Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Reputation => Topic started by: Hhampuz on May 19, 2018, 02:13:15 PM



Title: Bazinga442 leaving retaliatory negative trust that includes outright lies
Post by: Hhampuz on May 19, 2018, 02:13:15 PM
I left a warranted negative trustrating on user Bazinga442 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1246188) which he responded to by giving me unwarranted retaliatory negative trust.

I responded with a new negative trust rating that explained his abuse of the trust system and he retaliated again, this time spreading outright lies that I leave positive trust for scammers & forum offenders. However if he would look a bit closer and not just scratch the surface he would see that there's more to it than that. He also attacks my employer FortuneJack saying they are a "Well known Scam" (without evidence btw) as well as a lapdog of ALU (I've never been affiliated with ALU in any way, shape or form).


This user is clearly not in a right state of mind but I guess that is what happens when someone is found of doing something wrong and getting called out on it. I would urge others to never trust this user or engage in any sort of business with them. Rather be safe than sorry and all that.


Title: Re: Bazinga442 leaving retaliatory negative trust that includes outright lies
Post by: suchmoon on May 19, 2018, 05:00:29 PM
Ignore the moron. Everyone who disagrees with Bazinga is accused of being in cahoots with ALU.

Clearly Quicksy's alt or an equally deranged individual (which would be even scarier - one Quicksy is more than enough).


Title: Re: Bazinga442 leaving retaliatory negative trust that includes outright lies
Post by: TheUltraElite on May 19, 2018, 05:07:36 PM
@HHampuz take a look at the amount of butthurt untrusted feedback I got on my account. As for that matter the accounts of Vod, Lauda, suchmoon, The Pharmacist, actmyname and other DT.

I love the attention I receive from these scumbags. Thing is these people in an attempt to take revenge in the heat of their butthurtness - end up leaving negs on those whom they hate.  :-X

The proof of this is that such people wont be here for long as those people who have marked me with red. Since they came here to become shitposters - they stopped posting after getting negged and never came back. ::)

So it wont matter at all. Let them abuse the trust system (It has already been abused too much).

But Hhampuz you are an old member here, old enough to know this. Even if they spread lies about people all you can do is ignore them.


Title: Re: Bazinga442 leaving retaliatory negative trust that includes outright lies
Post by: digaran on May 23, 2018, 09:17:15 PM
@Ultra, I'm still here man. I'm a victim of abuse of power by suchmoon, actmyname and marlboro, the best cigar in the world. you people are funny, you'd care about untrusted feedbacks and would call them butthurts but when DT members leave negative trust it is always accurate and they are always right.


Title: Re: Bazinga442 leaving retaliatory negative trust that includes outright lies
Post by: pugman on May 24, 2018, 10:12:10 PM
@Ultra, I'm still here man. I'm a victim of abuse of power by suchmoon, actmyname and marlboro, the best cigar in the world. you people are funny, you'd care about untrusted feedbacks and would call them butthurts but when DT members leave negative trust it is always accurate and they are always right.
That's why they are on DT and butthurts are not on DT. Now not all the tags by DT members are accurate,people have been added and removed from the DT for many reasons. Abuse of power would make sense if the DT members have something against you,they don't FYI. The tags are only because of your own self.


Title: Re: Bazinga442 leaving retaliatory negative trust that includes outright lies
Post by: marlboroza on May 24, 2018, 11:46:25 PM
They all leave retaliatory feedback because they don't have valid reason to give accurate -ve feedback.
Ignore it and move on. At least they are not cursing your family and posting religious things  ;D
The proof of this is that such people wont be here for long as those people who have marked me with red. Since they came here to become shitposters - they stopped posting after getting negged and never came back. ::)
Not really. They usually move to new account.
@Ultra, I'm still here man. I'm a victim of abuse of power by suchmoon, actmyname and marlboro, the best cigar in the world. you people are funny, you'd care about untrusted feedbacks and would call them butthurts but when DT members leave negative trust it is always accurate and they are always right.
You are not victim of abuse, stop lying.


Title: Re: Bazinga442 leaving retaliatory negative trust that includes outright lies
Post by: digaran on May 25, 2018, 01:50:04 AM
They all leave retaliatory feedback because they don't have valid reason to give accurate -ve feedback.
Ignore it and move on. At least they are not cursing your family and posting religious things  ;D
The proof of this is that such people wont be here for long as those people who have marked me with red. Since they came here to become shitposters - they stopped posting after getting negged and never came back. ::)
Not really. They usually move to new account.
@Ultra, I'm still here man. I'm a victim of abuse of power by suchmoon, actmyname and marlboro, the best cigar in the world. you people are funny, you'd care about untrusted feedbacks and would call them butthurts but when DT members leave negative trust it is always accurate and they are always right.
You are not victim of abuse, stop lying.

I am. you are abusing your power by tagging me red for something that you think is trolling. you have shown us once again that you were included on DT2 just to harass me. otherwise who are you to tag me red for trolling? go report me to moderators, why do you care if I have questioned the staff member? you are not his alt are you? why don't you let him to defend himself? why don't you let people to defend themselves if I have trolled and harassed them?

Why would you tag me on their behalf?


Title: Re: Bazinga442 leaving retaliatory negative trust that includes outright lies
Post by: Quickseller on May 25, 2018, 02:41:34 AM
Would you be willing to accept the argument that he does not trust you and therefore the negative rating he has against you is valid?