Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Bitcoin Discussion => Topic started by: gabriella on November 25, 2013, 11:56:29 AM



Title: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: gabriella on November 25, 2013, 11:56:29 AM
how much time lapsed after you first came into contact with bitcoin for the first time, until you became convinced it is the future?


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Seccour on November 25, 2013, 12:00:48 PM
how much time lapsed after you first came into contact with bitcoin for the first time, until you became convinced it is the future?

1 sec :p


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Rampion on November 25, 2013, 12:00:54 PM
Like 30 seconds.

No joke.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: BitcoinNews.io on November 25, 2013, 12:01:01 PM
about 5 minutes. and the more i learn, the more i believe in a cryptocurrency future -- and long may that continue.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: stompix on November 25, 2013, 12:02:06 PM
1 year and still counting :)


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: JoelKatz on November 25, 2013, 12:05:14 PM
I think it was soon as I realized that the double-spend problem was the only real technical obstacle to payments with no central authority and that someone had actually solved it. It probably took me a day or two to reach that understanding.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: grondilu on November 25, 2013, 12:05:51 PM
About three days, during which I had been reading Satoshi's paper about ten times.

But to be fair I was thinking about digital currencies for quite some time before that.  So I was already very open to the concept.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Hawker on November 25, 2013, 12:06:30 PM
Like 30 seconds.

No joke.

Same.  Once I hard about it, I was buying gfx cards within a month.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Birdy on November 25, 2013, 12:31:16 PM
It took about a month of researching and trying with a small amount of Btc until I believed that it might be the future.
If it took you 30 seconds, you probably should rethink your decision making process.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: rat on November 25, 2013, 12:48:08 PM
It took about a month of researching and trying with a small amount of Btc until I believed that it might be the future.
If it took you 30 seconds, you probably should rethink your decision making process.


1 second. because i had nothing to lose. one of the best decisions i ever made.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Rluner on November 25, 2013, 01:08:02 PM
Zero seconds. The instant I herd about bitcoin, it just all made perfect sense to me, and I realised how doomed fiat money was, unfortunately for me this was only a few months ago.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Birdy on November 25, 2013, 01:16:33 PM
It took about a month of researching and trying with a small amount of Btc until I believed that it might be the future.
If it took you 30 seconds, you probably should rethink your decision making process.
1 second. because i had nothing to lose. one of the best decisions i ever made.

Then you didn't make a good decision, you made a random decision and were lucky.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: glub0x on November 25, 2013, 01:17:04 PM
how much time lapsed after you first came into contact with bitcoin for the first time, until you became convinced it is the future?
5sec time to read about it :)
yook me 1 year to put my money were my mouth was.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: wachtwoord on November 25, 2013, 01:20:53 PM
A few days to read a lot and get increasingly interested. The some time to see how other people respond to it. I mean, if I (or me and a small subgroup) are the only ones who care about this, it's not going to actually reach it's potential without adoption. True belief in this grew over time.

Right now I believe it (cryptocurrency) is snowballing sufficiently hard to be very unlikely to be stopped. The genie is out!


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: zeroday on November 25, 2013, 02:38:16 PM
When I first read about bitcoin in some geek newspaper in 2010, I realized it must be the most promising idea of the century. However, that time I had no time to play with it. In the middle of 2011 I was surprised when bitcoin, with the help of silkroad, attracted attention of US senators and its price started to skyrocket. I was almost ready to buy some, but, just few days before I sent a wire, "the bubble" bursted and I decided to wait.

When BTC slowly started to grow beyond $2 I finally decided to give it a try and wired $10k to gox. Then I continued buying at $6, $8, $12 and so on.
In April 2013 I had to sell a fraction of my bitcoins to save my business after our money in Cypros bank were stolen by European government.
But later I continued to buy bitcoins. Last time I've bought it at about $600 and now in my pans is spending 50% of my fiat income on BTC.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Rezree on November 25, 2013, 04:10:14 PM
Years. Saw some obscure Danish tv program about it in 2010 and found it fascinating but had no sense of what it was. Then stumbled upon it again last year, and some friends talked about maybe investing in it, but since I didn't have a lot of money I didn't have the guts to put in even a few hundred bucks.

Then about a month ago I suddenly realised how stupid I had been to be so timid and bought a few when it was around $450 and then again a few when it was around $700.

Even though I have less money now than I had when it was much cheaper, I have so much faith in it and I've decided to put all other non essential expenses on hold just so I can purchase BTC and other crypto coins.

Not a day goes by that I don't facepalm to myself about not investing sooner, but it's getting easier to deal with now since I've started getting into it and feel that although I might not have gotten on the boat with the cheapest ticket, I made it at least :)



Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: lightfoot on November 25, 2013, 04:12:42 PM
A year or two. I've been working on this stuff since I wrote a credit card online web site in 1994, we even did the "charge your card $20 and bank the micropayments on our site" thing. Other people tried to do it, numerous failures.

But hey, back in the late 80's we were all supposed to hook up to the AT&T CONNECT X.25 network. Boy that and that mail gateway thing (MTS? What was it again) really didn't go anywhere....

C


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: yavunka on November 25, 2013, 04:16:24 PM
It took a long time...many months of seeing my friends savings increase before I tentatively decided to test the water...even now...though I generally think it is going to be a success I've only invested a very small amount that I wouldn't mind losing.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: porcupine87 on November 25, 2013, 04:26:11 PM
18 months !
If only I had looked more carefully the first time...

+1


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: PrFen on November 25, 2013, 04:27:05 PM
Few minutes, but didn't take action  >:(

Exactly two weeks ago I came across Bitcoin again and couldn't stop reading since then. Already have some BTC and LTC, a will get more as soon as I learn more


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: blacksails on November 25, 2013, 04:40:34 PM
It took me a while actually. When I first started with bitcoin it was a way to make some money. So I started working, and the time passed by. A few months later a friend of mine asked "You know that scam you're working on, that fake currency?" and I got angry and suddenly defended it and the thoughts behind it. At that moment I realized that I had become a true bitcoin believer.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: indianplayers on November 25, 2013, 04:46:33 PM
Too long - I could have been a millionaire.

1st in 2009-2010 but didn't think bitocoin would get anywhere other than tokens for games.
2nd time when the run up happened 6 months ago. bought some coins, but not enough.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: johnyj on November 25, 2013, 06:54:47 PM
Started by CPU mining using default client immediately when I heard about bitcoin in 2011, fun game! But it took me almost 15 years to fully understand the scam nature of today's fiat money system, when I finally completed this lengthy research process around some time in 2012, I become a true believer of bitcoin

With the help of bitcoin, I quickly get rid of most of the knowledge from mainstream economy books, and this lead to my true understanding of fiat money system


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: LiteCoinGuy on November 25, 2013, 07:13:00 PM
some weeks/months. you cant be a believer after seconds, thats stupid. you dont know anything about it.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Ecurb123 on November 25, 2013, 07:13:49 PM
took me about 2 years. I heard about it and thought about it for awhile, but I guess it was the community which convinced me that it was a really special idea.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Hawker on November 25, 2013, 07:21:00 PM
some weeks/months. you cant be a believer after seconds, thats stupid. you dont know anything about it.

Wrong.  I had an online shop and an ebay account.  Once I saw the concept of Bitcoin, I was blown away.  I don't need to read the source code - I know a stupendous concept when I see it.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: wachtwoord on November 25, 2013, 07:21:27 PM
With the help of bitcoin, I quickly get rid of most of the knowledge from mainstream economy books, and this lead to my true understanding of fiat money system

mainstream == Keynesian == retarded


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: BitCloud on November 25, 2013, 07:24:12 PM
heart: 10 mins
brain: 2.5years


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Georgio on November 25, 2013, 07:55:37 PM
Too long - I could have been a millionaire.

1st in 2009-2010 but didn't think bitocoin would get anywhere other than tokens for games.
2nd time when the run up happened 6 months ago. bought some coins, but not enough.


Haha same story here :) My friend sent me link through skype back in 2009-2010. I read it, I even bookmark it! Then in one month or so I came back and read the article again. I also though it will be some kind of game money :D funny.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: BTC_GHD on November 25, 2013, 08:08:38 PM
Took me a few weeks


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Akka on November 25, 2013, 08:11:32 PM
Interested, about the first sec. I heard about it. Immediately got some coins.

But it took me about 6 Month of experimenting and reading about how it works and what the possibilities are until it really hit me.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: (A)social on November 25, 2013, 08:18:35 PM
~ 3 months


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: daneel2 on November 25, 2013, 10:49:15 PM
i am more of a decentralization believer than a bitcoin believer. i don't think in 100 years we will have much need for currency of any kind, and i see bitcoin as a step in the right direction. its much better than anything currently in place. i am so tired of all the corrupt old systems.. seeing bright hardworking people struggle for money while the few rich inherit more than they need. seeing really stupid, i mean extrmely stupid rich people who are only rich because somewhere down the line the were related to a guy, pisses me off.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: xselam1988 on November 25, 2013, 10:50:54 PM
about 6month


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: beetcoin on November 25, 2013, 10:51:56 PM
found out about it in late 2011.. didn't do anything for 18 months. a fool i am! mainly due to the inconvenience with getting them.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Alpaca Bob on November 25, 2013, 11:45:29 PM
It's more like a gradual process, isn't it? Maybe, like, an S-shaped adoption curve with lots of volatility down the road? ;) (Seriously though.)


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Un zafado cualquiera on November 26, 2013, 12:02:08 AM
it took me two days. when I read about proof of work I was in.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Melbustus on November 26, 2013, 12:35:47 AM
Intrigued when I first read that it was completely decentralized, but it took weeks for me to fully grok the technicals and work through the economic implications/models. Another several months to *really* understand it (this involves quite a bit of thought/research about the nature and history of money, governments, humans, and complex systems).

You guys that insta-believed must be geniuses. :-)



Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: wachtwoord on November 26, 2013, 12:38:29 AM
Intrigued when I first read that it was completely decentralized, but it took weeks for me to fully grok the technicals and work through the economic implications/models. Another several months to *really* understand it (this involves quite a bit of thought/research about the nature and history of money, governments, humans, and complex systems).

You guys that insta-believed must be geniuses. :-)



More likely morons. Due diligence is very prudent. Yes in this specific case you might have come ahead without it but that doesn't mean it should be dismissed.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Ibian on November 26, 2013, 12:56:28 AM
It took about a month of researching and trying with a small amount of Btc until I believed that it might be the future.
If it took you 30 seconds, you probably should rethink your decision making process.
+1, as they say.

I'm sceptical by nature and I don't gamble. It probably took months from I first heard about it until I decided to look into it. Then another several weeks to a month to investigate and decide if it seemed worth going for. Finally bought (peanuts), watched the price development for a few months while continuing to research, and now I am pumping all the money I can into it. All of it, only selling whenever I have some bills to pay.

If I can manage to reach my target number of coins before doing so becomes unrealistic, I should be able to live a decent life without ever having to work again. With the spending plan I have I should quickly recover the initial investment, so even if it crashes I come out ahead.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Findus on November 26, 2013, 01:02:28 AM
2 hours after I read about bitcoin, I was transferring 1 month salary to MtGox.
That was a few days after the April crash.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: HeliKopterBen on November 26, 2013, 01:18:14 AM
2 years.  I dismissed it to my own peril the first time I heard about it.  But I finally got serious about a year ago and studied it religiously.  Then I bought some last december... best decision I ever made.  Also, I learn more about the prospects of distributed technologies every day.  Immense potential exists.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: mskryxz on November 26, 2013, 01:54:47 AM
Heard about it in 2010 through another Forum.

Even installed the miner to mine Bitcoins in 2010.
Stopped because I couldn't play Starcraft 2 or WoW.

Finally convinced and entered the scene again in April 2013. Bought a decent amount of Bitcoins at $60-$65 each. Also turned 2 high end computers into LiteCoin Miners from April - Present.

I have a huge amount of profit if I cash out today even though I came in late. I also have a lot of Litecoins mined from April - Present should I wish to sell.

Only regret is if I would have just left it mining in 2010 I would be beyond rich.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: Anon136 on November 26, 2013, 01:59:30 AM
2 hours after I read about bitcoin, I was transferring 1 month salary to MtGox.
That was a few days after the April crash.

I'm not sure if you are an idiot or a genius.


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: DoomDumas on November 26, 2013, 04:52:30 AM
After few days reading about it, I invested 5000$, in hope to see a positive ROI.
After 6 month to a year, using it, reading every day about BTC.. I finally became convinced of it's true potential in it's future.

I always kept in mind that something could happen and makes btc useless..

Now, for at least 18 month, im now totally convinced of it's resillience and the mainstream adoption that will be reallity within 10 years.  I've never invest more than I can lose overnight.  Maybe I should have, but I still have no regrets at all..



Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: romerun on November 26, 2013, 07:37:17 AM
friend told me in 2011, downloaded client, syncing, waiting for few hours, cpu100% wtf, deleted, came back again after the 32 crash


Title: Re: How long did it take you to become a Bitcoin true believer after heard about it?
Post by: AnonyMint on November 26, 2013, 07:43:29 AM
1 year and still counting :)

Roughly 3+ years for me and still counting also, meaning I am not convinced of its great future.

However, I must admit that my reason for dismissing it in 2010 was that it was not backed by anything tangible, which I now think is a silly objection (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345722.msg3717333#msg3717333). I didn't get the value of the decentralization until I took a long study of it earlier this year, although it is clear I was aware of the "distributed" benefit as early as 2012. I will try to go find my earliest writings on Bitcoin. I am curious.

Edit: I found some of my prior writings. Here is one from summer 2011, where I had moved on from criticizing Bitcoin for not having tangible value and rather on the Tragedy of the Commons that money is:

Quote
Tangentially, I also think that knowledge will soon become fungible money (and I don't mean anything like BitCoin, of which I am highly critical), in the form of compositional programming modules, which will change the open source model from esr's gift to an exchange economy. Remember from esr's recent blog, my comment was that software engineering is unique in that it is used by all the others, and it is never static, and thus is a reasonable proxy for (fundamental of) broad based knowledge. I suggest a broader theory, that the industrial age is dying, which is why we see the potential for billions unemployed. But the software age is coming up fast to the rescue. Open source is a key step, but I don't think the gift economy contains enough relative market value information to scale it to billions of jobs.


Here are some from late 2012 in comments on ZeroHedge.

Quote
Note I am not criticizing the secure, anonymous, distributed trading capability of BitCoin. That could be reused in a knowledge trading system, where the supply of knowledge is allowed to increase by the market. In theory such a system (possibly coming soon) could destroy or attenuate the incidence of money, socialism, and governments. If ubiquitous, those vested interests (in money, e.g. central banks, governments, socialized welfare recipients, savers, passive investors, speculators, etc) might resort to 666 physical tagging in order to regain the ability (top-down control) to tax, redistribute, and destroy knowledge production (as they do now).

P.S. For those that like spooky correlations, a 666 system trends to knowledge becomes static (since any rise in knowledge becomes a threat to such a system), and thus axiomatically humans are effectively lobotomized (which is consistent with being harvested for their blood and flesh only since their brain wouldn't matter). Note that 666 is roughly the wavelength of blood red. So there is a potential solution to the biblical puzzle of the "number of a man". It is his blood. Think of the "Ministry of Plenty" which allocates rationing and starvation in the book 1984:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four#Background

Quote
you don't save wealth in bitcoins, you save your wealth in real assets
The problem with bitcoin is the same problem as with gold (money is always socialism (http://www.coolpage.com/commentary/economic/shelby/Demise%20of%20Finance,%20Rise%20of%20Knowledge.html#StoringIdleSavings)):

That is the supply can not grow as fast as people want to expand production, thus its value will increase just by idly holding it (for as long as the real interest rates are negative on any competing fiat). Thus people will hoard it (if there is ever any serious mass movement into it), thus destroying its viability for commerce (Dark Ages is an example).

The fundamental problem is that money can not represent a store of knowledge, and all value (and increase in production) created comes from knowledge. Read my article above if you want to understand deeply.

Money can't exist without credit (read the link above about the problem with gold), thus there can not exist a utopic advantage to any form of money that will avoid socialism

Money in every form is failure (socialism, suboptimal knowledge production) and thus not competitive (not even for the passive "investor" over the long-run).

Read my other comment linked below to understand that only knowledge (not money) is unlimited (fiat is limited, as debt is limited due to misallocating away from knowledge production, and hard money is limited in supply causing hoarding due to increasing "value" rewarding being idle from knowledge production and because the marginal utility of saving money is not infinite, because again debt and interest rates are not...an circular illusion that society has rightfully destroyed throughout recorded history in boom and bust oscillations between the two manifestations of the same problem)

Evidence all the commentators here who expend their energy trying to maintain the value of their idle savings, instead of producing productive knowledge outside the scope of maintaining idle savings (that dog chases his tail forever into the poverty abyss... it is no different than the supranational passive capitalists who spend all their energy trying to sustain or increase their idle savings rather than producing knowledge).

Quote
Trade knowledge instead of money. See my other comment for more reasons not to use money.

The supply of knowledge is not limited, unlike all forms of hard money which means they retard knowledge production because they reward idleness and limited supply must eventually be subverted by the fractional reserve demand created by inexorable demand for debt from the low knowledge producers. Because fiat money retards knowledge production by misallocating capital to the low knowledge producers. I explained this in more detail at the link above and the sub-link to my thesis paper (draft).

Quote
You can start by noting that most everything you have today (including the internet and computer you using, and including the food, antibiotics, etc) all came from knowledge production. Manual labor and hard resources without knowledge would give you the quality of life that existed before the stone age and the discovery of fire. Then after noting that, then observe that if knowledge were static, then we can already produce all that we need with robotics, so we could just eliminate the humans and churn out zillions of material goods which no one would be able to pay for with money (because no one would earn an income). And then you could proceed to note that since knowledge is the only thing of value being added in the economy, then ... you can follow the rest of the conclusions in my thesis...

P.S. the title could have been "Demise of Money, Rise of Knowledge".

P.S.S. Beside underestimating how much you depend on knowledge production to survive (and thus underestimate why you will be poor if idle yourself on money and savings), you also highly underestimated how inefficient it is to try to be self-sufficient and disconnect from nature's inexorable trend of maximum division-of-labor (more accurately division-of-knowledge) and maximum economies-of-scale.

Quote
You built the strawman of the bad effects of fiat money, then concluded that the effects of hard money are somehow different (even superior) without thinking it through and substantiating it. This is the myopia I am trying to correct.

I did not say hard money is worse. I said (if on a global basis, and not a localized gold standard receiving influx of gold) it will lead right back to fiat money again (see "Storing Idle Savings" section my paper), because people will demand usury and you can never stop that. And hard money can not be sustainably loaned because its supply is limited and usury grows at an unlimited compound rate. Thus fractional reserves come naturally (even illegally as they did by the private banks in 1800s), because of the law of supply and demand (if people demand it, supply will come). Read this:

Also hard money rewards people who sit on money instead of produce knowledge (as many of you do now, exspending muchtime thinking about your stacks of gold and silver). Note I have stacks (of unspecified quantity) too but I stopped thinking about them, because the measily annual increase in value of 21% (before taxes! what if they raise them to 100% as FDR effectively did? And block money laundering into a new digital fiat), can't come close to what I can generate in returns with my mind creating new software.

Hard money is not a solution to anything long-term. It allows the passive capitalists to enslave the world, then the masses try to fight back by borrowing more, and the cycle repeats over and over.

The only solution is individual knowledge production. It is up to you, if you want to end up with nothing or not. At the End Game, all the gold "investors" are destroyed any way. It must be that way. Do you really think nature is going to reward you for stacking money?

There is no system that will protect you. Nature wants you to be constantly producing knowledge in order to survive. Nature does not want to get you a comfy soft bed. Nature wants to keep the threats dynamic, so that you don't become complacent. Read the Parable of the Talents in the bible (even if you are an atheist, there is some economic wisdom).

====================================================

 

Let me explain it to you in different way. When gold skyrockets in value, it means the debt system collapses, which means the value of what the passive capitalists owns has imploded. They end up owning all the failure. By buying gold, you will own a large share of what is left, but what is left is failure. You end up with all this overcapacity in everything, even factories.

This enables interest rates to go sky high again, because real capital is scarce, as everything has imploded.

This is the 666 or slavery directed system because it seeks increasing failure as long as control is maintained (see the Ministry of Plenty in 1984), that oscillates between fiat and hard money.

Fortunately it doesn't own knowledge producers, and thus the progress of technology continues more or less orthogonally (although the capital adoption it is not linear, e.g. China is subsidizing -800% profit margin losses in order to slow down the onslaught of automation and robotics that will come after China collapses).

So by holding gold you end up owning a larger share of failure. Of course, politics of the majority will never let you be a slave owner, unless you want to kiss up the king slave owners. So it doesn't work out the freedom-directed way you are expecting it will for you. Technology will probably bail you out, assuming you don't go live in a bunker and shut yourself off from it.

Freedom comes from knowledge production only, not from money.

The supranational passive capitalists (a.k.a. the banksters, elite, TPTB, Bilderbergs, etc) are enslaved by their passive capital. They could not for a moment have the freedom to walk away from the grind of managing slavery. Try being a manager at a fast-food restaurant or labor intensive business and you will quickly see how slavery is mutual. They are slaves to you and you are slaves to them, because they must each grab slices of your time to get approvals for each thing that they are not free to decide themselves (e.g. overriding a duplicate order at the cash register, etc).

Co-dependencing is a jail because it can consume all your time and you don't get to do any thing productive with your mind! If your dependents are doing low-knowledge things, then you end up doing so too, in order to manage them.

Lets take Bill Gates as an example (or even Steve Jobs). Although Gates was reputed to be a good coder, my understanding of Gates and Job's igsignificant role were to be micro-managers of process in their key technology (and for Jobs also marketing) departments, i.e. the Cathedral model. This is why they never got around to understanding (or at least not fully adopting in Jobs' case) the benefits of a chaotic Bazaar model.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cathedral_and_the_Bazaar

http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/

Thus these guys built magnificient cathedrals, based on maintaining a firm top-down control on process. They were enslaved to it. When they left their companies, the cathedrals began to decay. These cathedrals has less value when left alone to run on autonomously. Have you not heard of the tirades and personal lashings dished out to employees by these two mega-managers?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1384932/Behind-screens-look-Apple-shows-Steve-Jobs-corporate-dictator-accepts-excuses-failure.html

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2385078,00.asp

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates#Management_stylehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates#Management_style

http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-435346.html

It doesn't mean these men were not smart, rather that they applied their intellect to building co-dependent cathedrals, which bogged them down. The Bazaar model is in its infancy, and we are only just starting to see the early effects of it, e.g. the internet and Android (Linux) are generated from the bazaar model predominantly.