Bitcoin Forum

hi everybody.


i want to go deeper to a lot of more promising icos.
but i can not handle it alone.
so i thought maybe about making some "deal" with some other guys,...
i think i can do 2 super deep reviews on an ico per week.
if we are alltogether 10 people (so 4 more people which can do as well 2 super deep reviews on icos)
we could share our infoarmtion and point of view.

is there anybody interested in it?
plz let me know.

or do you have any other ideas to get not scamming, really good ico reports?

I am interested in that as well. Preferably all 10 with different background and different countries so we can get insight view.

The real question is how can you trust others' advice, experience and evaluation?
So you will go back to the beginning and you can get the wrong advice to be scammed or lose your money.
It is better to focus on one ICOs that conducts your own deep research so that you make your decision or risking your money and trusting someone.
you can take this topic as an example Scammed by project endorsed by ALU [ATRIZ]  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3253973.msg33888978#msg33888978) at least when you trust a trusted member on this forum you reduce the chances of losing your money

There are people investing their time and picking out the right project and giving those information on the various threads mate. I cannot show out where is the exact thread is on the forum.
However, I will help you show the perfect project with the heavy white paper content and good dev team information.
So don't worry and try to make your work perfectly mate, cheers.

Let's assume that we have started the work with each other and we don't consider any profits or anything - what's all this for?
To provide these reviews publicly or keep them to ourselves? As well, reviewing is not an easy task especially when it is about ICOs because most ICO devs and admins like to remain in dark by not coming upfront and I personally hate such ICOs, because if they're hesitant to being transparent, what's the guarantee that they will really do what they are promising to take investments for? Secondly, I would only prefer those having hard caps and no hidden clauses should come in front of us (by editing or changing their terms later on). Most preferably, I always go for ICOs that have something genuine rather than attractive, something that's a nice concept and that could help us in the real world - like Pundi X. I checked their whitepaper thoroughly and invested in their ICO and feeling great that I did, because they are now coming up with great surprises every day.

That's an alien term in 2018.Promising as in,the one which promises great technical advancements in the blockchain world or just gives promising returns financially?

Pay someone to do it ? What skills do you have to offer ? Why would anyone take your reviews seriously ?

Who will benefit from it ? I won't.


3D Print a time travel machine and go back in 2015.

Hi Everyone!
That is good idea of team work. I'd like to be helpful and ready to share of my thoughts and discuss projects. I think this dream-expert-team at least have to make some kind of SWAT table per each project and those who are in, should give their Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats ( not repeated). Of course it would be +/- overall review, but still as many people as many opinions. And I'm sure that fo instance I see few threats another man will see another few...so what i'd like to say... Let it be some simplified but easy to use SWAT. Everybody win having such a short but compleate info. And of course of there will be more people involved i believe that it will great.