|
Title: delete Post by: BitcoinEXpress on October 07, 2011, 06:13:09 AM delete
Title: Re: delete Post by: CoinHunter on October 07, 2011, 06:22:10 AM lol, how many lies can you make up here? :D
Anyhow, make sure when the public beta goes live you do attack the network like you promised. Ok? Warm those geforce2mx's up. Beta is also supposed to be out within hours, so you may be unable to make it to Steve Job's funeral? Title: Re: delete Post by: Spacy on October 07, 2011, 06:44:14 AM Don't worry, the SC 2.0 shit storm is coming and I can assure you that I and a few others are going to turn any website, exchange or pool supporting you into a very painful experience. So you publicly admit you will try to hack any website related with SC2? Title: Re: delete Post by: coinotron on October 07, 2011, 08:31:18 AM The way to take down any network is to attack its hubs and Coinotron is one of those hubs. I'm working on acquiring some botnet time now as we speak and I can assure you, it is going to suck to be Coinotron when this comes online. Come on, BTX. Attack whatever you want. I can even prepare for you a list of potential new targets. You must have something to attack when you are done with Coinotron and other pools supporting SC 2. You work so hard. I feel obliged to lighten your load. I propose that you move your activity to real world. For starters attack something small and harmless like fly or ant. If you succeed we will move to more demanding targets: mice, rats, frogs. And so on. Title: Re: delete Post by: CoinHunter on October 07, 2011, 09:51:04 AM Got some inside info on mr bitcoinexpress.
Mr Dan Maddox got himself a mail order bride it appears? Does "lanie grace" approve of your childish activities Dan? http://filipina-sweethearts.com/mail-order-brides/men/dan459/dan459-1.jpg http://filipina-sweethearts.com/mail-order-brides/men/dan459/dan459.html (http://filipina-sweethearts.com/mail-order-brides/men/dan459/dan459.html) Title: Re: delete Post by: Lolcust on October 07, 2011, 09:56:59 AM This is getting progressively more and more puerile.
Also, I sort of think that SC2.0 would rather use some kind of "licensed mining + PKI framework" approach rather than lame "police nodes + civilian nodes" approach. 'Peer<---> Trusted "Policeman" Hash Node<---> Peer' architecture is just too unbelievably lame to be true. Title: Re: delete Post by: bulanula on October 07, 2011, 10:09:55 AM So, the plot thinkens !
artforz = bitcoinexpress = lolcust = satoshi = SAC = SC2 trolls = hacking all the currencies they can and scamming people ? Title: Re: delete Post by: Lolcust on October 07, 2011, 10:14:11 AM So, the plot thinkens ! artforz = bitcoinexpress = lolcust = satoshi = SAC = SC2 trolls = hacking all the currencies they can and scamming people ? Major Motoko Kusanagi shall break in through the roof any moment now! Title: Re: delete Post by: CoinHunter on October 07, 2011, 10:21:23 AM This is getting progressively more and more puerile. Also, I sort of think that SC2.0 would rather use some kind of "licensed mining + PKI framework" approach rather than lame "police nodes + civilian nodes" approach. 'Peer<---> Trusted "Policeman" Hash Node<---> Peer' architecture is just too unbelievably lame to be true. Haha, maybe learn how to program first before trying to understand these things eh? No one cares what an uneducated, non programmer thinks about programming a cryptocurrency. Oh, unless they're a troll too . :) Title: Re: delete Post by: Lolcust on October 07, 2011, 10:23:48 AM This is getting progressively more and more puerile. Also, I sort of think that SC2.0 would rather use some kind of "licensed mining + PKI framework" approach rather than lame "police nodes + civilian nodes" approach. 'Peer<---> Trusted "Policeman" Hash Node<---> Peer' architecture is just too unbelievably lame to be true. Haha, maybe learn how to program first before trying to understand these things eh? No one cares what an uneducated, non programmer thinks about programming a cryptocurrency. Oh, unless they're a troll too . :) Should one interpret that as tacit endorsement of the pathetic 'Peer<---> Trusted "Policeman" Hash Node<---> Peer' architecture and, thus, a tacit confirmation that you have, indeed, employed such a bizarrely contrived and inefficient scheme instead of using the concept of licensed mining ? Title: Re: delete Post by: CoinHunter on October 07, 2011, 10:32:10 AM Should one interpret that as tacit endorsement of the pathetic 'Peer<---> Trusted "Policeman" Hash Node<---> Peer' architecture and, thus, a tacit confirmation that you have, indeed, employed such a bizarrely contrived and inefficient scheme instead of using the concept of licensed mining ? Again, you are too ignorant to understand how I have solved the problem of 51% attacks, trying to educate you would be like trying to get a monkey to play a Metallica guitar solo. Leave it to your "big brother" artforz to fill you in, if he's capable, when the details are finally released. Title: Re: delete Post by: Lolcust on October 07, 2011, 10:37:05 AM Should one interpret that as tacit endorsement of the pathetic 'Peer<---> Trusted "Policeman" Hash Node<---> Peer' architecture and, thus, a tacit confirmation that you have, indeed, employed such a bizarrely contrived and inefficient scheme instead of using the concept of licensed mining ? Again, you are too ignorant to understand how I have solved the problem of 51% attacks, trying to educate you would be like trying to get a monkey to play a Metallica guitar solo. Leave it to your "big brother" artforz to fill you in, if he's capable, when the details are finally released. I find that such attitude goes against the spirit of openness and sharing that is paramount for any open-source project (IIRC, Solidcoin 2.0 is supposed to eventually see release under FOSS license, or did that get thrown out of the window?) Also, your statement pretty much implies that you have, indeed, deployed some kind of "'Peer<---> Trusted "Policeman" Hash Node<---> Peer" clusterfuck and are now just trying to put some lipstick on that pig :( Which would be a shame, as I hoped you would do something versatile, like licensed mining :( Title: Re: delete Post by: bulanula on October 07, 2011, 10:37:26 AM Should one interpret that as tacit endorsement of the pathetic 'Peer<---> Trusted "Policeman" Hash Node<---> Peer' architecture and, thus, a tacit confirmation that you have, indeed, employed such a bizarrely contrived and inefficient scheme instead of using the concept of licensed mining ? Again, you are too ignorant to understand how I have solved the problem of 51% attacks, trying to educate you would be like trying to get a monkey to play a Metallica guitar solo. Leave it to your "big brother" artforz to fill you in, if he's capable, when the details are finally released. They are the same person. SAC, BitcoinExpress, ArtForz, lolcust etc. all trolling SC2 with lots of passion. Why do you care about SC2 so much ? Leave it be losers. They feel Tenebrix is being threatened etc. Title: Re: delete Post by: Lolcust on October 07, 2011, 11:02:17 AM I am Satoshi.
I have no idea who SAC, CoinHunter, BTCX and Art are :) Title: Re: delete Post by: bulanula on October 07, 2011, 11:49:27 AM I am Satoshi. I have no idea who SAC, CoinHunter, BTCX and Art are :) Yes and I am Obama. Title: Re: delete Post by: Lolcust on October 07, 2011, 11:50:37 AM I am Satoshi. I have no idea who SAC, CoinHunter, BTCX and Art are :) Yes and I am Obama. I thought we agreed that you are a dog that learned to type ??? Title: Re: delete Post by: ArtForz on October 07, 2011, 12:32:58 PM Shrug, don't care much.
But this is interesting: Got some inside info on mr bitcoinexpress. So Mr. "Professional Developer" has a hobby of stalking perceived "enemies" on the internet and boasting about it... *facepalm*Mr Dan Maddox got himself a mail order bride it appears? Does "lanie grace" approve of your childish activities Dan? http://filipina-sweethearts.com/mail-order-brides/men/dan459/dan459-1.jpg http://filipina-sweethearts.com/mail-order-brides/men/dan459/dan459.html (http://filipina-sweethearts.com/mail-order-brides/men/dan459/dan459.html) Title: Re: delete Post by: CoinHunter on October 07, 2011, 12:41:08 PM So Mr. "Professional Developer" has a hobby of stalking perceived "enemies" on the internet and boasting about it... *facepalm* You facepalm a lot eh? Spending 30 seconds writing an internet post doesn't waste that much of my life, especially when it exposes hackers like yourself and btx. I'm not doing any investigating into anyone, SC users and others do and they discuss it because they don't like people like yourself and btx. The fact you're into furries was just the beginning, wonder what else they will expose about you. :D Title: Re: delete Post by: Lolcust on October 07, 2011, 12:45:58 PM So Mr. "Professional Developer" has a hobby of stalking perceived "enemies" on the internet and boasting about it... *facepalm* You facepalm a lot eh? Spending 30 seconds writing an internet post doesn't waste that much of my life, especially when it exposes hackers like yourself and btx. I'm not doing any investigating into anyone, SC users and others do and they discuss it because they don't like people like yourself and btx. The fact you're into furries was just the beginning, wonder what else they will expose about you. :D Better to be into furries than to be into designing lame "police node + civ nodes" cryptocurrency architectures that combine the lamest aspects of cryptocurrencies and of traditional money transfer systems. Not that I mean to imply that you have indeed designed such an abominable frankensteinean monster ;), that is, so far, unknown. Title: Re: delete Post by: Lolcust on October 07, 2011, 01:01:26 PM Chilax, everyone.
Let's just be friends and hope that CH's "protocol" isn't really a lame "Peer<---> Cop <---> Peer" (aka Peer 2 Pig ;) ) trinket Title: Re: delete Post by: Bobnova on October 07, 2011, 02:57:03 PM Again, you are too ignorant to understand how I have solved the problem of 51% attacks, trying to educate you would be like trying to get a monkey to play a Metallica guitar solo. Leave it to your "big brother" artforz to fill you in, if he's capable, when the details are finally released. Translation for our viewers at home: I have no desire to be laughed at, so I'm not posting my code Title: Re: delete Post by: sd on October 07, 2011, 05:42:25 PM If what BitcoinEXpress describes is true CoinHunter has built entirely the wrong thing. The design is essentially another central bank issuing currency as and when it sees fit with all transactions allowed only with approval from this central bank. It's no more peer to peer than putting money into government bonds except CoinHunter isn't nearly as trustworthy as any known world government. This deserves to fail big time. Title: Re: delete Post by: Lolcust on October 07, 2011, 05:44:10 PM Errr, I'd trust Coinhunter exactly as much as I trust Lukashenko.
Whether that is a compliment is up to you to decide. P.S.: If he wanted a central-bank type crypto-thingywingy, he could have done it using several readily available frameworks instead of raping BTC code :( Title: Re: delete Post by: bulanula on October 07, 2011, 07:53:55 PM The way to take down any network is to attack its hubs and Coinotron is one of those hubs. I'm working on acquiring some botnet time now as we speak and I can assure you, it is going to suck to be Coinotron when this comes online. Come on, BTX. Attack whatever you want. I can even prepare for you a list of potential new targets. You must have something to attack when you are done with Coinotron and other pools supporting SC 2. You work so hard. I feel obliged to lighten your load. I propose that you move your activity to real world. For starters attack something small and harmless like fly or ant. If you succeed we will move to more demanding targets: mice, rats, frogs. And so on. Coinotron is the fly or the ant ..... Now keep in mind, you invited it. WOW never seen this kind of arrogance before. You threaten to hack and actually do it. LOL where's my internet police at ?!?! Title: Re: delete Post by: Lolcust on October 07, 2011, 07:54:44 PM Stuck in a misconfigured router, I assume
Title: Re: delete Post by: coinotron on October 07, 2011, 07:54:57 PM The way to take down any network is to attack its hubs and Coinotron is one of those hubs. I'm working on acquiring some botnet time now as we speak and I can assure you, it is going to suck to be Coinotron when this comes online. Come on, BTX. Attack whatever you want. I can even prepare for you a list of potential new targets. You must have something to attack when you are done with Coinotron and other pools supporting SC 2. You work so hard. I feel obliged to lighten your load. I propose that you move your activity to real world. For starters attack something small and harmless like fly or ant. If you succeed we will move to more demanding targets: mice, rats, frogs. And so on. Coinotron is the fly or the ant ..... Now keep in mind, you invited it. BEX, as I said: attack, bite, assault, scratch etc. Do your best :) hehe Title: Re: delete Post by: bulanula on October 07, 2011, 07:58:15 PM The way to take down any network is to attack its hubs and Coinotron is one of those hubs. I'm working on acquiring some botnet time now as we speak and I can assure you, it is going to suck to be Coinotron when this comes online. Come on, BTX. Attack whatever you want. I can even prepare for you a list of potential new targets. You must have something to attack when you are done with Coinotron and other pools supporting SC 2. You work so hard. I feel obliged to lighten your load. I propose that you move your activity to real world. For starters attack something small and harmless like fly or ant. If you succeed we will move to more demanding targets: mice, rats, frogs. And so on. Coinotron is the fly or the ant ..... Now keep in mind, you invited it. BEX, as I said: attack, bite, assault, scratch etc. Do your best :) hehe Love you defiant attitude but I think you should not mess with these people ( artforz = lolcust = bitcoinexpress = SAC ) as they are DANGEROUS as dog poop ! Smelly *and* dangerous. Title: Re: delete Post by: Lolcust on October 07, 2011, 08:02:13 PM Not the best use of sarcasm there, mate. Sarcasm should be more...refined.
Title: Re: delete Post by: HolodeckJizzmopper on October 07, 2011, 09:25:18 PM Warm those geforce2mx's up. You DO know, that you come across sounding like a complete fucking moron when you say this, right ? And it's not even funny in any way, to boot. Title: Re: delete Post by: HolodeckJizzmopper on October 07, 2011, 09:27:57 PM Mr Dan Maddox got himself a mail order bride it appears? Does "lanie grace" approve of your childish activities Dan? Just fuck off and die in a fire already. The entire goddamned bitcoin "community" loathes you, and those who don't are infantile sycophants who don't know any better. Take some fucking communications classes or something. You are seriously one of the largest douche-bags on here next to Atlas. Title: Re: delete Post by: bulanula on October 07, 2011, 09:44:39 PM Mr Dan Maddox got himself a mail order bride it appears? Does "lanie grace" approve of your childish activities Dan? Just fuck off and die in a fire already. The entire goddamned bitcoin "community" loathes you, and those who don't are infantile sycophants who don't know any better. Take some fucking communications classes or something. You are seriously one of the largest douche-bags on here next to Atlas. Seems like you are the next alias of lolcust/artforz/bitcoinexpress/SAC huh ? Title: Re: delete Post by: HolodeckJizzmopper on October 07, 2011, 09:52:44 PM No, just sick of this childishness that is fragmenting and distracting a community.
I thought it was technically interesting to see if BTX could accomplish the attack on NMC, and then on SC, but lost interest when things pussed out. Personally, I think both BTX and CH/RS are douchebags. I can't take anyone seriously that has the narcissism to use an avatar of Brad Pitt (CH on his own forums). I admit that I mined 500 or so SC's when it first came out, but stopped mining them after seeing how CH/RS was conducting himself on the forums. No interest in supporting that sort of endeavor or attitude. I feel silly enough becoming involved with Bitcoin... Title: Re: delete Post by: bulanula on October 07, 2011, 09:54:07 PM I can't take anyone seriously that has the narcissism to use an avatar of Brad Pitt (CH on his own forums). Come on man, you gotta admit that is a CLASSIC ;D Title: Re: delete Post by: bulanula on October 07, 2011, 10:27:33 PM I can't take anyone seriously that has the narcissism to use an avatar of Brad Pitt (CH on his own forums). Come on man, you gotta admit that is a CLASSIC ;D I'm the last one to ever defend CH, but yeah, The Brad avatar is fitting. It actually is LOL ;D !!! Title: Re: delete Post by: Troll Toll on October 08, 2011, 02:07:51 AM BCX, crush sc2 if you want, but lay off the pools. The operators are just trying to make some money and support cryptocurrencies. And yes, I am biased, I mine at coinotron.
But come on, seriously? I know you've taken it to be your lifelong goal to squash sc2, and I don't really care if you succeed or not. If you do, then I will gain personally satisfaction from tasting coinhunter's tears of infinite sadness (I anticipate that they are delicious). if you fail, I'll mine SC2 and pump n dump and make some quick loot. If you can't destroy it without picking on the people who are supporting cryptos of all flavors, then you are no better than hackers stealing btcs (that's assuming the reports are real) and it doesn't deserve to be destroyed because IT SURVIVED YOUR MAIN ATTACK. Title: Re: delete Post by: bulanula on October 08, 2011, 02:16:04 AM BCX, crush sc2 if you want, but lay off the pools. The operators are just trying to make some money and support cryptocurrencies. And yes, I am biased, I mine at coinotron. But come on, seriously? I know you've taken it to be your lifelong goal to squash sc2, and I don't really care if you succeed or not. If you do, then I will gain personally satisfaction from tasting coinhunter's tears of infinite sadness (I anticipate that they are delicious). if you fail, I'll mine SC2 and pump n dump and make some quick loot. If you can't destroy it without picking on the people who are supporting cryptos of all flavors, then you are no better than hackers ( artforz=bcx=lolcust=SAC ) stealing btcs and dumping them which brings the price down (that's assuming the reports are real) and it doesn't deserve to be destroyed because IT SURVIVED YOUR MAIN ATTACK. There corrected that for you. Title: Re: delete Post by: Troll Toll on October 08, 2011, 02:30:49 AM Personally I think the theory that they are all the same person is retarded. That being said, I think the kind of "hacking/testing" (whatever you wish to call it) that bcx does tiptoes the line of whitehat/blackhat.
to the victor go the spoils Title: Re: delete Post by: Adamlm on October 08, 2011, 08:05:43 AM so when should we expect go-live of SC 2.0 ??
Title: Re: delete Post by: CoinHunter on October 08, 2011, 08:11:16 AM so when should we expect go-live of SC 2.0 ?? http://solidcointalk.org/topic/252-solidcoin-v20-public-beta (http://solidcointalk.org/topic/252-solidcoin-v20-public-beta) |
