Bitcoin Forum

I think on a day to day basis, getting hammered is a good investment.  It's a safe bet, and you'll never be disappointed with the results.

If back in 2007 you bough 1000 € of Royal Bank of Scotland's shares, you would be holding now 29 €
If back in 2007 you bough 1000 € of Fortis' (NL) shares, you would be holding now 39 €

Now... if back in 2007 you bough 1000 € of red wine and drink it meanwhile, you would be able to sell the empty bottles now for 46 €.  ;D

One of the commonest things to do with savings is to lend them to some Government. In view of the fact that the bulk of the public expenditure of most civilized Governments consists in payment for past wars or preparation for future wars, the man who lends his money to a Government is in the same position as the bad men in Shakespeare who hire murderers. The net result of the man's economical habits is to increase the armed forces of the State to which he lends his savings. Obviously it would be better if he spent the money, even if he spent it in drink or gambling.

The man who invests his savings in a concern that goes bankrupt is therefore injuring others as well as himself. If he spent his money, say, in giving parties for his friends, they (we may hope) would get pleasure, and so would all those upon whom he spent money, such as the butcher, the baker, and the bootlegger. But if he spends it (let us say) upon laying down rails for surface card in some place where surface cars turn out not to be wanted, he has diverted a mass of labor into channels where it gives pleasure to no one. Nevertheless, when he becomes poor through failure of his investment he will be regarded as a victim of undeserved misfortune, whereas the gay spendthrift, who has spent his money philanthropically, will be despised as a fool and a frivolous person.

And yes, brand matters you philistines.