Title: Mining with the 5750 Post by: legolouman on August 30, 2011, 07:21:51 AM Hey everyone! I've just recently actually started mining. I thought it was time to get something better than the 5450 I've been running (sad isn't it?) I've upgraded to the 5750!
Is it any good? I've estimated, that I can get about 160ish M/hash with it. Any tips? etc Thanks Title: Re: Mining with the 5750 Post by: maxll on August 30, 2011, 07:54:16 AM Even 185 Mh/sec. 900/300 0.95V linuxcoin/phoenix/phatk.
Title: Re: Mining with the 5750 Post by: iopq on August 31, 2011, 05:51:14 PM I'm getting 144.5 on stock core clock + underclocked gpu clock at 204 mhz
Title: Re: Mining with the 5750 Post by: legolouman on August 31, 2011, 06:15:27 PM Well that is fully acceptable for me. Thanks for the infos.
Title: Re: Mining with the 5750 Post by: pennytrader on August 31, 2011, 07:02:46 PM PowerColor Go Green 6750 (should be simliar to 5750).
875/300. stock voltage. 181mh/s (tried to OC to 925 and it crashed). best thing is: it's fanless and only draws power from PCI-E interface (so no 6PIN power connector needed). Well, I have a case fan blowing it at it to keep the temp at around 64C. Title: Re: Mining with the 5750 Post by: legolouman on August 31, 2011, 08:12:01 PM PowerColor Go Green 6750 (should be simliar to 5750). 875/300. stock voltage. 181mh/s (tried to OC to 925 and it crashed). best thing is: it's fanless and only draws power from PCI-E interface (so no 6PIN power connector needed). Well, I have a case fan blowing it at it to keep the temp at around 64C. I had the 5750 running at exactly that earlier today, except it roars, and needs the 6pin. It entirely owns the 5450! Title: Re: Mining with the 5750 Post by: pennytrader on August 31, 2011, 08:35:32 PM But I paid $130 for that 6750. :)
My goal was not to mine with it at all though. I just want a quiet powerful GPU. Title: Re: Mining with the 5750 Post by: legolouman on August 31, 2011, 09:24:02 PM I've needed a good video card for a while, but potential Bitcoins sweetened the deal, and made 115$ seem like a lot less
|