Bitcoin Forum

Other => Beginners & Help => Topic started by: genthis on November 23, 2013, 03:21:52 PM



Title: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: genthis on November 23, 2013, 03:21:52 PM
I just read on FB that the recent rise in price is due to the Western banking interest buying up shares to clear out competition for their own crypto-money due out sometime in 2014? A little unfair if my bitcoins have to compete with a bank that doesn't have to use third party transactions and can guarantee my balance if they get lost or stolen. There's also something about China trying to buy up bitcoins to mess with American interests. I dunno???


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: oldtimegin on November 23, 2013, 03:27:54 PM
I would say good luck to this bank.

Bankers do not have very high trust in society so I do not think anyone would want such a coin.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: Inedible on November 23, 2013, 03:28:58 PM
I just read on FB that the recent rise in price is due to the Western banking interest buying up shares to clear out competition for their own crypto-money due out sometime in 2014? A little unfair if my bitcoins have to compete with a bank that doesn't have to use third party transactions and can guarantee my balance if they get lost or stolen. There's also something about China trying to buy up bitcoins to mess with American interests. I dunno???

You're right - it's just a rumour.

There's no truth to these stories.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: vm1990 on November 23, 2013, 03:47:50 PM
im pretty sure the current price is down to china taking a very large interest in it :)


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: URSAY on November 23, 2013, 03:49:29 PM
I just read on FB...

You should of just stopped there.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: BRADLEYPLOOF on November 23, 2013, 03:59:36 PM
http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/technology/businessinsider/article/There-s-An-Electronic-Currency-That-Could-Save-4999475.php

Yes, there's truth to this rumor.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: Sindelar1938 on November 23, 2013, 04:21:58 PM
Rumour without foundation

Doesn't make logical sense


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: MicroGuy on November 23, 2013, 05:32:41 PM
I just read on FB that the recent rise in price is due to the Western banking interest buying up shares to clear out competition for their own crypto-money due out sometime in 2014?

The price is rising because the "secret" of bitcoin is finally entering into the consciousness of the mainsteam.

The internet was around for many years before it became so popular. Now the next step is when people find out there's more than one currency, more than bitcoin. This might take a couple of more years or maybe just a few months.

So consider yourself lucky! You have found this forum and you have read this post. So now you can explore the future and invest in time to perhaps bring yourself abundance.  :)

Just remember to always choose wisely: http://coinmarketcap.com/


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: raspcoin on November 23, 2013, 05:42:06 PM
http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/technology/businessinsider/article/There-s-An-Electronic-Currency-That-Could-Save-4999475.php

Yes, there's truth to this rumor.

Thank you for sharing. I am still sceptical about this initiative, as it does not solve the trust problem.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: bimblebob on November 23, 2013, 05:52:27 PM
Could be truth about china


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: Kiki112 on November 23, 2013, 05:54:19 PM
I would say good luck to this bank.

Bankers do not have very high trust in society so I do not think anyone would want such a coin.

this says it all, no one will buy their coins which they created with their stolen money :D


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: t3xasdolly on November 23, 2013, 05:58:43 PM
I just read on FB that the recent rise in price is due to the Western banking interest buying up shares to clear out competition for their own crypto-money due out sometime in 2014? A little unfair if my bitcoins have to compete with a bank that doesn't have to use third party transactions and can guarantee my balance if they get lost or stolen.


Banks already providing this centralized "crypto-money". Just create bank account with online access


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: PenAndPaper on November 23, 2013, 07:07:05 PM
So banks are buying bitcoins to destroy it and issue a centralized e-currency instead? Does that even makes sense?


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: stereotyyp on November 23, 2013, 07:16:35 PM
I think that there is something fishy going on with BTC. Prices are going up really fast -seems like more speculators are entering to market.
It is only good for bitcoin - price will rise insanely.
But this market is so fragile - i would like to see BTC price after there is some bad news about it. Something that USA is planning to ban btc protocol.. :D


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: Green2bit on November 23, 2013, 07:17:57 PM
China stepping in would not be shocking. They do not miss a beat.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: scarsbergholden on November 23, 2013, 09:05:35 PM
i think that rumor is bunk. totally bunk, man.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: monbux on November 23, 2013, 09:38:28 PM
huh.  My opinion was just that china has been buying bitcoins for the last few months, and that's how bitcoin prices multiplied.  The exchange BTChina is handling probably well over 40% of trades now.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: danaho on November 23, 2013, 09:42:45 PM
just trying to get out of newbie jail..thanks


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: bitcreative on November 23, 2013, 09:53:39 PM
I don't think banks support crypto currency now. It might be a rumor.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: Anon136 on November 23, 2013, 09:57:49 PM
government cant "solve the bitcoin problem" by buying them all and destroying them or locking them up. they are far too divisible, all they would do is drive the price up which would be exactly contrary to their interest. it is however possible that they have been buying them up with the intention of pushing bitcoin someday.

as far as the chinese government is concerned this is probably exactly right.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: raspcoin on November 24, 2013, 12:33:24 AM
government cant "solve the bitcoin problem" by buying them all and destroying them or locking them up. they are far too divisible, all they would do is drive the price up which would be exactly contrary to their interest. it is however possible that they have been buying them up with the intention of pushing bitcoin someday.

as far as the chinese government is concerned this is probably exactly right.

Banks are greedy, but not fanatical. Your proposition sounds like the best possible investment a bank could imagine. Yes, it would render banks obsolete, but they would still control a large share of the economy.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: BRADLEYPLOOF on November 24, 2013, 02:40:54 AM
here's the deal (and by the way i've had much vodka to drink, but it still makes sense):

1. Governments want to control the "money" aspect of everyone' lives
2. Digital currency makes banking (and the FED) obsolete
3. If the FED could create their own digital currency that's widely adopted (but still centralized) then bitcoin is still going to be the shit
4. Any centralized digital currency is doomed to fail because nobody wants to depend on a few people to tell them what their money is worth


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: metaverse22 on November 24, 2013, 02:49:21 AM
Hedge funds could be driving the BTC price.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: tarena on November 24, 2013, 04:39:32 AM
Dont discredit something because it was read by the OP on facebook just because it was read on FB. Especially when people are always attempting to parallel the growth of bitcoin to that of facebook. Bitcoin is nothing but speculation, albeit based on great concepts. Don't discount the fact that governments, and banks are not new to the idea of market manipulation, in fact it can be argued that they invented it. They are not a bunch of nerds with no experience in bull markets. They take calculated, systematic approached to reaching their goals. Moreover, they are flooded with cash to invest in destabilizing or manipulating bitcoin as per their own interest. Even those early adopters of bitcoins who are now millionaires cannot compete with the billions of dollars the governments and banks are able to invest towards buying up bitcoin either for attack of the network, or whatever they intend to do.

As for china, they invest in everything and are major players in every market. Gold, check, Bonds, check, Scrap metals, check, Bitcoins, check, they'll invest in anything and they exercise the forethought to be successful in all their investments. It's just in their nature, get used to it.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: PenAndPaper on November 24, 2013, 05:00:08 AM
People that are looking for conspiracies can find one everywhere. Bitcoin is conspiracy friendly anyway because we don't know the identity of Satoshi and because of other things that came to light like crypto algorithms being potentially rigged by the nsa.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: serves-two on November 24, 2013, 06:18:22 AM
A little unfair if my bitcoins have to compete with a bank ...

Not really, since your Bitcoins already do.

... and can guarantee my balance if they get lost or stolen

Independence comes at a price.

http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/technology/businessinsider/article/There-s-An-Electronic-Currency-That-Could-Save-4999475.php

I'm genuinely stunned by how shamelessly unattractive and dishonest that proposition is; it's openly a method to force negative interest rates on you:

Quote
Right now, your $100 bill is equal to the $100 in the bank. If you're bank account has a 5% interest rate, you earn $5 of interest in a year and that $100 bill is still worth $100. But what would happen if that interest were -5%? Then you would lose $5 over the course of the year. Knowing this, you would rationally withdraw the $100 ahead of time and keep it out of the bank.

...

"You have to do something a little bit more to get the negative rate on the paper currency," Kimball said. "You have to have the $100 bill be worth $95 a year later in order to have a -5% interest rate.

...

Got that? After a year of a -5% interest rate, $100 dollars are equal to $95 e-dollars. This ensures that paper currency also faces a negative interest rate as well and eliminates the incentive for savers to hoard dollar bills if the Fed implements a negative rate. Presto!

Something tells me you'll be much happier with your (currently mildly inflationary, but soon) static/deflationary Bitcoins.

st


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: Ltsknnr on November 24, 2013, 06:53:11 AM
BTC prices are in a bubble. The question is, where in the bubble are we, and when is it going to burst  (because it will). The current meteoric rise cannot be sustained, and the levels will diminish.

Right now its a "hurry up and wait" scenario where people are piling in trying to get on board, eventually the bubble will burst and fortunes will be made (and lost) depending on when you got in.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: atc1 on November 24, 2013, 08:30:38 AM
There's enough demand for BTC right now to ensure it's survivability in the short run. But with such high volatility combined with the fact that,as of now,BTC only satisfies it's potential only when converted back to the dollar,makes it a risky gamble. China has been taking unusual interest lately,so it's very likely that the present boom will end once the demand there stabilizes.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: stereotyyp on November 24, 2013, 11:40:42 AM
People that are looking for conspiracies can find one everywhere. Bitcoin is conspiracy friendly anyway because we don't know the identity of Satoshi and because of other things that came to light like crypto algorithms being potentially rigged by the nsa.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-2
SHA-2 is a set of cryptographic hash functions (SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512) designed by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) and published in 2001 by the NIST as a U.S. Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS).

So yeah - NSA designed SHA256 hash function that BitCoin is using. Strange.. Sure - hash functions might be rigged by them somehow.
Im not expert on cryptographics so i dont know how they could use it against Bitcoin.. :D


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: PenAndPaper on November 24, 2013, 12:14:31 PM
People that are looking for conspiracies can find one everywhere. Bitcoin is conspiracy friendly anyway because we don't know the identity of Satoshi and because of other things that came to light like crypto algorithms being potentially rigged by the nsa.
So yeah - NSA designed SHA256 hash function that BitCoin is using. Strange.. Sure - hash functions might be rigged by them somehow.
Im not expert on cryptographics so i dont know how they could use it against Bitcoin.. :D

That's well known and not strange at all. It's like saying that everything that uses a Sha functions is built by the government  :P
Rigged algorithms nevertheless might be a real issue.


Title: Re: Any truth to this rumor?
Post by: stereotyyp on November 24, 2013, 12:26:33 PM
People that are looking for conspiracies can find one everywhere. Bitcoin is conspiracy friendly anyway because we don't know the identity of Satoshi and because of other things that came to light like crypto algorithms being potentially rigged by the nsa.
So yeah - NSA designed SHA256 hash function that BitCoin is using. Strange.. Sure - hash functions might be rigged by them somehow.
Im not expert on cryptographics so i dont know how they could use it against Bitcoin.. :D

That's well known and not strange at all. It's like saying that everything that uses a Sha functions is built by the government  :P
Rigged algorithms nevertheless might be a real issue.

I dont know why Satoshi decided to pick SHA256 - it might be problem or might not be :P

I dont want to say that USA government is behind of BitCoin - that may be another topic (that Satoshi actually means something about new world order or he/she was government agent and so on..) :P
 
All i want to say, that everything that uses SHA functions MIGHT NOT be secure at all. It might be easily breakable by NSA.  ::)