|
Title: BCX Statement (confirmed) Post by: johnj on October 12, 2011, 10:07:33 PM First thing, Coinhunter you got your ass kicked and you know it! Second Thing DoubleC can verify this my post as my emails to him are from Justin Guss and Gmail. Status update. The reason that difficulty is only 25% of what it should be after 75 increases is real simple. I haven't let up LOL ;D ;D ;D So I am telling you this BEFORE it happens that my now 600+ EC2 instances will reach the max cycles of free usage and start dropping off. I expect full drop off to occur by in about 12 hours after this post. What you will see is the complete and utter freezing of SC 2.0, think Namecoin but a lot worse. A 16,000 difficulty on CPU only chain, cracks me up. LOL No way in hell an average user can mine this solo. Trusted Nodes My Ass The trusted nodes are controllers and gateways in addition to being profit generators for CH! When I started consolidating some of the wallets a strange phenomena occurred. After about 25 or so wallets sending to the primary address the transactions slowed down to about 20 minutes each, I suspect manual approval. A while latter the address received none of the transactions it was sent from other wallets. Furthermore the sending wallets could no longer send. Let me clarify, they sent but the funds were never recieved more than likely going to CPF. Repeated the same thing with 30 more new wallets and a primary address. I suspect Coinhunter contacted his huge miners and verified it wasn't them and logically concluded the only other HUGE miner out there is me. Coinhunter has the ability to regulate the transfer, track it and kill individual users and transactions at will. Forewarned I made a preview post of Solidcoin 2.0 and just about everything I predicted has come true including this. In that post I told you how a pissed off private beta tester was remotely killed by Coinhunter after asking some the questions that revealed themselves. This is the real world application of that control. We will NEVER see the source released. Bad news though, there are some working on dis-assembly as we speak. Coinhunter your only choice is to pull the plug and attempt a restart. Looking forward to playing with Solidcoin 3.0 ;D ;D ;D ~BCX~ No idea if it's legit, but it does appear to be in the same tone of BCX's previous posts. I guess we'll see in 12hrs or so. Title: Re: Alleged BCX update Post by: coblee on October 12, 2011, 10:16:25 PM The trusted nodes are controllers and gateways in addition to being profit generators for CH! When I started consolidating some of the wallets a strange phenomena occurred. After about 25 or so wallets sending to the primary address the transactions slowed down to about 20 minutes each, I suspect manual approval. A while latter the address received none of the transactions it was sent from other wallets. Furthermore the sending wallets could no longer send. Let me clarify, they sent but the funds were never recieved more than likely going to CPF. If this is true, that is really scary. Title: Re: Alleged BCX update Post by: bulanula on October 12, 2011, 10:40:07 PM Just unban the guy. He will be back anyways. Makes life easier for all of us. Better to hear it from the horse's mouth rather than from some obscure account claiming to be the real BCX etc.
Thank you ! Title: Re: Alleged BCX update Post by: bulanula on October 12, 2011, 10:45:53 PM Just unban the guy. He will be back anyways. Makes life easier for all of us. Better to hear it from the horse's mouth rather than from some obscure account claiming to be the real BCX etc. Thank you ! If DoubleC confirms it, it's not a supposed account is it? I don't trust him. Let the original account back. Hate dealing with all this sock puppet accounts. Title: Re: Alleged BCX update Post by: johnj on October 12, 2011, 10:46:59 PM I don't beleive it until some verification, weather from an unbanned BCX, DoubelC, or if the SC network freezes.
Sure will be interesting to see how this pans out. Indeed, a 16000 difficulty on a CPU chain is quite high. Guess that makes my previous poll more relevant ;) Title: Re: Alleged BCX update Post by: tacotime on October 12, 2011, 11:04:22 PM How the hell does one go about "disassembling" a binary to get the source code? As far as I know that's impossible. Actually, the SC2 source code decompiles pretty well with REC Studio. Title: Re: Alleged BCX update Post by: grod on October 12, 2011, 11:06:30 PM How the hell does one go about "disassembling" a binary to get the source code? As far as I know that's impossible. Then I suggest you google for "disassembler." It is very much possible, especially if you know what compiler was used to generate the code (most likely gcc on linux and of only a few likely versions). The reverse engineered code, like all machine generated code, is absolutely awful. But once you start "cleaning it up" and re-writing it to be more readable you can get to a good enough state to figure out algorithms. Well, ok, maybe not you or me -- but people with the skills and practice to do this demonstrably exist. Even for code run through an obfuscator. This, by the way, is how many games get "cracked." Binaries get analyzed, decompiled and poked at until the security mechanism is well understood. It is then replaced. Title: Re: Alleged BCX update Post by: bulanula on October 12, 2011, 11:10:37 PM 17375 difficulty :( No blocks for me :( Damn BCX and all his crap. Bet he is the one who DDOS the btcguild and deepbit pools and as soon as he can, he will steal all BTC coins too in a 51% as price falls lower and lower and miners drop out etc. Bad news.
Title: Re: Alleged BCX update Post by: doublec on October 12, 2011, 11:27:25 PM DoubleC can you verify? Yes, I received emails from BitcoinExpress from a gmail address with the name "Justin Guss" in the past.Title: Re: Alleged BCX update Post by: Bitcoin Oz on October 12, 2011, 11:33:58 PM I think he needs to be let back in. If he has cracked sc2 then it doesnt deserve to stand.
The idea of someone remotely killing things sounds like sony. :) Title: Re: Alleged BCX update Post by: johnj on October 12, 2011, 11:56:01 PM Quote The trusted nodes are controllers and gateways in addition to being profit generators for CH! When I started consolidating some of the wallets a strange phenomena occurred. After about 25 or so wallets sending to the primary address the transactions slowed down to about 20 minutes each, I suspect manual approval. A while latter the address received none of the transactions it was sent from other wallets. Furthermore the sending wallets could no longer send. Let me clarify, they sent but the funds were never recieved more than likely going to CPF. Question: Is this theft? Regardless of where the coins end up (CPF, destroyed, etc), CH&Co taking other peoples coins at will... sounds like theft. I'll be the first to admit though many of the technical details are over my head, but when someone takes/destroys something that doesn't belong to them... i'm not sure what else to call that. Especially when (allegedly) the coins were mined legitimately in the first place. Of course, this is contingent on being verified in the first place. Title: Re: Alleged BCX update Post by: johnj on October 13, 2011, 12:00:20 AM This type of activity is very Paypal like. All he would have to say is he suspected "Fraudulent" activity. Well, a charge back would mean that BCX would eventually get the coins back, since he was both the sender and receiver. If CH decides to never release the coins to either party... Title: Re: Alleged BCX update Post by: pbj sammich on October 13, 2011, 12:01:53 AM Trusted Nodes My Ass The trusted nodes are controllers and gateways in addition to being profit generators for CH! When I started consolidating some of the wallets a strange phenomena occurred. After about 25 or so wallets sending to the primary address the transactions slowed down to about 20 minutes each, I suspect manual approval. A while latter the address received none of the transactions it was sent from other wallets. Furthermore the sending wallets could no longer send. Let me clarify, they sent but the funds were never recieved more than likely going to CPF. Repeated the same thing with 30 more new wallets and a primary address. I suspect Coinhunter contacted his huge miners and verified it wasn't them and logically concluded the only other HUGE miner out there is me. Coinhunter has the ability to regulate the transfer, track it and kill individual users and transactions at will. Am I the only one who after reading this thought - ok so the proof he could easily show, ie... the 8 bazillion SC coins he generated has now been conveniently confiscated by Coinhunter. And why would you repeat the same thing 30 separate times after the first transaction if you suspected that ??? I guess like johnj says we'll see in 12 hours or so. Personally I think CH and BCX are both full of shit Title: Re: Alleged BCX update Post by: pbj sammich on October 13, 2011, 12:13:05 AM Ladies and Gentlemen behold another incarnation of an SC KoolAid drinker.... BCX never said CH confiscated anything other than the attempted consolidation. Releasing the code solves all of this. Reading comprehension fail ftw Honestly some of you can't look at both sides in your rabid fervor of trouncing the other side. Again, i think there both full of shit. I don't mine SC and won't install any closed source nonsense either. That said I don't really believe BCX either. Title: Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] Post by: pbj sammich on October 13, 2011, 12:18:09 AM ^ Thanks
Either way though, the next couple days will certainly be entertaining ;D Title: Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] Post by: johnj on October 13, 2011, 12:29:10 AM Small update:
I've been noting the difficulty changes every so often. All (the ones I noted) were within +12-13% increases, which is I believe the max increase per adjustment. The most recent increase is 8%, which signals that indeed the network is leveling out. Whether or not this is due to BCX pulling out is unknown, but the predictions are on course. Title: Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] Post by: bulanula on October 13, 2011, 12:49:09 AM Me thinks that BitcoinEXpress is like Agent Smith in the Matrix, he is getting stronger and will soon exceed the control of the machine. DoubleC just took a cheap shot at BCX in another thread. But he forgets that just the threat of BCX hitting Namecoin sent him scurrying like a rabbit along with Ruxum. There was statement in big red letters for almost two weeks that BCX was the reason he closed his NMC exchange. Actions speak louder than words. Conspiracy much ? I think Litecoin will be his next victim. Just wait and see. Title: Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] Post by: doublec on October 13, 2011, 12:50:38 AM DoubleC just took a cheap shot at BCX in another thread. But he forgets that just the threat of BCX hitting Namecoin sent him scurrying like a rabbit along with Ruxum. There was statement in big red letters for almost two weeks that BCX was the reason he closed his NMC exchange. It was a shot at you, not at BCX. You're the one that listed those claims, not BCX. Unless you're BCX of course.Title: Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] Post by: Deprived on October 13, 2011, 12:52:40 AM DoubleC just took a cheap shot at BCX in another thread. But he forgets that just the threat of BCX hitting Namecoin sent him scurrying like a rabbit along with Ruxum. There was statement in big red letters for almost two weeks that BCX was the reason he closed his NMC exchange. It was a shot at you, not at BCX. You're the one that listed those claims, not BCX. Unless you're BCX of course.Title: Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] Post by: bulanula on October 13, 2011, 12:58:41 AM Two posters above me ^^ Thank you for stating the obvious. It seems like CoinHumper's account got hacked and BitcoinExpress is now also known as CoinHumper.
Just look at how many posts about SC2 this goon started and how before getting hacked he was a totally different person. We are not idiots BCX. Come out in the open please. Title: Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] Post by: doublec on October 13, 2011, 01:13:59 AM I fail to see how it was a shot at me, you said he was full of shit and I simply pointed out the fact, his "Shit" scared the hell out of you. Please quote the part where I said he was full of shit, thanks.Title: Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] Post by: coblee on October 13, 2011, 01:17:07 AM I just got confirmation that BitcoinEXpressLives is BitcoinEXpress. BitcoinEXpressLives sent me a PM mentioning something only BitcoinEXpress knows. So this post did indeed came from BitcoinEXpress. I'm sure of it.
And he also promised me that he won't attack Litecoin. So that's good. Title: Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] Post by: coblee on October 13, 2011, 01:26:39 AM Here's another post from him:
BitcoinEXpress. PM me with what we previously talked about. the warning you gave me about privacy. and I will confirm your identity on the alt currency board. Just got confirmation. He PM'd with info only BitcoinEXPress knows. So it's him. Please post it in Alt Currency. @DoubleC I was in fact given 30,000 NMC after I called off the attack. It was not extortion as I wasn't demanding it and I wasn't expecting it. The only other person I ever talked about it too was Smoothie in PM, which means Coinhumper is more than likely smoothie as well as Bulanula or mods intercepted the PM's You and I don't have an issue, please lets not develop one as I have future profit plans that invovle you. ;D @Everyone I have nothing to do with the current attack on the Bitcoin chain. @johnj Yes you are right, my EC2's are decreasing and difficulty is gaining parity faster as a result. @Coinhumper Please STFU, I dont want Solidcoin ass kissers like Coinhunter ;D ;D ;D When I find the "Trusted Nodes" I will attack them. I think this will further exploit a major flaw in Solidcoin 2.0. ~BCX~ Title: Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] Post by: bulanula on October 13, 2011, 02:19:02 AM Here's another post from him: BitcoinEXpress. PM me with what we previously talked about. the warning you gave me about privacy. and I will confirm your identity on the alt currency board. Just got confirmation. He PM'd with info only BitcoinEXPress knows. So it's him. Please post it in Alt Currency. @DoubleC I was in fact given 30,000 NMC after I called off the attack. It was not extortion as I wasn't demanding it and I wasn't expecting it. The only other person I ever talked about it too was Smoothie in PM, which means Coinhumper is more than likely smoothie as well as Bulanula or mods intercepted the PM's You and I don't have an issue, please lets not develop one as I have future profit plans that invovle you. ;D @Everyone I have nothing to do with the current attack on the Bitcoin chain. @johnj Yes you are right, my EC2's are decreasing and difficulty is gaining parity faster as a result. @Coinhumper Please STFU, I dont want Solidcoin ass kissers like Coinhunter ;D ;D ;D When I find the "Trusted Nodes" I will attack them. I think this will further exploit a major flaw in Solidcoin 2.0. ~BCX~ Why won't he attack Litecoin crap !? Title: Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] Post by: bulanula on October 13, 2011, 05:10:32 AM @Bulanula/Smoothie I unignored you, your amusement is too tempting. I didn't attack Litecoin because I like Litecoin that's why! Fairbrix was a guinea pig and nothing more. Tennebrix, because I have millions of them that's why LOL.... Geez man thanks for that. Appreciate that at least someone on here is getting the comedy :) Welcome back ! Title: Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] Post by: johnj on October 13, 2011, 05:18:14 AM @BCX
SC 2.0 is back up to +12% difficulty upon the latest adjust. Any thoughts? Title: Re: BCX Statement (confirmed) Post by: johnj on October 13, 2011, 11:56:13 PM Status update. The reason that difficulty is only 25% of what it should be after 75 increases is real simple. I haven't let up LOL ;D ;D ;D So I am telling you this BEFORE it happens that my now 600+ EC2 instances will reach the max cycles of free usage and start dropping off. I expect full drop off to occur by in about 12 hours after this post. What you will see is the complete and utter freezing of SC 2.0, think Namecoin but a lot worse. A 16,000 difficulty on CPU only chain, cracks me up. LOL No way in hell an average user can mine this solo. 24hrs later, where's the freeze? Title: Re: BCX Statement (confirmed) Post by: Spacy on October 14, 2011, 10:51:30 AM Status update. The reason that difficulty is only 25% of what it should be after 75 increases is real simple. I haven't let up LOL ;D ;D ;D So I am telling you this BEFORE it happens that my now 600+ EC2 instances will reach the max cycles of free usage and start dropping off. I expect full drop off to occur by in about 12 hours after this post. What you will see is the complete and utter freezing of SC 2.0, think Namecoin but a lot worse. A 16,000 difficulty on CPU only chain, cracks me up. LOL No way in hell an average user can mine this solo. 24hrs later, where's the freeze? Lol BTX tried to crash SC2 with 750h of 1 core free instances? How cute ;D Title: Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] Post by: stryker on October 14, 2011, 11:28:25 AM Small update: I've been noting the difficulty changes every so often. All (the ones I noted) were within +12-13% increases, which is I believe the max increase per adjustment. The most recent increase is 8%, which signals that indeed the network is leveling out. Whether or not this is due to BCX pulling out is unknown, but the predictions are on course. I really hope people dont read this spew and take it as fact.... I don't even to think of the math to know that if that much horse power had been there since the start then dropped away there would be massive decreases in difficulty. An increase of 8% is simply the plateau of the current user base. It may be too soon to speak but I'm glad this is looking like so much hot air as having this kind of behavior linked with bitcoin is in no way a good thing.... who the hell will invest in any crypto currency if they are lead to believe its just some hackers war grounds and play-thing. Jezzus Title: Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] Post by: johnj on October 14, 2011, 01:10:41 PM Small update: I've been noting the difficulty changes every so often. All (the ones I noted) were within +12-13% increases, which is I believe the max increase per adjustment. The most recent increase is 8%, which signals that indeed the network is leveling out. Whether or not this is due to BCX pulling out is unknown, but the predictions are on course. I really hope people dont read this spew and take it as fact.... I don't even to think of the math to know that if that much horse power had been there since the start then dropped away there would be massive decreases in difficulty. An increase of 8% is simply the plateau of the current user base. It may be too soon to speak but I'm glad this is looking like so much hot air as having this kind of behavior linked with bitcoin is in no way a good thing.... who the hell will invest in any crypto currency if they are lead to believe its just some hackers war grounds and play-thing. Jezzus Uh guy... that was like two days ago. The difficulty increases haven't stopped. I highly doubt it's 'normal' for a difficulty to incur max increases almost 80x. And yes, since then it has gone back up to the +13% type increases. Title: Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] Post by: johnj on October 14, 2011, 01:18:21 PM Uh guy... that was like two days ago. The difficulty increases haven't stopped. I highly doubt it's 'normal' for a difficulty to incur max increases almost 80x. And yes, since then it has gone back up to the +13% type increases. sc 25706 360 25920 214 5.56% 30886.15386 33571.90570 8.70% 0d 2hr 54m 35s From all chains right now... next estimate is 8.7% Yep. And since my other post, it has went from 8->13->8, and now is at some other garbage. Title: Re: BCX Statement (confirmed) Post by: Bobnova on October 14, 2011, 02:13:42 PM Botnet took interest is my bet.
Title: Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] Post by: johnj on October 14, 2011, 02:23:05 PM Yep. And since my other post, it has went from 8->13->8, and now is at some other garbage. That happens on all of them, the site uses a prediction algorithm and it's not exactly accurate all the time.. i.e. GG has swings from big negative to small positive hash rates which usually tend to end in a real small/mid negative diff adjustment. I'm not using allchains for the difficulty % I take old diff * 100 / new diff = %increase/decrease Such as the last one 30866 is the old diff, 31841 is the new diff 30866 * 100 = 3086600 / 31841 = 96.93 which is a ~+4% increase. Title: Re: BCX Statement (confirmed) Post by: stryker on October 14, 2011, 07:25:55 PM I'd be surprised if the entire network had more than 100Mh/s..... it would not take much to massively affect difficulty... but TBF so far there has been no sign of this.... I also find it funny that the peeps that are most vocal against the trusted node solution are the same people who brought the need for such a drastic solution..... I'm no SC coolaid drinker or whatever you biffs call it but I am drawn to interesting innovative projects hence my initial interest in BTC then SC.... but flip me the boasters and blind fury ravers on here are fkin awesome entertainment and BCX and monkey boy in this thread I thank you the most and tip my cap to you sirs cos you are the most entertaining clowns in this whole game.... your the only reasons I frequent the alt cryto forum here so often ;D
Title: Re: BCX Statement (confirmed) Post by: steelhouse on October 15, 2011, 05:53:15 AM I mined from difficulty 1 to difficulty 15000, and lots of shares and no blocks. Either way that is bs.
Title: Re: BCX Statement (confirmed) Post by: CoinHunter on October 15, 2011, 03:35:19 PM Anyone can go on IRC , irc.lfnet.org and verify the SolidCoin network is 5 times bigger than any other alt coin. Please, do yourself a favour if you care about evidence and go verify it for yourself.
Furthermore, thanks to SolidCoin's ability to run as a minipool, there are many more non internet facing nodes running behind those nodes. Like I said before , if you're not ready for the future and are still in bicker mode then you probably don't deserve to be a part of it. Title: Re: BCX Statement (confirmed) Post by: MaGNeT on October 15, 2011, 03:37:29 PM Anyone can go on IRC , irc.lfnet.org and verify the SolidCoin network is 5 times bigger than any other alt coin. Please, do yourself a favour if you care about evidence and go verify it for yourself. Furthermore, thanks to SolidCoin's ability to run as a minipool, there are many more non internet facing nodes running behind those nodes. Like I said before , if you're not ready for the future and are still in bicker mode then you probably don't deserve to be a part of it. First you better explain this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48318.0 Title: Re: BCX Statement (confirmed) Post by: CoinHunter on October 15, 2011, 03:39:52 PM Here is a picture of the new SolidCoin v2.0 client with mining built right into it. Part of our plan with SolidCoin 2.0 is making cryptocurrencies easy for everyone, with just 2 clicks you can be generating coins on the network or with a pool.
http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/9716/sc20publicbeta.png Title: Re: BCX Statement (confirmed) Post by: MaGNeT on October 15, 2011, 10:10:26 PM Here is a picture of the new SolidCoin v2.0 client with mining built right into it. Part of our plan with SolidCoin 2.0 is making cryptocurrencies easy for everyone, with just 2 clicks you can be generating coins on the network or with a pool. <img deleted same as above> Wow with all the power spamming you must be feeling a little fearful. If you truly had all the user depth you claim, then you wouldn't even bother with us over here now would you. Solidcoin Features as the World sees them
and probably more features that haven't been revealed due to the closed source. The most dangerous thing is the kill switch... http://www.shtfplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/red_button1.jpg Title: Re: BCX Statement (confirmed) Post by: freequant on October 16, 2011, 02:17:59 AM Anyone can go on IRC , irc.lfnet.org and verify the SolidCoin network is 5 times bigger than any other alt coin. Please, do yourself a favour if you care about evidence and go verify it for yourself. You are not tired of talking bullshit all the time?You have a lot of nodes on IRC because the only miner that exists for your currency is your fucking closed source client that automatically connects to IRC by default. Quote from: CoinHunterlink=topic=47977.msg576254#msg576254 date=1318692919 Furthermore, thanks to SolidCoin's ability to run as a minipool, there are many more non internet facing nodes running behind those nodes. LOL. Like if it was not already the case of ALL the other crypto-currency clients ;)Quote from: CoinHunterlink=topic=47977.msg576254#msg576254 date=1318692919 Like I said before , if you're not ready for the future and are still in bicker mode then you probably don't deserve to be a part of it. Go Marty, start the DeLorean.If SolidCoin passes over 1GH/s, we will be projected to the future right before CoinHunter achieves his masterplan. |
