Bitcoin Forum

Hello everyone,

I think if you are a bounty hunter, you will want to write a review of project to get more rewards. I hope the bounty hunters who have a lot of experience share about the structure of a project review. What should the content be mention about to attract viewers as well as provide full information about the project?

Thank you.

Bounty is an excellent way to learn about the crypto market. Those who bounty are very meritorious. If you want to be good, you must acquire skills and knowledge. Here you will be able to do standard writing, you will be able to do well. Your skills and standards will give you the respect you deserve.

Bounty is an best learning method in crypto market. if you want to be a good bounty hunter you should need a quality not merit. your knowledge and skill make you meritorious. and it will make your quality.

I think here to get rewards, we should choose a topic on a discussion and go with a catchy title that attracts enthusiasts to know and discuss with having a nice introducing talk. And don't forget to check the grammar and relevancy in choosing words. Then go for the conversation.

Not only will it get them merits, it will also provide insights and the dos and don'ts for the bounty. This will act as an aiding mechanism for the people who are interested in bounty but are unable to find any leads.

The validation of your ICO is first and foremost, its concept, design, internal structure, team behind, as well as affiliation with other companies for profitable justifications for users to invest upon. Financial informations are also vital, tokens and selling prices etc.

State the unique features of the project using catchy phrases (do not make any promises of returns or investments) in an easy-to-read format

Well, writing reviews are about "convincing" the investor on why he should follow up on the project you're talking about. Always remember to read the white paper- that's your source of accurate and factual information. Let the investors know the the problems existing, the solution to be provided, benefits, the competitors, the future forecasts amongst others and you should make sure they're all described as per the white paper or technical paper.

I'm not a bounty hunter. And this is why many aren't trusting reviews anymore because of them are paid just to make the name lovely and attracting to the investors.

First of all, you need to mention what the ICO is all about, the concept/idea that they will work on. Then the affiliation with other organizations should be mentioned too. After that, you'll have to provide the financial informations like min investment, tokens for sale, soft cap etc. Lastly, you have to review the team behind the ICO, how good they actually are, how strong the roadmap is etc.

Yes, getting reviews will help the ones who are on the way to be a bounty hunter. Since the projects hire only the experts, getting to know the experience right from the horse's mouth will be helpful indeed.

Thank you for all constructive comments. Cryptocurrencies and blockchain are new to me. Then I am not a good reviewer now. But I think everything always has a begining point.
I will try to be a unbiased reviewer with:
Firstly, no calling for investment, just providing the transparent information of projects.
Secondly, no reviewing all projects that I joined their bounty, just the promising projects with the solid team.
I think there are someone say that is my talk, but I have not violate those rules. In my opinion, writting review is not only for bounty, but also for improving my writting skill as well as my english. So, it's helpful for me.

As you've said, it's fair. You can improve your writing skills while joining those bounties but at least make an honest and constructive review.

For a review to be great and so that it can convince viewers to read your content you must create a well written review. So in my opinion you must always formulate a catchy introduction to attract readers then, add some interesting facts in the body and close it with a catch phrase maybe from the ICO itself.

Follow the rules of the bounty campaign, sometimes they will give an advice on how to structure your review and how many link that you are going to put in, but it's always about how good the project and it's strong point and best features, this is what they are paying you for.

For you to write review about a project, you must first be able to introduce the project to your audience by stating to them the problem and the solution at hand that has a been proffered in order to solve it. Then state other benefits and the credibility of the project.

Yes, I will. Thank you for your advices.

Well, it's easy to say but not easy to do  ;D. But thank you for your instructions. I will try to do that.

I think the first thing that is required to write a ICO review is that what the ICO is all about, what change it will bring to the world or daily life. Then, there should be mention of their roadmap, community and team. Lastly you need to mention the phases of the ICO and all the financial information that the users will be interested in like, type of coin you are using, soft cap, minimum investment amount and the bonus for the early birds.

You are right, everyone can write an article or ICO review about a project but it is important to convince people with your experience in the cryptocurrency field.

Participation in bounty campaigns is a highly competitive environment. From any participant it will be a mistake to tell someone their secrets and methods of writing articles. You would not be lazy and read those articles for which the authors received a "high quality article." Everything is in the public domain.

Good luck and thanks for considering my advice. Most of the reviews now aren't honest so don't add and contribute with those reviews in the best way that you can without any politics involved.

There are various websites available that writes ICO reviews like ICObench, ICOrating, CoinIdol etc. Just search for a popular ICO and see how the review is written by them and follow the structure. Don't forget to mention the financial aspects of the ICO like soft cap, total coins, minimum investment required etc.

As bounty hunter i think we cannot be a reviewer, its because we helping project promotion, we at a subjective position to be a reviewer, people cant believe our review because we paid because of it, reviewer must independent

the most important point of an ICO review is knowing at least how it works, sorting out the benefits and the positive impacts that can be taken and other details that make other participants interested in participating in the ICO. provide complete information regarding tokens, roadmap and teams and the reasons are also better

Every ICO project always has their own strengths that they highlight, I always write down the advantages for each ICO project. Because that's where I think it's important.

I think you can see WP to get the structure from the ico project. from the project destination to the roadmap you can find it there.