Bitcoin Forum

Welcome to first NXT pool. Our address is: http://nxtpool.com/

• Forging is performed by one wallet. So it's important to make deposit from your personal wallet we can identify you.
• When block is found, each participant receives a share of the fee equal to the ratio of NXT amounts of the participant and the pool, minus pool commission.
• During the promotional period the pool commission is 0%.
• At the end of the promotional period, the commission pool will be 1-2%.
• All users who have made deposits of 10.000 NXT or more during the promotional period will have reduced commission after the promotional period.
• Currently all contributions and withdrawals are processed manually.
• Commission for withdrawal is one NXT.
• Pool wallet is running on dedicated server, works 24/7 and is stable. Forging wallet is automatically restarted every 3 hours for stability.

In order to start using the pool you need to register on the website by specifying your NXT wallet and send NXT to the pool wallet: deleted

Pooling gives an obvious advantage of more stable income. But besides that, after analyzing the forging code I found that the probability of generating a block depends on the number of coins not in a linear way (mathematical justification of this fact will posted here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=406331.msg4545539#msg4545539). Therefore, participating in the pool also gives higher incentive for participant than he would get by forging alone.


--------------------------
Total blocks found: 55
Total reward: 127 NXT

How? Manually?

how we can trust you?

Now manually. We work on automatic restart.
Upd: Automatic restart implemented.

Nohow of course.

The only thing I can say that I have created that pool because my 50 000 NXT have not generated any blocks yet and
and I want a part of that "higher incentive".

I do not plan to kill the goose that will lay the golden egg.

I think the risk reward for this is extremely lopsided. you might get lucky to get 200 nxt a day with 10 million nxt, and 10 million NXT is an awful lot of nxt to trust someone with...

If you have 10 millions you do not need a pool :)

Is the wallet running on the same server you host the site? If so that is extremely dangerous. Even if the site itself is 100% secure, never rule out internal sabotage from your host. It can happen when lots of money is at stake- slush encountered this with OVH on his Bitcoin pool awhile back.

I hope you are keeping the wallet open on an isolated machine that is ONLY used for NXT.

Separate server.

But the proverbial golden egg in this instance is the large amount of Nxt you will hold on trust versus the tiny fees that will be generated of which your share will be even tinier.   ???  The only way a pool would work is if you'd be willing to escrow an amount that equals the Nxt received but then of course that would still be subject to exchange rate risk.

My plan is following. When NXT become popular we will have about 1400 blocks a day, each block will have about 250 transactions, and about 2500 NXT of fee. Pool will forge about 20% and I will take about 1% of it as pool owner. It's about 7000 NXT a day. Not so tiny I think.

For example I have money to escrow all pools NXT. What for I need that pool? I can just buy NXT on that money and forge by myself.
So I may do that but only for a starting period of the project.

That's not the point. I'm saying if I had $100 of nxt and you (some anonymous forum user) are basically are saying you'll give me 1 cent a week to borrow it, I wouldn't take you up on the offer...

I really need a pool but I still cannot trust anyone with my NXT.
The gain for me would be a little more stable forging income but the risk would be loosing all my NXT.
Pool forging is not pool mining. The risk is damn high.

Do you have a reputation thread or something ? If not, could you give collateral ?

I wish there was some way to do some sort of pooled forging with my coins. I have a lot and dont mind parting with the coins i forge, but idk if there's a way to do that.

I think this is overestimation. At that time fees will become 0.01 or ever 0.001, so calculate your profit more realistically.

Your point is clear.

No I have not reputation thread. The only thing I can say that I have registered March 22, 2011.

Do you mean escrow BTC?


I do not talk about now. I understand that now project will be unprofitable. But I think I should start now to have reputation and profit in a couple of years.

Did you manage something similar before ? Did you trade through the forum ?


Yes or any other form of wealth as a guaranty.

It was before bitcoin.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=238044.msg2518968#msg2518968
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=75299.0

May be I should ask BCNext if he ready to be an escrow...
But as I say before, If I had money to cover all of the deposits, I would not need to start this pool.

Guys, is no point using pools.

With 100,000 NxT you will get about 1NxT/24h , and with this quantity is better you forge alone.

With 10,000 NxT you will get 0.1NxT/24h, you will need just 20 days to pay 2NxT fee to go and return. And you're risking your whole NxT stack to gain 3.1 NxT/month , that's a 0.36% anual ROI by risking all your NxT...

With 1,000 NxT you will get 0.01NxT/24h, you will need 200 days to pay 2NxT fee to go and return.

Really, no point using this.

1. Today I have complete domain transfer. Now pool can be accessed by http://nxtpool.com/
2. Implemented automatically wallet restarting system.
3. Pool power 97,743 NXT

Post the mining ratio (efficiency) of your pool so we can compare with solo mining.

Still searching for first block :(

Sent 44 NXT test. We'll see how this goes.

You're not doing much to facilitate trust here. You're coming off as though we should trust you before you give us reason not to. That's not a good approach to take. I've seen it taken with Visacoin. We should not trust you until you give us reason to. Be skeptical of this guy everyone.

Time works on me :)

Today we generate two blocks!

I am interested, but I can't allow myself to send away my coins :(

Were they empty of with fees?

Each has 1 NXT fee.

Join a pool does not improve your forging income, but has a huge risk to lose all your Nxt. Why not just keep your own computer/VPS on? Therefore, apparently no one will join a pool like this. It's completely different from PoW pool mining where you don't need to risk anything other than the hashing power for one day or even just one hour.

The algorithm of forging is constructed such way so:
p=P-1/4*P²
Where P - is probability to forge block with some amount and p - is probability to forge block with the same amount but split to 2 wallet.
For the small amount different is very small. But for big it's not so small.
For example if we have wallet with about 200 000 000 NXT it's change of forge about 20%. If we split amount for two wallets with 100 000 000 NXT on each our chance became 19%
p = 0,2 - 1/4*0,04 = 0,19
Converse statement is also true. If we union two wallets with individual chance 9,5% of forge we increase their total chance. It became 20%. We can continue.
First column number of wallets we store NXT. Second - total chance to forge block. Third chance of each wallet to forge block.

1	20,0000%	20,0000%
2	19,0000%	9,5000%
4	18,0975%	4,5244%
8	17,2787%	2,1598%
16	16,5323%	1,0333%
32	15,8490%	0,4953%
64	15,2210%	0,2378%
128	14,6418%	0,1144%
256	14,1059%	0,0551%
512	13,6084%	0,0266%
1024	13,1455%	0,0128%

So if we has 1000 persons with 200 000 NXT each, when they unite to the pool they increase their income by a half!
But here we look in to very big pool. If pool power will bee 50 000 000 NXT. It will increase income of member with 50 000 NXT about 12%

Yes but for each transaction you will lost @minimal 1 NxT .... for transaction.

So for 1 Nxt sent , you use 1..... pool for NxT by grouping all account doesn't worth .... and too risky , if your wallet get hacked ... you will refund all users back ?

Lets add some math:

We will consider the algorithm for generating units in the system NXT.
The algorithm is as follows :
For each  wallet hash function hit is calculated with value range from 0 to 2⁶⁴ ( denoted by 2⁶⁴ of N). By the cryptographic properties of hit its value can be regarded as a random variable x with a uniform distribution on the interval [0 , N]. Value of the function is recalculated when a new block appears.
On the function hit value time t is calculated in seconds by the formula:
t = x / (A * b) [1]
where x - is a random variable whose value hit, A - base target ratio is recalculated each unit in order to maintain the required rate of generation units ( performs the same function as the complexity of the system Bitcoin ), b - the balance of the wallet (coins). Wallet for which the value of t is the minimal generates the next block.
Consider two situations : 1) All of our available funds belong to the one wallet 2) Funds split into 2 wallet with equals sum.
Lets find out in which case the probability to generate a new block is higher.

1 ) Let wallets except our involved in the generation unit K₁, ..., K_n; their balances b₁, ..., b_n. Here we make assumption that each b_i > 0. Then the time to generate a block for each of them
t_k = x_k / (A * b_k); [2]
Denote t_m = min (t₁, ..., t_n). In order that our wallet would generate block the following condition must be satisfied t₀ <t_m where t₀ time of block generation by our wallet. After substituting [1] we get x / (A * b₀) <t_m where b₀ is the number of coins in our wallet , transform and obtain the condition for the random variable x
x <t_m * A * b₀
taking into account the uniformity of x the probability P is
P = min{1, (t_m * A * b₀) / N} [3]
Here we make assumption that 1 > (t_m * A * b₀) / N then
P = (t_m * A * b₀) / N [3.1]

2) The situation is the same but we have to balance two wallets b₀ / 2 on each of them. Probability that t₀₁ <t_m by the formula [3] is
p₁ = (t_m * A * b₀ / 2 ) / N = (t_m * A * b₀) / 2N
And substituting the value of [3.1], we obtain
p₁ = P/2
and for the second wallet
p₂ = (t_m * A * b₀ / 2 ) / N = (t_m * A * b₀) / 2N = P/2
the probability that our first wallet will not generate block
q₁ = 1-p₁ = 1 - P/2
and also for the second wallet
q₂ =1-p₂ = 1 - P/2
probability that neither the first nor the second wallet will not generate block is
q = q₁ * q₂ = (2-P) ² / 4
the probability that either the first or the second wallet block is generate
p = 1-q = 1 - (2-P) ² / 4 = (4-(2-P) ² ) / 4 = (4P-P² ) / 4 = P-P² / 4
so the final value
p = P-P² / 4 [4]
Ie probability to generate a block in the event of a less than half of funds in the case of storage facilities on one wallet to the square of this probability.

And simple example to illustrate what we talking about:
1) We have wallet with 2/3 of billion NXT and other person have wallet with 1/3 of the billion
2) We have two wallets with 1/3 of billion NXT and other person have wallet with 1/3 of the billion

2) is obviously we have probabilty of succes 2/3
but in case 1) we have probabilty of succes 3/4
http://s12.postimg.org/4vxmgb2jh/image.png

Here on horisontal axis value of opponent hit function and on vertical value of our hit function. Red space - we win. Blue space - opponent win.

P.S You may notice that for our last example [4] is not correct. The reason that P is very big and our assumption that 1 > (t_m * A * b₀) / N for each possible t_m is not true. It's became true for P<1/2.

If what you said is true, then either Nxt should fix this or it will worth nothing due to this unbelievable unfairness to prefer the large holders.

We generate two more blocks :) but they was empty :(
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=1000&blk=15008136651107453394
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=1000&blk=2778462017552493231

I sure that it can not be fixed easily.

This is not true. We already discussed this with Dervish in Russian. The fact that he continues to spread incorrect information makes me to suspect that he is going to conduct a scam.

This is his post, use Google Translate plz:

I said that my coefficient was incorrect, but not whole idea.


It means:

Yes I have lost coefficient calculation. :(
Benefit somewhat less than I expected.
For 1 million in a single splitting the difference is 0.03% (and here I quoted Come-from-Beyond)
For 50 millions in a single splitting the difference is 1.27%

And now I say that for 200 millions (20%) in a single splitting the difference is 5.26% (20%/19%)

Where is the lie?

The equation for difference is
d=P/p=P/(P-P²/4)=4/(4-P)

for 1% (1 million) d = 4/3,99 = 1,0025 difference 0,025% CFB have rounded it to 0,03%
for 5% (5 millions) d = 4/3,95 = 1,01265 difference 1,265% I have rounded it to 1,27%
for 20% (20 millions) d = 4/3,8 = 1,05263 difference 5,26%

Do you have any reference of p = P-P²/4?

Say if I have all the Nxts, my probability is certainly 1. Then I divide all my coins to two accounts, the probability of one account is (1 - 1/4) / 2 = 3/8 and the sum of my two accounts becomes 3/4? Does that mean there's 1/4 chance no forge in a round?

If I further divide them to 4 accounts, then the forge probability further decreases? So there're more empty rounds? Seems quite hard for me to understand.

EDIT:

What I said was not true.

Alice owns N, Bob owns N/2 + N/2 (==N).

Let's assess Bob's chance to hit target assuming that base target is such that Alice hits it within 1 minute (say, 0.001 probability):

Every of the accounts has 0.0005 chance to hit the target (0.001 * N/2 / N)
Chance that none of the accounts does it == (1 - 0.0005) * (1 - 0.0005) = 0.9995 * 0.9995 = 0.99900025
Chance that any of the accounts does it == 1 - 0.99900025 = 0.00099975

Thus the combined stake does have advantage which proves Dervish point of view. Let's calculate this advantage:

Alice / Bob = 0.001 / 0.00099975 = 1.000250062515629

Thus Alice quotient of advantage = 1.000250062515629 - 1 = 0.0003 = 0.03%

Max value of advantage quotient can be reached if Bob splits all his coins among very big number of accounts. It will be close to 0.05% in this case.

PS: 0.05% advantage is compensated by dispersion and can work only in very long run which doesn't make sense coz currency where stakeholders don't spend coins will die much earlier.

Ok, Now I understand better.
After split to two equal parts, p = 1 - (1 - P/2) * (1 - P/2) = 1 - (1 - P + P^2/4) = P - (P^2) / 4

So the equation Dervish used was correct.

We need another wallets with non zero balance to consider the way I does and get this equation.

Dervish overlooked that forging is a Poisson process. That's why he got insane numbers.

Do you assume the total coins join forging is 100 millions?

Can you please repeat your calculations with 20% but not 0,1% or just say that there is no lie in my words.

Sorry mistake. It should be read

for 0,1% (1 million) d = 4/3,99 = 1,0025 difference 0,025% CFB have rounded it to 0,03%
for 5% (50 millions) d = 4/3,95 = 1,01265 difference 1,265% I have rounded it to 1,27%
for 20% (200 millions) d = 4/3,8 = 1,05263 difference 5,26%

Here I wrote correct numbers:

I will try for CFB


Alice owns N, Bob owns N/2 + N/2 (==N).

Let's assess Bob's chance to hit target assuming that base target is such that Alice hits it within 1 minute (say, 0.2 probability):

Every of the accounts has 0.0005 chance to hit the target (0.2 * N/2 / N)
Chance that none of the accounts does it == (1 - 0.1) * (1 - 0.1) = 0.9 * 0.9 = 0.81
Chance that any of the accounts does it == 1 - 0.81 = 0.19

Thus the combined stake does have advantage which proves Dervish point of view. Let's calculate this advantage:

Alice / Bob = 0.2 / 0.19 = 1.0526

Thus Alice quotient of advantage = 1.0526 - 1 = 0.0526 = 5.26%


I also find out the reason why split reduces the chance. It's because these two accounts do not exchange information so they cannot avoid duplicate work.

Ok. Let's do it step by step.

---

Imagine we have 5 people only. Each of them owns 200M. Total forging power is 200+200+200+200+200. Agree?

Edit: Maybe u don't lie but just confused. I don't state that u spread incorrect information intentionally.

I marked incorrect assumption with red.

Thank you for your attention to my math. I agree that my words may be confusing, but they correct. And I also agree that in small amounts phenomenon is negligible.

And I want to remember that when I first point out that paradox I even has no idea to make a pool. I just study NXT forging algorithm. And then you answer:


Do you think it is necessary to do a pool? you said.
And I think. Hm... He is right! And start to make pool. Spent about ten days for it on winter holidays. And now make final steps with codding.

Why?

The probability is 0.2 if he has 20% of Nxt, right?

Now I think, if one of them split it to (100, 100), all other four actually may have a little bit more probability due to that one's loss. That only makes the difference larger.

I believe that actually the large holder does have a considerable advantage in forging, although it may be not that important anyway. As I always think the forging profit is negligible.

No, the point is that if base target == 100%, then guy with 200M can hit the target within 1 minute only with 0.1 probability. If someone starts playing with probabilities the system will just raise difficulty lowering advantage of combined stake.

Let's discuss situation when 2 guys combine 200 and 200 into 400. What total forging power will be in this case?

What do you mean when saying "Total forging power"?

Why don't we imaging 3 people with each of them owns 333,333333M?
I have already solve that task.

Ok, I got a little bit more.

In your example, 5 people have equally 200M, does the system adjust the difficulty so that the expected interval is 1 min. Therefore the probability of none of the 5 people to hit the target (P0) needs to be around 50%? (What's the value in your algorithm?). P0 = (1 - P) ^ 5. If P = 0.2, then P0 = 0.32, a little bit too high. If P = 0.1, then P0 = 0.59, almost. Seems P should be around 0.125.

Therefore, this is a WRONG argument:
"If I have p percent of the total Nxt, I have p percent of chance to hit the target in 1 min."
But this is true
"If A account has twice Nxt as B, A have twice as much chance to hit the target in 1 min."

In other words,
If we add up all the probability of hit the target in 1 min of all accounts, it is NOT 1.

Yes, you are correct in this. You mistake is, as CFB has pointed out, assuming P(200M) = 0.2. This is wrong.
Make it simpler, suppose there's only one account, P(1000M) != 1. It should be around 0.5, so that the average interval is around 1 min. If the probability of hit target in 1 min is 1, then the average interval is definitely smaller than 1 min (maybe only 0.5 min depends on the distribution).

Isn't the part highlighted in blue also incorrect? "My first account forges" and "my second account forges" are not independent events.

Each coin is like a mining rig. So we could use "forging power" to describe possibility to forge a block.

Ok P(200M) = 0.2 is incorrect but it was not my main point. In my main math post I have not such assumption. And even if I have mistaken in 2 times (do not considered retargeting), the idea is still correct.

In my post I study another events:
Event A - time that wallet #1 need to generate block less that time other wallets except ours need to generate block.
Event B - time that wallet #2 need to generate block less that time other wallets except ours need to generate block.
And this events are not mutual exclusive.

I don't get why u rely on this graph. U don't take into account that base target will be adjusted. This is what I call "Poisson process". Every account can forge is block, this is a Poisson process. But there is also another Poisson process that determines changes of forging difficulty (a process of a higher level). U don't take it into account, that's why u get wrong numbers.

Anyway, Could we reach a conclusion that "The large holder does have an advantage in forging. If some large account be divided into many small accounts, they lose this advantage and will give the rest large holders a little bit more forging advantage. Nonetheless, the difference is not so high so it will not jeopardize the system."

An extreme case:

suppose there's an account with 500M Nxt, and other 5000 users with 100K Nxt. To be fair, the large account should forge 50% of the coins, but actually at least one user in the 5000 hits the target in 1 min is 1 - (1 - p/5000)^5000. If p = 0.2, then 1 - (1 - p/5000) = 0.181. Which means the large holder actually can mine around 52.5% of the coins. The sums of small accounts can mine around 47.5%, but when they all combine to one account together, they can mine 50% (not 52.5%) and the advantage of the large holder goes away too. (The exact value of p here does not matter, it could be 0.3 or 0.18. The conclusion is that the advantage exists but not so large).

U should understand that forging process is unfair from point of view of pure math, but it is fair from point of view of statistics, coz advantage of larger stake lays within the dispersion.

But "forging power" of coin in different size wallet is different. How can sum them?

It's correct. But the numbers r not. Already answered in that russian thread and here:

Why? I think the account does not know who the owner is. There's no communication between your two accounts. Therefore, they are just like any two accounts in the world.

Ok. Just answer the question "We have wallet with 2/3 of billion NXT and other person have wallet with 1/3 of the billion what probability that we find a block?"
Poisson process is about different time moments, not about probability in current time moment.

But are they independent?

Isn't it simpler if you ignore time and just consider who forges blocks N, (N+1), (N+2), etc?

Suppose:
 - I have 400,000nxt in account A1 and it is actively forging
 - You have 400,000nxt which is split into 2 accounts A2 and A3 (200,000 per account), both of which are actively forging
 - The other 200,000nxt is either held by other people, but is constantly being involved in transactions and so never actually forging, or is destroyed nxt sent to the genesis block

My assumption is:
 - If account A has X nxt, and a total of Y nxt is forging across the whole network, then P(account A forges next block)=X/Y.
Is that assumption correct?

For block N, chance of each account A1,A2,A3 forging:

P(A1 forges block N)=0.5
P(A2 forges block N)=0.25
P(A3 forges block N)=0.25

i.e.:
P(I forge block N) = P(you forge block N) = 0.5

Difficulty can go up and down, and time taken to forge a block may vary, but the calculations above are independent of this.

Or where did I go wrong?

We can sum them coz forging power of 1M == forging power of 0.5M + 0.5M + epsilon, where epsilon is small if compared to 1M.

Even more, due to orphaned blocks 1 single pool will lose more than get, we already saw this in early days when were DDoSed.

No, the probability cannot be simply added together, so that assumption is also not correct.  
Moreover, we can only use probability to forge one block in 1 minute.
P(A1 forges block N)=0.25
P(A2 forges block N)=0.125
P(A3 forges block N)=0.125
P(you forge block N) = 1 - (0.875) * (0.875) = 0.234375.

So before splitting, the probability to forge one block in 1 minute is 0.5, but after splitting 0.484375, the difficulty may be adjusted in following rounds.

U'll find ~ 2001 blocks of 3000 ones.

Can you prove it?

Already proved upthread.

This is not a proof. You prove that epsilon is small making assumption that epsilon is small. Some situation with ddos is also is non a prof.

As I say
Poisson process is about different time moments, not about probability in the current time moment.

There are TWO Poisson processes. I'm talking about higher-level one. Ur math doesn't take into account BASE TARGET. This is why ur numbers r INCORRECT.

Dervish, why not to discuss with CFB a getwork like of pool. Your pool will be more attractive if people don't need to send Nxt to you. I guess it's doable by distributing work to multiple clients if there's some support from the client code?

When we implement Account Control users will be able to lease forging power instead of transfering real coins. No need in getwork.

Actually we should be getting used to use pools, they r necessary in later stages of TF. Their official name is "hubs" though (time to reserve good domains in advance ;)).

Ok - I agree the assumption is not correct, and that large forging pools have an advantage (although not necessarily a significant one).

Found an empty block:
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=1000&blk=6230879150822305049

Found block with 52 NXT fee!
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=1000&blk=5718908617635827598

Kudos!

Why the pool report page is blank? Or I need buy share to view that page?

I hope I can check pool result before join.

On report page you can see only blocks founded later than your have been registered.

Pool works for 20 days and we have found 10 blocks:
1 with 52 NXT reward,
3 with 1 NXT reward and
6 empty blocks.

One more:
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=1000&blk=11598068148172595097

im deposit some nxt then find some block and see some nxt reward after that im send some nxt and my reward is gone away. why?

Please PM me your email or wallet, and I'll check it.

Ok. Now I understand.

When version 0.5.9 of client come out pool found a couple of blocks in obsolete fork. When we update client theirs gone.

Last two blocks founded by the pool are:
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=1000&blk=3817219428846416162 - today
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=1000&blk=11598068148172595097 -height 52254 (28.01.2014)

You can use request http://lopcalhost:7874/nxt?requestType=getAccountBlockIds&account=17093633478753342904&timestamp=1
to check ids of the blocks founded by the pool.

I spent 7758 NXT to your Pool, but it still shows me a 0 NXT in my fund?
Where are my NXT? ^^

hi our forum has just gone live and  if your looking to promote your pool feel free to come over and check us out !

Our site is nearly ready but until then publish your pool on our board and and we will add you to our pool directory ,

http://larfinfool.com/forums (http://larfinfool.com/forums)

We add funds manually. Sorry for delay.

Ok, thanks saw it :)
Sry. for the bad add. Have to say it's all here :)

One more block:
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=1000&blk=17783817433037423107

Im in with 2259 Nxt! Hope the Pool rocks the blocks and found a lot!!

You are welcome.

Found empty block - http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=1000&blk=11642355869349621241
Found block with 2 NXT fee - http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=1000&blk=4804259970638733656

Found block with 2 NXT fee - http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=1000&blk=5778656998176917312

Found block with 4 NXT fee - http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=1000&blk=13858147043818572255

Last 2 blocks was good:
22 NXT fee - http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=5123470827004189135 (04/05/2014)
27 NXT fee - http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=2779417649952402043 (11/05/2014)

sorry missclick =/

I sent 1000 ntx and after a day my balance is still @ 0

NTX Address: 6564225689312079988

I have updated your balance. Sorry for delay.

Does this pool allow for leasing NXT?

Yes. But you should register on the website first.

I have decided to close pool. Please request your deposits back.

Request to all who have made use of the pool. Please leave feedback:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=6964

Hello Dervish

I request my deposit back which i sended to nxtpool.com
My Account: "NXT-S5NA-X99X-NL3Y-HPWPD"

Devish

What do you mean? Your account is blank. You have not send NXT to anybody:
https://www.mynxt.info/account/NXT-S5NA-X99X-NL3Y-HPWPD
If you insist  - provide info about your deposit.