Title: 2013-12-01 businessinsider - Joe Weisenthal: I'm Changing My Mind About Bitcoin Post by: zeroday on December 02, 2013, 03:13:01 AM http://www.businessinsider.com/im-changing-my-mind-about-bitcoin-2013-12
Yes, it's that guy who previously declared that bitcoin is a joke. Quote First of all, it's wrong to say that Bitcoin has no value. There's prima facie evidence that this is untrue. Title: Re: 2013-12-01 businessinsider - Joe Weisenthal: I'm Changing My Mind About Bitcoin Post by: shawshankinmate37927 on December 02, 2013, 03:19:24 AM Gotta respect someone who can admit they were wrong. We all make mistakes, but few have the courage to admit it.
Title: Re: 2013-12-01 businessinsider - Joe Weisenthal: I'm Changing My Mind About Bitcoin Post by: Junko on December 02, 2013, 03:31:20 AM “First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, and then you win.”
Title: Re: 2013-12-01 businessinsider - Joe Weisenthal: I'm Changing My Mind About Bitcoin Post by: laowai80 on December 02, 2013, 05:24:05 AM In this new article he still brings up mostly illegal and questionable use cases for bitcoin, trying to give himself an image not being completely lacking understanding of bitcoin in the past, but like he knows all about it, but still doubting, and covering his back for the future when bitcoin could go mainstream, so that he could later say that he hadn't completely written it off. Nice try, Joe, but you could do better than that :) In short, I am not convinced, he still is on agenda to discredit bitcoin, but this time not by depicting its users as clowns, but now as shady characters. So, just a change of tactics on his part.
Title: Re: 2013-12-01 businessinsider - Joe Weisenthal: I'm Changing My Mind About Bitcoin Post by: beetcoin on December 02, 2013, 06:10:45 AM you know what a clown is? a "columnist" who can't distinguish between "your" and "you're"
Quote Let's go back to the marijuana sale. If you're scouring The Silk Road, you're most likely looking to pay roughly the "street value" for the pot your buying i'm being pedantic, i know, but he's been calling bitcoiners clowns.. the least he could do is not be one ;D In this new article he still brings up mostly illegal and questionable use cases for bitcoin, trying to give himself an image not being completely lacking understanding of bitcoin in the past, but like he knows all about it, but still doubting, and covering his back for the future when bitcoin could go mainstream, so that he could later say that he hadn't completely written it off. Nice try, Joe, but you could do better than that :) In short, I am not convinced, he still is on agenda to discredit bitcoin, but this time not by depicting its users as clowns, but now as shady characters. So, just a change of tactics on his part. towards the end he was talking about how centralized/government backed currencies are better, because its value doesn't fluctuate as much :D Title: Re: 2013-12-01 businessinsider - Joe Weisenthal: I'm Changing My Mind About Bitcoin Post by: eternaluniverse on December 02, 2013, 06:36:41 AM He didn't change his view on bitcoin to pro-bitcoin, he just found a new way to explain why he is anti-bitcoin. I'll just wait for his next article in a few weeks where he tells us to forget what he said in this one.
Title: Re: 2013-12-01 businessinsider - Joe Weisenthal: I'm Changing My Mind About Bitcoin Post by: beetcoin on December 02, 2013, 07:11:16 AM well, to be fair to him, he's at least warming up to bitcoin some. before he said bitcoin was for "jokers and has no value," now he's saying it's "for druggies, launderers, and gamblers.. but it does have value."
yeah, it does seem like he might have something against it, but his position has changed somewhat. he's still a clown for loving government backed currencies though. Title: Re: 2013-12-01 businessinsider - Joe Weisenthal: I'm Changing My Mind About Bitcoin Post by: LiteCoinGuy on December 02, 2013, 10:54:02 PM Gotta respect someone who can admit they were wrong. We all make mistakes, but few have the courage to admit it. didnt read his text but your comment is correct :) |