Bitcoin Forum

Hi guys,

I am a big fan of democracy and wonder if it could work if the whole world would be united in one giant union.
Would such a government consisting of more than 100 nations even be able to act anymore?

I think to be able to effectivly rule, there is a need for a few people who have real power, like the roman triumphirate, At least for the administration. They should be elected for a few years, maybe for a lifetime. But the parliament should be able to unseat them.

Seperation of power is necessary to imho.

What are your opinions on that? How do you imagine such a government?

People of different countries and cultures have such different needs at the moment that I don't think a world government would be very effective. In the future if things are more uniform we might benefit from a government like the United States (with countries being like the states in this case),but that time is a long way off.

No matter how good we have think about what should the world looks like and whatever, we couldn't change the leadership of the world. As a matter of fact, recently North Korean Leader and South Korean leader had a peaceful talk. New world history that seems impossible to happen but the world were witness about what had happened already.

Even we built a very secure palace if the enemy that we face is from outside and mostly inside that we think we manage the place so secure. There are things that uncontrollable.

You sound like Obama, Soros, The EU, the Clintons, the Rothschilds, and all the others promoting global eugenics and servitude. Thankfully public opinion is resisting this at last. Brexit, the election of Donald Trump, and similar events are evidence that we may return to sanity.

You can only implement a system like that by imposing and forcing it to people. There isn't anything about democracy on this plan. It's just a way to erase the history and the local cultures of the nations. It's an atempt to "equalize" people in a way everyone will become mediocre and standardized, the humanity would lose its enchantment and originality.

Of course only a small group (the leaders) would live outside this insanity, enjoying confort and wealthy in a private space, ruling the chaotic world as an unified nation.


I'm also proud people are resisting to these ideas even more.

I might get interested in a world gov that did nothing but have secret agents that went out on missions to take care of people and entities that wanted or worked toward world government.

I do not think that Brexit will lead to something good, economically it is not beneficial to Great Britain is politics. Some British lawmakers want a complete break-up of ties with Europe, others hope to maintain a deep relationship that would leave Britain in the overall economic market, but outside political structures and without the right to vote about what the EU will decide.

I don‘t think a world government would automatically lead to a totalitarian state that just serves its rulers. I think of it alittle bit like the galactic republic in star wars. Just one big council, like the UN is today, only with actual power. I also don‘s see how this would lead to extinction of local culture and creation of mediocre men. This could happen though, but it happens also today.

if my opinion is something that is not possible, every human being created by god have their own desires are different, let the world make one, in the family alone, there must be differences and each have their own opinion, what if it happens in a country that just one government, which must be troublesome and very difficult in its arrangement, this is my opinion on this matter

the world united as one state with one government would basically look like the usa today,

it would have a capitalist elite that would controll the money and the labouring money earning cattle that wants that world state, and pays with their work a huge price for it. they would systematically lose substance btw. as every power greedy person would try to become part of the capitalist elite, living of the work of the other.

societies tend not to be unified for quite a while this way, as they tend to need external forces to be this way,

but you could also illude yourself by becoming a citizen of the world by working for the money of the world bank, which trust in the end will enrich the banksters in the world bank in the first place.

i would only join such a world state if i would be allowed to be capitalist in that state.

regards

I honestly do not have much knowledge about different types of government and how every system works. But I can talk about a concept of world government that I think would work better. I don't know what type of government it is or is it already existing or nonexistent type of government but what I know is that it should be transparent, open for everyone - that means every sector and group of people in the society must have a representative to hold a power, it must also fair and equal when it comes to power, independent to each other, and people could vote whom they want to have a seat in the government.

It’s actually very simple each country will vote for their leader and when all the leaders have been selected they then vote for the overall candidate to lead the entire world.

I think there are definitely people high up that would like to have a world government. I heard that a North American Union could be the start of something like that. I definitely think that one world government is a bad idea. It would give too much power to a small group of people. Every region and country has their own problems and concerns. There's no way that some group of people in one place in the world could care for the problems of all people in the world. They would be far too distant. I'm sure there would also be many countries against it. How would you get those countries "in line"? By force?

A government should be 'for the people, by the people and to the people' I know that some people hate democracy but democracy is the best form of governance. You should look at the countries where dictatorship is ruling. We should be thankful that such governance is not in place.

It's not the best. It has its downsides. Its main downside is that everyone is treated equal and we all know that people aren't equal. Some are smart and some are dumb and guess what, there's always more dumb ones than smart ones. Do the math, in a democracy the smart ones are being ruled by the dumb ones.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones)

This will give you an idea of what a "world government" will look like.

Democracy is  best for every country but politicians use  democracy in wrong way  for their corruption and bad governance.