Bitcoin Forum

Bounties programmes no doubts is one of the avenue of reaping tangible coins to your wallet by signing up to do some task with various bounty campaigns, however,  bounties programmes comes up everyday, with promising projects.
With the ways the campaigns are scheduled you cannot possibly participate in all bounties. How can you now select credible bounties among all the bounties that troop in every day,  what are the criteria you look for before joining a bounty.
I will be impress to learnt credible insight on this from the bounty experts.

Follow credible bounty managers. Mostly, startups rely on bounty managers with enough experience in marketing and handling of bounty hunters. You can check them out via telegram and bitcointalk. Been tailing some bounty managers and teams who has handled great projects.

the first thing I look is who is bounty manager, then I take a look at:
- website
- social media (very important), because if there are only few people that follow the project in my experience 90% of them will fail....

I have been thinking about this topic for some time now because bounty programmes wastes a lot of time and one has to be paid accordingly but unfortunately some scams do not pay and run away leaving a hunter stranded so there should be a way to test the credibility of a bounty before it is even allowed in the first place.

I specify from Bounty Manager, ICO rating website. And see what projects they will work on. if in presale does not reach softcap. leave the bounty and look for the new bounty.

Well there are a lot of ways really. Most bounty hunters look at the bounty manager first. If they recognize the manager and know how they manage previouse campaigns they mostly choose them over the others. Also some read the whitepaper and check the website if its legit. It really helps a lot to check these.

As ICOs rose in popularity in 2017, so did bounty programs. The allure of getting free tokens for promotional activities was something that appealed to a lot of crypto hobbyists. Make sure to read the white paper and check the team's credentials.

I identified reasons why Bounty Campaigns make sense to blockchain projects. The share reserved for a Bounty Campaign usually ranges from 0,5% to 20% of the total amount of issued tokens during an ICO. If the share is much higher, I recommend to be careful.

Looking at the number of supporters is important before making any investment decision. But be careful blindly trusting perceived swarm intelligence. There is a big difference between those supporters who are genuinely interested in a project, curious, authentic and critical. And those who get paid by the project to propagandize favorable content about them.

In my opinion, I would suggest that you need to follow good bounty manager with track records and also managers that have good ranking on the forum so that you would have a 85% chance to get your bounty tokens from projects. Managers like AMAZIX, token suite, sylon, need money are all good managers

There are many ICO projects and you can find a scam but most of them is a legits. Well there's  a lot of ways to find bounty campaign,  check the website, roadmap,  read their whitepaper.  Honestly  the first thing that i check from the campaign  is the bounty manager if it's really trusted and reliable person.

this is my criteria for choosing a good bounty

1. bounty allocation
2. the bounty manager
3. an interesting project

first I see how much allocation in a bounty campaign, if a little I will miss it, even though it is a good and hype project.

awesome yes no doubt some bounties leave their hunters stranded but its always good you follow credible and reliable managers tested and proven in part

It is very difficult to determine a credible reward, some projects may have a good concept and a good team, but after raising a large number of ETH, ICO is a quick way to get ETH, and after getting a lot of money, it may not be motivated to develop a project. In short, I try to find those who do not need too much time to complete the task to sign up for bounty, so maybe they will lose too much time and energy when they encounter a fraud.

It's very time consuming and very tricky you have to set up criteria on what is a good bounty program, the team projects is very important, and the people behind it, they should be capable of making their road map realized, they can hire a good bounty manager but if their project is not good it will not become profitable in the long term.

Yes you right, as being bounty hunter my strategy is following the great manger who are making bounty projects that`s have recently more successful projects because there are high possibility that their projects are good enough to have a good income in the future.

a lot of ico that comes up and it makes us must be smart in choosing a bounty program that has a good prospect. there are several criteria in choosing a good bounty such as a bounty allocation that big, a manager bounty who trusted, and the bounty duration. if all is fulfilled well then the chance to get a big profit will be gained.

I think bounties with kyc are good as the show the project is serious about what they doing.

Then the issue of an experienced bounty team is also important as they can easily turn down an ico project that looks like a scum if they fail to provide certain information during its internal check

The strength of the ico team has some influence on the value of coins so team plays a role in choosing a bounty.

Things you look at for a credible ICO include the following; great product/service concept, good team, strong support, product with large audience consensus mechanism etc. Also go through the official whitepaper of the project to study about the them. Thanks

Mostly people or bounty hunters have a different ways to determine a good bounty program,but in my own i must accept that im not so much expert about this of strategy but i have an small idea or experience by choosing which  is credible bounty program,by choosing a good reputation of bounty manager,because in my own i the whole success of bounty programs would defies the treatment an the attitudes of bounty manager towards its team,therefore if a bounty manager is a good communicator and responsible into his team concern,then thats bounty is credible and the success of the campaign is surely would achieve.

As ICOs rose in popularity in 2017, so did bounty programs. Make sure to read the white paper and check the team's credentials.

1.   Inspect the project properly: Don't participate in every Bounty you find you should look into it and check if it's worth to take part in it. It is better to make a few good ones than hundreds of bad ones. Remember always quality better than quantity.
2.   Find a particular type of bounties: At Bounty campaigns, there are always different categories and there will always be one that is ideal for you. E.g. Signature campaigns or translation campaigns.
3.   A way of identifying the scams is if you take a look at the team of the project. If it is a scam, you probably won't find much information about the founders.

I think that the bounty company should be chosen as the ICO. To conduct a technical analysis of the project, and only then look at the amount of bounty reward and think whether it is happy to participate in it....

Many criteria for determining potential success in ico bounty projects. Before following the bounty, the first thing to see is the bounty manager. Next check out the project developer team, white paper, website, until the ico rating site. It all depends on your analysis.

Just found this one, it's not a airdrop, but I really like the idea Smiley The contest for WC2018, where you can win up to 100.000 LYMS
 http://bit.ly/WC2018Contest

Make sure its a reputable campaign manager and then check the primary ratings and reviews sites to find out what the experts say about the projects team, product offering and advisors etc

The higher the rating the more potential an ICO can have of raising at least its minimum requirement but this doesn't guarantee anything its only a guideline

bounty campaign manages by high rank manager with higher trust are mostly credible compared to bounty manage by newbie especially the new created account. there are many list of good manager here you can search them.

Find a reliable bounty is not possible by 100%. You can only remove completely unreliable. I will look at the rating of the bounty, the idea of ​​the project, what kind of manager leads and if I'm comfortable with it. I can not avoid scam, there are projects with a higher rating being scam.

For me it is difficult to define a good bounty campaign to get valuable coins when it is sold in exchange, since most campaigns claim they are good, but I certainly would think and see a lot or no people interested in participating, but the main thing is I will see first who bounty manager who run the project and read the ICO whitepaper.

This is a relevant information cos most projects are not even projects per say but a plot to defraud people of their money.

One proven method that I use in selecting the bounty campaign to join is by checking the bounty manager running it. THere a few bounty managers who really see to it that bounty participant are given their rightful rewards whether or not the ICO along with it succeed or fails.

looking for gifts that can be trusted of course must also be based on ICO who opened the bounty. with the ICO are nice will certainly produce a bounty of good too. bounty is indeed a most flattering way in getting crypto and everyone knows it. without such a large investment capital but the result could be more than that.

I will learn everything about the project such as project development team, website, community. If all is well then I think this project is safe and I will definitely join their bounty campaign

Try to research the ICO,  investigate the project's team,  read the White Paper.  Try to explain yourself - why crypto market needs this coin/token.  If ICO is good for you,  than bounty campaign is probably good as well.

the first thing i do is checking the bounty manager ,  good Bm always take at least they think the bounty will trusted , after that try to looking about the coin and decide to join or not

We have differebt ways on how to determine the good shot of bounty,like in telegrams we see to it of there are managers who wants to proves something or i may sar alert in telegrams,so thats one of the great idea to apply.

Now that the market has been down this entire year, there are more and more people moving towards bounty hunting.
Notice how almost all of the topics on altcoin discussion are about bounties? (and also icos...)
I have no problem with people doing what they can to make money, but the ironic thing is, this bounty hunting craze is really destroying the market.

To be clear, the number one reason the market is down because of the unsustainable growth of crypto last jan.
The bubble economy popped and here we are now.
But one thing that is keeping it down is that there are very few successful new companies coming in.
The ICO market is basically terrible, some would say dead.

I think the one of the main reasons the ico market is dead is because so many bounty hunters destroy the icos tokenomics before it even has a chance.

Normally look for a decent bounty manager and then research the current bounties they have, always need a good team behind the ICO too.

The first things i usually used as the based of decision to choose a bounty campaign is the concept of the project itself.
Next will be the progress on their selling and their coin price.
Those are the most important things for me.

Better to do is try to research first because if you did not do so it may be risky for you to choose a certain legit bounty campaign, because the foundation of all knowledge is through research. Try to visit legit sites that tells what is a legit bounty then try to ask some people who have a  lot of experience in this kind of business because they have more experience in terms of problem that they encounter.

The percentage rendering to bounty should not be too big, i think usually bounty which render big pool end up being a scam for example envion bounty pool was huge and till today bounty were not paid
Secondly, team credibility is important an unknown team with fake profile is a reg flag.
Lastly the bounty manager credibility is as well important and must be taken into consideration before venturing into a bounty campaign.

Following the Bounty Manager is a good idea and it must be done.
I have also participated in various Bounty Managers and the most excellent is the Bounty manager who has the most members such as Amazix or btltcdigger.

I did many bounty campaigns in last year and now I'm doing only ones managed by bounty manager that I know bacause there are too many poor campaigns

That is indeed true that we can't join so many project at a time, we just be able to join once at a time, especially for signature campaign.
That way we need to know about the project that we join, is it good or not.

The first thing I do is look at the table of awards of participants , then look at the site , the team , white paper and the requirements of the company.

the foundation of all knowledge is through research. Try to visit legit sites that tell you what legit gifts are and then try to ask some people who have a lot of experience in this kind of business because they have more experience in matters they face.

Researching the project, production, development and the team behind and also the bounty manager because I have seen that there are many now bounty managers that are greedy if the project is legit and hype. They going for the worst, shortened the participants or add some tokens of their other accounts that have joined.

For me project and it`s team are  on the first place to check if it has proper use case and team.  Then looking at the bounty allocation
and the bounty manager. Even the good managers  are not guarantee that the project will reach soft cap and this is why
it is important to check the progress to avoid doing the bounty and not be payed out if the ICO  not achieves the fund raising goals.

To me, researching for bounties is like researching for ICOs to invest in, I check out the team, check out the history of the team and their credibility, then check people's interest in the project to determine if it is worth pursuing, but mostly, I check the team, advisors and partnerships, they always tell me what I need to know.

You dont need to review nor study the bounty program.
All you need to have review and study i the main ICO and the project together with the team.
That will state the program, and it will never fail you. so beware.

There are specific tips that I follow but it does not give 100% guarantee that the bounty will be real. It includes the age of the website, the authenticity of team members, how original the white paper is, and the white paper should also be free from mistakes.

Everyone has their own criteria. If I first saw the allocation, the second is what the project includes goals, teams, token information, its Ico, the third is his bounty manager? and the last of the rules. Good luck to you.

We can determine a bounty program if it is credible by looking in a ico review site but ofcourse it doesnt define that the project will pay you in the end, for me joining a bounty program today is a gamble.

First,check who the manager is and the history of the manager in crypto space,research the team,get feedback on the project,join the social media platform of the project, with all these,you will be able to gather enough info.

I usually follow bounty campaigns that are handled by trusted bounties in this forum to prevent scam bounties. before following the bounty I observed the project whether the project had any potential or not.

Joining legitimate bounties is important for us to get rid of being scammed. It is necessary for us to do a series of research first. I gues, we should be observant. We must join a bounty with an active and well trusted developers. Try to avoid bounties that is suspicious. We should be wise upon joining.

First of all I choose only bounty that are managed by trusted and well known bounty managers.
Second allocation has to be not too high and numbers of participants have to be not too high.

I always try to join a campaign which is managed by a good campaign manager of course. Then I go digging for a little bit about the team behind the project and find out they are fake or not. If both of those are okay, I feel quite safe.

Bounty task are indeed another way of earning through cryptocurrency and the first and easy thing that determine credible bounty program are.
1) Signing up for a bounty hosted by forum reputable/green trust member.
2) signing up for a bounty project which their CEO or team members are well know in the crypto business or other online businesses. An example is  Karat Coin (https://karatcoin.co/).
3) Going for a project that have genuine license or registration number. This is why is important to read through project before investing or joining their bounty program.

I pay attention to the bounty manager, depends on the reputation of the manager whether I will participate in the campaign or not, I also pay attention to feedback from the team. The idea of ​​the project plays an important role in whether this coin will be in demand or not.

Credible bounty program, can never be determined or predicted by anyone, some people see that a good bounty is determined by the bounty manager, it is not true but also not wrong, the bounty manager only has the task to evaluate the project they handle is not a scam project , That is all. Bounty managers do not guarantee that the rewards obtained by bounty participants will be better, sometimes the bounty campaign held by the new bounty manager is much better. There is no one who can determine which bounty campaign is good and give a big reward for bounty participants

The most important thing is to check people who are responsible for project development. Every team member should have a profile on LinkedIn, where everyone can learn about their history and experience. Of course, the more experience they have, the more likely the project will succeed.

That the biggest question arguing herein forum even if the biunty manager are credible aometimes he/she also a victim of the fake project.

Difficult to answer that thread how to find credible ico bounty project, because the fake project is almost the same promise  from the legit.

My criteria for joining a bounty campaigns i will sure first to see the roadmaps if it is progressive or not then i will see the token sale if then token reach the softcap or hardcap and whitepaper is important to see the plan of the project lastly the good exchanger plan like kucoin listing or binance that would boost the price of the token.

I am no expert in determining good bounty program and the only considerations that I will do in getting a good bounty campaign project are the following.
a) I will first check the ICO ratings if it has a high rating from the ICO experts.
b) I will do a research on the ICO project particularly on the team members and the whitepaper to determine if the ICO is legitimate and authentic.
c) I also consider the bounty manager handling the project and check it should have no red trust rating.
d) Lastly, I will check the spreadsheet if there are many high ranking members joining the ICO project.

Look at managers portfolio. If manager is good, he had several successfull campaigns behind his back. Otherwise, you shoudl avoid bounty.

It's no secret that bounty is a good way to earn cryptocurrency, if not one of the best. And many do not neglect this way of earning, including me. On how much time you will pay bounty companies depends on your income.
For information, the most promising ICO bounty programs, we can say, without prejudice to their project, will safely allocate up to 2% of the total issue of tokens, so we get a unique win – win scheme of the system.
By the way, the entry thresholds for users in the ICO bounty program are quite low. First, if you want to enter the program, you need, of course, enthusiasm. Secondly, it is desirable to have a live and permanent account on the platform bitcointalk.org ahhh! Third, active pages on the most popular social sites - Facebook, Twitter, Youtube channel and Telegrams (the last site in General is the Golden bottom for the ICO bounty). Fourth, you will need to have a wallet on at least two crypto assets - Bitcoin and Ethereum. Well, the fifth argument, it is necessary to have some knowledge in the world of crypto industry.

I want to share with you my observations, how to choose a reliable program bounty program.

The first thing you need to pay attention to is the reputation of developers. Mass PR-campaign is the prerogative of developers. Famous people will be your reliable help in the fact that the project "will not give up". Pay attention to the news and behavior of SEO developers. They should not only sing the praises the praises of their projects, but also to give justification. Not superfluous to the discussion of the draft on special forums. There you will get a real picture of what is happening with the ICO-project. By the way, many forum participants are tough to project managers, and if you see that managers ignore such forums and messages, there is a reason to question the future ICO-project bounty.

The amount invested in the project. Priority project startups can collect millions of fees in just a couple of hours. But if it's been a couple of days, and on account of only 80K "foreign bucks", then you have nothing to lose here for sure.

The amount of the received remuneration. This is the most sensitive issue of all future startups. Most of the co-founders think to shift to their partners the bulk of the routine work of daily and hourly promotion of the project, and pay them real rubles, hryvnia. But do not despair here, sometimes within only 1 subscription campaign you can earn a decent amount of hundreds of us dollars. But, if you, for example, have already 1 million real subscribers, and the creators of the projects "on the go" throw 1000 tokens, you should think about it. Remember that your time and your reputation will cost you more.

 The nature of the tasks. Here you need to think globally, if your subscription consists of 30 reposts, several comments, well, maybe a dozen posts, then you have to rely on their own strength. It is a completely different thing millions, thousands of reposts on Twitter or YouTube channel.

And finally, I would like to say that if you worked in freelancing, then these bounty ICO programs will not be so difficult for you, but if you face this phenomenon for the first time in your life, you will have to learn, learn, and learn again, as one great classic of modern politics said.

bounty managers are being paid to manage the marketing of the ICO.
They are credible because they handled many ICO before when scam is not in the market?
To have a good bounty you should look for the ICO itself and the project!
Remember, Bounty is based to the success of an ICO.

It's almost impossible to determine good bounty programs in this current market condition.
Sometimes i joined a really good bounty and super well managed but the result is so cheap.
But sometimes i just joined random airdrop and the reward is more than bounty. So it's so random

Check the bounty manager social media. This person shoudl be real and participating in project. Idenity theft is very widespread, so check is the right call.

I think there are some renowned bounty managers whom you can follow and partake in the bounties they host, also before you join check the reward for the campaign and the work they expect you to do. Not all bounty programs are credible but there are still ones that are worth to join.

I think is very hard to determine credible bounty program this time but we can just try and study there whitepaper well , know the bounty manager and other team check if they have product.

This are my major factors to take:
1. Team-  should be real
2. Contract address- their should be progress in transaction especially if they already started the ICO.
3. BM- must have a clean and better reputation especially about their trust rating.
4. Product- better if it has a physical evidence. I am talking about the tokenization.
This is my only option and I know everyone has their own strategies to take.

I have been doing bounties for quite some time now and my participation has given me a lot of rewards. But not all bounties that I join have rewarded my effort. Unfortunately there were bounties that turn out as scams and never distributed stakes. Knowing everything about the project is very important. The whitepaper, the credibility of the team running the project, the functional website, and strong community support would likely tell if the bounty is a scam or not. But right now my main criteria (which so far worked for me) is the bounty manager running the campaign. Their credibility is as important as the other factors I have mentioned.

Estabilished bounty manager is more important than other things like how many tokens they allocated for bounty program or how many participants are involved in bounty campaign.
Estabilished manager carefully chooses projects that are not scam because if project is a scam, your profit will be zero.

What works better for me is to watch and study the bounties as promoted by other high ranking memebers of the forum, study each and do further research and later join the one with most potential

I agree. Following trusted bounty managers lessens the risk of being scammed as well as increases the chance of earning a good token. Still, at this moment, it is extremely difficult to earn a token that does not die soon. The market is very low in general and most coins have dipped so bad.

Campaign managers is not an issue here they are just head of the marketing in this community and social media platform.
I can tell that the bounty is credible if the ICO project and team is really good.
We should research not the bounty itself but the project it is being represent.
That is the measurement of success bounty as always.

I think this is like when you want to invest your assets in ico ,. learn and do research, starting from reading white paper, teams and products, especially technology. analysis.
overall it's almost the same because we want the same profit

in my opinion, it is indeed very difficult to determine which credible bounty is, because almost 80% of the bounties are similar, so I only believe in the bounty manager who I think is trusted

I completely agree with you, at this time all the hope for the manager. Then it only remains to choose a project with a good idea. Now only such projects collect caps.

at least, I just join in the program of people that I know would never scam.
like some program that admins of bitcointalk topics post, it's a guarantee to me
and then, I check the ICO in the net, then white paper, and try to confirm if information is true or not.

Bounty program is really a source of fortune for me, from the bounty program already gave me the possibilities to gain something that i'm unable to gain previously. But the bounty result in this year is dropping compared to what i got last year.

I agree with you, also I normally use to check ico drops for bounty, as well I follow some YouTubers that promote ico and I join their bounty because of the hype.

There are too many bounty campaigns now so my primary choice is to select only ones that are managed by a well known and trused bounty manager. There are many good in this forum and most of them wll pay attention not to manage scam bounties.

I often visit ICO rating websites to learn about various ICO projects, I also see if there is a reputed manager or not and also try to learn the team involved with the project is credible or not.

Bounty manager and his credibility, Project and its potential, Team member details and their past experience. If the ICO has been started then check how much they have raised. All this factors affect the bounty and payments.

I look at the number of payments that they are going to give, how much do you want the software cap and hard cap to collect, plus the team what, how many people have already registered,and thus understand get this company to earn something,and if the project is serious, then the future in General can grow the token well

I follow reliable and proven managers of bounty companies. Of course, among their bounty companies sometimes come across bad projects or simply fraudulent projects, but among their companies it is easier to discern what is a good project or Vice versa fraud.

Honestly now looking for a profitable bounty project like looking for a needle in a haystack, all that has been suggested has been done, a long experience also sometimes misses the right choice

It goes this way, every successful bounty depends on a successful project. To pick out any successful project (bounty), you must consider the project team, the solutions offered by the project and if it is one that can be easily adopted. You must consider public partnerships and also the investments already raised by the project either through private funding or community funding. Check the roadmap and how committed the developers are to the project. Everything checks out positively, then the project has a huge chance of being successful.

You can conduct an analysis of the project. You should pay attention to the project site, white paper, the development team. You can also pay attention to the bounty manager, this is the easiest way.

A good bounty is handled by reputable bounty managers. This is the first condition you have to look at. Also you have to visit their white paper, website and social media handles. From the white paper, you can know what the project is all about and also those behind the project. From the social medias you can know how active the members are. All these will help you in choosing good bounties to join

Strict rules, friendly manager and realy good tasks. There is no way of getting 1 ETH worth tokens for one single repost, you need to understand it.

I have seen a lot of credible bounty managers here where in the end they've became greed and abuse their popularity here in the forum, while doing some activity which is illegal like they run away the fund of the owners of the project they managed then some are doing cheating abuse, or etc. Meaning, credible bounty managers is not enough to say that the bounty is credible.
I think as long as the bounty team of the project is transparent to their community, the the project is running in good progress, and  always giving an updates to all socials media they have I  could say that campaign bounty is credible.

Most of good bounties offer people to spend tokens during the bounty campaign. Just take a look at the dresscode, they offer raffles and bets for bounty hunters.

Of course, I first see who the manager of this campaign is. Next, I check the project team and read the whiteaper and then see if this project has a product. After all this, I decide to participate in this campaign or not.

Usually i will check the whitepaper first. I need to know their idea and development strategies. Also i always check the manager of bounty. Popular bounty manager more trusty rather than unpopular bounty manager. But in the end its a very hard to find a good bounty campaign.

To get rid of the bounty and bad quality bounty you can search for bounty development teams such as Amazix. The team will help you remove lousy quality ICOs, and it is not feasible because they also do this job for the reward and they will do all that is good for them.

The most important thing for me is the bounty manager of each bounty campaign , then I check the website of each bounty and see their rank on other websites , their events, roadmap and crowdsale , It is hard to choose one but when you got one you can get some nice tokens that hopefully going to get add to some exchange soon!

I don't know how to choose good projects yet. And I don't have much free time because I have a job. So I try to participate in those projects that are traded.

From my personal experience, when I was a newbie, I took the bounty first available. And when he worked for more than one year. Little by little I have already begun to figure out what bounty I can connect to. I choose the bounty in the following way. I see how much bounty allocates for bounty hunters and then I count how much approximately the rewards come out to me. And in such a simple way you can choose a promising project for rewards.

Bounty Managers who have good experience and work are now no longer a guarantee that projects that are managed become good or even successful, all come back to your personal analysis

First of all, it is important for me that the bounty program in which I will take part is well paid, in the second number of participants who can participate in the program my payments directly depend on it, in the third it is important for me to know the probability that the project will enter the market.

There are not many commercially available projects in this market, and it is very rare. If you just focus on finding such bounty, you will not get anything here, and most of those bounties have extremely low budgets

You should check their website carefully, especially the team and advisors. A legit project will guarantee you a bounty. The third is to check their social media channels, if there are many active members and admins clearly answer the questions, that can be considered as a plus point.

First thing I would  advise is check out the bounty manager, if he looks familiar and have a proven track record with previous bounty program he has handled. Also ensure the project is realistic and real. I hear a lot of people complaining about participating in bounties without getting rewarded.

I agree that first of all when choosing a bounty, we pay attention to the Manager, his rank and past completed bounty campaigns. I also pay attention to the bounty pool, and specifically to the pool of campaigns in which I plan to participate. Then I look at the social networks of the potential project, the amount of Eth, that is planned to be collected. Pay attention to the team and the location of the project

You would not blame a bounty manager for what could happen to a project and I think a lot of people just like the idea of being spoon fed most of the time.

This is not something that we just have to keep pushing blame, because for every bounty participant that ended up joining a scam project, they are just as guilty as the campaign managers themselves, because they could have averted that easily, if they had taken their time to at least do some pretty good diligence on the project they are participating in its bounty.

Bounty campaign has its own risk too, and you have to live with it. Sometimes, you may even participate in a project's bounty that you believed in but ended up not reaching its soft cap, and then investor's money are refunded, which in this case, shows basically that there will be nothing for the bounty participants. It is all part of the risk.

In order to get paid for the work, it is always necessary to look at the project, its Directors, which amount they claim to evaluate the project itself, how interesting it is. And you can just type a few, in your opinion promising, and always get income, just do not count on all projects.

Firstly, focus on the legality about certain projects then decide to join their bounty program. Good bounty is always come if the projects proven sincerity and teams effort to broadcast their predevelopment of the project. More or less what I can suggest to you is to check first the team legality, viable product and interesting concept. A bounty campaign becomes successful if the projects deemed credible. If the projects launch just to secure funds then we cant justify their complete commitment about their project.

I'm looking for projects that include high ranks. According to my logic, these are quite smart people and they know exactly where there is money and where you can earn.

This is purely my project evaluation scheme, which consists of checking the level of development of their social networks and who manages this company.

It is quite a difficult task today to choose a good project to participate. I look at the bounty manager first of all, I see to the social networks of the project and also pay attention to the development team.

My criteria for choosing bounty is a large bounty allocation. In addition, I also consider aspects such as teams, roadmap, partners, and also sales tokens transparently. Apart from the above, I have a group to review bounties and can make a decision to choose one of the bounties.

There is no way to determine credible bounty, they are new in the market, they have no prior projects with which you can check to see if they are good when it comes to keeping their word and their promises, so basically its a game of pick and miss. You just have to find one which doesn't look too much of a scam before you start to promote the coin

I am usually checking the project first and if it seems legit, I am searching for a bounty campaign of this project. It is the easiest way of finding a good bounty programme and not to get tricked or scammed by other community members.

It is true that it is impossible to accurately confirm the credibility of any project, but you can determine its risk - at least more or less.
All you have to do is double-check the people who create the project, analyze the whitepaper and make simple math calculations about total supply and its allocation.
If all of this data looks very good, in my opinion the success of the project can be estimated at 70-80%.
Later, we should research marketing and activity in social media - it can give next 5-10% on plus.
With result is 80-90% risk of support project like this in my opinion is not so big.
Of course we are talking only about bounty, for investition resarch should be much more deeper - in proportion to the amount we want to invest.

Strict rules, friendly manager and a really good goal. Unable to get the token value of 1 ETH at a repost, you need to understand it.

Usually, the Bounty Manager is an important factor in my first judgment whether the bounty is worth participating, because in most cases, we can't predict whether it will be scam before the end of a bounty, so more often we It can only depend on who is the bounty manager.

Choosing a bounty event requires observing many aspects, such as a bounty manager, a white paper, whether the project is innovative, and what are their sales channels?

Of course now it is very difficult to choose a good bounty in the market , I choose only 2 items, it is a good bounty Manager and high ratings on sites with ico

I specifically find good bounty campaigns by reading out some ico review that has a good ratings and see if they have available bounty campaigns to be able to participate. And if you find good ico that has a outstanding feature, do not let that pass by.

A good bounty manager, Projects that are really based on a whitepaper. Developers should be active on Github along with their social media exposures they need to show how the technicality works on a systematically way.

today, many ICO projects have chosen to quit, due to very bad market conditions. and that affects bounties hunter.

but, some ways to choose a good project are a manager, good vision and mission, team and advisor, features, and benefits.
You can check it all on the website, or an ICO whitepaper.

But indeed, everyone's think is different. For me, the way you look for bounty above is bad. Many ICOs with high ratings often fail, why do you think? rating on ICO rating sites can be made as good as possible to attract investors. While they did not know that rating never guaranteed that many investors would arrive.

Look at the portfolio managers. If the manager is good, he had several successful campaigns behind him. Otherwise, you should avoid generosity.

Most of the good rewards offered to people to spend tokens during the campaign for compensation. Just look at the dress code, they offer lotteries and betting for bounty hunters.

I have always chosen a project before starting to participate in their bounty campaigns. I am spending a lot of time by checking if the project is legit and if so I am look for any bounty that they are offering.

Check social media manager. This person must be a real and participate in the project. Identity theft is very common, so check - the right call.

My criteria:
1 How many tokens were allocated on bounty.
2 If on bounty was allocated some percent from token sale, than I check how much money was already collected, because payments will depend on it.
3 Checks advisors, partners and funds which already invested in this project, if project doesn't have respectful advisers or partners, probably that project won't be able to collect softcap and you won't get any payments.