Bitcoin Forum

Well...the two are super good
Bounties are good, real investment is also nice.
But you know, bounties is tasky and time consuming..such as article writing, translation, media campaign and the likes.
But you see investment....you just got to dive into any project if you have your capital (BTC) already and wait for what happen next.

As a investor of any project u need to understand the concept and value of the product and thats why is whitepaper created by owners of project do its most important to read and understand whitepaper before you go ahead and invest.

I don't believe in white papers for any project, and most of the time, the white papers are just for reference.
I prefer the open source code of this project, which directly reflects the excellence of the project.

No, there are so many ICO scams on the market. I don't believe in 90% of ICO white papers, and even the remaining 10% will be carefully selected. If you want to achieve something in the field of encryption, you must judge. Can be done without being blinded by the scam

Most of ICOs can be seen as scam because in fact no one wants to pay for a token that is not a security. When they are delisted they go to zero  8)

you must remember this the whitepaper can be considered as a way to give the more explanation about your concept or proof of your concept about your future vision. it doesn't give you a high accuracy about the project. It's still a concept and I suggest you not to believe about that 100%.

Whitepaper is just a things which can help investors clearly understand about the projects. So I don't really believe 100% in it, not everything in whitepaper is right. Whitepaper is only for reference.

Most of the ICO's are scam projects and we have to be extremely careful when you select the ICO to invest. A white paper is an authoritative report or guide that informs readers concisely about a complex issue and presents the issuing body's philosophy on the matter. It is meant to help readers understand an issue, solve a problem, or make a decision. Normally i read entire whitepaper before investing money with any project.

A large portion of the ICO's are trick undertakings and we must be greatly cautious when you select the ICO to contribute. A white paper is a legitimate report or guide that advises perusers briefly about a mind boggling issue and displays the issuing body's theory on the issue. It is intended to enable perusers to comprehend an issue, take care of an issue, or settle on a choice. Ordinarily I read whole whitepaper before contributing cash with any task.

Now a lot of scam projects very often copy white paper from more successful good projects to initially seem more technologically advanced. Very sad the fact that good scam-projects write a very high-quality white paper, and to distinguish them from the honest company almost impossible.

No, investment is not just about throwing your hard-earned money into ANY project. This is the main reason why people fall victims to the scam projects. You should study and research about the project properly before investing in it to ensure that it is a legitimate one and whitepaper definitely helps in that. You should understand what the project is all about and what its goals are and what problems it aims to solve. Moreover as per my personal opinion ICO Investments are really the shittiest things you can do. Instead try to buy it on early stages after listing. You will atleast be sure that you wont be losing money. But still whitepapers can speak a lot about the projects.

Yes whitepaper is very important for a project that wants to raise funds it not only provides with the concept, plans and use cases of the project but also help in convincing the investors if the team is good and project is solid.

you don't have to believe in it but if a whitepaper is written with high quality it tells you a lot about the project itself and how serious the guys are about it

Most of the scam ICOs are having common shits in their whitepaper thats why you can easiy predict what will happen to an ICO by reading its whitepaper,as far as i am concern that best ICO would have a good unique whitepaper,should have both whitepaper and a lightpaper for non technical investors who doesnt have any deep understanding in programming.

 As an investor you need to be sure that the one where you put your money is safe and profitable in long term of holding reading their whitepaper is a must if the ICO you will participated in or invest in is legit and plans are too good to be true . So it will be profitable in the future .

the share of mistrust is always there. But white paper is an inseparable part of the project.
It is often possible to understand the reality of the goals of the project, and plans. Or vice versa - read it and understand that the project is empty.

Whitepaper bring a lot of sense for a project.
Every investor should know the project's whitepaper before making a decision.

For me not 100% that most project that has good whitepaper is a reliable and trustworthy project.  Because everyone can make good white paper just to convince more interested people or investors to contribute on the project ,, that's why i don't believe especially nowadays which is there are some fresh projects that always copy paste an idea from legit ICO project..

All of them whitepapers look good to me but I don't believe 100%.  Just like girls with makeup, they all look pretty.

But most of the project's whitepapers are just copy paste.

For that doings then we cannot fully trust them up since legit ones don't copy any works from others and most of the people does that are scammers.

We must fully read those critical info so that we will not go on bad things on our bad negligence.

of course white paper as a bridge liaison with investors, and like bounty, bounty can help you get a little share of the work. but the result is certainly different because after all the rankings will be very bepengaruh especially for experience. and if you are interested in investing, I think it's better. but in the process the same should wait and create a futures plan. and must have much advance understanding of the related in the crypto industry.

Of course, whitepaper is the first thing people see when trying to figure out the ICO project. But we all understand that in the whitepaper you can write anything to attract investors' attention, so one can not blindly believe that it's written there, there are many factors to determine the success of some the project.

I personally dont believe in white papers. Most of the time, the white papers are just for reference purposes.
I prefer the open source code of this project, which directly reflects the excellence and strength of the projects achievements.

I do not believe in everything. I trust all, not for the first year I do it and still come across scammers. Of 100% of my projects - 10% of scammers.

Sometimes whitepapers are too idealistic not being practical, but I adore how forward looking they are. Its just quite disappointing sometimes, the team cannot carry on what's written on the whitepaper, too bad they change it over time, which frustrates the community, However, a well written whitepaper will encourage investors to come in.

-)))) During the middle ages makeup in some countries was prohibited. But your post making more sence that others. But you really cannot tell. NEO was presented as ugly as a minute made crap and now it is big. NXT started as an occult sect closedf society and doing good. Doge started as a joke. But many many serious projects with VISION and ADVISORS have fallen to zero.

The first place to start is by reading the whitepaper and figuring out what the actual project is, then you need to look in to the team and their interactions with the community, you should investigate if it is a new idea or what competition they will face, you should check out the roadmap to know what their objectives are and when they intend to deliver them, you should look at the ICO structure, and finally you should see if there is a lot of support from the community.

putis papers is at the core of a project because it covers all of the project's work objectives and systems, but to further convince us to be able to tell which project is real we should also see their team members as not many projects include fake team members or just picking up images from google.

Actually the whitepaper gives lot of information about the upcoming project based on blockchain technology. Whitepaper is the introduction between the project and the investors, at the time of reading whitepaper it must elaborate highlights of the projects like what their project can do, what problem they are solving and why they are using blockchain. if you find these information than you can go for further steps on making investment decision like researching about Team, Community, Token matrix, Marketing & ratting on trusted sites and by trusted influencers. In short I don't rely on whitepaper only for making my investment decision.

I don't really believe in the whitepaper. But you can't believe it. From this we can understand more details of the project. At the same time. many white papers have exaggerated the technology. Whether the project can be realized is of course other.

Not all the whitepapers are really true, and there are really many people that has knowledge on doing beautiful whitepapers and right now, most of the ICO and bounties right now are scam and that is the scariest part of the industry right now.

The whitepaper is very important in any blockchain project to make a first general evaluation, and understand its validity and feasibility, but this does not mean that 100% of what is written will be realized. To evaluate a project I also look at other things, such as the quality of the team and any advisors, that are of fundamental importance

I do not trust what is written in white paper and I'm too lazy to spend a lot of time studying it. It's better to watch the video review to understand what the project is about.   

Most ICO projects have Whitepaper.
For projects that do not have Whitepaper, it is best not to invest.
The projects have Whitepaper They all need to look very carefully, Many projects copy to do their Whitepaper to deceive.

white paper is necessary, but I do not trust 100% on white paper. many other aspects that I have to score before deciding to join a project. concepts, road maps, team members are things to be learned.

No, I do not think it's okay not to read the white paper. There are people who do not do this, it's your right, but how can you invest in projects if you do not understand what this project is about and do not understand the little things?

I think that white bugamaga does not give 100% guarantee of the progress of the project. It is necessary to identify the main criteria for selection.

You also need to know what you are investing in? The whitepaper describes all the information about the project, so you can make a decision about investing. I think that it is not necessary to read every page in the whitepaper, because there are many websites that briefly tell what the essence of the project is.

you are right, at least we read to know the little things but I am different, I see a vidio uploaded by a project to see the process and reality of the project.

All white papers are just a plan. They will maybe fail. You can't trust 100% of the future. Unless you know it very well, the white paper is never meant to make people believe in them,the white paper just puts forward a plan.

No, of course I don't. I almost do not know the projects, which would be 100% adhere to what is written in white paper. This is just a trick for the investor. And while the market is what it is - it does not affect the price of their tokens.

Of course not, whitepaper just as a first step for a project. After we read the whitepaper in detail we can do other research such as their team. mvp/prototype or others. So whitepaper can not be a 100% reference that the project is good

Whitepaper is only paper. I can write everything on paper and leaving project after I collect some money.
We need regulations in this sector or ICOs will be still very risky!

Not all of what they say is true because they have to attract people to invest in their project i personally do not see any harm in that but they should be honest about their project and their objectives.

Not always, if the project  have not a good potential for (my opinion). I wount invest there.

Whitepaper gives a very good chance to understand that the project is a scam. Often scammers use someone else's whitepapers as a prototype. It's not difficult to see.

as an investor a well written whitepaper is really essential. to me, i really will not believe 100% in a whitepaper because it just give idea off the project.

Most whitpaper I've read are almost identical and most of them are just too good to be true. Whitepapers are important for us to understand but we seem to be used to it.

1 year ago, i always believed all whitepaper of any project which i found. But now, this can't. The ICO, the coin scam everywhere. The real projects fail to achieve their goal. They can't make the investment to trust anymore. I won't invest any ICO anymore

White Paper is an initial introduction to any ICO project. You have right to believe or not which depends on your analysis and understanding about all information in White Paper.
But I think, White paper just aims to popular with investors and marketing their projects, then you should check and confirm any information and consider before you take a decision.

Probably your right and correcect buddy and besides from the whitepaper also need to knows the reputation  of the developers behind the icos project before to put an investing because need to know some icos are have an hidden agenda.

A white paper is key, it represents all of this project, its genes. If the white paper is a copy, then this project is very worthless. The technology described in the white paper needs to be achievable rather than a simple overview.

No I dont believe the 100% whitepaper because I have seen many whitepaper written with faking information about the project. Whitepaper gives us to understand the project. If you feel any doubt by reading whitepaper then do not invest on it.

don't believe their whitepaper. that's 85% scam projects write very good contents and nice future in their whitepaper. and you know these scam projects are selling whitepaper things only. nothing is true

You should carefully study the white paper and in case of inconsistencies or inconsistencies recommend not to participate in such a project.

A white paper is just a technical vision. It is a castle in the air. How can we 100% believe it? It is not something that can be seen and touched. So be skeptical about the project at all times.

We read the whitepapers of the project when we want to decide investment. As you say most of the whitepapers are copy-paste, the whitepapers must be realistic not a dream. We should search about team members, develepors, advisors behinde the project.

Yes its all a plan but this WP is just like a backbone of a certain project because this is the only thing on where you can read up all the things related to the project. This is one of the most important things to read before tending to invest. The decision or jurisdiction would only depend on you if you got convinced or not on what are the things you have read up. Most projects do deliver non realistic goals and those are the thing I do usually need to spot out.

I don't believe it, because there are so many projects that the white paper looks fake.
It looks like a white paper just to raise money, because these tokens have no real value.

of course we should only invest in the project we believe however reading whitepaper is very important, every ICO must have a whitepaper, it may be just reference informations and should not be trusted 100%, informations can easily be faked by scammers and of course, we should never trust them all but always becareful when choosing to invest ICOs.

Whitepapers are really vital in any project. Investors and hunters needs it to understand at least the basic concept of a project by reading through the content of a whitepaper. Not all whitepapers are execellent though. But some of them really makes sense.

Whitepaper s very important, as it shows what the ICO is trying to accomplish. An as an investor, you need to be sure of the project before investing, and the only way to know about the project is through the whitepaper

Whitepaper is a good thing to understand where the project goes to  and what roadmap its going to complete. I don't think Whitepaper will help you to understand if this project is a scam or else, but you will find it informative anyway

Whitepapers are important for understanding the idea of a project or goals to be achieved. They are a very important source of information for investors. However, you probably can not have 100% confidence in white papers, because scammers also create them.

Well, as an investor I won't invest in a project without a whitepaper because it's just like saying they don't have plans and they just want to test the crypto space with my funds. Though not all projects with whitepaper are successful the more reason why I won't give any whitepaper a 100% because whitepapers can be written in less than 48hrs.

whitepaper just to explain to investors about project, planning, etc. I believe it does not fully go according to their plan, so do not trust 100% to their whitepaper.

From what i've seen and read, most whitepapers are just sugar coating the project and nothing more. So I can't give any whitepaper a 100% as it might just be a way to further interest users about the project whereby the project might end up being a shitty one.

Nope, sometimes they just "reskin" other project whitepaper and upload it.
To assess a project we have to look the project closer into their community and ask everything and see if their support can give us good answer or no

Yh somehow, but recently they have start cooking up white paper by scamers, so that how it goes but its not that rampant now, so the percent for you to know the project is real is 70 - 80%. But white papers are real 100% real

Well, 100% believe of course there is no sense,since any project can be bent,but I believe that the crypto-currency market in any case will give good profits and growth,and that now the market is at the stage of an eruption and a flight into space,and in General we live in the 21st century,and Finance from the 17th century

As a Investor or Bounty Participants, we need to learning how to read a whitepaper, even information in whitepaper not 100% correct, you need to know what does this project do, how does it work and why do we need this project, finally you'll know that projects really needs to be built on the blockchain or not, it's help you a lot in ICO investment

Not all Whitepapers are good some of them are copy cat from other ICO or Cryptocurrency that are running. They might good at first, Promote their project but at in the end they are just shit!.

In fact, there are few people who can analyze and determine the potential of a future project. A well-written technical document does not guarantee success to the project, because the core of the project is its team, because only a strong and bold team can implement the project in practice. I have seen many projects with a good idea, but they could not create a viable product and the project was dying. The project has more chances to become promising if it has a strong team.

White paper use to be the road and how the project will be run with the level to achieve the aim that is set for the project but the way and manner project were run now is even not the way white paper are specify for, most just write for write sake and don't follow the whitepaper any more .

Whitepaper is some kind of business plan of the project. But you can't completely depend on what whitepaper says. You need to do some other researches about the project too.
About bounties and investments.

• If you don't have any money to invest then bounties are the alternative solution for that. But yeah, you need to dedicate your time a lot. But remember you don't have any risk when you do bounty.
• But if you want to invest then it is better to keep in your mind that anything can happen in the market and you can lose your all money just over one night or you can double your money within just few hours or days.

i know investments is the best and the fast way to earn, for example we buy a coin in the market, then the price of the coin is rising,, you already earn some money,, but, if you can do both, between bounties and investing , why not ?

about whitepaper i will believe if i see the team members from the project have a lot of experience in cryptocurrencies and look professional,

Its true that whitepapers are an important piece of document for investors to understand how the project works and some are really good but at the same time I'd be wary as some projects can straight off plagiarise another whitepaper, you would be surprised how much it happens. The fact is, a whitepaper should be a technical piece, if it doesn't have the technical details nailed down before the ICO or project begins, then how can you possibly trust that they will fulfill their obligations or road map milestones later? When they clearly have no idea about the technical challenges they're likely to face along the way.

I personally think that most whitepapers should be assumed to be exaggerative. Assuming that 50% of the promises will not come through, 25% will be half-assed and the other 25% will be delayed.

Of course I do not believe in pure white paper, because it's just one of the ways to evaluate a project, because the whitepaper can be just the project forever on paper. There are also many other ways such as project team and consultant, project ideas, evaluation from the crypto investor community.

Only white paper ithink still not enough.
I'm always invest in ICOs, but i read first that project roadmap, website, and than how big popularity that project.
So i never following in ICOs sammed

I never believe 100% in everything that was said in the Whitepaper. Especially about the dates, roadmap, exchanges listings and other big promises of the managing teams of the projects. Almost all the projects where I was taking part in, breached their promises and holding poor management and marketing campaigns. A lot of projects are simply too amateur in crypto-world and know nothing about it. They just want to make quick fortunes out of nothing, not investing a single dime. It is actually very hard to choose the right ICO today to invest because everything looks and sounds fantastic on the paper. And everything looks terrified when you see the moves and decisions of the team when they finished their ICOs and left their investors empty-handed. I even know lots of projects which ICO price dropped by 100% and never grow up again.

 if you are an investor you must be careful enough. You must understand a product project and concept. White books are authoritative reports that briefly inform the reader.

As an Investor or Bounty Participants, we have to figuring out how to peruse a whitepaper, even data in whitepaper not 100% right, you have to realize what does this undertaking do, how can it work and for what reason do we require this venture, at last you'll realize that tasks truly should be based on the blockchain or not, it's assistance you a considerable measure in ICO speculation