Bitcoin Forum

Hey guys, I don’t have a lot of time but I really love to take part in bounties, so I would like to know which type of bounty campaign is more profitable? Is it better to make videos and posts on Bitcointalk, or it is more profitable to take part in Twitter and Facebook campaigns?

very difficult to explain.
because the essence of a success is not of the type of campaign,
but from the total allocation of funds and the success of ICO / bounty.

If your social media accounts for example in facebook, you have almost 5000 friends, then you got a chance to get a high allocation stakes in facebook campaign. Also applies the same in your twitter campaign. If you own also a youtube channel and you got massive subscribers and followers, you can join the video campaign. And in the bitcointalk, if you have atleast a jr. member account, you can join also in there. To sum up, if you got a high audience rate, surely you got high rewards, its best to join all these campaign.

hi guys,
for the division of value, so far that has a great income is a signature campaign. But if you want to work do not waste much time, maybe better make vidio and blog.

of course making video review or something for promote ICO is more profitable than facebook and twitter,but it's not easy to create

hello buddy
I've been following a variety of campaigns for three months if you have creativity and video editing skills are excellent because many campaigns give great rewards for the making.

Videos and posts in bounty companies are more profitable, Chet Facebook and Twitter bounty.. In General, if the high rank in bitcointalk, the subscription company bounty the most profitable

So far
From my observations
I think video making, and translation signature are the most profitable

You should know that Twitter and Facebook are the easiest bounty parts so you can't earn so much money from a single twitter or facebook bounty only. Of course making Video and joining signature campaign are much better than social media campaign like Facebook and Twitter :)

Facebook and twitter campaigns have got plenty of participants, so you wouldn't earn much. Higher ranked member can participate in signature campaign and earn a decent amount. You can do videos, blog and article bounties and earn good amount.

As far as my own view today about the bounties are concerned, the most stakes distribtion are Content (article,blog,video) campaign and Signature Campaign. But sometimes if the said bounties, or should I say applied to all bounties, are not productive or having only a few participants, rewards are being deducted and being add to the most performing bounties like social media.

But since social media bounties are no doubt an easy task, lots of bounty hunters are joining here. Therefore lots of distribution so in the end, the rewards are not that interesting. To OP, you need to check for yourself if that will be worth it.

There is no doubt some projects reward bounty hunters differently, but the buck of the tokens go to translation, Video, article and signature campaign, so if you can translate IMO, you are likely to be rewarded better than other bountied because there are only few people eligible to do this

There is clear difference between two.
In case of Twitter/FB bounties, work is negligible. You can do 30-35 bounties at the same time devoting an hour or one and a half daily. But disadvantage is that there are huge participation in Twitter/FB bounties and mostly by those users who spam with many alt accounts using bot to retweet or post. So in the end, you will get much less stakes than expectations.
Whereas in case of Videos or Signature campaign, time element comes to play, especially in video making. My friend who join most of the video campaigns tells me that average time to make standard 2-3 minutes video is 4-5 hours. However, if you are daily poster then Signature campaign won't take much of your time.
So my suggestion to you is to go for Twitter/FB + Signature at the same time and leave video or blog ones.

I think making videos and post in bitcointalk is more profitable. Because of the high reward allocation and low participants who joined the campaign. Translation campaign has huge allocation more than another campaign.

I think all campaigns are good, but every campaign has its own rules. The article campaign just once created, can be two to three articles, but the problem is an article if the campaign does not fit the rules then the reject. But can also join with many projects.
Twitter and facebook campaigns we can join many projects, but this campaign is often accepted, the rules are light.
Signature campaigns are only for one project, can not be more. Sometimes this campaign we have to follow until the end of the season. Otherwise it will be rejected.

If you have good video skills and some subscribers in youtube, videos are one of the best earners.
Signature would earn you more for your effort. While facebook and twitter campaign earning are unlimited and the limit is the time you can afford.

Hello guy, normally the signature is the biggest part of the campaign. I think you should participate in the signature campaign for more profit. Also, the blogging campaign is good.

All of those types of bounties are profitable, you don't have anything to put on it as long as you're doing your part of doing the task.

What you should be focused with is on how to choose those bounties that are legitimate and will pay their participants upon completion of your chosen bounty.

I most often follow facebook and twitter campaigns, but actually I also took part to create a video project, for more and more prizes I received. and the more participation we follow.

You can get good rewards like video, or bitcointalk post compared to facebook and twitter campaign. But the execution success rate in video and bitcointalk requires a lot of effort. It will be properly reviewed by a bounty manager. But when your entries got accepted, expect a good rewards from it.

Well if youre skilled in creating videos for advertising then its more profitable than facebook and Twitter campaigns but for me since this both can only consume 3-5 hours of your daily obligation why not do it both for more profitable means of working?

Since i see no problem on your part than choosing one,and the time allocation will almost similar then make it both ,and i assure you in time you may manage it greater than the beginning

hello mate, its really depends on how much allocation for every campaign. hi quality video editing is very profitable also if you have a great talent for editing videos. facebook and twitter campaign are also good, but the stake is depends on the number of your friends. signature campaign is also good and profitable task.

As a starter there are some campaigns you can't participate in for example, bitcointalk signature campaign which has a bit higher reward for participants, but for beginners you can start with facebook and twitter campaigns and adhere strictly to the instruction.

Blog, Videos and Article campaigns usually offers bigger allocation in bounties compared to Twitter/FB campaigns.But it would be better to join social media campaign as well to maximize your earning for a certain bounty.

I think all campaigns are good. Which one you have the most followers should give priority. PB and TW often have a lot of participants, so if you have a large follower, your reward is huge. If you own a YouTube channel that has a certain number of subscribers, then it should be used because very few people join this channel.

if indeed you have expertise in making good video content of course you can follow bounty campaign activity with a promotion through video. besides that other things that can be done is to join in the campaign signature activities and of course by following the signature campaign you must follow the rules applied by the campaign manager.

Which one is more profitable depends on too many factors, most of the time the allocation of tokens for the signature campaign is higher and there are less participants so it may seem like the one that generates the most profits, but the advantage of social media campaigns is that you can participate in several of them while you can only participate in one signature campaign.

I think you should make a video/blog campaign that's really attract a lot of investors if you have high quality video/ a lot of followers you will have gain much stake on taking part of it. The best time to do that is when it pre-ico get started. Heads up to my friends who are fond to be a blogger.

1. It depends on the token allocation for each bounty campaign. Most bounties allocate more tokens for signature campaign. Some on videos or articles.
2. It depends on your social media followings. Usually, the more followers/friends you have, the higher the stakes.

Any of them is profitable. This depends on how ready you are. For facebook and twitter(# of friends and followers) and also with signature the (rank) that you find yourself in.

In my opinion, signature campaigns are more profitable because they are usually bigger than other campaigns. However, to get maximum results your forum ranking should be high, and it is difficult to raise the rankings in the forums because it was hit by merit. Video-making campaigns can also be an alternative to getting great results compared to social media campaigns facebook and twitter.

Being blogger, signature campaigner and translator is the most profitable because participants have a limit than to facebook bounty and Twitter because allocated token will dividend to all participants so the more participants the less reward.

make my video my best choice than you follow social media campaign. because of the number of participants, participants who follow the social media campaign is very much compared with the video campaign. other than that the video is usually enough to make once while your social media campaign must report every week.