Bitcoin Forum

Some bounty managers show disrespect for bounty hunters that sometimes make me wonder if the bounty hunters are seen as part of the project or they are seen as people who are just in for the tokens.I think that bounty hunter are the first strong partners that every ICO can ever have.These people sacrifice their sleep to create contents so that they can promote the project for its success so that they can also get their rewards accordingly.

There are so many different hunters and so many different managers - it is just the matter how humanly you are. Some hunters are here just for money - they dont understand what coin are they advertising. Some managers are rude because of such hunters and so on.
And we all should try to understand each other to get maximum comfort from our collaboration :)

Agreed, and that is why there are some bounty managers who are quite wary of bounty hunter who are only in for a quick money as they are just sometimes spamming posts or violating bounty rules but there are also bounty manager who disrespect bounty hunters who provides quality content for them and that is where we should step in and report then to the admins as that is not good for the community of this forum.

Not necessarily. Bounty hunters just do the campaigns. Some join the team and invest but others are just helping them spread the ideas about the ICO.

responding from the bounty hunter that much it can increase the level of promotion in a project in the ICO, bounty hunter sometimes just looking for payment without knowing what project is developed, it causes sometimes there are managers who do not care about him

Bounty hunters are on a contract to advertise for the ICO project.
And it's the responsibility of both parties to abide by the rules of contract for it to continue.
As the bounty participants have no involvement in the decision making, there votes and opinions don't count, so they can't be considered a part of the project.

Yes, bounty hunters can become partners of an ICO project. Especially the hunters are making contents, spreading the exposure of the ICO project, and a lot more. So yes, I guess they are partners of an ICO project.

Not partners but a tool for successful project because bounty hunters helps to promote and spread words about the project. maybe managers are being rude to some bounty hunters who are also rude because I understand that managing a campaign is not an easy task too.

Here people are divided into 2 types, someone just hunts for tokens, and there is someone who studies the project, helps him to move forward, and if the project is good you can get free tokens and still participate in the ICO. But many people are simply looking for a freebie.

Bounty hunter does have an important role in the ICO project. Without Bounty Hunter the project holder will also not be able to achieve its target in a project. Who have a Project will also be overwhelmed to respond to every comment and question all bounty hunter.

The reward manager is the link between the ICO project and the bounty hunter. There is no reward manager. It will be difficult for the project party to promote the project. So they should be cooperative.

bounty hunters may consider as part of ICO's project because one of the general rule is to promote or spread this project.Bounty hunters bound every campaigns and study its general rule.ICO manager is in-charge on every bounty campaigns and study every particpant which we all knew is bounty hunters.

Absolutely yes, but when project offer that it's also depend on your experiences.

I agree with your opinion of mutual respect is the key to success, as our bounty hunters help promote their projects and as bounty hunters we just want to be respected and keep the promises they have made

Partnership is a signed deal between two parties, as a bounty hunter, you did not sign any deal with any one, you join the bounty freely and so will bear any consequence that comes out of it, mostly bounties have rules and if you follow the rules, you will be rewarded

Not just the managers treatment alone. Most projects even after successful completion of their ICO still don't like to pay the bounty hunters or even if they decide to pay, they slash the previous payout which was promised and some outrightly don't pay at all. It is so inhuman and very much uncalled for.

Yes, I agree with the subject thread regarding your opinion that bounty hunters are partners for an ICO project because they are the ones who wear's the ICO name and avatar. Bounty hunters had contributed to the success of an ICO spreading it's name on the crypto community and would likely reach to the investors thereby offered them information that perhaps make them consider investing to such ICO.

I totally agree with you. We as bounty hunters should be treated with respect and in somewhat partners of the ICO itself. Bounty hunters are essential for the success of an ICO. It plays a very vital role in success or failure of a particular project. Without us, there are no way to introduce their project all over the world and to everyone.

I guess being mutually professional towards each other is the best way forward for both the bounty managers and the bounty hunters. It is disrespectful for the managers to talk down on the hunters just as much as it is for the hunters to 'only care about the free money and not the tokens'

I, too, often faced with disrespect. But unfortunately nothing can be done . everything depends on the person .

Bounty hunters don't always care even for the thoughts of what kind of project they advertise - they just want to earn .  And for each job you need to pay - so managers need to treat them with full responsibility of payment

Everything depends on understanding the sides. Ideally, bounty hunters are advertisers who are willing to take risks and advertise the company for the future. However, the sphere itself is now somewhat choked up and both sides often chase only profit. That is, bounty hunters start using multi accounts, which almost do not bring any effect to the project, and managers understand this and, naturally, do not show any respect even to honest participants. I think in the future some company will come up with an innovative way out of the situation)   ::) ::) ::)

No doubt that bounty hunters should be one of the main partners of the ISO team, because we are promoting the project, making it better and recognizable. With the help of us new investors are attracted. Therefore, we must be respected.

Indeed, this is the reality no matter what the project is if there is a bounty hunter they are only there to help the project advertise and of course to receive the necessary rewards for their work. Bounty hunters is a partner of every ICO, technically but most of the time the bounty hunters are too greedy to participate on every bounty.

Hunters need to be respected, as they promote their word and deed this project .In my experience, many participants are also investors of this company, which they advertise

In my opinion, I dont think that we bounty hunters are part of an ico project. We are just helping them in promoting their project and we are paid for our work. But both bonuty hunters and managers should have respect for each other because all of us need respect in order to do our tasks well, and that is promoting the ico project.

Everyone has a different view of the reward manager's approach. First of all, I think bounty hunters must be involved in respecting the bounty rules. If the rules are not followed, it is understandable to receive disrespectful treatment. So bounty hunters and bounty managers should understand each other.

I think it's true that the reward thread is very helpful to the promotion of ICO project.
However, many bounty hunters do not receive due respect, which is a serious problem.

Will i think its not a partner. Because bounty hunter are only making or sharing the news of a ico so people will know on the ico. Because using bounty hunter or bounty is a good marketing strategies

I think if bounty hunters do their responsibilities properly and understand the ICO that followed it will not happen that way, and the role of bounty hunter in a project determines the success of the project. because many bounty hunters are only concerned with their pay but not serious in providing support for the project.

I agree with opinion bounty hunters is not part of an ICO project, they only promote the project. Partners is people/ institution have already replace their technology system or fund into project, without that we can't call them partners. Bounty hunters position is out side the ICO project and can be used to grow up audiences/ members and make people invest into ICO project.

To be honest, you are indirectly working for the project. So you wont be considered as an actual partner. Even these bounty managers are not even considered to be partners as they are just employed as well to promote the project and manage the bounty hunters.

The skill level of these bounty hunters vary a lot. Some just post and tweet random junk, especially ones that use bots. Writers are more respected, especially translators as it requires more skill

I want to clarify that I have met very diligent and respectful bounty managers so far, but I don't think anyone will see bounty hunters as partners, more as community managers, people in charge of marketing the project, more than anything to spread the word about the project and attract new investors, so we are paid with tokens, but if hodl tokens I think we would become investors too.

many managers do not give tokens to the bounty hunters, the manager does not appreciate the hard work that bounty hunters have done, why they cheat bounty hunters? .Bounty hunter is one of the most cost-effective advertising strategies, managers and developers should appreciate a bounty hunter effort for their ICO advancement.

may indeed can be said like that. because of the existence of this bounty hunter, then the project can help ICO in terms of promotion. This promotion will be very useful for the ICO to be able to get a lot of investors.

Bounty hunters not really a partner but a messenger or advertiser. I don't really think a bounty hunter can be much important to other project members. But bounty hunters still play a rule in making the project successful.  They are the one who promote and spreading the news about that project so that everyone will know. So in exchange to that bounty hunters should be respected too.

that's cause not all bounty hunter follow the rule from bounty manager. many of them spamming at ICO telegram channel saying "when exchange" "it's scam i'm not getting paid" etc, that in fact it destroy the project they promoted.
i've seen it many times, maybe they didn't read the rule at bounty page and complain at ICO channel.

Bounty hunters play significant part in promoting the ICO project. Yes it is true that bounty hunters are there to earn. And as the name implies, they are there for the rewards. But, remember before they can get the reward they need to help promote the ICO.

This is just normal. While bounty managers are just doing their job if they are very strict and seeing hunters don't understand what they are promoting.

Just need to understand both sides.

I think you are quite correct, bounty hunters are really part of the project because they play a very big role in promoting the project in their various promotion avenues, so I wonder why some bounty managers look down on bounty hunters when it comes to payment time.

It depends on the bounty hunters if he/she wants too invest on a campaign which it joins. For me theres a less of bounty hunters do because why they should invest if they get free without lossing a money while doing a campaign.

I have been doing bounties for quite a long time now and I must say you make a valid point. There are some bounty managers and community managers that look down on hunters. I encountered one one community manager or community admin that see its bounty hunters as a "threat" to the project and consider them as just "dumpers". With that said, we also have to consider the other side of the story. Cheaters do exist and managers will try to take all the measures to prevent them from getting paid.

Everyone is different. I think bounty hunters are one of the reason why an ICO will be successful. It increases the chances of attracting investors and spreading the news that the ICO is active for a certain product. Bounty hunters should be given more credit and should not be seen as a person who just want the money. It is their choice to sell their reward and no one should stop them from doing that. Traders are earning money because of that as well so in the end, bounty hunters are helping not only the ICO but those who are trading.

Yes it could be, may it  consider as a marketing community. First purpose of the bounty is to promote or introduce thr project in any social media out there such facebook,twitter,blogs,youtubr and even here in the forum. Projects have their marketing people but we bounty hunters to.the same for some rewards.

Yet bounty hunters are generally not respected.
Moreover, ICO investors are very disgusted with bounty hunters, and they think that bounty hunters will sell a lot of tokens after the end of ICO.

A bounty hunter can not be seen as a partner because he has no say in the agreements he/she signed up for and also at the mercy of the manager who can change the T&C at any point of the campaign.
That's not partnership, it is not even an employment; I see it as a master-servant relationship.