Bitcoin Forum

Deleted

Youre account is going to be tagged soon making it worthless.

Because account selling is one of the biggest reasons why you can't trust "established" accounts.

Account buyers are up to no good, one way or another.
Either they are participating in bounty programs with "rep" that they don't deserve, or they are trying to prey on the gullible, by looking like a long term member of the community, for scamming purposes.

I don't trust account sellers.
And account buyers even less.

Ah, I see.

So you don't care that you are assisting in the scamming of others.
You are just worried that during this transfer, you might get scammed by someone else.

You wouldn't happen to see any irony there, would you?

Dont listen to this asshat. He’s as big of a scammer as they get

@Heritagesports, you provably stole .003 from me. So feel free to crawl away and die any time now. I haven't done a thing to you.

@FuckOffWillYou, given your username, I think it unlikely that I will get anywhere trying to reason with you. That said, your insult was about as pointless as they get.

I'm here to waste your time. I'm here to disrupt your thread. I'm here, to stop you from assisting in ruining this forum.

Look how well I have done. Instead of engaging in attempting to sell your account to enable scammers, I've shown you to be an idiot, incapable of anything more than moronic insults, and diverted the conversation from selling an account, to (apparently) my political orientation.

Pretty clear that English isn't your first language.
So kudos for the insults. I can tell you are trying hard.

But if you're looking for an angry reaction, I'm afraid you'll be disappointed. I'm finding this more comical than irritating.

Perhaps you should stop trying to sell anything at all, and become a stand up comedian?

One track mind, aren't we.  :D

Are you capable of insults that do not directly involve sexual acts?

*sigh*.
Fine. I'll answer all your questions in one go.

All of them follow the same basic logical fallacy of being a "loaded question".
You presuppose the facts that you are questioning about. Hence creating a scenario where your truth is assumed at the very start, assuming I bother to answer.

My non engagement is based upon the fact that there is no truth to any of your questions, thus avoiding the fallacy entirely.
I was trying to be kind, by not answering.

After all, we can't all have IQs over 75.

Well. Thinking is generally assumed to be an acceptable pastime for young and old alike.
Perhaps you should try it sometime.  ;)

Ease up there!

You're repeating yourself a bit much.  ;D
Here, let me help you. http://www.thesaurus.com/ (http://www.thesaurus.com/)
Instead of "son of a whore" twice, you could go with "son of a strumpet" and sound a little less unintelligent.

You're welcome.  ;)

Huh. Well lucky for both of us that you aren't. :)

I'd hate to die. That sounds painful.

He must be the same guy in another thread who is constipated. That guy wanted to buy merit,  LOL Prunes!   :D 

These guys never cease to amaze.  :)

But yeah, I'm thinking same guy. Does bitcointalk have an IP restriction? So only one account per IP?
I know you could get around that with VPNs, and proxies, and whatnot. But based off what I've been seeing, I don't think intelligence is a strong suit for any of these people....