|
Title: math physics related 9/11 question. want to take a crack at it? Post by: notig on January 29, 2014, 02:38:05 AM I just came across something that might be of interest to you. It is a
paper by a "Dr. Frank Greening" here: http://www.911myths.com/WTCREPORT.pdf In it, he attempts to calculate the feasibility of the collapse of the towers but I believe I have found an error. Here he states: Quote we have an initial mass nmf falling onto the floor below and becoming mass (n+1)mf. This new, enlarged, block of floors descends with velocity v2 = {n/(n+1)}v1 through a distance hf at which point it strikes the floor below and becomes mass (n+2)mf moving at velocity {n/(n+2)}v2, and so on The problem is, in a hypothetical tower collapse, the only thing that would change is the velocity of any mass above the collapse points. The total mass would not change. If he wants to add the mass of each floor to the upper mass with each collapse, that is fine but he also has to then subtract the same mass from the lower floors. Title: Re: math physics related 9/11 question. want to take a crack at it? Post by: Pussymaker on January 29, 2014, 04:14:54 AM The total mass does not change but the falling mass will increase with the time.
And n*massfloor resembles the mass of the floor which falls and adds up with the floor beneath which is now falling too. http://abload.de/img/unbenanntssuqn.png Title: Re: math physics related 9/11 question. want to take a crack at it? Post by: guybrushthreepwood on January 29, 2014, 10:55:42 AM I'll be honest, not an answer I expected from somebody called pussymaker.
Title: Re: math physics related 9/11 question. want to take a crack at it? Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on January 29, 2014, 05:47:56 PM I always knew a bowling bowl would fall faster than a marble dropped at the same time. Now I have proof!
Also, the OP proves that the moon landing was fake. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/a15hammerfeather-med.jpg |
