Title: Six connected account caught with strong proof. Action required from DT Post by: The Cryptovator on May 18, 2018, 07:38:16 PM Connected account :
Artem0008 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1225881) comp1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1254724) pulor86 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1281820) Teror1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1188354) lawner85 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1179903) sutc1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1183941) Related Eth address : Artem0008= 0x0F3C907B4fC832b413668Bcd1F99Ae9164A5623e comp1= 0x4CD302C1c4AA1d92c48DA9bd0e3Aea74c1674851 pulor86= 0x8046883aEdc074cC98B56e97eC84B1ec3Be0CE1f Teror1= 0x82B5e5E6D405d000494c52a10f89dB407bAe4A0e lawner85= 0x41A4e5818e5F6d81696Efe0a1D949319312F479A sutc1= 0x2702ae59f545d123D14F28CEF555C822ECc0e6Eb From all account transfer token to Artem0008= 0x0F3C907B4fC832b413668Bcd1F99Ae9164A5623e https://etherscan.io/address/0x0F3C907B4fC832b413668Bcd1F99Ae9164A5623e#tokentxns http://i66.tinypic.com/2vdpc92.png All account holders joined DOCADEMIC facebook bounty. camping Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DOBqB8AJEduosprm59vACR9bEJK5kZUYym0DP4d7WlM/edit#gid=1746197752 Artem0008 #1586 comp1 # 1610 pulor86 # 1613 Teror1 # 1593 lawner85 # 1591 sutc1 # 1592 All screenshot below incase if spreadsheet disable: http://i67.tinypic.com/2m4p076.png http://i68.tinypic.com/2qb85xg.png We can see they are joined very nearly date and time. I believe here enough proof available to give them red tag or ban from forum. No one is my enemy here. I just try to help to keep this forum cheat and spam free. Bitcointalk has a great reputation around crypto world, I think this kind of user damage of bitcointalk reputation. I expect if punished such as bounty cheater, other members will not try to cheat on future. Title: Re: Six connected account. Abuse bounty. Action required from DT Post by: digaran on May 18, 2018, 08:41:37 PM This will never end. people are greedy and they will keep abusing bounties. I would like to request for disabling signatures of Jr members and full members.
Title: Re: Six connected account. Abuse bounty. Action required from DT Post by: audaciousbeing on May 18, 2018, 09:48:03 PM This will never end. people are greedy and they will keep abusing bounties. I would like to request for disabling signatures of Jr members and full members. And you think that would solve it? You don't even know if higher rank members are the ones behind those cheating accounts. What surprises me is that despite the amount of bounties they join and cheat their way through, they end with threads about how such bounty have turned into scam or threads about how to identify good the right bounty to join. What I think would solve it to a large extent is some rules in that section of the forum. To a large extent, the bitcoin section of the forum has been reduced with all of the cheating but the bounty section is very much infested. I think there is need to start keeping a list of managers whose campaign have abundance of cheaters and get them tagged. With that, they are forced to do some decent background check on the participants they are accepting. Title: Re: Six connected account. Abuse bounty. Action required from DT Post by: The Cryptovator on May 19, 2018, 03:10:04 PM This will never end. people are greedy and they will keep abusing bounties. I would like to request for disabling signatures of Jr members and full members. Even this will never end, at least we can reduce spamming. By giving them red tag or ban them. Title: Re: Six connected account. Abuse bounty. Action required from DT Post by: BitcoinSupremo on May 19, 2018, 03:14:33 PM This will never end. people are greedy and they will keep abusing bounties. I would like to request for disabling signatures of Jr members and full members. Even this will never end, at least we can reduce spamming. By giving them red tag or ban them. Tagging them is good but doesn't solve the core problem. They are like metastasis , the cancerous cells which keep adding themselves to different parts of the body, you kill some of them with chemio-therapy and soon after they are sparsed in a different area of the body. So far there is no definitive cure for cancer, and as an analogy I don't see any definitive cure for recovering this disease of bounty abusing. Title: Re: Six connected account caught with strong proof. Action required from DT Post by: The Cryptovator on May 19, 2018, 07:44:45 PM Still no action from any DT member's
Title: Re: Six connected account. Abuse bounty. Action required from DT Post by: digaran on May 20, 2018, 01:21:24 AM This will never end. people are greedy and they will keep abusing bounties. I would like to request for disabling signatures of Jr members and full members. And you think that would solve it? You don't even know if higher rank members are the ones behind those cheating accounts. What surprises me is that despite the amount of bounties they join and cheat their way through, they end with threads about how such bounty have turned into scam or threads about how to identify good the right bounty to join. What I think would solve it to a large extent is some rules in that section of the forum. To a large extent, the bitcoin section of the forum has been reduced with all of the cheating but the bounty section is very much infested. I think there is need to start keeping a list of managers whose campaign have abundance of cheaters and get them tagged. With that, they are forced to do some decent background check on the participants they are accepting. Who would spend time on identifying those bad managers? I would first terminate my own managing service and then would start tagging those managers. I would stop my own managing business to avoid any conflict of interest. I shouldn't tag campaign managers if I'm a manager myself. Title: Re: Six connected account. Abuse bounty. Action required from DT Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on May 20, 2018, 01:29:20 AM Tagging them is good but doesn't solve the core problem. They are like metastasis , the cancerous cells which keep adding themselves to different parts of the body, Cancer is treated by killing cancer cells, or preventing them from multiplying. In either case, you have to do something because if you do nothing, the patient dies. Thus, I'm content to keep killing these cells one by one if that's how it has to be done. When DT members were tagging shitposters, we got the merit system out of it--so good things can happen if you're persistent. Tagged all of these scunts. Thanks again OP for the sharp eyes. Title: Re: Six connected account caught with strong proof. Action required from DT Post by: The Cryptovator on May 20, 2018, 03:09:59 PM Thanks for tag them. At least they got some punishment. May be other members will little aware.
Title: Re: Six connected account. Abuse bounty. Action required from DT Post by: Lauda on May 20, 2018, 06:17:54 PM Tagging them is good but doesn't solve the core problem. They are like metastasis , the cancerous cells which keep adding themselves to different parts of the body, Cancer is treated by killing cancer cells, or preventing them from multiplying. In either case, you have to do something because if you do nothing, the patient dies. Thus, I'm content to keep killing these cells one by one if that's how it has to be done. When DT members were tagging shitposters, we got the merit system out of it--so good things can happen if you're persistent. Tagged all of these scunts. Thanks again OP for the sharp eyes. [1] This one is really a losing battle. One side-benefit of the merit system (even though I don't like it as an attempted solution) is that tagging higher ranked accounts is now several degrees more effective than it was. Title: Re: Six connected account caught with strong proof. Action required from DT Post by: coinlocket$ on May 20, 2018, 07:35:26 PM Just saw the reference. still missing around 15 accounts to tag I copy paste my report here!
Note: A lof of my reports have 19 accounts, it can be the bot limit! Accounts Connected: Stalov (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1167873), sutc1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1183941), Teror1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1188354), Rie21 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1189377), Pai92 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1216463), Artem0008 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1225881), Teeer90 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1229498), Fros21 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1233573), Rofov1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1236867), Perpor22 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1237587), coddor92 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1238834), niyor (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1244397), coi21 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1249027), spuror22 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1253836), comp1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1254724), Nyior (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1257036), pulor86 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1281820), kimk1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1282408), Maror1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1283508), Proof: Stalov (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1225881), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1225881;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/D4DUQ sutc1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1183941), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1183941;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/L7cV2 Teror1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1188354), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1188354;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/5NilA Rie21 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1189377), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1189377;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/9XWom Pai92 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1216463) -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1216463;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/2mAe9 Artem0008 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1225881), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1225881;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/D4DUQ Teeer90 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1229498), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1229498;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/Q1MU9 Fros21 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1233573), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1233573;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/FfMJa Rofov1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1236867), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1236867;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/iKrlT Perpor22 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1237587), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1237587;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/VcqXV coddor92 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1238834), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1238834;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/lSqnY niyor (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1244397), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1244397;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/mU5oF coi21 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1249027), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1249027;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/BO4CJ spuror22 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1253836), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1253836;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/y8isD comp1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1254724), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1254724;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/YLCRZ Nyior (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1257036), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1257036;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/prCh2 pulor86 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1281820), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1281820;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/BdCt1 kimk1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1282408), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1282408;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/lIa7f Maror1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1283508), -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1283508;sa=showPosts -> ARCHIVE -> http://archive.is/W7vIA Related Addresses: Code: https://twitter.com/5vdx6jnPNKWkvIl Code: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100022040063751 Code: 0xFa1B91CdB2A185096832C38A9A6aDA0e252d4707 Miscellaneous: 99% of the times on the same bounties in the same order... with same format, seems clear to me! Even this one is exactly 19 accounts, must be the limit of the bot? updated version Abusing huge amounts of Bounties. ~ Most addresses have only one transaction/new addresses without transaction.I don't see how these accounts are connected. ADDING PROOF Told you man this was an easy case! https://etherscan.io/address/0xb8804065d6107de28b3205263b0f1772fc05f811#tokentxns https://puu.sh/AoMX6/1bdba4b615.png Now guys you heve the prove, told you was an easy case, they cheated for 4k so far PLS TAG HIM Title: Re: Six connected account caught with strong proof. Action required from DT Post by: LoyceV on May 23, 2018, 09:26:48 AM I found this topic through the red trust on one of the spammers. I found a total of 21 involved accounts, and requested them to be banned for spamming (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3188706.0) 2 months ago. Unfortunately, that didn't happen.
Title: Re: Six connected account. Abuse bounty. Action required from DT Post by: bigmaster23 on May 23, 2018, 04:18:15 PM This will never end. people are greedy and they will keep abusing bounties. I would like to request for disabling signatures of Jr members and full members. Might be laborious spending the day to Reputation I also encountered this kind of paint so if I we're you start doing something good for your account (why bother if you have many) nevertheless don't pin out the rest of jr,member and FM are worthless than you, P.S now I understand why people get nuisance by you making them your accomplice. |