Bitcoin Forum

As all we Know this kind of competition needs community. Most of the projects gives huge amount of airdrops to their voters. Winners will be at the and airdropers Why do you think  your voted coin must be listed Kucoin.

I voted for NOBS because new ICO's needed to be checked by the community by advantages and disadvantages.

What do you think some of the project put new obligated task for their existing airdrops. I do not feel that its fair, to change the rules on the way is not trustable. Let show what crypto community thinks.

The majority of them are paying their communities to spam the vote and it can't be a good thing in my opinion. The dev will try to do everything to spam their coin with bunch of votes.
I thought that is not a healthy thing and it should be changed. That looks so terrible

KuCoin voting competition is a healthy way of knowing how the crypto community accepts a project.  It also give a chance for the tokens project to be listed in an exchange with the support of its subscribers. The robot app of coin do not allow multiple voting of the project by the same subscriber and the result as I see it is just fair.

Every exchanges has now implemented user voting listing of coins which in return is highly profitable for the exchange both during the voting and after the most popular token get listed. It also leads for the tokens that have large community or the one that can spend a lot for development(listing) would make up to a popular exchange.

If the exchange does not expressly prohibit it in its rules, I don't see any problem. The project that wins the competition saves the money that would have to pay for the listing and also receives $30,000 in the form of a marketing package. There is nothing wrong in distributing a part of that money among the users who vote for them.

But as I know its not easy to vote multible times because you need a  account which is registered from kucoin before the voting starts. So bigger airdrop community win the voting.

 I just  hope there wont be manipulations just like Mercator where King, classy coin and a few others were removed for manipulating votes. if kucoin admin are strict, then only projects with a large community will be able to win. i voted for APPOLO i hope they win.

KUCOIN is indeed one of the best category exchange. The voting system introduced by the KuCoin was to encourage KUCOIN community to help KuCoin to list their favourite coin or token. But this voting competition was not at all looking healthy as lot of projects were offering airdrops to get them listed on the exchange.

kucoin is a great exchanger and you can guarantee its security. it is also has a huge trading volume daily and there's a lot of listed coin.

I think it’s good
It have made sure there are a lot of airdrops lately and also it helped increased kucoin participants list too
So on the positives, it is a very good move

I read there are a few projects which cheated, let’s wait to find out the judgement

I think this mode can only bring a lot of traffic to Kucoin.
However, it has no effect on the project team, because the trading volume of kucoin exchange is very low.

I think this is a gooe thing, KuCoin is great exchange pretty huge marketcap, but they should listen to the community more often, and this is one of the way. Though there are still many flaws in their voting system, some projects are cheating using bot (and maybe other method). So KuCoin team should check further about the winning projects.

I DON,T LIKE VOTING COINS. You know the developers who made succesful ICo will not ask the communitu to vote to lst the voin. Voting to list is free of charge. I think the developers have no much cash to list the coin. Coin like that wiill drop in price

Kucoin exchange has been one of the best cryptocurrency exchanges and I really like their voting process, it's easier for voters to follow. The only thing I do not understand is the option which make possible such that a single telegram user can vote multiple coins, after voting the first coin, then move to vote the second one and continues like that. I feel that shouldn't be. In my own opinion, a telegram user is suppose to be eligible to vote only one coin in the voting list.

The problem is; if they give us one chance for voting then most bigger airdrop given coin will win. I think this usual way is better. The important point is they need to check all the votes strictly. 

But as we already now most of the projects can not get enough funded because of the bear market condition now. If the project is good but they did not funded enough;  it is better to get the change listed free of charge. Then they can use that listing money as a project development supply.

this is actually a difficult thing for me because of a very tight competition and a lot of ico who give free coin so that his coin can be selected when voting in kucoin, what I really want a very good project without any seduction would have many votes

Good hype around new listing it's always good. It's help to project and exchange to involve more people and create very cool community.

I personally believe the voting campaign for listing a coin on exchanges is a strategy to promote and advertise the exchange and coins to be listed on the exchange between cryptocurrency audience.

The projects i voted did not pay anything and i voted at least 5-6 projects. Kucoin pays the winner for so called promotion.

It should not only be for the crypto community that accepts a project. First yes but there are other outsite ppl.

I think this voting competition will benefit kucoin more than the tokens, they are actually invading all these communities that all these communities have, they are leveraging to targetted crypto communities from their they will attract thousands of new users, traders and investors, so i think its good time to buy more kcs ;P

Not so sure about the voting competition as the room for fraud is very great.  Kucoin is an awesome place to trade however so hopefully they have some good security in place to stop any funny business.

I do think it's a great thig they did for putting that up

The contests are mostly won by teams that have traded on the Kucoin exchange for a long time.

I do not believe that an ordinary person can win a contest

First of all most of the voters who voted love airdrops and secondly other voted cause they support the project they voted for, and this is their best chance to get listed on one of the big exchange to get noticed.

As far as myself is concerned, I too voted for the project I support and love it to get listed on Kucoin exchange.

To my mind such competitions are a paradise for scams and unfair play. Of course, KuCoin gave an amazing chance for crypto communities to get listed free. But it drastically lacked a good organisation.  Obviously the organisation of such activities must be more well-thought. Hope they'll draw the right conclusions, make some improvements, and will come back with the same initiative one more time to give one more chance to another community. And hope that other exchanges will follow their example.

Its not announced but It seems that Apollo team has won the voting competition. What is the main reason of their success for your opinion?

Airdrop ? Big community? A good project?
 

I never participate in voting, even if I have those coins which I can vote for. Why? That's simple. I'm too lazy for this stuff. There's no point in wasting my time cause I know I won't affect this) Probably, it's not right but I believe if the project is really good, any voting on KuCoin won't influence its development. Good projects don't need these formalities!

i agree with you, actually the voting event is very unnecessary followed for them, developers should be able to prove that they are really serious in the project, this they can prove with bold to pay to the market to get in the list. of course members will be much more trusting than free listing.

I like Kucoin voting pattern, it's not like other exchanges that will charge you to vote for a coin, rather they decided to vote through telegram and I believe they have put things in check to determine how to remove people who might want to abuse the vote. So it is the real community that will decide which coin to be listed.

I think its a good chance for projects with low cap, those projects doesnt have money for listing, so the community of the project can help it, thats great idea actually!

As long as KuCoin doesn't spam the Ethereum network with multiple transactions from multiple different ethereum addresses like other stupid exchanges did, it is ok in my opinion. Getting community involved in a healthy way is good.

Such votes often have a great deal of fraud. By airdrop when voting. Each person will create multiple accounts to vote for more rewards. So it's not really fair. And many votes are virtual.

I think I like the kucoin community voting free listing competition. It's done only once in a while so every project will want to take the opportunity to get listed in a decent exchange like kucoin for free. It show that community can decide the fate of a token and gives power to them.

Voting aims to take the most votes from the community of a coin. If the community wins the voting, then their coin will be listing for free. And this is also done Binance.

Kucoin wants their token to be bought by new users everyday so that they can increase their KCS value which also mean the value of KCS which is under the name of team will also increase, ultimately increasing the overall valuation of the platform. They have this voting competition just for that. But I hate when few ICO put money to get listed just after  ICO without making any development on their product. They just want to trade their tokens without offering anything and keep pushing their deadline for other developments.

This is only the strategy of kucoin exchange to gain more follower/trader in thier platform. I think kucoin objectives is only to expand community thats why they do a voting competitions for free listing and most voted coin by the community will become the winner. I think there is nothing wrong about that, only the coins participants doing a dirty games they teach community to cheat like creating multiple accounts in order to do multiple votes. Thats not fair to other coins who did a clean fights.

I think this is really a marketing form. It looks like recently some small Trade-exchanges that accepted to users listed their coins which they want it to trade in market. On the user side, this is also good way to trade new tokens

It should be a rule for coins devs to not be allowed to pay the members that voted for them. People should vote just because they want the coin to get listed on Kucoin, not in order to gain more coins.

majority of the voters are paid thats why majority of the coin list so fast to some exchangers that need vote. i see lot of this coin asking for vote and trade for their coins.

For listing by vote like this I think which project/coin has bigger community will be the winner :). And it's fair if you don't wanna pay BTC for Kucoin to be listed :).

Airdrop for voting is a good way to attracted people to vote for any project/coin to be listed on kucoin but at the moment I think almost new projects and coins often pay attention to big exchange like Binance cause it's the best place to be listed at the moment :).

Kucoin is one of any big exchange market and make an altcoin have great potential when listed on kucoin, but I think vote is not good solution of making altcoin price higher. Many ico have schedule and road map about their token market and have how much their token price when listed on exchange market later.

What matters to an exchange is the passenger flow. Vote on the currency, this is good, although many of the coins are airdrops. However, attracting a lot of traffic is important to the exchange.