Title: delete Post by: BitcoinEXpress on October 03, 2011, 06:19:11 AM delete
Title: Re: delete Post by: CoinHunter on October 03, 2011, 06:22:30 AM You won't have long to wait, it will be up within a few days. Just keep an eye on the site or forum like all other SolidCoin users.
Title: Re: delete Post by: grod on October 03, 2011, 06:25:06 AM If only there was a way to short the various shitcoins... I'd do it even with 5:1 margin requirements. Satoshi was a freaking genius. Every alt currency so far has been an unmitigated disaster for "investors."
That said, with a truly memory size constrained crypto scheme it won't matter what interface you have to the underlying hardware. Browser wrappers, native API, whatever. Just like having a 1600 CPUs won't help when your bottleneck is startIOs. Title: Re: delete Post by: CoinHunter on October 03, 2011, 06:28:04 AM Please, I'm sure you can wait a few more days to show the world how smart and brave you are. Real development takes time, it's not like changing a variable in geistgeld and hacking the chain, which is all you're known for.
Title: Re: delete Post by: CoinHunter on October 03, 2011, 06:39:15 AM I guess we'll see in a few days then won't we. Regardless what I am known for, it was enough for you to be talking crap one minute and pulling down your network the next wasn't it? Riiight. Like you're the only troll on the block. You think pretty highly of yourself I think when you've actually done _nothing_ to deserve that own self impression. Title: Re: delete Post by: zillagod on October 03, 2011, 06:48:36 AM Title: Re: delete Post by: CoinHunter on October 03, 2011, 07:18:37 AM You also do not have enough faith in your own code to let me test your "unbreakable SC 2.0" with an audience watching either do you? So until you are ready to step and get bitch slapped again, STFU. Haha, I said it will be out in a few days. If you want to pull out of your "attack" because you're scared then that's ok. No harm no foul right? Otherwise hold your mouth and do it publicly when it starts, we'll all be watching! :) Title: Re: delete Post by: Lolcust on October 03, 2011, 07:25:20 AM I distinctly recall CH promising a whole article/whitepaper about his design.
Are we going to see it ? Title: Re: delete Post by: Tomatocage on October 03, 2011, 07:53:35 AM Is it just me, or is the only one talking shit is Bitcoinexpress? He's trying to ride Artforz's coattails and take credit for everything when AF does all the heavy lifting.
Title: Re: delete Post by: Lolcust on October 03, 2011, 08:04:12 AM I think CH is just taking his time to figure out the answer to "how do I makefiles?" conundrum so he can port TBX algo to his little chain.
Anyone willing to bet whether SC2.0 will be "accidentally scrypt-based" ? Title: Re: delete Post by: CoinHunter on October 03, 2011, 08:22:25 AM Nah I'm not like artforz, copying other code to solve problems which are simple. Take a look at my block init for example.
Code: void BlockHash_Init() Title: Re: delete Post by: bulanula on October 03, 2011, 08:37:17 AM Nah I'm not like artforz, copying other code to solve problems which are simple. Take a look at my block init for example. Code: void BlockHash_Init() LOL made my day ! Why all you hating on RealSolid ? At least he did not premine 7.7 million coins like Lolcust's Tenebrix scamchain. If you see the changes in SC2 you can clearly see that the features implemented are leaving bitcoin way behind. It took ages to Bitcoin 0.4 and still it is lacking some features of SC2. I say let us judge after Fairbrix vs Tenebrix vs Solidcoin 2 are all launched for the best CPU coin. Title: Re: delete Post by: Lolcust on October 03, 2011, 08:41:11 AM Why all you hating on RealSolid ? At least he did not premine 7.7 million coins like Lolcust's Tenebrix scamchain. He does take away 5% of coins mined by other people's power and hardware, forever. Which is far more ripe for abuse than any amount of premine. Also, the utterly unaudited "reimbursement" process and trying to play the cop, the judge and the jury in the "moon case". So yeah, no matter how questionable my actions, I won't be able to be as questionable as CoinHunter - he is truly a God among men. A Norse God by name of Loki. Title: Re: delete Post by: JasonWoods on October 03, 2011, 11:16:09 AM Instead of just leaning back with popcorn, everybody now can bet on the result:
http://webetcoins.com/rounds/41 BitcoinEXpress promises to successfully attack SolidCoin 2.0 CoinHunter promises SolidCoin 2.0 will be fail-safe If SolidCoin 2.0 is not public before Oct 10, BitcoinEXpress wins. If no successful attack is reported before Oct 17, Coinhunter wins. Title: Re: delete Post by: caish5 on October 04, 2011, 01:48:19 AM It seems I'm the only one with a confirmed bet.
Come on people, lets make this interesting. Title: Re: delete Post by: sd on October 04, 2011, 06:31:01 PM It seems I'm the only one with a confirmed bet. Come on people, lets make this interesting. How is that interesting? CoinHunter has a long history of bad code and trash talk. No-one seriously thinks he will come up with something that can't be abused. Title: Re: delete Post by: Lolcust on October 04, 2011, 06:33:05 PM Well, I do think he can introduce licensed mining and call that "solution" to the "51" problem.
But I am reasonably certain he will forget to [exploitation prevention advice redacted in order to maximize lulz] :D Title: Re: delete Post by: sd on October 05, 2011, 03:33:22 AM Well, I do think he can introduce licensed mining and call that "solution" to the "51" problem. But I am reasonably certain he will forget to [exploitation prevention advice redacted in order to maximize lulz] :D I get the impression Coinhunter has forgotten about the massive amount of effort the criminal justice system needs to investigate crime. Simply collecting a load of coins and handing them out to anyone who claims to be a victim is wide open to abuse. That's assuming any of these tax coins are going to be used for that purpose anyway. It doesn't matter anyway as botnets will eat his broken BitCoin network if his own bugs don't. Title: Re: delete Post by: PatrickHarnett on October 05, 2011, 04:15:09 AM This looks fun, so I placed my bet - shame I couldn't use iX, i0, name or SC 1.0 and had to use BTC.
Title: Re: delete Post by: freequant on October 05, 2011, 04:30:39 AM Instead of just leaning back with popcorn, everybody now can bet on the result: http://webetcoins.com/rounds/41 BitcoinEXpress promises to successfully attack SolidCoin 2.0 CoinHunter promises SolidCoin 2.0 will be fail-safe If SolidCoin 2.0 is not public before Oct 10, BitcoinEXpress wins. If no successful attack is reported before Oct 17, Coinhunter wins. You forgot the following outcomes: "SC2 fails miserably, but SC2 people are delusional and deny that anything happened" "SC2 fails miserably, but CoinHunter dodges by claiming that the challenge was about crashing Starcraft2, and the Battlenet server is still standing ..." Title: Re: delete Post by: Bobnova on October 05, 2011, 04:41:33 AM What's really funny is to read the SC forums.
Title: Re: delete Post by: Spacy on October 05, 2011, 07:39:46 AM The funny thing is: Most of the complainers will drop TBX and start to mine SC2 when it is published, because there are some BTCs to be made ;-)
Title: Re: delete Post by: fivebells on October 05, 2011, 07:54:54 AM Why so much naked hostility and contempt in this thread?
Title: Re: delete Post by: ohforf on October 05, 2011, 11:36:11 AM Instead of just leaning back with popcorn, everybody now can bet on the result: http://webetcoins.com/rounds/41 BitcoinEXpress promises to successfully attack SolidCoin 2.0 CoinHunter promises SolidCoin 2.0 will be fail-safe If SolidCoin 2.0 is not public before Oct 10, BitcoinEXpress wins. If no successful attack is reported before Oct 17, Coinhunter wins. No release date for SC2.0 has been announced, it will probably be after Oct 10. The whole Challenge seems like an Atempt to make Coinhunter rush the release without proper testing. Every half-decent Coder should know that Software Development and testing takes time. Title: Re: delete Post by: ohforf on October 05, 2011, 12:33:16 PM Instead of just leaning back with popcorn, everybody now can bet on the result: http://webetcoins.com/rounds/41 BitcoinEXpress promises to successfully attack SolidCoin 2.0 CoinHunter promises SolidCoin 2.0 will be fail-safe If SolidCoin 2.0 is not public before Oct 10, BitcoinEXpress wins. If no successful attack is reported before Oct 17, Coinhunter wins. No release date for SC2.0 has been announced, it will probably be after Oct 10. The whole Challenge seems like an Atempt to make Coinhunter rush the release without proper testing. Every half-decent Coder should know that Software Development and testing takes time. Coinhunter was here talking shit again and told BitcoinExpress his new chain was ready for him to break anytime he wanted to try, when BCX told him to fire it up he was ready the little bitch ran and hid yet again like he usually does all talk no action... I dont know what you are talking about. Let me quote Coinhunter: Quote You won't have long to wait, it will be up within a few days. Just keep an eye on the site or forum like all other SolidCoin users. Impatient much, eh ? :PTitle: Re: delete Post by: Bobnova on October 05, 2011, 01:57:47 PM [qoute]
Let me quote Coinhunter: Quote You won't have long to wait, it will be up within a few days. Just keep an eye on the site or forum like all other SolidCoin users. [/quote]What solidcoin users? Hard to use someone that is shut down. Title: Re: delete Post by: bulanula on October 05, 2011, 04:26:50 PM The funny thing is: Most of the complainers will drop TBX and start to mine SC2 when it is published, because there are some BTCs to be made ;-) Finally somebody with a BRAIN round ere ! Title: Re: delete Post by: Bobnova on October 06, 2011, 02:37:36 AM Yup.
If it's more profitable, the masses will mine it. I know I will. I may also slam it's creator though. Title: Re: delete Post by: Lolcust on October 06, 2011, 07:52:28 AM It won't be very profitable if it gets haxored, and CoinHunter did all he could to maximize the probability of getting himself hacked
Title: Re: delete Post by: sd on October 06, 2011, 04:50:47 PM It won't be very profitable if it gets haxored, and CoinHunter did all he could to maximize the probability of getting himself hacked Poorly thought though design, check. Buggy code, check. Steal from and try to piss off the entire BitCoin community from the lowest forum troll to the project lead with constant lying, check. Piss off entire BitCoin community more by putting additional distribution restrictions on his BitCoin derived work, check. Piss off his users by adding a block generation fee, check. The only thing he hasn't tried is adding a hardcoded admin password to the client. We should run a sweepstake on how long it's going to take for SC2 to crash and burn. Title: Re: delete Post by: Moray on October 07, 2011, 04:42:34 AM Quote The only thing he hasn't tried is adding a hardcoded admin password to the client. Hey, that's an idea. ::) |