and are there any white lists for bona fide participants?

yes , bounty campaigns today is paying a decent amount of altcoins and sometimes the payout is better than your own salary so you can actually leave your work on the corporate world and focus on trading in the market.

   Yeah you are right more people make disturbance not only in bounty campaigns but every field of life. Less people means good business and more people means bad business. For me I like this signature campaign and no any bounty campaign because I am making handsome money from this campaign. I don’t need any bounty or any other campaign.

It still depends to the situation, if I saw that they had a good projects then I would prefer to choose less participants in order for me to get much bigger allocation but if I am not that sure about the projects I would choose more participants because this can be the one reason that can convince me that it is a good project.

Actually its hard to find less participant campaign of a most promising project! Therefore what I really don't care about number of participants in a such campaign,but I really care about the project quality before joining to the campaign. Spotcoin bounty campaign is one of a example for good project.

I prefer those projects where there are fewer participants. The less involved in the project the greater the reward

For me I prefer less participants. The less the participants, the more the earnings. But the more participants, the less the payments and it's tiring being paid below ones effort.

It is not a criterion I look at or evaluate very much. I usually review elements such as project goals, project team, whitepaper before joining a campaign. As a result of this effort, it is beneficial to do research as if it has invested. As a result, all the labor given for weeks or months and the time wasted is a bad situation.

It's better to have enough participants in a single bounty since if the bounty has less participants well most likely it's not a good project since every hunter has a good eye on joining a campaign. And if it has even more than expected well sure the bounty is good but the personal stakes/overall stakes has much lower percentage.

This is not the criterion by which to choose a bounty company. But if the project supports many users in social networks and telegram - it's good.

There is no doubt that the quality of the Bounty campaign depends on the quality of participants' work. Therefore, in my opinion, less participants is much better as you are easier to inspect the partcipants' job .

I think the aim of such bounties is that as participants go about carrying out the various activities, the people in their circle begin to know more about the cryptocurrency. Therefore, more participants in bounty will be much better as they can help the bounty campaign more popular and effective.

Less is better because now there're so many people in forum but not all of them know about altcoins appearently.

More is better because the more people join in forum, the more popular altcoin market is

Honestly, the success of a bounty campaign results from the ways you manage the participants, which means the number of participants is not the problem, the problem is how you can manage them for a proposed purpose.

The quality is much more important than the quantity. I think you should focus on the quality of the bounty campaign instead of expanding the number of participants, because the final purpose is the success of the bounty campaign. In some circumstances, less is efficient for you to manage and keep your eyes on the rate of progress

if asked about it honestly I would prefer if fewer participants provided all members, developers and campaign managers are active in bounty campaigns. if the participants bounty a bit then more chances for us to get more tokens

If I choose, I will choose more participants, Because I'm sure that an ICO Campaign will be easier to identify with the number of bitcointalk members to support it. And of course they can easily reach their target's hard cap and soft cap, Many large investors will invest in them because of the popular and of course one of the things I'm looking at is their platform if it can be used person.

I do not care about the number of participants in bounty. I prefer care to the concept of the project that i wan to follow. But in my opinion, the more participants will more profitable for a project because the more people who promote the project it's mean the possibility for the project to visible and attract investors to invest. But the success of the project all goes back to the concept of that project, can to attract investors or not.

for me, I prefer if fewer participants because it is clear the tokens that we can get will be more. and otherwise if many participants then the number of tokens that we receive is smaller because it still must be shared with all participants

Everything is relative. Big quantity of participants is better for project promotion – the project gets larger population coverage. The same time it’s not good for participants personally, they will receive less tokens in the end of campaign.
As for me less participants is better.

Bounty allocations are dividided equally to participants based on their stakes everyweek,which is why participating to campaigns which has few peole who joined will be much profitable than a campaign which has thousands of participants because the more people who joined in the more division with the total bounty stakes of a specific campaign.

too many participants then we will be paid a little, if too few participants it will be difficult in promoting a good project I think is a project should limit the number of participants who want to join it will make us more fair in receiving payment from us work

The number of participants shouldn't make a difference in any bounty. As long as the bounty manager is active and work for what he is paid for that I am also good. But sometimes there are bounties where hundreds of people apply in a single day and there have to be at least 200 participants so the manager is very busy and could miss some good members that were applying or do other mistakes. I would say I like the bounties with less participants because everything it is more organized but there could be campaigns with hundreds of members and still be organized.

I prefere bounties with less participants, because of some kind of "exclusiveness" around that project: less participants means more rules to follow and of course a bigger reward

I prefer bounty campaign where less participants. Because in such campaigns you can get more profit. Especially i like bounty where number of participants is restrictions, but it is very hard to find such campaigns. When number of bounty hunters more than 2000 or even 3000 you can get 5-10 $. I think there are no sense to take part in.

I watched today the spreadsheet of the project dedicated to the human genome, forgot the name, but there were about 1000 participants in the signature campaign. I wonder whether they are satisfied with their earnings.

I prefer bounty with less or limited participants, it bring more income and a very clean result on spreadsheet, i think there should be rules with maximum participants

Prefer joining bounties which has less participants but it is one in a blue moon because theres a lot of people that are joining bounties today,which is why the campaigns are getting more less profitable compare to he good old times from previous years which less people are joining bounties,that is why those people are lucky enough to get those big bounties.

High five for less participants. because of big reward. But It doesn't mean any less participation bounties. After the checking it If I feel that project is good I will join with it. But you need to confirm it as a good one. Some bounty campaigns have participation limit. They are also great.

As a bounty hunter I prefer the campaigns with less users because more users = lesser individual rewards. This is actually good for the project though and not for us. But it doesn't mean one need to join a completely deserted campaign.

I prefer less participant because if the participant are few, you will get more token from your stakes. In the end you will get more token, more token more money you get. Bigger participant is great too because the project will know more easier then they will get more investor. More investor more money in the bounty but still I will prefer less participant

if my position as an investor or token buyer during ICO, I prefer projects that have less participants and small bounty allocations. because the risk of token price dump will decrease when the tokens listed to the market.

For me I prefer less participants but the whole thing even depends on the amount of token allocated to the Bounty participants.

There has to be a balance between too many and too few. If there is only a few people involved, you may be a lot of stakes but you might not Get anything if there isn’t enough publicity to reach the soft cap. The better the token does in the sale, the more momentum it carries onto exchanges. Like others have mentioned, capping the number of users is good for the hunters, but it doesn’t generally help the project who would like as many people as they can doing bounties.

I think more participants would have be a best  bet because  it will allowed  much people  to partake in bounty  and this will make the project  goes beyond  reasonable  doubt

I never pay attention to this, because there were already a few cases that say that it does not matter at all, because the most important is only the project, if you think that you made the wrong choice only because in the bounty project very few participants then it is not right to relax.

It doesn't matter as long as the project has a good platform and is active and legit. However, some bounty hunters prefer to join bounties with less participants because for them, they could get a higher rewards which I find quite greedy. As for me, as long as we are earning for free, that is more than enough to thank for.

I most like the  bounty campaigns, where there is a limit on the number of participants. As a rule, there are the greatest rewards.

fewer participants, it is better, there are many signature campaign participants who are not doing their job properly. even can be said as a cheater. I think all managers should check every post of a signature campaign participant.

I prefer less participants of course but it should meet the minimum number for the campaign.

But we have to take note also that, in some cases, funds allocated for the campaign is based on sales of tokens during presale/ICO. If this is the case, the chances of getting more exposure (which usually leads to higher sale) is higher if there are more participants.

Less participating hunters the better because there will be more rewards to those hunters,stakes are just like slices of stakes,fewer people means more care for everyone,that is why i am focused with the campaigns which has less participants because i can earn more with these campaigns than participating campaign which has thousands of participants.

there's other people said that it is better to join in a bounty campaign that has great participants because it shows that this campaign is legit.

Aside from that it would be best to have more participants in bounty so we will be able to learn and hear lots of ideas from different people.

Most of the bounties are paying the participants in stake based calculation so you will get more rewards if you have less number of participants so it is better to join in the campaign with less participants but in other hand if something is not a worth project then no people will interested in their tokens because they migh don't have any value in the future so getting payment with that token is just wasting our time.So it is tough to say which bounty is good but we need to select the bounty with future potential to get rewarded.

For me number of participants doesnt really matter. As long as the project is good and the member of the team are trusted and have a good platform this is the important thing to be consider. That at the end of the campaign on time distribution of token to the participants.

There are now so many bounty participants in each bounty that the stakes and earnings are getting less and less. Also the fact you have a huge gang of Vietnamese bounty thieves stealing our content and usernames, it is hard now to know who is who and what is going on with bounties. Every bounty I join, I see Vietnamese cheaters stealing my username and I have to spend time every day reporting them. It is a huge headache and a big waste of my time and I am really beginning to feel so bored trying to weed out these thieves.

hm If there are paying you in stakes of the bounty pool, of course i prefer less participants. But if you get piad an fixed amount of tokens the number of participants is not really important at all

You need to participate in bounty campaigns where number of participants are limited. There awards are the highest for less work.

Of course, if there are fewer people involved, we will be rewarded a lot, I look forward to that