Bitcoin Forum

Coinotron has publicly requested that I test their security

Maged,

Not getting paid and it was Coinotron that wanted to play the high stakes game. At anytime they decide they don't want to go forward, all they have to do is say so. I just thought I would let people know before it happens, that's all.

~BCX~

Not getting paid and it was Coinotron that wanted to play the high stakes game. At anytime they decide they don't want to go forward, all they have to do is say so.

I can't believe this.  Please link.   You are the opposite of douche right now.

I don't want anyone one to bow down to me LOL....and certainly do not extort people in spite of a very bad rumor that I received almost a 1000 BTC to call off the NMC attack. It was actually closer to 1500..(jk)..

If Coinotron wants to cancel this, all they have to do is say so.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?PHPSESSID=7cc52b94a69df24ccec1476f5eddd536&topic=47135.0  Post number six in the thread.

BTW I wasn't attacking the Fairbrix chain, just testing out something an accidentally reorged the chain ....sorry.

If you are so sure i'm talking garbage, then as a sign of support deposit a large sum on Coinotron and just let it set LOL.

Is it possible that the solution to "GPU Hostile" crypto-currencies lies within the IE9 Hardware Acceleration and an older lesser known work around for previous anti-parallel computing by the cryptocommunity?

Maybe a modded hardware accelerator could turn GPU's into APU hybrids and could crunch at tens of thousands times faster than every CPU on the network combined. A mere 1 GH /s machine would be a beast...I would shutter to think what a 68 GH /s farm would do.

I would love to claim this as my own idea but it in fact is the (theoretical) brain child of a couple of iOS engineers I know. They (theoretically) adapted it from from previous failed attempts at cryptographers to prevent parallel computing in cracking MD5 hashes.  "GPU Hostility" was solved a while back.

I would also speculate that someone needed a testnet and really didn't want to disrupt Tenebrix as there is already an exchange and pool. I would venture to say this theoretical attacker may in fact have nothing against Fairbrix and is developing a Solidcoin killer.

All just theory on my part.  ;D ;D ;D

~BCX~


PS I would also guess the test is complete and I wouldn't worry about it.

Hi Retard,

We'll see who's talking crap when CH/RS decides to put SC 2.0 on the table. A day or so ago he was here talking his usual line of garbage, showing us PS'd screen shots of a testnet and squawking about how it was 51% and BCX proof right up until realized that I had already tested a CPU only chain killer on Fairbrix.

He didn't seem too anxious to put his bullet proof testnet  up and scampered away like usual.

I noticed all you devout CoinRumper Butt Buddies seem to forget the most important thing. SC 2.0 is still talk and very much non existent.

Totally fabricated statemnts on tour quote. Yes I hit FBX, if you want to play word games claiming a reorg isn't an attack, ok....

I defer to Coblee, was it an attack or reorg? Is there a difference LOL  ;D ;D ;D

1) As I told you in PM, the coins were destroyed, they're gone, not coming back.
2) Thanks, but I really do not care if people are upset with me
3) All Alt Chains are nothing more than test subjects to me except for TBX, I like TBX.

All Alt Chains are nothing more than test subjects to me except for TBX, I like TBX.

Just because you donate the proceeds of crime to a "charity" doesnt make it any less of a crime. You steal peoples coins and that creates a victim. Unless you make people whole you are nothing but a criminal in my book. Think VERY carefully about your actions.