Bitcoin Forum

Dear all,
I am a newbie in bounty job. I joined some campaigns but it is very difficult to determine the good ICO to do. Some ones are good, but some others are bad, the rest is scam. So, it is not controlled. So pls share the knowledges and skill to determine them.

The most important thing is to have some sort of MVP.  If you can't prove your teams capabilities and work ethic you should just bow out of this market.

Joining in an ICO has a lot of considerations like doing KYC, bench ratings, Team developers with their experience related on the project they will promote, and the white paper that tells the summary of the project with the possible roadmap that the project will going to follow. Aside from that you can check also how good the concept of their project and to utilize their coins for that project which will determine the marketing after hitting the exchange.

Probably the feasibility of the subject as well as the general idea of it is enough. But if you want to go deeper, explore their ANN Thread as well as their White papers. That's where most of the information about the project is and most likely show you if it's a scam or not.

There are few key things to look out for in ICO before investing your money, you need to check the project they want to build, is it what people are going to use? you need to check their team, you need to check their road map and know what's planned for the future. Finally you need to check their token metrics

You should start with their website. Look at the team (has the team previously conducted successful projects?) and the road map.  Read the white paper. Look how much is allocated to the bounty company. There are quite a few ways to see if ICO is not a Scam, but still we are still often faced with projects that eventually turn out to be a Scam.

The developers are one of the main thing you should look at, gather some information about them, what they know, what they currently do, and what can they do regarding of development of their coin. The other is the trend it is somehow not that relative into a good coin but it is as important as the others, knowing what is the current trend is the easiest way to know whether it is a good coin.

It is okay if the coin you've invested is not the best as long as you know the coin have the potential of good future development.

The most important thing is to tell people that the project solves really big problems of people, but only on the condition that the project can really solve the problems. Also talk about what will be given to investors. This is probably the most important.

There are obviously some shady businesses but there were hundreds of successful projects as well. The key is basically reading and researching about the project you’re going for. Some digging might give you an idea about the project, its properties, competitors and problems being faced by it now and in future. For a start go Liven and Ubex, these are my favorite projects and I have read the whitepaper to understand them properly.

For me, to check if the ICO is good, we should do a lot of research about the ico. We should check their website and their whitepaper because it is where their information are located and displayed. You should also check for the members of the ICO and also the managers handling this ICO.It is also important to check if their project or product has a good future after the ICO is finished and if their project is believable, not just too good to be true.

Detail information, persude explaination, good purpose, new technology, high application.

I think that with this faces every . It is really difficult and long time to look for good projects . and even after a lot of research over the net it turns out that it was mashenniki (((

The most important things to consider when looking at an ICO you want to invest in might be the Whitepapers and the team members behind it. The Whitepaper shows you what the projects is all about, how it aims to achieve its goals and to an extent,shows you whether or not it has potential to succeed. The role of the team members also has a long way to go.

for many, they like to look at how good the whitepaper is. For some others, it is the team behind the project. If the whitepaper is good enough and convincing or if the team members of the project seem to be reliable, a lot of persons would consider it reasonable to invest in the ICO. People want to see how much problem the project can solve or what new advancement it can bring to the industry.

There are many things to consider. My advice is to search for different information's sources and to try to get an idea about the projects.

Key features  to realize good ICO Projects are :

1.The most important things to consider when looking to invest in project is whether or not it solves a real issue.
2.Also vital to evaluate is the team behind the product. A brief bio of the team is expected in the whitepaper but this needs to be checked by visiting multiple forms of social media to establish whether or not the team members are actually real.
3.Another area to consider is the future plans of the company, both in terms of its future roadmap and the use of its ICO. Does the roadmap have a logical and realistic path, with clear goals set out? Does it even exist?