|
Title: spooks Post by: prophetx on November 18, 2013, 01:15:32 AM http://www.cartoonshdwallpaper.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Running-american-animated-series-scooby-doo-daphne-depicted-as-coming.jpg
Just something to keep in mind. Title: Re: spooks Post by: Pente on November 18, 2013, 01:41:02 AM They are here, but observing only.
Title: Re: spooks Post by: nlovric on November 18, 2013, 10:28:48 AM Believe is the wrong term as it means that one believes another plus it's kind of used to indicate disbelief in what is asked about; the correct terms would be think etc.
Title: Re: spooks Post by: prophetx on November 18, 2013, 12:21:52 PM Believe is the wrong term as it means that one believes another plus it's kind of used to indicate disbelief in what is asked about; the correct terms would be think etc. No. Title: Re: spooks Post by: Lethn on November 18, 2013, 02:29:50 PM They're not exactly covert are they? On the one hand you have government loyalists coming over here and ranting at us about how we should pay our taxes and thank intelligence agencies who spy on us and then you have the Bitcoin Foundation which claims to represent us but is really just a private club of paid elitists who are cosying up to the United States government in particular in the hopes of benefiting as our unelected diplomats despite the fact that the U.S government has shown to be about as anti-cryptocurrency as people come.
Title: Re: spooks Post by: xkeyscore89 on November 18, 2013, 02:41:21 PM They're not exactly covert are they? On the one hand you have government loyalists coming over here and ranting at us about how we should pay our taxes and thank intelligence agencies who spy on us and then you have the Bitcoin Foundation which claims to represent us but is really just a private club of paid elitists who are cosying up to the United States government in particular in the hopes of benefiting as our unelected diplomats despite the fact that the U.S government has shown to be about as anti-cryptocurrency as people come. Isn't there a hearing between the Bitcoin Foundation and Homeland Security going on today? Title: Re: spooks Post by: bythesea on November 18, 2013, 04:07:02 PM Yes I do. Its not that hard to search forums and looks for points of interest....
Title: Re: spooks Post by: benjamindees on November 21, 2013, 03:42:32 AM It's not debatable. There are spooks here. Lots of them. They've been here for a long time. And they are sloppy as fuck, as usual:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=10635.msg157209#msg157209 The only question is, how many of the Bitcoin "leaders" are government agents of one sort or another. Title: Re: spooks Post by: Inedible on November 21, 2013, 08:25:13 AM A real covert agent will be well educated, intelligent and attempt to insinuate themselves at the top of the power hierarchy.
You won't spot them because they'll blend right in. Title: Re: spooks Post by: Hawker on November 21, 2013, 09:57:06 AM Wow - I am the only one voting no.
Might I point out to my paranoid friends that (1) the entire forum archive can be browsed and (2) nothing important happens here. Governments do use sock puppets but it would be a waste of time to have one here. And yes - I do get the irony that some twat will announce that this post means I am a sock puppet. :P Title: Re: spooks Post by: prophetx on November 22, 2013, 02:31:05 PM Wow - I am the only one voting no. Might I point out to my paranoid friends that (1) the entire forum archive can be browsed and (2) nothing important happens here. Governments do use sock puppets but it would be a waste of time to have one here. And yes - I do get the irony that some twat will announce that this post means I am a sock puppet. :P didn't some post here help agents track down a fictional pirate recently... Title: Re: spooks Post by: Hawker on November 22, 2013, 04:18:52 PM Wow - I am the only one voting no. Might I point out to my paranoid friends that (1) the entire forum archive can be browsed and (2) nothing important happens here. Governments do use sock puppets but it would be a waste of time to have one here. And yes - I do get the irony that some twat will announce that this post means I am a sock puppet. :P didn't some post here help agents track down a fictional pirate recently... Nah. We don't know how he was actually found. There was a leaked detail about a stackexchange posting but that struck me as a distraction. For me, the fact that he hired an udercover cop to kill someone that threatened Silk Road was probably a big factor in his being identified as DPR. Title: Re: spooks Post by: Kiki112 on November 22, 2013, 11:06:53 PM Wow - I am the only one voting no. Might I point out to my paranoid friends that (1) the entire forum archive can be browsed and (2) nothing important happens here. Governments do use sock puppets but it would be a waste of time to have one here. And yes - I do get the irony that some twat will announce that this post means I am a sock puppet. :P didn't some post here help agents track down a fictional pirate recently... Nah. We don't know how he was actually found. There was a leaked detail about a stackexchange posting but that struck me as a distraction. For me, the fact that he hired an udercover cop to kill someone that threatened Silk Road was probably a big factor in his being identified as DPR. interesting where did you get that info? it sounds a little bit far-fetched to me :-\ Title: Re: spooks Post by: Kluge on November 22, 2013, 11:12:00 PM Between Pirate and DPR, forum screenshots have appeared multiple times in court dockets. I don't think there are a bunch of government agents on the forum telling people to pay taxes, but governments, in some form, obviously look around the forum from time to time (or at least use sent screenshots as evidence).
They (FBI in particular) have a habit of discovering and contacting people in the community who are fairly private. Whether that's from being on the forum or somewhere else, it seems pretty plausible they've infiltrated the Bitcoin community to some degree, but probably only to get information on certain people. Title: Re: spooks Post by: cdtc on November 23, 2013, 12:43:40 AM They are here watching your every step.
Title: Re: spooks Post by: Hawker on November 23, 2013, 10:39:56 AM Wow - I am the only one voting no. Might I point out to my paranoid friends that (1) the entire forum archive can be browsed and (2) nothing important happens here. Governments do use sock puppets but it would be a waste of time to have one here. And yes - I do get the irony that some twat will announce that this post means I am a sock puppet. :P didn't some post here help agents track down a fictional pirate recently... Nah. We don't know how he was actually found. There was a leaked detail about a stackexchange posting but that struck me as a distraction. For me, the fact that he hired an udercover cop to kill someone that threatened Silk Road was probably a big factor in his being identified as DPR. interesting where did you get that info? it sounds a little bit far-fetched to me :-\ http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/11/feds-hit-silk-road-suspect-ulbricht-with-4-new-murder-for-hire-charges/ The guy was willing to order torture and killing. He was also willing to record it in his diary. Dreadful combination. Title: Re: spooks Post by: Spendulus on November 23, 2013, 05:38:26 PM They are here watching your every step. If they here and they got smarts, they got in and bought some coin. if they not smart, they will be around pulling that civil service paycheck. Reporting to Fuhrer Obama on za bitcoin! Heil! LOL... Title: Re: spooks Post by: Spendulus on November 23, 2013, 06:01:22 PM Wow - I am the only one voting no. Hello, SOCK PUPPET. Let me correct your comments.Might I point out to my paranoid friends that (1) the entire forum archive can be browsed and (2) nothing important happens here. Governments do use sock puppets but it would be a waste of time to have one here. And yes - I do get the irony that some twat will announce that this post means I am a sock puppet. :P A) Nothing important happens here. WHAT BETTER PLACE FOR THE AGENTS TO LURK? They must be diligent and focused and work hard to find things where there is nothing. You see, the appearance of nothing where all those crypto hackers lurk is proof they hiding something. Something big. IT WOULD BE A WASTE OF TIME TO HAVE ONE HERE? Za! Ve must have dozens! Waste of time is important for budget cycle! Hundreds! The collective effort will prevail. Title: Re: spooks Post by: Hawker on November 23, 2013, 06:06:15 PM Wow - I am the only one voting no. Hello, SOCK PUPPET. Let me correct your comments.Might I point out to my paranoid friends that (1) the entire forum archive can be browsed and (2) nothing important happens here. Governments do use sock puppets but it would be a waste of time to have one here. And yes - I do get the irony that some twat will announce that this post means I am a sock puppet. :P A) Nothing important happens here. WHAT BETTER PLACE FOR THE AGENTS TO LURK? They must be diligent and focused and work hard to find things where there is nothing. You see, the appearance of nothing where all those crypto hackers lurk is proof they hiding something. Something big. IT WOULD BE A WASTE OF TIME TO HAVE ONE HERE? Za! Ve must have dozens! Waste of time is important for budget cycle! Hundreds! The collective effort will prevail. Hmmm. I must admit, until reading your post I had not considered the possibility that Russian spooks are camped out here. Title: Re: spooks Post by: MaxwellsDemon on November 23, 2013, 07:32:47 PM I was actually sent here to post on behalf of the CIA.
Unfortunately I had to resign since they refused to pay my salary in Bitcoin ;D Title: Re: spooks Post by: Spendulus on November 23, 2013, 08:17:06 PM I was actually sent here to post on behalf of the CIA. YA! I vas Spook in good days! 1980s. Days of evil empire.Unfortunately I had to resign since they refused to pay my salary in Bitcoin ;D Today just nobody. Is said - "nobody is perfect!" I perfect. Title: Re: spooks Post by: nate008 on November 25, 2013, 08:32:17 AM I think there are lots of them , browsing through and reading all this stuff sends at least 4 -5 of them to a mental institute each month I would guess.
Title: Re: spooks Post by: dank on November 25, 2013, 08:42:10 PM Wow - I am the only one voting no. Bro, I had this feeling when you started going against anarchy so consistently. Along with the jokes about calling the police because the government is corrupt, that's a good one.Might I point out to my paranoid friends that (1) the entire forum archive can be browsed and (2) nothing important happens here. Governments do use sock puppets but it would be a waste of time to have one here. And yes - I do get the irony that some twat will announce that this post means I am a sock puppet. :P Hawker, Vod, deisik, there's a good bit on here and have been for a while. How much do you all get paid? Is it worth leaving a negative legacy behind as your life, for money? When you can have everything and anything you imagine in the afterlife? We will all find out who they are when we die. Title: Re: spooks Post by: supernovax on April 22, 2014, 12:07:20 PM I never got into Spooks, but I feel your pain- I was never the same after the X-files finished. I hope you discover another meaningless yet pleasurable way to waste your evenings before too long.
|
