|
Title: [ANN] GrizzlyCoin Post by: xdr57663 on February 06, 2014, 12:56:07 PM New Coin
Title: Re: [ANN] GrizzlyCoin Post by: steking on February 06, 2014, 12:58:12 PM How many coins? s
Title: Re: [ANN] GrizzlyCoin Post by: kevin99 on February 06, 2014, 12:59:08 PM apparently 0 :)
Title: Re: [ANN] GrizzlyCoin Post by: Amph on February 06, 2014, 01:12:30 PM failcoin, still waiting for it
Title: Re: [ANN] GrizzlyCoin Post by: dnamicro on February 06, 2014, 01:15:48 PM Hey what coin, Woh Grizzly coin.
WTF ? where is the necessary information Title: Re: [ANN] GrizzlyCoin Post by: SackofBits on February 06, 2014, 01:26:07 PM WTS 1 million grizzly coins
Title: Re: [ANN] GrizzlyCoin Post by: Crypt0-B on February 27, 2020, 03:14:07 AM The US Securities and Exchange Commision has rejected New York based firm Wilshire Phoenix’s Bitcoin Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) application, citing ongoing concerns over market manipulation and a lack of surveillance-sharing agreements.
Commissioner Hester ‘Crypto Mom’ Peirce has publicly disagreed with the rejection. NYSE Arca had submitted a proposed rule change to allow the listing and trade of Wilshire Phoenix's United States Bitcoin and Treasury Investment Trust. The proposal included both US Treasury Bonds and Bitcoin and hoped to address the SEC’s concerns over market manipulation by automatically rebalancing into bonds during periods of BTC price volatility. Explaining the reasons behind its Wednesday ruling the SEC said the company had been unable to provide enough proof that it can protect itself from “fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices” in the Bitcoin market in order “to protect investors and the public interest.” |